Bunny Hopping in FPS games. Is it oKAY?


Bunny Hopping (run & jump + strafe + dance at full throttle)  

151 members have voted

  1. 1. Should it be allowed to bunny hop in FPS games?

    • Yes. Move however you want in order to survive
      69
    • No (reason?)
      50
    • Indifferent. I don't bunny hop, and I don't mind it.
      32


Recommended Posts

My opinion exactly. :laugh:

Hopping is a crime, especially in FPS games. It's not only impossible to kill someone with Jordan sneakers, but it is also unrealistic. I'd like to see a soldier in Iraq do that... he/she would be dead in a fraction of a second.

haha thats going to be a new training module soon i reckon..

The master technique of BUNNY HOPPING!

I dont mind bunny hopping. I think its easier to kill a hopping target then strafing.

A few others have posted this and it also annoys me like in BF2, you jump then prone right away. It was termed "Dolphin Diving". Really really cheap in BF2

i alwasy thought camping was bas.. in quake 3 arena on the one where its a floating battlefield with the bouncers i would bounce to the remote station and camp over the rocket gun and zoom in and keep shooting people where thy spawn at in the main game field............

that was only against bots though ive never been to play against real people

the worst game it happens in is BF2 but in reality i haven't had much of a problem with it anyway i just think in future they need to work on the physics of jumping better.... like bf2 jumping half a story high nearly enough to clean jump from floor onto roof of a building is pretty bs.

also when bullets do realistic damage bunny hopping isn't an issue since 1 hit damages and second should kill or 1 if in the head.

the worst game it happens in is BF2 but in reality i haven't had much of a problem with it anyway i just think in future they need to work on the physics of jumping better.... like bf2 jumping half a story high nearly enough to clean jump from floor onto roof of a building is pretty bs.

also when bullets do realistic damage bunny hopping isn't an issue since 1 hit damages and second should kill or 1 if in the head.

I remember it was high but not that high :p

And yeah nothing wrong with camping! It really is a legitimate strategy.

If you cant take a camper down on your second go then you are really not as good as you would like to think you are :p

I don't like it, but it depends on the game.

I have only really come across it when I use to play BF2, which was highly annoying to see people jumping around like there were springs attached to their legs, though at least in a later patch they stopped people from shooting while jumping, which made it slightly less annoying, but then people started jumping and immediately going prone.

Though I think it is fine in games like unreal.

But other than those two I have rarely seen it in any games, I personally would prefer games going for more realism to just not have jumping in them at all.

When it comes to any kind of game, regardless of genre, that involves more than just you playing it I tend to enjoy playing in a more fair and fun way than other;s. I have this motto for playing games, "If it ruins the enjoyment of anyone in the game, don't do it." Now I am not talking merely winning and ****ing off the other player, but in general anything that breaks the normal game experience or pace of the gameplay. This includes camping, spawn killing, weapon whoring, glitching, trash-talking, etc.

I don't know about anyone else here, but I play for the experience and challenge, not the title of winner at the end of whatever match, round or duel. THe point of games is to have fun, and I can guarantee that winning is not the only way to have fun.

Now, these bunny hoppers, I have seen them and must admit they are some of the more annoying people. It is similar to the speed glitch in Chromehounds or weapon slides in Gears of War. The player can move abnormally fast or get to objects with less hindrances as a result, changing the pace as well as the handicap in favor of those who do it. It isn't fun, it isn't fair, it's just stupid. I don't see how people can really feel accomplished when they know they used unfair or unpleasant means to claim bragging rights. Even many generals and commanders in the military have at least some moral pride to keep up. Most of them don't like being complete ######. This is why things such as the Geneva Convention were held.

Like I said, just because you find it annoying doesn't mean you have to blame the players, blame the developers for making such things possible.

It's easy to blame cheating on the developer when you have never once developed anything remotely close to game content yourself. Anyone who has worked on some form of software knows that there are unforeseen glitches that not even alpha, beta or pre-release testing catches.

By the way, any game wanting to be "realist" wouldn't let that happens, CoD are arcade-like game, tbh

As I said above, it isn't about not letting them, but more or less just not catching them. Think of the testing as a series of nets in a water filter. Each one is setup so that the next will catch things the last didn't by being ever-finer holes in the material (aka, more people in each test phase). But even then, to get something perfectly clean you need to do this hundreds of times. That isn't cost effective, so developers usually do it much less than required to catch every little bug in the game and get the game out before Duke Nukem Forever releases.

Don't blame people while remaining ignorant. It is you, the gamer, who decides whether or not he/she will exploit game glitches.

Edited by Emn1ty
Hopping is a crime, especially in FPS games. It's not only impossible to kill someone with Jordan sneakers, but it is also unrealistic. I'd like to see a soldier in Iraq do that... he/she would be dead in a fraction of a second.

You want realism, go to Iraq :p

I don't know about anyone else here, but I play for the experience and challenge, not the title of winner at the end of whatever match, round or duel. THe point of games is to have fun, and I can guarantee that winning is not the only way to have fun.

It's not the only way, but it's what pushes you to play which leads to "fun".

