GTA IV for PC (official)


Recommended Posts

What resolution do you play at? 1440x900? I've yet to break the 35 FPS barrier with my rig: C2D E6750 @ 3.2 GHz, HD 4870, and 8GB DDR2 RAM + Windows Vista Ultimate x64 w/ SP1.

The game is heavily cpu dependant. A quad-core cpu in a multithreaded game is a lot beefier than a dual core cpu.

I'm on an X2 4200+ (2.2ghz stock @ 2.75ghz) / 2GB of ram / 9800GTX and nothing I do to the graphics settings make the game playable (as far as I'm concerned) due to my mediocre cpu. I suspect things would be different if I had a new Q9450 or something else beefy/quad-core.

Frequent dips below 30fps = unplayable.

The game is so crappily ported that it runs 360 code via qemu.

The game is heavily cpu dependant. A quad-core cpu in a multithreaded game is a lot beefier than a dual core cpu.

I'm on an X2 4200+ (2.2ghz stock @ 2.75ghz) / 2GB of ram / 9800GTX and nothing I do to the graphics settings make the game playable (as far as I'm concerned) due to my mediocre cpu. I suspect things would be different if I had a new Q9450 or something else beefy/quad-core.

Frequent dips below 30fps = unplayable.

The game is so crappily ported that it runs 360 code via qemu.

The game definitely favours more than 2 cores. Anyway, I've started playing the game (for real now) and I'm enjoying it a lot. The missions are fun and I'm always finding new and interesting looking cars to drive.

  • 3 weeks later...

So I bought this game on steam and it looks like crap graphics wise on low but even still it punishes my video card. I can only play the game for a minute before my X1900XT beeps signaling it's overheating.

So I bought this game on steam and it looks like crap graphics wise on low but even still it punishes my video card. I can only play the game for a minute before my X1900XT beeps signaling it's overheating.

This is what we have to live with for a bad PC port.

I'm still playing the game, can't believe how addictive it is. Also, with the latest patch I've been able to tweak the game quite a bit and found the sweet spot between smooth gameplay and looking good. These settings allow me to hit the Vsync roof at 60 FPS and that's constantly, it never dips in-game ( Okay, perhaps a few frames but nothing noticeable );

Untitled-2.png

A tip for anyone who's experiencing constant FPS dips and tiny freezes, Vsync is the key!

People that don't have money or incentive to upgrade. It's a decent video card but it's definitely not good enough for GTA IV. I have an HD 4870 and it's playable, but barely enjoyable. You'll need a Core i7 gaming rig coupled with a very high end CrossFire or SLI configuration to run the game (maxed out) at 60 FPS.

lol...no way. I can play GTA IV fine on my current setup....also GTA IV doesn't utilize SLI or Crossfire yet, so that would be a waste of money until it does so.

E8400 @ 4.1GHz, GTX-275 @ 720/1584/1215 clocks and I have everything on high @ 1680x1050 resolution and average 62fps on the benchmark. Game play is fine as well.

lol...no way. I can play GTA IV fine on my current setup....also GTA IV doesn't utilize SLI or Crossfire yet, so that would be a waste of money until it does so.

E8400 @ 4.1GHz, GTX-275 @ 720/1584/1215 clocks and I have everything on high @ 1680x1050 resolution and average 62fps on the benchmark. Game play is fine as well.

Actually, it does utilize Crossfire from what I've heard, even displays the Crossfire icon if you activate it. I have heard it doesn't / didn't support SLI, which was supposed to be added in a patch at some point ... not sure if its one of the previous patches or its still being worked on.

Oh and just to make it clear, just because it doesn't show the full amount of available video RAM in options, it's still doing Crossfire.

Actually, it does utilize Crossfire from what I've heard, even displays the Crossfire icon if you activate it. I have heard it doesn't / didn't support SLI, which was supposed to be added in a patch at some point ... not sure if its one of the previous patches or its still being worked on.

Oh and just to make it clear, just because it doesn't show the full amount of available video RAM in options, it's still doing Crossfire.

ok, well I am a nvidia user....so I just assumed because SLI didn't work, XFire doesn't as well. I'm not sure...so its a possibility.

lol...no way. I can play GTA IV fine on my current setup....also GTA IV doesn't utilize SLI or Crossfire yet, so that would be a waste of money until it does so.

