Recommended Posts

No, like I already said. Windows it more popular because people don't even know Linux exists. They MIGHT know about Apple Macs, but most will just see them as the overpriced machines that beatniks buy. 99.9% of the average Joe out there only knows about Windows, so that's what he buys. You cannot compete against such market oversaturation, which is why many of the Linux desktop OS's are doing their best to look as much like Windows as possible. It's the ONLY way they're going to get more people using it.

Therefore, going back to the original point of this topic, it's pointless to try to retain the "classic" look and feel of Windows, as that's not what Microsoft want. They want ultra-sleek modern interfaces that are 90% eye candy, and eye candy is what Joe Public wants. What the minuscule percentage of enthusiast users want is totally irrelevant, so you might as well just get over it.

And they say Microsoft isn't an anti-competitive Monopoly...

So to paraphrase:

Resistance it Futile. Assimilate or die.

I'm glad you have no problem with Windows (Microsoft) having that much power over your life. The government should have split Microsoft into separate sub companies (like they did to AT&T years ago.)

Monopolies only hurt the consumer. :angry:

Oh, come on! Can Linux users launch and play MS Flight Simulator X? No? How about Crysis? Is the Gimp better than Adobe Photoshop? No, not even close. I could go on...

You can't blame Linux for that. You need to bring up that complaint with Microsoft, Adobe, and EA/Crytek.

And they say Microsoft isn't an anti-competitive Monopoly...

So to paraphrase:

Resistance it Futile. Assimilate or die.

I'm glad you have no problem with Windows (Microsoft) having that much power over your life. The government should have split Microsoft into separate sub companies (like they did to AT&T years ago.)

Monopolies only hurt the consumer. :angry:

They have no power over my life that I don't choose for them to have. I'm a realist, look at the reality of the situation. Windows IS the market leader, and there's zero chance any other OS has until all the software companies start to listen. Apple are overpriced, and the Linux world can't even agree with each other on distro's, leaving it nothing but a wealth of confusion which just puts people off. Windows is affordable, easy to use, and supported by everyone. You can't beat that.

Monopolies may hurt the consumer in some cases, but having TOO much choice hurts the consumer equally, as he ends up either not buying anything, or buying something that can't do what he wants. What would you tell Joe Bloggs if he wanted a desktop PC to surf the internet, do his email, and play World of Warcraft; and someone sold him a Debian box? He'd be screwed, wouldn't he?

You can't blame Linux for that. You need to bring up that complaint with Microsoft, Adobe, and EA/Crytek.

Yeah, but very often, when I say games don't work on Linux, people claim "but there is wine, there is cedega, every game in the world runs like a charm", which is simply not true. And yes, Microsoft is fully responsible for making Direct3D so easy to program for :)

The fact that Linux has a low market share is because popular applications people are used to, and computer games, usually do not work or require a lot of knowlegde to force them to run properly.

Also, I hate how fonts look on Linux distros. They're just ugly, even when you install Tahoma, it won't look like on Windows. And there's no ClearType :p

So, from a typiucal user's standpoint, Linux has nothing to offer for me. Sure, it's free, but I have to learn to live without software I use...

What would you tell Joe Bloggs if he wanted a desktop PC to surf the internet, do his email, and play World of Warcraft; and someone sold him a Debian box? He'd be screwed, wouldn't he?

No, he wouldn't actually. Debian runs Firefox (Ice Weasel), has an email client and Runs WoW in Wine just fine actually. In fact, that's what my laptop does right now. There unfortunately was a bit of tweaking to do to get WoW running, but that was the only tweaking needed and it works awesomely for internet, email and games.

Now, what do I do to get Blizzard to support Linux better? Post on the support forum? (That only brings folks like those in this thread that complain about Linux market share and other nonsense...) Nope. I wrote them a letter. To which I was replied. "We currently only support Windows and Mac." And that was it. So, how do you suggest people spread Linux? You get on a forum and people jump down your throat like above... or you send a letter to some company who could care less about the 1% (or 5% according to w3c) sales revenue.