To everyone who always bring back realism into this conversation: Is war fair? Well, you want to bring realism into gameplay and prevent us from "exploiting" what we can't do in real life, but that itself represents what war is: unfair. I can guarantee that most of you guys would bunny hop in real life if you could to avoid being shot at.

Clearly your intentions are to make the gameplay as realistic and fair as possible so that everyone can enjoy it. Ya well, no one is stopping you guys from doing the same, it's your decision not to bunny hop so you have no complaining to do if you ask me.

The way i see it, those who complain about bunny hoppers are either: A. So bad that they can't hit a moving target no matter what, or B. console gamers, since it's even more unlikely they'll know how to hit a moving target with thumbsticks(hence why console fps games are uber SLOW paced).

Bunny hoppers aren't that big of a threat. And in some games, such as bf2, they're no threat at all since they can't shoot in the air.

The way i see it, those who complain about bunny hoppers are either: A. So bad that they can't hit a moving target no matter what, or B. console gamers, since it's even more unlikely they'll know how to hit a moving target with thumbsticks(hence why console fps games are uber SLOW paced).

Bunny hoppers aren't that big of a threat. And in some games, such as bf2, they're no threat at all since they can't shoot in the air.

Being a console gamer has nothing to do with it. I do concede that console games are slower but I could still just as well put a bullet in the brain of console bunny hopper and I do play console games more.

however bunnyhoppers on the PC are just a joy :D

I miss PC gaming :(

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Free Software Foundation Europe pushes EU to force Google to allow AI uninstalls on Android by Paul Hill Credit: Pexels Users should be able to fully uninstall AI-based features from Android devices and be able to access interoperability functions, free from Google’s verification requirements, the European Commission has heard as part of an Android interoperability consultation under the Digital Markets Act. These measures were proposed by the Free Software Foundation Europe (FSFE) last week when it submitted its documentation. The FSFE noted that Google had started silently installing AI models without telling users. It noted that the EU’s DMA requires companies like Google to allow users to uninstall pre-loaded software from their devices, but in the case of the AI models Google is installing, they reinstall if you delete them, contravening the DMA. To get Google back under control, the FSFE has told the European Commission that there needs to be improvements within the Android Open Source Project (AOSP). First, it said that users should be able to fully remove pre-loaded AI components from their devices, with companies being prohibited from silently reinstalling or reactivating them. Second, access to Android interoperability features should not be contingent on registration, authorization, or contractual relationships with Google. This pertains to Google’s attempt to force developers to register with Google, even to publish apps to alternative app stores like F-Droid. Discussing its submission, Lucas Lasota, FSFE Legal Programme Manager, said: Google is planning to roll out its Android Developer Certification in September 2026. This will force every Android app developer to register with Google before their software can be installed on certified Android devices, but it should affect those who have removed Google Apps from their device. The program is controversial because it entails the signing of contracts and payment of account fees to Google, as well as the handing over of the identities of developers. It said: The FSFE said that if the Commission’s draft measures remain unchanged, then Google will be allowed to make developers verify their identity. The FSFE believes that asking developers to register is contrary to the text and spirit of the law. In summary, the FSFE has told the Commission that no developer should need a Google account, a Play Store presence, or any agreement with Google to access Android’s interoperability features.
    • You could disable this "functionality/feature/whatever" with 2 registry keys, ages ago.
    • My Photos app is version 2026.11050.1001.0 and it remembers the window size and position. My Snipping Tool is version 11.2602.49.0 and it can capture the taskbar.
    • MusicBee 3.6.9668 by Razvan Serea MusicBee is an application geared toward managing extensive music collections, easy to use and with a comprehensive feature set. It makes it easy to organize, find, and play music files on your computer, on portable devices, and on the Web. It provides playback of a wide range of audio formats, smart playlists with the ability to discover and play new music from the web, advanced tag editing with automated artwork and tag look up, folder monitoring, automated file re-organization, portable device synchronization, and secure CD ripping with AccurateRip verification. MusicBee features: Supported formats: MP3, AAC, M4A, MPC, OGG, FLAC, APE, TAK, WV, WMA and WAV. Audio CDs: Audio CD playback and ripping (with CD-Text capabilities) is supported. CD tracks can be ripped (in fast or secure mode) as individual files or as a single album with embedded cuesheet. Conversion: Conversion from and to all supported formats as metadata are preserved. Synchronization of tags only (in case that the output file already exists) instead of reencoding is possible. ReplayGain support: both playback and calculation. File Organization: Organization and renaming of music files into folders and files based on tag values such as artist, album, name, track number, etc. that can be specified. MusicBee can do this automatically for all files in a music library or the user can choose the files or folders themselves. Web Browsing: Browsing of the web using Mozilla's XULRunner environment. Scrobbling: Tracks played from MusicBee can optionally be scrobbled to Last.fm. Customizable user interface layout. Customizable keyboard shortcuts. MiniLyrics support Download: MusicBee 3.6.9668 | MusicBee Portable | ~9.0 MB (Freeware) Download: Windows Store Edition View: MusicBee Home page | Release Notes | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      519
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      185
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      87
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      81
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!