Recommended Posts

The classic start menu is present in Windows 7. To get to it, though, you have to enter Safe Mode.

Why is the classic start menu in Safe Mode but not in "normal mode"? I have no idea. I really don't know.

Because it's not meant to be used by the average end user on an everyday basis, that's why. Safe Mode is just that... safe. It loads only the bare minimum needed to run Windows: Windows Classic, classic Start menu, likely no indexing, etc.

They should definitely have it as an option in the RTM build. Why does it matter if only a certain percentage use it? Obviously they don't have to do much work if it's already in safe mode. It could be a "hidden" option in the Control Panel so as not to make new users confused when they see it, if that even matters. But I know a lot of people who love the classic start menu because of its simplicity.

They should definitely have it as an option in the RTM build. Why does it matter if only a certain percentage use it? Obviously they don't have to do much work if it's already in safe mode. It could be a "hidden" option in the Control Panel so as not to make new users confused when they see it, if that even matters. But I know a lot of people who love the classic start menu because of its simplicity.

I still don't understand how the classic start menu is really any simpler. It seems more complicated to have to scan over, and hover around a list of folders to get to the app one wants all the time, instead of just having pinned there for me whenever one needs it.

  • 4 weeks later...
I still don't understand how the classic start menu is really any simpler. It seems more complicated to have to scan over, and hover around a list of folders to get to the app one wants all the time, instead of just having pinned there for me whenever one needs it.

If you're managing over 200 installed apps like I am on my development machine, and you have always taken the care to sort them into hierarchical groups... then you'd understand why being forced to use the new start menu format is a big problem.

If you're managing over 200 installed apps like I am on my development machine, and you have always taken the care to sort them into hierarchical groups... then you'd understand why being forced to use the new start menu format is a big problem.

What I was trying to point out was that, at a certain point where there are a lot of applications, it's just unwieldy to even try to navigate the start menu, and shortcuts should probably just be pinned somewhere.

I found it annoying to navigate the new start menu even when I only had to scroll down once, at which point I just started pinning the shortcuts to the desktop and start menu.

I can see where a lot of applications can start to become difficult, since even with small icons, the new start menu can only pin so many shortcuts.

Just more change for change sake, by arrogant people who didn't learn a damn thing from the Vista fiasco and still think that their way is the only way.

Onward towards the future. AWAY from the antiquated past.

Just more change for change sake, by arrogant people who didn't learn a damn thing from the Vista fiasco and still think that their way is the only way.

Well put... this is like signature quote worthy...

But, I do like the start menu instant search run feature. I use it to search forrun things.

The few things that I personally dislike are,

- Search GUI and Options

- Fat GUI Borders

- Horribly ugly look without glass effect - seriously did they fire the guy who made Royale? (I wish there was Royale for 7...)

- Start -> All Programs being in this little box, not ergonomic (if that the right word to use)

- Without recent documents, menu looks like a lot of waster space... I do not get why start menu would not just compress itself.

- I have not found out how to make the quick launch icons STAY next to the start button.

- I have found no ability to make start search into start run. (once again search results in a tiny box are not cool)

- remove zoom-in / zoom-out effect from 3D TAB thing (whatever it is called)

Tiny list? You can make it as large as you want:

11973773.jpg

That is pretty damn ugly.

  • 1 month later...

Well most people maybe like the classic menu because have lots of programs and don't record the name of all programs and can be more familiar with the icon of the progam. Then typing the name of the program is a no go. If there would be a possibility to auto-show All programs when open the start menu would be very nice.

Well most people maybe like the classic menu because have lots of programs and don't record the name of all programs and can be more familiar with the icon of the progam. Then typing the name of the program is a no go. If there would be a possibility to auto-show All programs when open the start menu would be very nice.

Even if they can't remember the name of the program, the newer start menu is still much better. I no longer lose my position and have to start over when navigating through the menus like I used to when using the old cascading menus.