I'm open for suggestions on what you think would be a better way. It's a chicken and egg scenario and there's a lot of people out there with your viewpoint that change will/should(?) never happen. (However, you are willing to accept change from Microsoft on the interface...)

ClearType and Anti-Aliasing is not the same thing, at least it looks totally different. I think ClearType is using subpixels to smooth the edges and its patented, or something. Even Macs use a different method for font smoothing (grayscale antialiasing?), which also looks much, much better than what Linux (I use Ubuntu sometimes) offers.

Fonts in Linux really don't look too attractive - sure, they're readable, but I just got used to fonts looking pretty ;) But that's not all - even if a website used exactly the same font in both OSs, there will be different spacing between letters on Linux and Windows, causing word wrapping in different places and may cause websites to break their layout.

ClearType and Anti-Aliasing is not the same thing, at least it looks totally different. I think ClearType is using subpixels to smooth the edges and its patented, or something. Even Macs use a different method for font smoothing (grayscale antialiasing?), which also looks much, much better than what Linux (I use Ubuntu sometimes) offers.

Fonts in Linux really don't look too attractive - sure, they're readable, but I just got used to fonts looking pretty ;) But that's not all - even if a website used exactly the same font in both OSs, there will be different spacing between letters on Linux and Windows, causing word wrapping in different places and may cause websites to break their layout.

FYI: http://www.killertechtips.com/2008/04/10/h...n-ubuntu-linux/

^ Subpixel font smoothing under Ubuntu.

No, he wouldn't actually. Debian runs Firefox (Ice Weasel), has an email client and Runs WoW in Wine just fine actually. In fact, that's what my laptop does right now. There unfortunately was a bit of tweaking to do to get WoW running, but that was the only tweaking needed and it works awesomely for internet, email and games.

And who's going to configure Wine for Mr Joe Public, hmm? Remember, he doesn't know a thing about computers, and has bugger all chance of doing that himself.

I'm open for suggestions on what you think would be a better way. It's a chicken and egg scenario and there's a lot of people out there with your viewpoint that change will/should(?) never happen. (However, you are willing to accept change from Microsoft on the interface...)

There IS no better way.. Linux is great for server stuff, and fine for "geeks", but mainstream? Forget it. It's NEVER going to happen, so Linux should stop trying and play to their strengths instead, like keeping the internet running. ;)

And who's going to configure Wine for Mr Joe Public, hmm? Remember, he doesn't know a thing about computers, and has bugger all chance of doing that himself.

There IS no better way.. Linux is great for server stuff, and fine for "geeks", but mainstream? Forget it. It's NEVER going to happen, so Linux should stop trying and play to their strengths instead, like keeping the internet running. ;)

Really?

Check this out:

http://www.acer.com/aspireone/

http://www.linuxhaxor.net/2008/09/15/linpu...ux-lite-review/

THAT is also Linux. And it's one of its strengths. No bloat, no risk, no configuration needed. Just beautiful simplicity for everyday use.

THAT is also Linux. And it's one of its strengths. No bloat, no risk, no configuration needed. Just beautiful simplicity for everyday use.

He's playing the game/application card. The Linux desktop itself can be very stable, simple, and fast (relatively easily) but through ugly/shady/immoral deals with OEMs, schools, and other organizations MS has made Windows a pervasive piece of software. On top of that, they've taken that power and abused it to create "lock-in" software APIs like DirectX instead of sticking with and expanding/improving the technologies that spawned those (OpenGL.) If they can get people to develop for Windows only by abusing their market share, they maintain their dominance. If people could run the same games and software on Linux/Mac (technically, and legally [sometimes]) then Microsoft would have to start working to keep their customers instead of changing all the interfaces around every 2 years at their whim.

Wine is VERY close to having a 100% complete (if not already) Win32 API to be able to run all those windows apps flawlessly. DirectX is coming along, but it's still a bit behind. MS is trying their hardest to get away from Win32 now more than ever to counteract that. (For better or worse) And they are trying to keep the libraries a changing goal as well.

