Recommended Posts

Classic Start Menu for Windows 7 - Seven Classic Start http://www.sevenclassicstart.com/

=)

Thank You!

There is now a chance in hell that I might actually move to Windows 7.

I've read comments in this thread that the win95/98/me/nt4/2000/xpclassic start menu needs to go because it isn't pretty.

Well, some of of don't care about everything being pretty. I care about low latency, quickness, usability, and clarity. My background is a nice solid color. Buttons are clearly defined. I turn off that annoying visual effects. I clean up my start menu so that I can access my programs with 2 keystrokes or 2 mouse clicks, whichever I prefer. I turn off that annoying 'click' sound every time I click on something. I've created my own install disc of WindowsXP that by default has all of the hidden/system files shown. File extensions aren't hidden. The 'Documents and Settings' folder is instead 'Profiles'. 'Program Files' is 'PF64' and 'Program Files (x86)' is 'PF32'. I don't install crap, including a virus scanner because I don't need one; email is scanned and I'm not stupid about downloading random junk. I do install Ad Muncher which is a wonderful advert removal app. I use the lightweight Thunderbird in lou of heavy Outlook. I do use Office 2007 because well, it is an amazing office suite. No indexing. Classic search.

Some of you guys prefer otherwise. I respect that. Have your pretty start menu with objects moving around. I suppose many users install so much crap it is no wonder they need a virus scanner and a search engine just to find their programs.

But why are you guys so insistent that there not even be an option for users such as myself that like a lightweight and efficient system?

I'm using WindowsXP x86-64 and I'm happy with it but there is one annoying limitation that Microsoft didn't bother to correct. I cannot hibernate with more than 4GB of addressable memory. I had 4 GB installed in my system, but the BIOS reserves some of the address space under the 4GB mark so some of my RAM gets mapped about 4GB. I've worked around this issue by booting WindowsXP with a /MAXMEM=4096 option but I loose nearly 1/2 gigabyte of RAM because of that. Not a big deal today, but this will be an issue down the road as applications require and increasing amount of RAM to run well. The other issue is that new systems don't always come with WindowsXP x86-64 drivers. But I'm got everything working on my specific system at least.

I'm working my way through 'Windows 7' trying to give it a fair evaluation. My latest issue is that I don't seem to be able to add programs to 'SendTo' for all users (not the default user, 'All Users'). But I'm working through things.

Well, some of of don't care about everything being pretty. I care about low latency, quickness, usability, and clarity. My background is a nice solid color. Buttons are clearly defined. I turn off that annoying visual effects. I clean up my start menu so that I can access my programs with 2 keystrokes or 2 mouse clicks, whichever I prefer. I turn off that annoying 'click' sound every time I click on something. I've created my own install disc of WindowsXP that by default has all of the hidden/system files shown. File extensions aren't hidden. The 'Documents and Settings' folder is instead 'Profiles'. 'Program Files' is 'PF64' and 'Program Files (x86)' is 'PF32'. I don't install crap, including a virus scanner because I don't need one; email is scanned and I'm not stupid about downloading random junk. I do install Ad Muncher which is a wonderful advert removal app. I use the lightweight Thunderbird in lou of heavy Outlook. I do use Office 2007 because well, it is an amazing office suite. No indexing. Classic search.

Some of you guys prefer otherwise. I respect that. Have your pretty start menu with objects moving around. I suppose many users install so much crap it is no wonder they need a virus scanner and a search engine just to find their programs.

But why are you guys so insistent that there not even be an option for users such as myself that like a lightweight and efficient system?

I'm using WindowsXP x86-64 and I'm happy with it but there is one annoying limitation that Microsoft didn't bother to correct. I cannot hibernate with more than 4GB of addressable memory. I had 4 GB installed in my system, but the BIOS reserves some of the address space under the 4GB mark so some of my RAM gets mapped about 4GB. I've worked around this issue by booting WindowsXP with a /MAXMEM=4096 option but I loose nearly 1/2 gigabyte of RAM because of that. Not a big deal today, but this will be an issue down the road as applications require and increasing amount of RAM to run well. The other issue is that new systems don't always come with WindowsXP x86-64 drivers. But I'm got everything working on my specific system at least.

