Bunny Hopping in FPS games. Is it oKAY?


Bunny Hopping (run & jump + strafe + dance at full throttle)  

151 members have voted

  1. 1. Should it be allowed to bunny hop in FPS games?

    • Yes. Move however you want in order to survive
      69
    • No (reason?)
      50
    • Indifferent. I don't bunny hop, and I don't mind it.
      32


Recommended Posts

My opinion exactly. :laugh:

Hopping is a crime, especially in FPS games. It's not only impossible to kill someone with Jordan sneakers, but it is also unrealistic. I'd like to see a soldier in Iraq do that... he/she would be dead in a fraction of a second.

haha thats going to be a new training module soon i reckon..

The master technique of BUNNY HOPPING!

I dont mind bunny hopping. I think its easier to kill a hopping target then strafing.

A few others have posted this and it also annoys me like in BF2, you jump then prone right away. It was termed "Dolphin Diving". Really really cheap in BF2

i alwasy thought camping was bas.. in quake 3 arena on the one where its a floating battlefield with the bouncers i would bounce to the remote station and camp over the rocket gun and zoom in and keep shooting people where thy spawn at in the main game field............

that was only against bots though ive never been to play against real people

the worst game it happens in is BF2 but in reality i haven't had much of a problem with it anyway i just think in future they need to work on the physics of jumping better.... like bf2 jumping half a story high nearly enough to clean jump from floor onto roof of a building is pretty bs.

also when bullets do realistic damage bunny hopping isn't an issue since 1 hit damages and second should kill or 1 if in the head.

the worst game it happens in is BF2 but in reality i haven't had much of a problem with it anyway i just think in future they need to work on the physics of jumping better.... like bf2 jumping half a story high nearly enough to clean jump from floor onto roof of a building is pretty bs.

also when bullets do realistic damage bunny hopping isn't an issue since 1 hit damages and second should kill or 1 if in the head.

I remember it was high but not that high :p

And yeah nothing wrong with camping! It really is a legitimate strategy.

If you cant take a camper down on your second go then you are really not as good as you would like to think you are :p

I don't like it, but it depends on the game.

I have only really come across it when I use to play BF2, which was highly annoying to see people jumping around like there were springs attached to their legs, though at least in a later patch they stopped people from shooting while jumping, which made it slightly less annoying, but then people started jumping and immediately going prone.

Though I think it is fine in games like unreal.

But other than those two I have rarely seen it in any games, I personally would prefer games going for more realism to just not have jumping in them at all.

When it comes to any kind of game, regardless of genre, that involves more than just you playing it I tend to enjoy playing in a more fair and fun way than other;s. I have this motto for playing games, "If it ruins the enjoyment of anyone in the game, don't do it." Now I am not talking merely winning and ****ing off the other player, but in general anything that breaks the normal game experience or pace of the gameplay. This includes camping, spawn killing, weapon whoring, glitching, trash-talking, etc.

I don't know about anyone else here, but I play for the experience and challenge, not the title of winner at the end of whatever match, round or duel. THe point of games is to have fun, and I can guarantee that winning is not the only way to have fun.

Now, these bunny hoppers, I have seen them and must admit they are some of the more annoying people. It is similar to the speed glitch in Chromehounds or weapon slides in Gears of War. The player can move abnormally fast or get to objects with less hindrances as a result, changing the pace as well as the handicap in favor of those who do it. It isn't fun, it isn't fair, it's just stupid. I don't see how people can really feel accomplished when they know they used unfair or unpleasant means to claim bragging rights. Even many generals and commanders in the military have at least some moral pride to keep up. Most of them don't like being complete ######. This is why things such as the Geneva Convention were held.

Like I said, just because you find it annoying doesn't mean you have to blame the players, blame the developers for making such things possible.

It's easy to blame cheating on the developer when you have never once developed anything remotely close to game content yourself. Anyone who has worked on some form of software knows that there are unforeseen glitches that not even alpha, beta or pre-release testing catches.

By the way, any game wanting to be "realist" wouldn't let that happens, CoD are arcade-like game, tbh

As I said above, it isn't about not letting them, but more or less just not catching them. Think of the testing as a series of nets in a water filter. Each one is setup so that the next will catch things the last didn't by being ever-finer holes in the material (aka, more people in each test phase). But even then, to get something perfectly clean you need to do this hundreds of times. That isn't cost effective, so developers usually do it much less than required to catch every little bug in the game and get the game out before Duke Nukem Forever releases.

Don't blame people while remaining ignorant. It is you, the gamer, who decides whether or not he/she will exploit game glitches.