E8400 @ 4.1GHz, GTX-275 @ 720/1584/1215 clocks and I have everything on high @ 1680x1050 resolution and average 62fps on the benchmark. Game play is fine as well.

Question is, do you have the game maxed out? And by maxed out... I mean every possible setting as high as possible. It isn't achievable with the GTX 285 so it's definitely not achievable with the GTX 275. For that, you'll need a dual-GPU/dual video card solution coupled with a high end quad-core CPU. Anyway, as far as I'm aware the game does support CrossFire configurations. I'm not so sure about SLI configurations.

Question is, do you have the game maxed out? And by maxed out... I mean every possible setting as high as possible. It isn't achievable with the GTX 285 so it's definitely not achievable with the GTX 275. For that, you'll need a dual-GPU/dual video card solution coupled with a high end quad-core CPU. Anyway, as far as I'm aware the game does support CrossFire configurations. I'm not so sure about SLI configurations.

The GTX 275 is basically a GTX 285, there are several benchmarks of both cards and they are within .5 - 1fps of each other when tested in games. It's just the GTX-275 is a better choice because it is $90 cheaper. Also, with my E8400 @ 4.1GHz, it barely sees 85% usage...so I don't see how you'd absolutely need a Quad-Core CPU to play this game with good frame rates as it doesn't even utilize my CPU 100%.

And to max out every single setting in GTA IV would be a complete waste....some of the settings in GTA IV I can't even tell a difference visually when I turn them up.

Anyway, I don't remember my exact settings as I already pretty much beat the game and got bored with it, but every setting was/is on High or more and a few settings are on very high. 1680x1050 resolution, vsync off, every other option is on. view distance is like 100, forget the other settings...

The GTX 275 is basically a GTX 285, there are several benchmarks of both cards and they are within .5 - 1fps of each other when tested in games. It's just the GTX-275 is a better choice because it is $90 cheaper. Also, with my E8400 @ 4.1GHz, it barely sees 85% usage...so I don't see how you'd absolutely need a Quad-Core CPU to play this game with good frame rates as it doesn't even utilize my CPU 100%.

And to max out every single setting in GTA IV would be a complete waste....some of the settings in GTA IV I can't even tell a difference visually when I turn them up.

Anyway, I don't remember my exact settings as I already pretty much beat the game and got bored with it, but every setting was/is on High or more and a few settings are on very high. 1680x1050 resolution, vsync off, every other option is on. view distance is like 100, forget the other settings...

No, the GTX 275 is not a GTX 285. It's half of a GTX 295, and it sits between the GTX 260 Core 216 and GTX 285 (see here). As for CPU usage, it isn't indicative of performance. GTA IV benefits from the use of multiple cores because it has the support for it. As indicated by this benchmark, a C2E QX6850 @ 3.0 GHz beats a C2D E8500 @ 4.0 GHz. Also, take a look at the FPS difference with the E6850 and QX6850. There's a huge jump in performance when you go quad-core.

You don't have the game maxed out. To say that maxing the game out is a waste is ludicrous. Why? Simply because you don't notice it doesn't mean I, or anyone else, wouldn't. The settings are available for a reason: to make the game look better visually. As I said before, you need a hefty system to max out the game and achieve 60 FPS. Rockstar themselves have said that the higher settings are "reserved for future computer hardware".

No, the GTX 275 is not a GTX 285. It's half of a GTX 295, and it sits between the GTX 260 Core 216 and GTX 285 (see here). As for CPU usage, it isn't indicative of performance. GTA IV benefits from the use of multiple cores because it has the support for it. As indicated by this benchmark, a C2E QX6850 @ 3.0 GHz beats a C2D E8500 @ 4.0 GHz. Also, take a look at the FPS difference with the E6850 and QX6850. There's a huge jump in performance when you go quad-core.

You don't have the game maxed out. To say that maxing the game out is a waste is ludicrous. Why? Simply because you don't notice it doesn't mean I, or anyone else, wouldn't. The settings are available for a reason: to make the game look better visually. As I said before, you need a hefty system to max out the game and achieve 60 FPS. Rockstar themselves have said that the higher settings are "reserved for future computer hardware".

