Recommended Posts

I stumbled on this neat feature in the boot menu of Windows 7

"Repair Your Computer"

Makes life alot easier than, popping in the Windows DVD, booting from it, waiting for it to load all the pre-install stuff, then pressing the repair button etc.....

dsc00134ix4.jpg

I get it my my Vostro with a Nvidia M8600GT GPU; I don't get it from one with a 8600GT Ultra.

I guess it's a feature of the GPU MS are exploiting - it's another Mac-feature off of the list and very cool for that:

This is very interesting what you are saying, I have a friend who has the 20" iMac and I have the 24" iMac, in Mac OS X, my iMac dims as it should do as it is specified in the System Preferences, but it does no transition, no fade. My friend's iMac had the same setting configured, and the iMac fades to dim, its instant, but you can tell it is doing it and my iMac isn't. I am guessing it is some hardware feature my iMac does not have.

Just like to add:

ISO Burning

I read all 16 pages to make sure this wasn't listed since search didn't help me, oh well. Anyway, I am installing Expression Studio 2 and it is an ISO and I just noticed that Windows 7 includes a program called Windows Disc Image Burning Tool. It looks very similar to the program Microsoft offers for Windows XP that does this function. That program did not work in Windows Vista, I guess they are integrating it into Windows 7. I just do not like how it looks like some program they threw a couple registry entries in the registry, dragged and dropped a program in system32 and said there's image burning support. Basically I am saying I thought they might make it have that special Microsoft touch, like maybe some integration into the operating system, perhaps Disk Management or something could have some integration of it, and maybe they could have added image mount support.

Otherthan that, Windows 7 seems to be the success, by the way, for you Windows 7 should've been Vista people, Windows 7 being Windows Vista would have been put down either way, wasting features they could've included in Windows 7, Windows Vista is the platform Windows 7 stands on, and Windows Vista is always going to be treat like crap. So get over it, Windows Vista is Windows 7, Windows 7 is Windows Vista. Why do I say that? Because I think that after service pack 2 is released for Windows Vista, Windows Vista will just be an earlier release of Windows NT 6 and Windows 7 will be a later release of Windows NT 6 (6.1), certain functionality will separate Windows 7 from Windows Vista, such as the superbar and upgraded Windows features, but otherthan that, the speed of the two will be the same, they will both share the same drivers and applications, and so on. Just to remind you, next release of Windows Server is Windows Server 2008 R2, thats exactly what NT6.1 is, the second coming of Windows Vista and Windows Server 2008.

I stumbled on this neat feature in the boot menu of Windows 7

"Repair Your Computer"

Makes life alot easier than, popping in the Windows DVD, booting from it, waiting for it to load all the pre-install stuff, then pressing the repair button etc.....

dsc00134ix4.jpg

Very neat, how did you come upon this screen or how do you activate it?

I just do not like how it looks like some program they threw a couple registry entries in the registry, dragged and dropped a program in system32 and said there's image burning support. Basically I am saying I thought they might make it have that special Microsoft touch, like maybe some integration into the operating system, perhaps Disk Management or something could have some integration of it, and maybe they could have added image mount support.

I use it regularly, and I think it's great that I can just right-click on an ISO and burn it. It's also been extremely reliable for me, whereas some of the other free ISO burning tools have given me less consistent results. It is very simple, of course, but it works and that's what matters to me :)

Is there a way to control what programs have their windows grouped in the super bar? I use pidgin for my IM client and I would like to have separate icons in the super bar for each conversation window that I have open. For other programs I like the default behavior of the super bar. Did I overlook something, or is this a feature planned for a future beta?

Is there a way to control what programs have their windows grouped in the super bar? I use pidgin for my IM client and I would like to have separate icons in the super bar for each conversation window that I have open. For other programs I like the default behavior of the super bar. Did I overlook something, or is this a feature planned for a future beta?

I'm not sure if you can handle it per app, but that is definitely a good option to have. So far it looks like you can just turn it on for everything or off for everything.

I stumbled on this neat feature in the boot menu of Windows 7

"Repair Your Computer"

Makes life alot easier than, popping in the Windows DVD, booting from it, waiting for it to load all the pre-install stuff, then pressing the repair button etc.....

dsc00134ix4.jpg

thats in vista also btw

Why Microsoft decided to have Previews on Taskbar i find it useless? In my opinion those previews should pop up in the middle of screen by pressing middle mouse button. Scroll up and Scroll down will list them in Circle.

Having previews on taskbar just beats the purpose. Are they going to keep alt tab thing?

It seems that Microsoft is going to wrong design every time.

Virtual Desktop would be more useful then this.

Why Microsoft decided to have Previews on Taskbar i find it useless? In my opinion those previews should pop up in the middle of screen by pressing middle mouse button. Scroll up and Scroll down will list them in Circle.

Having previews on taskbar just beats the purpose. Are they going to keep alt tab thing?

It seems that Microsoft is going to wrong design every time.

Virtual Desktop would be more useful then this.

So how would a circle work if there's a lot of windows, say more than 12? Would all windows from all currently running apps be organized in a condensed circle full of tiny thumbnails? How could the user choose to see thumbnails for just an application and not all at the same time?

You're probably thinking of something along the lines of an elliptical 'weapon selection' or 'item selection' scheme used in games, say Crysis or Left 4 Dead's voice menus. Okay for controllers. No good for mice. Imagine the amount of mouse movements needed to nail down a particular thumbnail in the circle, or furiously scrolling the mouse wheel.