Even if they can't remember the name of the program, the newer start menu is still much better. I no longer lose my position and have to start over when navigating through the menus like I used to when using the old cascading menus.

well something that I must agree is that the Start menu is much more elegant than vista :)

The whole idea behind windows is for a user experience, I for one can say that removing the classic start menu doesn't make it user friendly for my needs.

As said before those who use classic start and have their programs setup into folders so they know were things are this just doesn't make sense in 7.

Agreed if the programs always displayed in the new start menu under my folders at all times I may see things as a step in the right direction but as for now I cannot

and will not use 7 based on the start menu.

Big mistake for sales on Microsofts part seeing that my company with over 90 000 users world wide use classic start menu on about 60% of the machines.

if they just keep all of these options in it leaves unnecessary code and features in the codebase of Windows.

They have more legacy code in Windows to worry about than classic mode. If they can keep compatability in there for 15+ year old programs, they could have left classic mode alone.

They have more legacy code in Windows to worry about than classic mode. If they can keep compatability in there for 15+ year old programs, they could have left classic mode alone.

Agreed.. I am all for stability and speed.. And I prefer the classic start menu as well.. :) Old fashioned I guess. :) I like basic navigation for my start menu be it Linux or Windows.. The new one is too fancy for my needs and I will have to get use to it, unless a reg hack or a program from StarDock comes out for it.. :) heh

  • 2 weeks later...

I hope in the next release they will add more bling bling to it. Some strong nice blue LED's like - in every corner ..and maybe some shiny gold plate on desktop or on the orb. Lot's of GOLD .

And I hope they won't let you customize it and remove the gold. Anyone don't like this - the hell with them. We have to embrace the bright (golden) future. And stop living in the past.

Also some new ideas I had recently -offtopic - they should change the taste of beer and other food every few years. Don't you get bored with the food having the same taste ? Who would want themselves stack in the past ? Today yogurt could taste like yogurt - next year - could taste like a mushroom !!! Great ! Always something new to keep us excited.

Also - do you know that tons of CG artists in Hollywood - the ones making your favorite movies with dinosaurs and other special effects use new software with very old outdated UI. You don't believe they can't learn a few buttons or tricks in a new UI don't you ? - since they probably know more advanced software then anyone here.

They must be having a secret stupid reason for that.

