Apple Announces Last Year at Macworld, No Steve Jobs Keynote


Recommended Posts

We knew this year's Macworld was looking grim, but we had no idea how grim: Not only is Steve Jobs not delivering the keynote, Apple says it will be their last one ever.

Instead of Jobs, delivering this year's supposedly final Macworld keynote is Phil Schiller, Apple's senior VP of worldwide product marketing.

While we have confirmed this information with Apple, what this means for WWDC or town halls is unknown. We had predicted that Steve Jobs was preparing his farewell following his highly de-centered introduction of the new MacBooks. At the very, very best, this is another step in that direction, preparing the world for an Apple without Steve. We don't really want to think about the worst.

Apple Announces Its Last Year at Macworld

CUPERTINO, Calif., Dec. 16 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ ? Apple® today announced that this year is the last year the company will exhibit at Macworld Expo. Philip Schiller, Apple's senior vice president of Worldwide Product Marketing, will deliver the opening keynote for this year's Macworld Conference & Expo, and it will be Apple's last keynote at the show. The keynote address will be held at Moscone West on Tuesday, January 6, 2009 at 9:00 a.m. Macworld will be held at San Francisco's Moscone Center January 5-9, 2009.

Apple is reaching more people in more ways than ever before, so like many companies, trade shows have become a very minor part of how Apple reaches its customers. The increasing popularity of Apple's Retail Stores, which more than 3.5 million people visit every week, and the Apple.com website enable Apple to directly reach more than a hundred million customers around the world in innovative new ways.

Apple has been steadily scaling back on trade shows in recent years, including NAB, Macworld New York, Macworld Tokyo and Apple Expo in Paris.

Apple ignited the personal computer revolution in the 1970s with the Apple II and reinvented the personal computer in the 1980s with the Macintosh. Today, Apple continues to lead the industry in innovation with its

award-winning computers, OS X operating system and iLife and professional applications. Apple is also spearheading the digital media revolution with its iPod portable music and video players and iTunes online store, and has entered the mobile phone market with its revolutionary iPhone.

© 2008 Apple Inc. All rights reserved. Apple, the Apple logo, Mac, Mac OS and Macintosh are trademarks of Apple. Other company and product names may be trademarks of their respective owners.

Source: Gizmodo

Cue the 'Steve Jobs is dying' comments...

So is this the last of the Macworld expo as well since Apple won't be there? I guess Violet Blue really ****ed off Steve Jobs last year.

Macworld Expo is separate from Apple. It's just a trade show convention held by IDG--so it probably won't be canned unless more companies drop ship.

Not entirely unexpected given the downturn of the economy. I guess Apple will be focusing more on events held at Cupertino, like the Macbook and iMac launches.

What the hell? Apple has had skyrocketing success for the last 7 years. It's not like the money has suddenly run out so why suddenly bail out like this?!

What a joke.

What the hell? Apple has had skyrocketing success for the last 7 years. It's not like the money has suddenly run out so why suddenly bail out like this?!

What a joke.

I don't think success has anything to do with it really, but more on working on their own time table. Having large expectations and rumors before the Macworld keynote really hasn't done well on their stock, and this would let them plan around their own timeline and release products accordingly (rather than always having something to please investors every January).

I don't think success has anything to do with it really, but more on working on their own time table. Having large expectations and rumors before the Macworld keynote really hasn't done well on their stock, and this would let them plan around their own timeline and release products accordingly (rather than always having something to please investors every January).

I agree with this statement, and as scrtsqurrl, mentioned, this could help reduce costs for Apple in the long run and they could put it into other resources.

We had predicted that Steve Jobs was preparing his farewell following his highly de-centered introduction of the new MacBooks. At the very, very best, this is another step in that direction, preparing the world for an Apple without Steve. We don't really want to think about the worst.

Concerning this statement, there hasn't been any official word on Steve Jobs leaving Apple anytime soon.

Edited by Kevin.
What the hell? Apple has had skyrocketing success for the last 7 years. It's not like the money has suddenly run out so why suddenly bail out like this?!

What a joke.

It's easier and cheaper to have "town hall" launches from their own corporate campus, like they've been doing for most things lately. Also, they can disseminate info over the net instantly, and have their product in worldwide Apple stores ready to try the day its announced.

