Recommended Posts

The classic start menu is present in Windows 7. To get to it, though, you have to enter Safe Mode.

Why is the classic start menu in Safe Mode but not in "normal mode"? I have no idea. I really don't know.

Because it's not meant to be used by the average end user on an everyday basis, that's why. Safe Mode is just that... safe. It loads only the bare minimum needed to run Windows: Windows Classic, classic Start menu, likely no indexing, etc.

They should definitely have it as an option in the RTM build. Why does it matter if only a certain percentage use it? Obviously they don't have to do much work if it's already in safe mode. It could be a "hidden" option in the Control Panel so as not to make new users confused when they see it, if that even matters. But I know a lot of people who love the classic start menu because of its simplicity.

They should definitely have it as an option in the RTM build. Why does it matter if only a certain percentage use it? Obviously they don't have to do much work if it's already in safe mode. It could be a "hidden" option in the Control Panel so as not to make new users confused when they see it, if that even matters. But I know a lot of people who love the classic start menu because of its simplicity.

I still don't understand how the classic start menu is really any simpler. It seems more complicated to have to scan over, and hover around a list of folders to get to the app one wants all the time, instead of just having pinned there for me whenever one needs it.

  • 4 weeks later...
I still don't understand how the classic start menu is really any simpler. It seems more complicated to have to scan over, and hover around a list of folders to get to the app one wants all the time, instead of just having pinned there for me whenever one needs it.

If you're managing over 200 installed apps like I am on my development machine, and you have always taken the care to sort them into hierarchical groups... then you'd understand why being forced to use the new start menu format is a big problem.

If you're managing over 200 installed apps like I am on my development machine, and you have always taken the care to sort them into hierarchical groups... then you'd understand why being forced to use the new start menu format is a big problem.

What I was trying to point out was that, at a certain point where there are a lot of applications, it's just unwieldy to even try to navigate the start menu, and shortcuts should probably just be pinned somewhere.

I found it annoying to navigate the new start menu even when I only had to scroll down once, at which point I just started pinning the shortcuts to the desktop and start menu.

I can see where a lot of applications can start to become difficult, since even with small icons, the new start menu can only pin so many shortcuts.

Just more change for change sake, by arrogant people who didn't learn a damn thing from the Vista fiasco and still think that their way is the only way.

Onward towards the future. AWAY from the antiquated past.

Just more change for change sake, by arrogant people who didn't learn a damn thing from the Vista fiasco and still think that their way is the only way.

Well put... this is like signature quote worthy...

But, I do like the start menu instant search run feature. I use it to search forrun things.

The few things that I personally dislike are,

- Search GUI and Options

- Fat GUI Borders

- Horribly ugly look without glass effect - seriously did they fire the guy who made Royale? (I wish there was Royale for 7...)

- Start -> All Programs being in this little box, not ergonomic (if that the right word to use)

- Without recent documents, menu looks like a lot of waster space... I do not get why start menu would not just compress itself.

- I have not found out how to make the quick launch icons STAY next to the start button.

- I have found no ability to make start search into start run. (once again search results in a tiny box are not cool)

- remove zoom-in / zoom-out effect from 3D TAB thing (whatever it is called)

Tiny list? You can make it as large as you want:

11973773.jpg

That is pretty damn ugly.

  • 1 month later...

Well most people maybe like the classic menu because have lots of programs and don't record the name of all programs and can be more familiar with the icon of the progam. Then typing the name of the program is a no go. If there would be a possibility to auto-show All programs when open the start menu would be very nice.

Well most people maybe like the classic menu because have lots of programs and don't record the name of all programs and can be more familiar with the icon of the progam. Then typing the name of the program is a no go. If there would be a possibility to auto-show All programs when open the start menu would be very nice.

Even if they can't remember the name of the program, the newer start menu is still much better. I no longer lose my position and have to start over when navigating through the menus like I used to when using the old cascading menus.

Even if they can't remember the name of the program, the newer start menu is still much better. I no longer lose my position and have to start over when navigating through the menus like I used to when using the old cascading menus.

well something that I must agree is that the Start menu is much more elegant than vista :)

The whole idea behind windows is for a user experience, I for one can say that removing the classic start menu doesn't make it user friendly for my needs.

As said before those who use classic start and have their programs setup into folders so they know were things are this just doesn't make sense in 7.

Agreed if the programs always displayed in the new start menu under my folders at all times I may see things as a step in the right direction but as for now I cannot

and will not use 7 based on the start menu.

Big mistake for sales on Microsofts part seeing that my company with over 90 000 users world wide use classic start menu on about 60% of the machines.

if they just keep all of these options in it leaves unnecessary code and features in the codebase of Windows.

They have more legacy code in Windows to worry about than classic mode. If they can keep compatability in there for 15+ year old programs, they could have left classic mode alone.