And BTW, AT&T is NOTHING like they were before in the powerhouse industries. I would even argue that Verizon/Sprint/et al. and the cell phone revolution would not exist today had AT&T been allowed to reign. You would probably be paying more for slower internet as well.

Really?

Check this out:

http://www.acer.com/aspireone/

http://www.linuxhaxor.net/2008/09/15/linpu...ux-lite-review/

THAT is also Linux. And it's one of its strengths. No bloat, no risk, no configuration needed. Just beautiful simplicity for everyday use.

I'm well aware of Linux's success on the Netbooks. I'm also aware of the steps Microsoft are starting to take to counter their current dominance on that side of things. Once Windows 7 is released, how long do you think the Netbooks will continue to run on Linux?

Please note, I'm not AGREEING this is a good thing, it's not; but it IS inevitable.

So why not just keep a command prompt open?

Using command prompt is not the same. In command prompt, you can't just type "sol", press enter, and Solitaire will open.

Surely you know this!?

Because it works. Simple as that. It lets me customize what programs show up, where they are located, and how far down they are. I can place all my common programs on it, or bury them 14 links down if I want. It may not work for you, but it works for me. The first thing I turn off on my machines is indexing, personalization, and all that garbage because I KNOW where I put my files. Yes, the Regular Joe may not, but why alienate power users by taking away options?

The newer 'start' menu also lets you customise which programs show up (using small or large icons as well - more choice than the old 'start' menu!). You are able to place them in a certain location in the list (as with the old 'start' menu) and put them how high you want them (as with the old 'start' menu). You can place all your common programs or put them 14 links down (yes, with small icons on, you are able to have 14 or more links).

How is this alienating power users? It's even adding features (allowing you to display large or small icons). It even makes the tasks you describe quicker as you don't have to click 'All Programs' to access your common programs, like you did with the 'start' menu!

Surely you know all this!?

Just to let you know, my tone in this post is on purpose. You debating with other users trying to say they are wrong when you are actually wrong and you are ignoring the features of a very well designed operating system to try and promote the one you favour.

Edited by cJr.
Whoa now... People don't necessarily WANT windows. They GET windows. They have no choice in most cases. They buy a computer and it comes with a license. I dare you to go to Dell's home page and configure a computer with something other than Windows. Yes, you can get a Dell with Linux, but you have to find a small link on the side of the page or go through hoops. How many Linux Desktops can you buy at Best Buy or Circuit City? You think my parents tried Linux and decided it wasn't for them? No. They had never heard of it... because it wasn't installed with their computer. It has nothing to do with like or dislike. That's what they get. "Regular" people don't know any better. Period. To claim it's more popular because people buy more copies is naive and ignorant.

Because it works. Simple as that. It lets me customize what programs show up, where they are located, and how far down they are. I can place all my common programs on it, or bury them 14 links down if I want. It may not work for you, but it works for me. The first thing I turn off on my machines is indexing, personalization, and all that garbage because I KNOW where I put my files. Yes, the Regular Joe may not, but why alienate power users by taking away options?

Here's a case in point: I dual-boot between Vista (with the Classic Menu) and Windows 7 (with the different menu). Both are 64-bit. Both support all my hardware. Both support all my applications. Then why is it (when it comes to day-to-day usage) that I'm in Windows 7 most of the time, when I took the extra steps to set up the Classic Start Menu in Vista (where it isn't the default)? It's not a pre-built; I installed the motherboard/drives/CPU/OS/etc. myself. Yet here YOU are accusing most users of being *sheep*. To quote you:

"It has nothing to do with like or dislike. That's what they get. "Regular" people don't know any better. Period. To claim it's more popular because people buy more copies is naive and ignorant."

Have you taken a hard look at the default layouts for GNOME and KDE? Both look an awful lot like one or the other of Vista's menu options (KDE 4.1, in fact, looks a lot like the default two-panel Start Menu, which is the default in XP, Vista, and now 7, while GNOME, the default in most Linux distributions, and the default in the largest free UNIX distributions, OpenSolaris, defaults to a single-pane version of the same sort of desktop). Why is that the case? Why would a UNIX (and especially OpenSolaris) want to clone Windows?