WWDC probably isn't going anywhere, since it's a convention specifically for developers.

Trade shows really are a holdover from the days of print. I'm sad to see them die (I went to four consecutive E3s in the past, and a bunch of local computer trade shows), but the web really has completely changed everything in a span of a decade.

Who knows, Jobs might be there via satellite just to say Hi, LOL.

Schiller's OK, I suppose. It's not a major event, anyway.

MacWorld is not a major event? :blink: since when?

I have absolutely no problem with Apple and I think they make excellent products, but I will never understand the nerd erection that Steve Jobs instills in so many people.

What's wrong with Apple announcing new products like everyone else?

Not really surprised. Trade Shows cost a lot of money to put on and participate in. Money that could be better spent in R&D.

Trade shows do cost a decent amount of money, but its an excellent opportunity for tech companies to show off their new yet-to-be-released and prototype products. Just about any company will find their money well spent and appreciate extra attention they can get.

Kind of sad its coming to the end of the Steve-era. Actually kind of enjoyed those classic MacWorld keynotes with all the "Booms!" and "Just one more thing" parts despite not being much a Mac fan.

Trade shows do cost a decent amount of money, but its an excellent opportunity for tech companies to show off their new yet-to-be-released and prototype products. Just about any company will find their money well spent and appreciate extra attention they can get.

Kind of sad its coming to the end of the Steve-era. Actually kind of enjoyed those classic MacWorld keynotes with all the "Booms!" and "Just one more thing" parts despite not being much a Mac fan.

I'm sure we'll see more of him (I hope), just not at this particular show.

Possible reasons might be political:

After IDG announced a return of its East coast Macworld Expo to Boston from New York, Apple promptly canceled its own presence at the relocated event and refused to return even when IDG reversed its decision and moved the event back. The magazine publisher continued on with the New York gathering for 2004 and 2005 but was ultimately forced to shut it down as attendance dwindled and exhibitors rapidly backed out.

http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/08/12...bs_keynote.html

why is everyone thinking that Steve Jobs won't present any more keynotes EVER?

the press release says that Apple won't be in Macworld anymore and that Steve Jobs will not do this next keynote. not that he won't do any other keynotes :s

why is everyone thinking that Steve Jobs won't present any more keynotes EVER?

the press release says that Apple won't be in Macworld anymore and that Steve Jobs will not do this next keynote. not that he won't do any other keynotes :s

Trade shows are a dying breed, anyway.

The important events are WWDC and CES.

CNBC insider: Politics Not Pancreas the Reason for Jobs' Macworld Exit

I can tell you that sources inside the company tell me that Jobs' decision was more about politics than his pancreas. Sources tell me that if Jobs for some reason was unable to perform any of his responsibilities as CEO because of health reasons, which would include the Macworld keynote, I should "rest assured that the board would let me know."

Apple has been trying to separate itself from Macworld for some time, preferring instead to host its own "special events" a few times a year. There used to be Macworld New York, Boston, Tokyo and other expos around the world. But over the years they have been scaled back significantly as Apple has been able to appeal directly to its customers via the iTunes website and its 250 retail stores which host more than 3.5 million visitors every week.

The fact is, Apple hosting its own events gives the company complete and total control over its own message. More and more companies are leaving traditional trade shows in favor of enjoying the total spotlight at their own events. I've reported recently that some big names are either dramatically reducing, or exiting all together, the massive Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas next month.

http://www.cnbc.com/id/28265938

No one will be able to fill the shoes of Steve, definitely not Phil Schiller. But its becoming clear that Steve is slowly transitioning himself from being the key in the Apple keynote presentations, not good for Apple, but the company will move on :yes:

Microsoft moved on when Bill Gates left his full-time position, and I'm sure Apple can do the same when Steve Jobs leaves his full-time position.

Actually, once Steve leaves, maybe the MacBooks will have FireWire again.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
    • Cheers everyone for the replies. It's been very useful. 👍
    • Compared to the 7735HS it is around 25-30% slower in multi-threaded tasks (according to Google search) I did a review of the 7735HS Beelink SER6 Max in 2023, but thinking about it, it's not comparable to the 7730U. For the example you gave about how it will be used, the 7730U is actually an excellent choice for its power and battery efficiency.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      194
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      71
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!