I'm working my way through 'Windows 7' trying to give it a fair evaluation. My latest issue is that I don't seem to be able to add programs to 'SendTo' for all users (not the default user, 'All Users'). But I'm working through things.

Talk about an off-topic rant...

In any case you made pretty much no arguments against the Vista/7 start menu. You can access your programs in two keystrokes or mouse clicks in the new one too, with less mouse movement. The background *is* a solid colour. The buttons *are* clearly defined.

It's not about denying you, it's about letting the Windows developers work on more worthwhile things, like improving the current start menu, not one that was designed over a decade ago.

And lol that you turn off indexing. I thought you wanted speed? Apparently not.

Classic Start Menu for Windows 7 - Seven Classic Start http://www.sevenclassicstart.com/

=)

They want money for something that looks 100% out of place and offers little functionality? FAIL.

Windows 7 start menu is kinda fat but it still looks good.

In any case you made pretty much no arguments against the Vista/7 start menu. You can access your programs in two keystrokes or mouse clicks in the new one too, with less mouse movement. The background *is* a solid colour. The buttons *are* clearly defined.

I'm trying to give Windows 7 a chance, so please educate me on how to do this.

When I press [Windows Key] and then type any letter, that letter gets used as the first letter in the 'Search' rather than selecting one of the displayed programs. What am I doing wrong?

I'm trying to give Windows 7 a chance, so please educate me on how to do this.

When I press [Windows Key] and then type any letter, that letter gets used as the first letter in the 'Search' rather than selecting one of the displayed programs. What am I doing wrong?

You're not doing anything wrong. That's how it works in Vista/7.

It's not about denying you, it's about letting the Windows developers work on more worthwhile things, like improving the current start menu, not one that was designed over a decade ago.

That's an argument, but not everyone is using that argument. Many claim things like "the new one looks better so the old one shouldn't even be an option because I don't like the old one."

That's an argument, but not everyone is using that argument. Many claim things like "the new one looks better so the old one shouldn't even be an option because I don't like the old one."

The newer Start Menu looking better is just icing on the cake. Most people like it, including me, because it gets the job done quicker. I LOVE the Search and Jumplists. If you really do want to get things done quicker, you'd be using the new Start Menu not the classic.

sorry, you responded to me question to +Kirkburn and I didn't realize until now that you are two different people.

I guess I'll wait for +Kirkburn to explain.

Keyboard: Easy, type the first two letters of the program name - it'll be at or near the top of the list. This if you're suggesting every single program is right at the top level of your All Programs menus, which invariably it won't be.

Mouse: Click on your pinned program: option one, only one click. Click on the all programs button then your program: option two. Plus your mouse hardly moves to navigate around the all programs menu, unlike in XP.

And while this may be about your specific experience, where I'm sure you optimise your start menu to hell and back, normal users would see even more benefit.

Btw, my name is just "Kirkburn".

I've been watching this and other forums for a bit, specifically the posts on the start menu.

It's odd how some posters sound like the voice of Microsoft, fervently trying to convince users that they don't want to use the classic start menu.

I understand the old start menu was tied to legacy code; it was time for it to go.

Replicating the functionality of the old start menu would be trivial under the new code.

Microsoft took a similar tack with Office 2007. Many of the same complaints were made, and ignored.

But Microsoft's attitude was not ignored at our company. This is the year 2009, and we have approx 2,200 workstations that still run Office 2003. The reason? Our users did not care for the 2007 interface. We saw no reason to fight that.

Approximately two years ago today, we had closer to 3,000 workstations using Office. We found that a number of our users were open to adopting OpenOffice instead. These were users who did not require us to cross-train them on a new product.

While I can't quite state that we'll be making a similar transition for our XP users (we've had little reason to adopt Vista; less than 100 of our machines run that OS) we are of course open to less expensive alternatives in the new economy.

While I have enjoyed trialing Windows 7 personally, I too would prefer the functionality of the 'classic' start menu. I was actually looking forward to rolling out the OS on a number of machines, but (I'm rather laughing to myself) this arrogant stance on the part of Microsoft, and some of the posters in this forum again make me hesitate to adopt this product. I am the primary person who makes this decision in the case of our organization; a small number of users will overrule me on this, the majority will be stuck with my decision.