They have more legacy code in Windows to worry about than classic mode. If they can keep compatability in there for 15+ year old programs, they could have left classic mode alone.

Agreed.. I am all for stability and speed.. And I prefer the classic start menu as well.. :) Old fashioned I guess. :) I like basic navigation for my start menu be it Linux or Windows.. The new one is too fancy for my needs and I will have to get use to it, unless a reg hack or a program from StarDock comes out for it.. :) heh

  • 2 weeks later...

I hope in the next release they will add more bling bling to it. Some strong nice blue LED's like - in every corner ..and maybe some shiny gold plate on desktop or on the orb. Lot's of GOLD .

And I hope they won't let you customize it and remove the gold. Anyone don't like this - the hell with them. We have to embrace the bright (golden) future. And stop living in the past.

Also some new ideas I had recently -offtopic - they should change the taste of beer and other food every few years. Don't you get bored with the food having the same taste ? Who would want themselves stack in the past ? Today yogurt could taste like yogurt - next year - could taste like a mushroom !!! Great ! Always something new to keep us excited.

Also - do you know that tons of CG artists in Hollywood - the ones making your favorite movies with dinosaurs and other special effects use new software with very old outdated UI. You don't believe they can't learn a few buttons or tricks in a new UI don't you ? - since they probably know more advanced software then anyone here.

They must be having a secret stupid reason for that.