I'll tell you why. Because, as much as they hate to admit it, the Windows Way *works*. Windows is moving away from the PC formfactor where it began and into places that you would have never even thought about seeing a GUI (mainframes, for example). How it got there is utterly irrelevant; it's there, and Linux and UNIX must face the competition.

Familiarity breeds a lot more than comtempt - it breeds *pervasiveness*.

Taking away options from power users? Pfaw.

The classic startmenu is a 14-year old legacy that has finally met it's end in Win7. (Good riddance.) It's a poor and messy way to access your programs.

To most generic PC-users the classic startmenu has been dead since XP wrested the majority away from 98SE.

hmmm... I'm not running the beta so I don't know what the fuss is about, but I tend to be a mouser too, and dislike having to type in stuff to navigate, especially when I'm laying here in bed like I am now, or when I have my HTPC outputting to the HDTV and I just have a mouse on my lap to navigate. I hope they haven't messed with the ability to use mostly the mouse if the user wants. I don't use linux, because I detest the idea of the terminal. last thing I want is windows to go that direction... though as long as windows allows the ability to place program icons on the taskbar, and on the desktop, I don't see this ever becoming an issue.

Bottom line.. I'll adapt. I'm not all that picky.

Edited by stockwiz
Have you taken a hard look at the default layouts for GNOME and KDE? Both look an awful lot like one or the other of Vista's menu options

Uh, yes, I run Gnome.. (right now actually... in Debian Experimental [read: newest stuff]) and my Gnome menus which rest in the upper left hand of the screen (kind of like the file menus) are separated into three drop downs. Applications... where my application are. Places... where links to things like shares, recent docs, OS bookmarks (bookmark your favorite folders), and search. And system... where you configure stuff, shut down, log out, etc. It's NOTHING like Vista. It's more like if Win2k had three start menus named Applications, Places, and System.

SUSE Enterprise Desktop (AKA Novell, AKA Microsoft) however put in a custom menu to make it look kind of like Vista. I removed it the day I got my laptop and installed Debian. This is not the default Gnome tray. I think Fedora has something like this as well called bigbar or something.

If I were migrating a windows user, I might put them in KDE first because it could be customized a bit more easily to look like Windows. You know what though? That's the freaking beauty of Linux! If you want it to look like Windows, go for it. If Windows had multiple Window managers it might be the same way and people could have a choice. (That would be awesome...btw) If I remember right, Microsoft shut down the last company that tried to make an shell replacement though.

Gnome is nice and simple. That's the design philosophy behind it. You don't get as many twinkly sparkle windows as you get in KDE, but it's layout is smart and intuitive. Nothing is buried too far for experimentation failure and it's not cluttered like the default Windows installations with widgets and crap all over the screen.

Default Gnome looks a little like this: http://www.udel.edu/topics/os/unix/sunray/...-desktop-sm.jpg

There is however the option to make Gnome look like XP/Vista but you have to install a few themes to do it: http://blog.mypapit.net/wp-content/uploads...7/07/gnome2.jpg

Taking away options from power users? Pfaw.

The classic startmenu is a 14-year old legacy that has finally met it's end in Win7. (Good riddance.) It's a poor and messy way to access your programs.

To most generic PC-users the classic startmenu has been dead since XP wrested the majority away from 98SE.

I agree, not to mention that it's usually the same so-called "power users" who are always complaining that Microsoft hangs on to legacy designs and devices and has yet to really rebuild Windows.

Frankly, you ever notice how it's these so-called "power users" who always seem to have the most problems with Windows?

ClearType and Anti-Aliasing is not the same thing, at least it looks totally different. I think ClearType is using subpixels to smooth the edges and its patented, or something. Even Macs use a different method for font smoothing (grayscale antialiasing?), which also looks much, much better than what Linux (I use Ubuntu sometimes) offers.