275 is better than a 285 in Price/Performance ratio, if you'll pay $90-$100 for a 1-3fps increase, you are very retarded to say the least. If you look at your own review that you just posted here: http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum/hardw...-review-15.html you'll see that even in the higher resolutions where the 1GB of VRAM (GTX-285) is suppose to be better vs the 896MB of the 275 there is only a 1fps difference.

here is another benchmark test result sheet for you, all within 1fps of each other basically, so now again...if you still think I'm wrong....then I don't know what to say.

http://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/graphics/...force-gtx-275/7

I'll agree with you somewhat on the Processor part, if you have a low end dual core (3.5ghz and under)...then sure the quad will be better. But if you have a E8400, E8500 or E8600 @ 4GHz +, there is absolutely no reason to go Quad, it would be a waste of money. It doesn't even utilize over 85% of my Processor at 4.1GHz.

Despite your processor review, the 5fps increase doesn't justify the $1,000 Price tag of a QX Processor....show me a bench of a Q6600 vs a E8500 thats around the same price level, and then I'll take that review seriously.

275 is better than a 285 in Price/Performance ratio, if you'll pay $90-$100 for a 1-3fps increase, you are very retarded to say the least. If you look at your own review that you just posted here: http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum/hardw...-review-15.html you'll see that even in the higher resolutions where the 1GB of VRAM (GTX-285) is suppose to be better vs the 896MB of the 275 there is only a 1fps difference.

here is another benchmark test result sheet for you, all within 1fps of each other basically, so now again...if you still think I'm wrong....then I don't know what to say.

http://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/graphics/...force-gtx-275/7

I'll agree with you somewhat on the Processor part, if you have a low end dual core (3.5ghz and under)...then sure the quad will be better. But if you have a E8400, E8500 or E8600 @ 4GHz +, there is absolutely no reason to go Quad, it would be a waste of money. It doesn't even utilize over 85% of my Processor at 4.1GHz.

Despite your processor review, the 5fps increase doesn't justify the $1,000 Price tag of a QX Processor....show me a bench of a Q6600 vs a E8500 thats around the same price level, and then I'll take that review seriously.

Forget about price. What I'm saying is that you'll need better hardware to max out the game at 60 FPS. The price/performance ratio is a topic for another discussion and is therefore irrelevant. The GTX 275 is beaten by the GTX 285 (by 2.89 FPS) as well as the HD 4870 (by 1.64 FPS) @ 1680x1050 (see here). Even if it's a 0.1 FPS difference, it's still better. My original statement still stands: "You'll need a Core i7 gaming rig coupled with a very high end CrossFire or SLI configuration to run the game (maxed out) at 60 FPS."

A) You didn't have to post the Far Cry 2 benchmark because it's unrelated. B) Price/performance isn't an issue if you want the best of the best. And in the case of GTA IV, you definitely need the best of the best [of PC hardware].

Am I the only one that hates the car chases, especially those that require you to go on a motorcycle? :p They murder my computer so often the guy gets away. >.< Not to mention there hard and I'm bad at video games. :p

i wish the "interaction" features of BULLY make it into GTA next.

i really enjoyed the ones in GTA SA, where CJ pwnd :p

i thought atleast that kind of interaction (Yes / No) wud make it into GTA4.

but anyways, i'm hoping that R* bring the interaction features into GTA next. :D

some features like these would also be awesome :D

-edit

R* shhould also bring bully's cop/prefect type of system, i.e., when we hide somewhere, cops should go away "wanted" stars reduce...

Edited by san.W10

I just uninstalled GTA IV. The graphics (played it at 1920x1200 on very high settings on my laptop) and environment interaction are fantastic but that's all there is to it. The plot felt like it was trying to emulate Mafia and I got bored of it by the 43rd mission. All the missions ended up being "collect and drop packages" or assassinations. Here's to hoping that Mafia II will be a pleasurable experience like its predecessor this October.

I just uninstalled GTA IV. The graphics (played it at 1920x1200 on very high settings on my laptop) and environment interaction are fantastic but that's all there is to it. The plot felt like it was trying to emulate Mafia and I got bored of it by the 43rd mission. All the missions ended up being "collect and drop packages" or assassinations. Here's to hoping that Mafia II will be a pleasurable experience like its predecessor this October.