Edited by Emn1ty
Hopping is a crime, especially in FPS games. It's not only impossible to kill someone with Jordan sneakers, but it is also unrealistic. I'd like to see a soldier in Iraq do that... he/she would be dead in a fraction of a second.

You want realism, go to Iraq :p

I don't know about anyone else here, but I play for the experience and challenge, not the title of winner at the end of whatever match, round or duel. THe point of games is to have fun, and I can guarantee that winning is not the only way to have fun.

It's not the only way, but it's what pushes you to play which leads to "fun".

To everyone who always bring back realism into this conversation: Is war fair? Well, you want to bring realism into gameplay and prevent us from "exploiting" what we can't do in real life, but that itself represents what war is: unfair. I can guarantee that most of you guys would bunny hop in real life if you could to avoid being shot at.

Clearly your intentions are to make the gameplay as realistic and fair as possible so that everyone can enjoy it. Ya well, no one is stopping you guys from doing the same, it's your decision not to bunny hop so you have no complaining to do if you ask me.

The way i see it, those who complain about bunny hoppers are either: A. So bad that they can't hit a moving target no matter what, or B. console gamers, since it's even more unlikely they'll know how to hit a moving target with thumbsticks(hence why console fps games are uber SLOW paced).

Bunny hoppers aren't that big of a threat. And in some games, such as bf2, they're no threat at all since they can't shoot in the air.

The way i see it, those who complain about bunny hoppers are either: A. So bad that they can't hit a moving target no matter what, or B. console gamers, since it's even more unlikely they'll know how to hit a moving target with thumbsticks(hence why console fps games are uber SLOW paced).

Bunny hoppers aren't that big of a threat. And in some games, such as bf2, they're no threat at all since they can't shoot in the air.

Being a console gamer has nothing to do with it. I do concede that console games are slower but I could still just as well put a bullet in the brain of console bunny hopper and I do play console games more.

however bunnyhoppers on the PC are just a joy :D

I miss PC gaming :(

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Plans. Christ at least editorialise this tripe for what it is or put your own journalistic take on it.
    • If you have a TV in your living room, chances are you can probably just use the Steam Link app and play your huge PC in big picture mode, effectively giving you the Steam Machine experience to see if you'd actually like it. The good news is the Steam Machine can have it's drives upgraded. It has a USB-C 10Gbs port as well, so the 512GB drive could be quickly moved to an external enclosure and repurposed.
    • This machine could very well be a second gaming PC for their living room as a console experience. So we would have to assume their main PC exists as well; With that said, I have 10gb home network with a 2.5gigabit internet connection here so we tend to have more than enough speed to download games. However, we can't make use of the 10gb LAN using Steam's built in transfer tool because it always compresses transfers and that slows the transfer down to well below a standard gigabit port speeds, sometimes as slow as 200-300Mb/s transfers. While that's probably still faster than most internet connections anyway, if they'd fix the LAN transfer issue it'd be upto x5 faster even on a gigabit LAN, than simply dropping a 2.5gbe port on there with hopes of a few people having fast internet connections. There are solutions, work arounds, like using LANCache if you run a NAS... or simply copying the files over manually using a network share.
    • Samsung announces ultra-fast UFS 5.0 storage to supercharge mobile AI by Paul Hill Local AI models tend to run a lot more slowly than cloud services like Claude and Gemini; however, Samsung has just announced that it has developed its UFS 5.0 solution, which increases data transfer to speeds of 10.8GB/s, enabling faster storage and processing in mobile memory that has the potential to provide more optimal local AI experiences. Commenting on this development, Jangseok Choi, head of Memory Product Planning at Samsung Electronics, said: If you’ve tried local AI, you’ll know it can be quite slow, especially if using the larger parameter models. By developing this new solution, Samsung says that storage is evolving from just storing data to a core piece of infrastructure that supports AI computation, too. The Korean company said that UFS 5.0 integrates the latest embedded memory interface standard from JEDEC and achieves up to 10.8 gigabytes per second (GB/s) transfer speeds. Regarding write speeds, Samsung UFS 5.0 can reach 9.5 GB/s. Both the read and write speeds are twice as fast as those of the previous UFS 4.1 standard. Aside from being ideal for local AI, Samsung’s UFS 5.0 is more power efficient by 40% compared to UFS 4.1. Samsung achieved this by implementing innovations such as clock gating and multi-voltage technologies. UFS 5.0 is also ultra-compact at just 7.5mm x 13mm x 0.9mm; that is 16.7% smaller than UFS 4.1. The company said it will be bringing it to multiple devices in the future, including mobile, wearable, and extended reality.
    • A bit like the steamdeck, this probably isn't for you.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
    • Dedicated
      tuben earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      mnsgroup earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      496
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      209
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      99
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      86
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!