Fonts in Linux really don't look too attractive - sure, they're readable, but I just got used to fonts looking pretty ;) But that's not all - even if a website used exactly the same font in both OSs, there will be different spacing between letters on Linux and Windows, causing word wrapping in different places and may cause websites to break their layout.

Correct. Anti-aliasing is a rendering technique, and Microsoft's ClearType is their proprietary method of rendering anti-aliasing on text. Apple actually uses Quartz Extreme, which is a PDF-based technology.

As for Linux, I find that it depends on the window manager. For example, GNOME never seems to produce nice anti-aliased text, whereas XFCE does. I imagine that in Linux, there is likely more settings that have to be tweaked to achieve lovely anti-aliased text than in Windows or Mac OS X, where anti-aliasing is generally "always on."

Bottom line.. I'll adapt. I'm not all that picky.

I've been enabling the classic start menu since 2001 and while I'll miss it, you said it best, I'll live. My classic start menu is always kept tidy. Shortcuts are moved to appropriate categories (Entertainment, Internet, Office, Games, etc.). "Use personalized menus" is turned off and "show small icons" is turned on.

I can't believe the elitist attitude some of the people in this thread are displaying. Just because someone does something differently than you doesn't make them wrong and certainly doesn't make them less productive.

Changes?? Every body love changes, for better! Change to horse is better keep quiet!

I have been work with windows since Win 3.11, 1993; the best Menu was Windows XP!

The Master is definitively retired? we can feel it! Come back Bill Gates we forgive you!!!!

... Any way, Windows 7 is better than Windows Vista!!! Return to Menu windows XP and windows 7

can be the best! Sorry... ups?!

why are people still stuck on the classic menu? it's not intuitive and it looks ugly. The Vista/7 start menus are very intuitive, and easy to use, etc..... Do you guys just not like having it easy or what? :p

Because the superbar/new start menu is an awkward mess. :) It's not "easy" to me at all. You can't look and see what documents are open just by glancing at the taskbar anymore, you have to move and click the mouse more. (I'm tracking this with a mouse monitor. Windows 7 greatly increases mouse travel and clicks for me.)

Because the superbar/new start menu is an awkward mess. :) It's not "easy" to me at all. You can't look and see what documents are open just by glancing at the taskbar anymore, you have to move and click the mouse more. (I'm tracking this with a mouse monitor. Windows 7 greatly increases mouse travel and clicks for me.)

Change it so that it shows text as well instead of just icons.

They need to get rid of classic anything on 7. Period. The start menu is gone... and the classic theme looks hideous in 7.

I agree. A lot of problems come about because of sticking onto old features. It's nice that MS doesn't ditch old users, but at the same time, it's good to move on. Vista felt very much like a hybrid. Windows 7 feels very polished, they've cleaned off the crap of Vista, tuned it up and left us with the good.

Techies should be able to learn that pressing Winkey and the typing in the executable file name does the exact same thing without the +R