Why Microsoft decided to have Previews on Taskbar i find it useless? In my opinion those previews should pop up in the middle of screen by pressing middle mouse button. Scroll up and Scroll down will list them in Circle.

Having previews on taskbar just beats the purpose. Are they going to keep alt tab thing?

It seems that Microsoft is going to wrong design every time.

Virtual Desktop would be more useful then this.

You may find it useless, but I'm sure plenty of other people don't. I don't see why they need to put it in the middle of the screen, that's why you have alt-tab. You can quickly cycle through and see whats open. I'm sure they've looked at different scenarios and designs, but this definitely works best. Middle clicking on a taskbar and getting a display in the middle isn't very intuitive.

Why Microsoft decided to have Previews on Taskbar i find it useless? In my opinion those previews should pop up in the middle of screen by pressing middle mouse button. Scroll up and Scroll down will list them in Circle.

Having previews on taskbar just beats the purpose. Are they going to keep alt tab thing?

It seems that Microsoft is going to wrong design every time.

Virtual Desktop would be more useful then this.

What's the difference having them in the Taskbar rather than the middle of the screen, which happens anyway with Alt+Tab?

What do you think the purpose of the thumbnails is?

Why Microsoft decided to have Previews on Taskbar i find it useless? In my opinion those previews should pop up in the middle of screen by pressing middle mouse button. Scroll up and Scroll down will list them in Circle.

Having previews on taskbar just beats the purpose. Are they going to keep alt tab thing?

It seems that Microsoft is going to wrong design every time.

Virtual Desktop would be more useful then this.

The taskbar thumbnails are something everybody can (and will) use. Virtual desktops would be used by basically nobody. And popping something up in the middle of the screen would create a lot of mouse travel, versus having the thumbnails pop up right next to the cursor when you hover on the app icon.

Further, while I love middle mouse button functionality, you can't count on it for everyday tasks since laptops don't even have one.

If you haven't used the new Windows 7 UI, I'd suggest you wait until you can before making up your mind about it. The new taskbar really is well thought out and facilities muscle-memory very, very well.

Virtual desktops would be used by basically nobody.

I beg to differ, there are many uses for virtual desktops, especially when users have a large workflow (and subsequently, a lot of windows opened) on computers with only one monitor; virtual desktops would allow you to move different workflows to different desktops for easier access (for example, you could have your web browser and e-mail programs open in one desktop, a development environment (Visual Studio for example) in another desktop, and Dreamweaver or Photoshop in a 3rd desktop), it would make things a lot cleaner in the long run.

I beg to differ, there are many uses for virtual desktops, especially when users have a large workflow (and subsequently, a lot of windows opened) on computers with only one monitor; virtual desktops would allow you to move different workflows to different desktops for easier access (for example, you could have your web browser and e-mail programs open in one desktop, a development environment (Visual Studio for example) in another desktop, and Dreamweaver or Photoshop in a 3rd desktop), it would make things a lot cleaner in the long run.

i agree but i think they are afraid of noobs switching desktops and wondering where everything went! they should bury the feature deep in the guts some where so its hard to activate. or make it a powertool that you have to download from windows live or something.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I'm hoping with the Surface Pro 12, I can use either USB-C for my Xreal One Pro glasses. With my Surface Pro 11 OLED X Elite, I have to plug them into the top port. The bottom port will power it, but nothing shows on the screen. Maybe it's my setting. When I plug in the glasses, I have it output only to the glasses. So maybe I need to turn on both displays with it in the top port, then switch the glasses to the bottom port and set it to output only to the glasses. And then hopefully Windows remembers the settings for either the top port and bottom port (one of the awesome features of Windows where it remembers the exact configuration when plugging in external monitors.
    • Forgive my ignorance, but the only difference I see here is that a USB-A is now a USB-C, so there are two of them. For the modern age (and I'd argue since 2020), most products would now come with USB-C as an option, if not the default. Display, charging, devices, etc on TWO connectors, sometimes all combined! So having 2 of those powerful ports is great for something this size! Meanwhile my Surface Pro (5) has a single USB-A port which I cannot even get display out to, instead relying on some Surface Connect dock which I don't have. That is a poor experience, not to mention expensive and not compatible with other devices. Thank God USB-C is mainstream!
    • wow. that color finally comes to Surface Pro. was always a little jelly when a friend had the sandstone Surface Laptop. I wonder how different this dune is from the sandstone. I'll be getting the dune version. always thought black and platinum were a little boring. I'll still have access to my blue Surface Pro 11 as it'll be a hand-me-down.
    • Looks a very subjective aren't they!? I like its simple design. I love the way Apple designs their products with function over form, minimalization, and simplicity over cluttered complex designs. Many, not all, of their products follow this trend, and the device becomes a tool rather than dominating the space. I do not however like their OS. I have never bought a Apple product, and while I'd consider the Neo for my wife, I am hoping there are better alternatives out there when her failing MacBook Pro 2017 finally stops. Fischer-Price is famously plastic, garish, and poorly made. Basically you're describing the Window Laptops the Neo competes against! This is how product design should be, and what Apple have often followed in recent years: https://tenprinciples.design/
    • Isn't that true for every codec? I remember having to buy a PCI MPEG-2 decoder card just so I could play DVDs on my computer back in the late 90s. AV1 support is still fairly new.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      B2Proxy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      MadMung0 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      jefred earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Apprentice
      JoeyNeo went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Week One Done
      oliviaexpo earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      485
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      228
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      70
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      58
    5. 5
      neufuse
      56
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!