Oh dear! :no:

Its a sin not to complete GTA 4. :p

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I have a couple to mention, and they still run great on Windows 11 Adobe Lightroom Version 2 Alcohol 120% ISO Buster Pro version 1.9.1 (Still supports HD-DVD too) Nero Burning Rom 8 (Only the burning software, no backup, media converter, etc)   PowerDVD 12 Ultra SPTD (SCSI Pass through Direct Driver) UltraISO WinImage    
    • Linux 7.1 arrives with an NTFS overhaul and major hardware performance boosts by Paul Hill The founder of the Linux kernel has just announced the availability of Linux 7.1. This is a stable version of the kernel that will now be tested by various Linux distributions before it is shipped to users through update managers. Some users, like those on Debian, for example, might not get it for a long time, if at all, while Fedora users can expect it in the near future. With Linux 7.1 out on time, the merge window for Linux 7.2 is now open, giving contributors the opportunity to send in major new features that have been waiting for the last two months. Torvalds warned that he is currently travelling and will be in another timezone, so timing for the merge window may be irregular due to timezone differences and limited internet access. Torvalds said that he has already fetched early pull requests to allow him to do some offline work, but the travel could still cause disruption. Right now, he is not planning to extend the release, but did consider it. He said he might later regret not extending, though. In terms of this last week of development for Linux 7.1, Torvalds said there were no major or alarming changes. This week consisted mostly of smaller driver updates to GPU, networking, and sound, networking fixes, trace tooling fixes, and misc minor fixes. The shortlog this week lists fixes for driver bugs, memory leaks, I/O and USB fixes, networking and RDMA fixes, DRM/graphics fixes, and tooling and verification improvements. Specific fixes include USB series heap-overflow and buffer overflow fixes, and multiple use-after-free, memory-leak, and refcount corrections across subsystems such as i2c, zram, gpio, and net. There are fixes for graphics drivers, including amdgpu, i915, and virtio, as well as hypervisor and virtualization tweaks affecting mshv, vmbus, and hyperv. According to Phoronix, anyone running Linux 7.1 should look out for the new NTFS driver, Intel FRED for improved performance on Panther Lake and future CPUs, faster graphics with Intel Arc Battlemage, and improvements for older AMD Radeon GPUs. If you are running Linux on your computer and everything is fine, then you don’t need to worry about updating to Linux 7.1 as a priority; just wait for it to be pushed to you. If you have tried Linux on hardware but it didn’t work properly, trying again with a distro that uses Linux 7.1 could cause Linux to work on your machine, thanks to the new hardware support.
    • you can also do this with this tool: PowerSettingsExplorer made by mbk1969 at 3dguru forum.. I found it by accident researching on modern standby and annoying quirks of it in 2022
    • AB Download Manager 1.9.1 by Razvan Serea AB Download Manager is an open-source, feature-rich download manager designed to accelerate downloads, organize files efficiently, and provide seamless control over downloads. With support for multiple connections, resume capability, and an intuitive interface, it enhances the downloading experience for users seeking speed and reliability. The software integrates with various browsers, enabling quick link grabbing and batch downloading. It supports HTTP, HTTPS, and FTP protocols, ensuring broad compatibility with different file sources. Users can schedule downloads, set speed limits, and categorize files automatically for better organization. AB Download Manager is lightweight yet powerful, making it a great alternative to proprietary download managers. Its open-source nature allows developers to contribute, customize, and improve the software as needed. Whether you're downloading large files, managing multiple downloads at once, or seeking an ad-free experience, this tool offers a practical and efficient solution. Key features of AB Download Manager: Multi-Connection Support – Accelerates downloads by splitting files into multiple segments. Resume Capability – Allows paused or interrupted downloads to be resumed without starting over. Batch Downloading – Supports downloading multiple files at once for improved efficiency. Browser Integration – Captures download links directly from browsers for seamless operation. HTTP, HTTPS, and FTP Support – Ensures compatibility with a wide range of file sources. Download Scheduling – Enables users to automate downloads at specific times. Speed Limiting – Lets users control bandwidth usage for optimized performance. File Categorization – Automatically organizes downloaded files into designated folders. User-Friendly Interface – Simple and intuitive design for easy navigation. Cross-Platform Compatibility – Works on multiple operating systems. Ad-Free Experience – No intrusive ads or tracking for a clean user experience. AB Download Manager 1.9.1 changelog: Added An option to customize notification sounds (#1259) Fixed Ongoing notification was laggy on Samsung One UI devices (#1269) Improved Updated Translations Minor UI/UX improvements Download: AB Download Manager 1.9.1 | Portable | ~80.0 MB (Open Source) Download: ARM64 | Portable ARM64 | Android Links: AB Download Manager Website | Github Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • watching him because of the Mr Klinton cat
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      507
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      140
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      90
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      81
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!