That has a weird effect. Minimises all the screens. Also, typing notepad brings up OneNote's SideNote for me instead of Notepad. Not that I particularly mind, but it doesn't work exactly the way you'd expect, infact, it works really bizarrely.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • On the topic of being locked out of a service. Recently two different friends of mine got locked out of their Google accounts. Both were hack attempts and one of them is waiting 30 days before he can get back in. He had backup codes and MFA but not a passkey. It was a browser token hack. Anyhow he has to wait 30 days for the dispute or whatever to end. The other person only had a password and is screwed losing all of the email, docs and years of photos. Google won’t help her at all. Her fault because she had no backup/recovery setup. Enable passkeys if possible. Also do NOT use browser based password managers. If using a cloud service make sure it is one you can fully sync to one of your devices so you can back it up. Like a PC or Mac with some backup drive plugged into it. Google is the worst to use IMHO. You can’t sync your photos at all. You have to use the “Take Out” service which is manual and takes days. That service strips the meta data from your photos. Also Google Docs synced to a device are useless without a Google accounts. MS Office/Libre Office is not going to open a link to a Google doc to a dead account.
    • Why you need to take back control of your synced passwords and how to go about doing that by Paul Hill Credit: Pixabay Last month, when Google decided to introduce daily and weekly caps for Gemini, it reignited an anxiety of mine, that you can’t really depend on service providers to maintain features forever, and it got me looking into free software (as in freedom) in other areas too. One app I quickly came across was KeePassXC on desktop and KeePassDX on Android as an alternative to password manager lock-in within the Chrome or Firefox ecosystems. I personally like to switch around with browsers, and using either password manager is inconvenient, so something like KeePassXC was interesting to me. The main issue with it now is syncing; I was not sure how to do that. After a bit of research, I came across Syncthing, a tool I was vaguely familiar with but had never used because it seemed complicated. However, I was completely wrong, and honestly, I think everyone should use it if they use multiple devices. It essentially lets you share folders peer to peer across all of your devices, no cloud services that you don’t control necessary! And it was fairly simple to set up, if not a bit clunky. Since setting it up, I’ve also started using Syncthing to back up other apps too, so don’t think it’s limited to just saving password databases. You can use it for pretty much anything you use Dropbox or Google Drive for. Before continuing to talk about those apps a bit more, let’s walk back a bit and talk about browser sync. Ever since the late 2000s and early 2010s, really, since we have been using smartphones, browser sync has been a necessity of life. I don’t know about you, but I have hundreds of passwords saved. For the most part, they’re all unique, so I don’t remember them and rely on software to manage them for me. Until recently, I’ve relied on password managers in Chrome and Firefox, but what I always found annoying was that it can be hard to transfer them between browsers. Sure, on Windows it is simple enough, but on Linux, exporting bookmarks has been temperamental. It works OK nowadays, but not too long ago, Chrome required you to enable exporting passwords in chrome://flags. The situation is even worse on mobile; there is no exporting or importing of passwords of any kind. You literally have to do it on a desktop, which is incredibly annoying in our mobile-first world. Sync also lets us take out bookmarks, history, tabs, and autofill data easily. To enable sync, it’s just a matter of signing into the browser once, and it handles the rest. It’s nice and easy. Obviously, all this has some issues, including those I’ve outlined above about it being hard to transfer data between browsers, but also things such as account suspension, lost account passwords, and other lock-in mechanisms, such as passkeys, being tied to a specific browser. On a sidenote, I have just removed all of my passkeys because they can make it harder to move browsers. I think the biggest threat to your synced passwords, especially if doing this with Google, is having your account suspended. I don’t ever expect mine to be suspended, but you do hear horror stories on Reddit where people lose access to their Google accounts. Imagine if you have hundreds of passwords, then suddenly lose access to them because Google froze your account, what would you do? So yes, it can be nice to use these syncing services for their convenience, but they also have risks. You may have seen me going on about free software quite a bit in my editorials. It’s essentially a concept championed by the Free Software Foundation. It’s software under particular licenses that grant you four freedoms: run the program for any purpose (0), study and change the source code (1), redistribute copies to others (2), and the freedom to distribute modified copies to others (3). For example, if there is an app I use and one day it gets abandoned by the developer, I can keep running it or even clone the software and continue developing it. Look at the myriad of cool services Google has run over the years before killing them. You can’t take the source code for those because they are proprietary, for the most part. Both KeePassXC and Syncthing are free software, so I get the freedoms