I prefer the classic start menu as well since I organize my folders. Once organized I can find things much quicker and it just feels more logical to me then a constantly changing start menu. Also "personalized menus" were annoying as hell too, first thing I turned off in XP and Office. The Vista/Win7 start menu might be tolerable if for example when I disable "display recently opened programs" that I see the "All Programs" menu on first click. But what happens is I get a completely blank menu. So I still have to click twice to get to my programs, essentially slowing me down. Anyway since moving to Windows 7 form XP I just made more use of autohotkey to avoid the start menu as much as possible.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • As I've been usually saying lately - we all can thank "AI" for this.
    • Friday Windows 11 preview builds are here. Insiders in the Experimental (formerly Dev) and Beta Channel can download builds 26300.8697 and 26220.8690. My Windows11 device on the Preview Channel just got 26220.8728. My guess is this build is a nightly update from 26220.8690.
    • Traffic has a surprisingly unexpected impact on your surroundings by Sayan Sen Image by Radik 2707 via Pexels A collaborative study by researchers from several Israeli institutions found that everyday pollution from traffic and industrial activity measurably changed the atmospheric electric field over the Tel Aviv metropolitan area, providing new evidence of how human activity can influence the lower atmosphere. The research was led by Dr. Roy Yaniv of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem and the Gertner Institute at Sheba Medical Center, Dr. Assaf Hochman of the Fredy & Nadine Herrmann Institute of Earth Sciences at the Hebrew University, and Prof. Yoav Yair of Reichman University. The study also involved Itay Froomer, a student from Hadera High School and the Israeli Museum of Medicine and Science (Technoda), who carried out the work as part of the Ministry of Education's 5-unit physics research track. The researchers focused on the atmospheric electric field under fair-weather conditions. Even in the absence of storms, a weak electric field naturally exists between Earth's surface and the atmosphere. One of the main ways scientists measure this field is through the Potential Gradient (PG), which is the inverse of the vertical component of the electric field. PG is a key part of the global electric circuit, a planet-wide system of electrical currents maintained by thunderstorms and electrified clouds around the world. Scientists have long known that the atmospheric electric field can be influenced by factors ranging from large-scale atmospheric processes to local weather conditions such as dust, fog and clouds. Human-made pollution is also known to play a role, but understanding exactly how urban emissions affect the electric field close to the ground has remained an area of ongoing research. To investigate this relationship, the team analyzed measurements from a newly installed electric field mill, an instrument used to continuously monitor the strength of the atmospheric electric field. The instrument was installed at the Center for Technological Education (Roter House) in Holon and became operational in August 2024. It was funded by Israel's Ministry of Education and the Holon municipality. The electric field mill forms part of a broader monitoring network that includes nearby meteorological stations and air-quality monitoring sites. This allowed researchers to compare electric field measurements with detailed weather data and pollution records to better understand what was driving changes in the Potential Gradient. The study focused on two major urban pollutants: fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and nitrogen oxides (NOx), both commonly produced by vehicle traffic and industrial activity. PM2.5 refers to microscopic airborne particles small enough to remain suspended in the atmosphere for extended periods, while NOx is a group of gases released during fuel combustion. Researchers examined daily, weekly and seasonal patterns in the atmospheric electric field and compared them with changes in pollutant concentrations. Their analysis revealed a clear relationship between NOx levels and changes in the Potential Gradient, particularly during morning and evening rush hours when traffic emissions were at their highest. “What we observe is a direct physical link between emission peaks and electrical variability,” explained Dr. Roy Yaniv. “NOx reduces atmospheric conductivity very quickly, so the electric field responds almost instantaneously during traffic rush hours.” Atmospheric conductivity describes how easily electrical charges move through the air. According to the researchers, nitrogen oxides rapidly alter this conductivity, causing a near-immediate response in the electric field. PM2.5, however, was associated with a delayed response. The researchers attributed this difference to the particles' longer atmospheric residence time, meaning they remain in the atmosphere for longer periods, as well as their different microphysical interactions with surrounding air and atmospheric components. The study also identified a pronounced "weekend effect." In Israel, traffic volumes and some industrial activity decline significantly on Fridays and Saturdays. During these periods, concentrations of both NOx and PM2.5 dropped, and corresponding changes were observed in the atmospheric electric field. “The weekend signal demonstrates just how sensitive the electric field is to changes in human activity,” the researchers noted. “When emissions decline, the electrical environment adjusts at once, providing a high-resolution indicator of urban atmospheric conditions.” The findings showed that pollution levels can influence not only the chemical composition of the atmosphere but also its electrical properties. Researchers said the results strengthened the case for using atmospheric electricity as an additional tool for environmental monitoring, particularly in densely populated urban areas where anthropogenic, or human-caused, influences are most pronounced. The study also pointed to potential public health applications. By combining air-quality measurements with observations of atmospheric electricity, researchers said they could gain a more complete picture of how urban atmospheric conditions change over time. “Integrating air-quality data with electric-field measurements gives us a clearer picture of how the lower atmosphere evolves moment by moment,” the researchers added. “It’s a framework that can support both scientific insight and practical environmental decision-making.” Beyond the scientific findings, the project highlighted a collaboration between universities, public institutions and secondary education. Researchers said the work demonstrated how students could take part in real-world environmental research while contributing to studies of air quality, atmospheric processes and their potential effects on society. Source: Hebrew University, ScienceDirect This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing
    • We aren't even at the all-star game and Microsoft is talking about an update that will most likely be released during the World Series if not after. A lot can happen in the world between now and the 2026 World Series, including the 2026 FIFA Cup. Tell me about it again after the FIFA Cup is concluded. That should allow plenty of time to prepare for it.
    • Great, tell me when I have a "Bad Pool Caller" elsewhere not in Windoze.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      AMV earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      542
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      186
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      77
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      77
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!