I prefer the classic start menu as well since I organize my folders. Once organized I can find things much quicker and it just feels more logical to me then a constantly changing start menu. Also "personalized menus" were annoying as hell too, first thing I turned off in XP and Office. The Vista/Win7 start menu might be tolerable if for example when I disable "display recently opened programs" that I see the "All Programs" menu on first click. But what happens is I get a completely blank menu. So I still have to click twice to get to my programs, essentially slowing me down. Anyway since moving to Windows 7 form XP I just made more use of autohotkey to avoid the start menu as much as possible.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • "it opens up new doors for people who prefer using Edge, but cannot be bothered to configure a Microsoft account" You already have a Microsoft account if you are using Windows 11, because you can't set it up without one.
    • This is how much iPhone 18 Pro could cost after Apple's price hike confirmed by Hamid Ganji Image via Apple Apple CEO Tim Cook confirmed in a recent interview that the company may have to raise prices on some of its products due to the ongoing memory shortage. While he did not elaborate on the scale of the price hikes, new estimates suggest that Pro iPhone models could become significantly more expensive this fall. The Wall Street Journal and research firm TechInsights have come up with an educated estimate of how much the upcoming iPhone 18 Pro could cost after its launch in September. The estimate is based on current increases in memory and storage chip prices. For starters, the iPhone 18 Pro base model is expected to feature 12GB of RAM and 256GB of internal storage. According to TechInsights estimates, 12GB of DRAM for the iPhone 17 Pro cost Apple $39 last year. However, for the iPhone 18 Pro, the cost of the same amount of DRAM could soar to $145. Likewise, 256GB of flash storage that previously cost $13 could now cost around $51. Producing a base iPhone 17 Pro reportedly cost Apple around $582, but TechInsights estimates that the production cost of the iPhone 18 Pro could rise to $726. If Apple wants to maintain the roughly 47% profit margin it enjoys on the iPhone 17 Pro, the base price of the iPhone 18 Pro would need to reach $1,371. After standard pricing adjustments, customers could end up paying around $1,299 for the base model. However, that may not be the end of the story. As we previously reported, the iPhone 18 Pro is said to feature a variable-aperture lens, which could cost Apple at least 50% more than the current camera system. The estimated $1,299 price tag does not include the additional cost of this upgraded camera hardware. Once that expense is factored in, the base model could cost at least $1,399. A $1,399 price tag for the base iPhone 18 Pro would represent a significant increase over the current $1,099 starting price of the iPhone 17 Pro. If Apple wants to keep its upcoming iPhones competitive, it may need to accept lower profit margins.
    • Oh man, but what if I have the PS3 version?
    • Floorp 12.15.0 by Razvan Serea Floorp is a cutting-edge web browser that combines the trusted foundation of Mozilla's Firefox with a unique Japanese perspective, offering users an exceptional online experience. This open-source browser prioritizes privacy, customization, and security. Floorp is transparent, with no user tracking or data sharing, and it's completely open source. With a strict no-tracking policy and full transparency, your personal information remains private. As an open-source project, Floorp not only shares its source code but also its build environment, inviting users to contribute and build their unique versions. The regular updates, based on Firefox ESR, ensure that you always have the latest features and security enhancements. Floorp key features: Strong Tracking Protection: Floorp offers robust tracking protection, safeguarding users from malicious tracking and fingerprinting on the web. Flexible Layout: Customize Floorp's layout to your heart's content, including moving the tab bar, hiding the title bar, and more for a personalized browsing experience. Switchable Design: Choose from five distinct designs for the Floorp interface, and even switch between OS-specific designs for a unique look Regular Updates: Based on Firefox ESR, Floorp receives updates every four weeks, ensuring up-to-date security even before Firefox's releases. No User Tracking: Floorp prioritizes user privacy by abstaining from collecting personal information, tracking users, or selling user data, with no affiliations with advertising companies. Completely Open Source: The full source code for Floorp is open to the public, allowing transparency and enabling anyone to explore and build their own version. Dual Sidebar: Floorp features a versatile built-in sidebar for webpanels and browsing tools, making it perfect for multitasking and quick access to bookmarks, history, and websites. Flexible Toolbar & Tab Bar: Customize your browser with Tree Style Tabs, vertical tabs, and bookmark bar modifications, catering to both beginners and experts in customization. User-Centric Web Experience: Floorp prioritizes user privacy and collaboratively blocks harmful trackers. Floorp 12.15.0 changelog: Refine appearance of Start top sites and Hub sidebar by @CutterKnife in #2435 Improvement command pallete by @Walkmana-25 in #2429 Fix gesture command by @Walkmana-25 in #2425 Add Mac OS formatting for modifier keys in shortcut editor by @Walkmana-25 in #2424 refactor: bridge as little by @nyanrus in #2416 fix(pwa): follow Firefox 150 ShellService API changes (Bug 1985098) by @Ryosuke-Asano in #2409 feat(notes): Desktop向けThree-Way Merge Sync実装 by @Ryosuke-Asano in #2402 fix(pages-settings): resolve Invalid Hook Call error in SortableContext by @Ryosuke-Asano in #2350 README: fix signpath avatar url by @CutterKnife in #2453 Enhance command palette with new actions by @Walkmana-25 in #2449 feat(split-view): implement tab drop functionality with overlay and new window zone by @Ryosuke-Asano in #2445 fix: restore 'Hide Interface', 'Toggle Navigation Panel', and 'Rest Mode' keyboard shortcuts by @Ryosuke-Asano in #2458 fix: prevent unified extensions panel from closing on bottom navbar (#2079) by @Ryosuke-Asano in #2462 fix: prevent workspace system from overriding SessionStore tab selection on startup by @Ryosuke-Asano in #2461 fix: prevent multi-row tabs from disappearing when sidebar opens website by @Ryosuke-Asano in #2460 fix: prevent private container tab from saving first page to history by @Ryosuke-Asano in #2459 fix: prevent browser close when container tab is the only tab open by @Ryosuke-Asano in #2465 Resolve conflicts for #2467: Add split-view mouse gesture commands by @Ryosuke-Asano in #2472 fix(os-server): auto-generate auth token on enable by @Ryosuke-Asano in #2471 fix(settings): change broken link to Floorp Docs by @regularentropy in #2477 Enhanced search functionality in the command palette — now supports English keywords, Japanese morphological analysis, and hiragana search by @Walkmana-25 in #2470 fix(patches): align Gecko patches with Linux CI runtime by @Ryosuke-Asano in #2482 feat(pwa): add Firefox Container support for PWA apps by @Ryosuke-Asano in #2443 fix(statusbar): add event listener for buttons in status bar by @greeeen-dev in #2484 Download: Floorp 64-bit | 95.0 MB (Open Source) Links: Floorp Website | Github Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Google Gemini co-lead Noam Shazeer is leaving for OpenAI by Pradeep Viswanathan Noam Shazeer is best known as one of the co-authors of the 2017 “Attention Is All You Need” paper, which introduced the Transformer architecture that now powers most large language models. He also worked on several major Google AI projects, including LaMDA, before leaving the company in 2021 to co-found Character.AI. He also authored the Sparsely-gated Mixture of Experts (2016) paper, which is popular among the AI community. After falling behind OpenAI and Anthropic a couple of years ago, Google brought Shazeer back in 2024 as part of a major deal with Character.AI. Through this deal, along with Noam, several other researchers returned to Google DeepMind. More recently, he was a vice president of engineering at Google and a technical co-lead for Gemini. Today, Noam Shazeer announced on X that he is leaving Google and joining OpenAI. In his post, Shazeer said it was a difficult decision to move on, adding that he was proud of the Google team and what it had built together. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman welcomed the move with a post of his own, saying Shazeer was one of the people he had most wanted to work with since OpenAI’s early days. Google has made strong progress with Gemini over the past year, closing the gap with OpenAI in several areas. But losing Noam Shazeer is a major talent setback for them, especially after bringing him back less than two years ago by spending a fortune. For OpenAI, the hire adds one of the industry’s most experienced language model researchers to a team that is already pushing ahead with ChatGPT, Codex, and its next generation of frontier models.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      With What earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Harris Gilbert earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Vincian earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      541
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      171
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      85
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      64
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!