listed above. In my use case where I’m syncing a database full of my passwords, I also get proper ownership over my data, there is no losing access to the database due to a frozen account, I can access the code of the tools I’m using, and I can get support from real people online if I run into issues, rather than having to consult a vague help page from an opaque company. With the KeePassXC password manager, you create a .kdbx file, which is what will be synced between devices. KeePassXC has cross-platform apps and also has browser extensions so that the browser can fetch passwords from the database once it is unlocked. Meanwhile, Syncthing is a peer-to-peer file sync tool where you can select folders to sync between your devices. Just pop files in the folders you choose, and then they will be available across your other devices whenever they come online. Syncthing is resilient as it works over both LAN and the internet and only ever sends content between your devices, never to a third-party server somewhere else. By combining these two pieces of software, you can essentially replicate the browser sync functionality. I have had a weird, conflicting issue where a new file is appearing, but it doesn’t seem to be impacting my main password database, which is updating between devices just fine. If you want to get a setup similar to what I have, you will need to go here to download KeePassXC for your computer. Once you have that, you will need to download your passwords from your web browser to a CSV file. In Chrome, you can type chrome://password-manager/settings into the URL bar, and you should see an option to download your passwords under Export Passwords. This will give you the CSV file you need for importing into KeePassXC. If you use a different browser, just use a search engine and type “browser-name export passwords” and muddle along. In KeePassXC, you’ll want to press Import File from the home screen, select the CSV file, and create a new database from it. On one of the screens of the wizard, there will be a Title field with a drop-down selected to none. Change this to Title and continue. You’ll select a name for the database, the encryption level (the defaults are fine), and then you will pick a password. I would choose four unrelated words that are easy for you to remember, as you’ll be typing them fairly often to access your passwords. When you have all your passwords in your new database, you will want to set up the browser extension so that your browser can fetch passwords from KeePassXC. Rather than explain how to do that here, refer to KeePassXC’s guide on how to set it up properly. Once you’ve got that set up, you want to install KeePassDX on Android. You can grab it on the F-Droid store and the Google Play Store. For iPhone users, there are other .kdbx-supporting apps, but I haven’t tried any of them, so have a look around and use what suits you. Once you have that done, you will want to install Syncthing on your computer and find a third-party app for your mobile device. On Android, I use an app called BasicSync; there are also options for iOS, but again, I’ve not tried these. Once you’ve got SyncThing, you’ll want to set it up and connect all of your devices together and share a folder between your gadgets. PCWorld has a good tutorial on setting up a synchronized file between your devices using SyncThing. Once you’ve set it up, congrats, you’ll never have to touch that stuff again except for adding or removing devices. I’ll be honest, I didn’t particularly like setting up Syncthing. It didn’t take me a massive amount of time, but I think I had to check online because I found it a bit confusing. That said, I’ve had it running for several weeks now and never need to touch the Syncthing settings, so that’s very nice. I also mentioned a conflicting file. I’m not sure why this is appearing, but the main .kdbx file seems to be updating and syncing just fine. What’s nice is that both KeePassXC and Syncthing are free software, so they won’t just vanish one day; you can take the code and fork the project or use a range of alternative implementations that others have made. It’s also nice that it works over LAN, so even if your ISP is having problems, your passwords will still sync. One area where you will want to be a bit more careful with this setup is if you only have one device. I am OK because I have a computer and two phones, all synced up. If you just have one device, you will probably want to store a backup of your .kdbx file somewhere else. Obviously, you’ll also want to remember your password really well, too. If you get locked out, it's game over. Overall, if you want to take back control of your computing from big tech, taking control of your passwords is an important part of this. You don’t need to immediately clear out your browser’s password manager; try running KeePassXC and the password manager concurrently for a while to see if you run into any problems. If you do try this out, let us know some other creative ways to use Syncthing. I haven’t really come up with a solution about what to do with my bookmarks, for example.
    • If the price was a dollar, someone would complain "Why isn't it free?" If it was free, someone would complain they weren't being paid to play it.
    • That lens of history will burn if you hold it at the right angle... Warn users too late: Shame, Microsoft! That extremely minor update to an obscure Control Panel widget required 2 years of warning. Warn users too early: Shame, Microsoft! We've got better things to do. Pipeline and process be damned, we'll just always be disappointed, eh?
    • Microsoft Paint used to be my favorite Windows app as a kid, and it's still pretty good by Usama Jawad I have been using Windows since the early 2000s, when I was around 10 years old or so. I vaguely remember playing around with Windows 98 and Windows 2000, but that may have been on school PCs which had old operating systems installed. My main OS on the home PC, and the one I recall spending most time with, was Windows XP. At that time, I used the home PC to create Word and PowerPoint documents for school, but a lot of the time, I simply used it to play games. My dad would bring game discs which we would try and install on the PC, sometimes unsuccessfully, and sometimes, we would rely on flash games in the browser, like Bubble Trouble on Miniclip. However, the problem with the latter approach was the internet speed. On a good day, our dial-up internet would offer us speeds of 56 kbps, but on most days, it was closer to 33 kbps. This did not facilitate online gaming as I would often have to wait minutes for a game to load or "draw" on the screen, and trying to download pirated games wasn't simple either. I remember getting tired of waiting for online games to load and just downloading simulator games from the Big Fish Games website instead, only to be disappointed after finding out that I was just being given access to trial versions of the title, and I needed to fork out money to pay for the full version. All of this is to say that it wasn't very easy to find entertainment options on the home PC when I was a kid, due to a number of reasons, mostly outside of my control. This situation pushed me towards a rather unconventional ally: Microsoft Paint. Whenever the internet wasn't working as good as I expected, I would simply spin up Paint and draw complete rubbish on the canvas. Of course, that wasn't always the intention, but it usually happened when I messed up drawing a straight line or something, and then I would give up on that particular piece and simply draw a random collection of objects. Microsoft Paint was extremely accessible and easy to use. Even if you weren't an artist, you could quickly understand the tools at your disposal and how to leverage them on a canvas. The absolute breadth on offer ensured that each painting was truly unique, as you could utilize various combinations of tools like the pencil, paint, spray paint, and more to truly personalize your creation. Since I wasn't particularly good at drawing both on digital screen or a physical screen, I remember that my main style of art would be to insert a bunch of randomly intersecting lines and then fill them with random colors through the paint can. I have trying to replicate that art style in the latest version of Paint below, and as you can see, it's truly Pablo Picasso-esque. The human imagination truly knows no bounds Microsoft Paint kept me occupied for hours and was my best friend when video games on the home PC were inaccessible for one reason or the other. There was no academic or professional reason for which I would need to use Paint, but I still loved using it in my personal time, even if what I created wasn't worth being shown to anyone. It was simply fun. Fast-forward to today, and the situation is mostly the same. Now that I am almost 29 years old, and I still have no reason to use Microsoft Paint in a professional capacity. In fact, I don't even use it in a personal capacity, except to dabble with it from time to time, just to see if core functionalities are still intact. And I'm happy to say that I think Microsoft Paint still offers the same accessibility and inviting experience that it did to me a couple of decades ago, even though its UX has been refreshed and it's been integrated with Copilot features. Interestingly, things could have been a lot different, had Microsoft had its way. Microsoft Paint was marked for deprecation with the Windows 10 Fall Creators Update in 2017, and even began displaying a product retirement alert, urging customers to shift to Paint 3D instead. Fortunately, after consumer backlash, Microsoft reversed course on this decision, and Paint continues to be a native app inside Windows installations that can also be updated quite frequently through the Microsoft Store. Instead, Paint 3D ended up on the chopping block, which is for the better, I think. I have intermittently played around with Microsoft's refreshed Paint experience in the past few years, and I do think it has received worthwhile upgrades. the UI and the UX has been modernized while retaining core functionality, and the app is still fairly easy to use. It doesn't meet any of my use-cases, but I've never really had any use-cases ever, as described previously. Of course, the elephant in the room is the Copilot integration. Personally, I believe that this is one place where Copilot does make sense, environmental concerns aside. I know that a lot of creatives use AI to generate images, and while some may be using professional alternatives, Paint still offers a decent casual experience, with the power of Copilot. Of course, you do need to have a valid Microsoft 365 Copilot license and available credits to use it, but even if you don't, you still get the big Copilot button in the toolbar, unfortunately. All in all, I am glad that Microsoft Paint continues to be a native feature in Windows 11, and a piece of software that has evolved to meet modern needs without cutting off its own roots. It's just an iconic piece of Windows history that was an essential part of my childhood, and while I don't use it anymore, I'm just glad it is still there.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      514
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      88
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!