Our little company won't make or break Microsoft. But I have to believe there are others thinking as I do.

I've actually been a pretty ardent Microsoft supporter. I'm getting over it. The forums I've read since January have posters using the identical language on different sites. This cannot be coincidence. Microsoft is shaping opinion through shilling - an ugly practice.

Dear Microsoft: Users like the posters of this forum are telling how they would prefer the interface crafted. Each time these topics arise, you use the phrase 'usability testing.' Each time you utter or type this phrase, I would like you to visualize the dollars that you will be turning down. I've explained in number of copies of software we have chosen not to purchase over a period of five years. Think of it what you will.

I'll now take a cue from Microsoft and share my message in another forum.

Awesome! Die classic start menu, die! I always was depressed when I saw someone using XP w/the classic menu. For sure its time for users to adapt.

after using this for months now. classic is a must. I hate how they made vista retard friendly to compete with apple. everything is dumbed down. search is slow and sometimes people don't even know what they are looking for until the read it. seriously I could click the app I was after faster than I could type and wait for 7 to search.

after using this for months now. classic is a must. I hate how they made vista retard friendly to compete with apple. everything is dumbed down. search is slow and sometimes people don't even know what they are looking for until the read it. seriously I could click the app I was after faster than I could type and wait for 7 to search.

Maybe there is something wrong with your setup, my search results appear in less than half a second.

There's nothing wrong with preferring the old menu because you're used to it, but don't pretend like it's more efficient or faster than the new setup, because it's not, and Microsoft would have done a plethora of usability studies before making the decision.

It's quite amusing how a lot of the people whining about the classic menu also disable the search indexer.

I've actually been a pretty ardent Microsoft supporter. I'm getting over it. The forums I've read since January have posters using the identical language on different sites. This cannot be coincidence. Microsoft is shaping opinion through shilling - an ugly practice.

No, we are not Microsoft shills, nor do we have anything to do with Microsoft. It is insulting for you to suggest so.

Microsoft does a huge amount of usability testing. It's how the Office 2007 interface was crafted in the first place.

Micosoft have no obligation to listen to people on random forums. If everything was designed by committee, you'd end up with a terrible, terrible UI. MS make decisions, and they test them. If they don't work, they change them. We get that you prefer the old style - but MS cannot and will not keep it that way forever. They will not continue to maintain and support old code forever, especially when they will have tested out newer code on the general public and got a good response.

Regardless of how easily MS could have kept it, that is not the same as continuing to support and code around it.

Gee, there's already a free piece of software that re-enables it, so I guess nobody has a point anymore. In one topic everyone is mad at Microsoft because they leave so much legacy code in, and then when they try to remove some to improve consistency everyone starts complaining again...

Gee, there's already a free piece of software that re-enables it, so I guess nobody has a point anymore. In one topic everyone is mad at Microsoft because they leave so much legacy code in, and then when they try to remove some to improve consistency everyone starts complaining again...

Microsoft bashing has been the hipster thing to do since about 2006.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Helium Browser 0.13.4.1 by Razvan Serea Helium is a private, fast, and honest Chromium-based web browser — built for people, with love. It offers the best privacy by default, unbiased ad-blocking, and a clean experience free from bloat and noise. Proudly based on Ungoogled-Chromium, Helium removes Google’s clutter while keeping a fast, efficient development pipeline. With thoughtful touches like native !bangs and split view, Helium is a people-first, fully open-source browser that puts control back in your hands. Privacy, security, and control come first. Ads, trackers, and third-party cookies are blocked automatically, HTTPS is enforced everywhere, and all Chromium extensions work seamlessly — while Google can’t track your activity. Helium’s 13,000+ offline-ready !bangs let you jump straight to sites or AI tools like ChatGPT instantly. Open-source, people-first, and unbiased, Helium delivers a browsing experience that’s fast, secure, and free from noise, ads, and compromises. Helium Browser key features: Performance Fast, efficient, and lightweight — built on Chromium’s optimized engine. Energy-saving and consistent — stays fast over time without slowing down. No bloat — stripped of unnecessary components for maximum speed. Minimalist interface — compact, clean, and distraction-free. Customizable toolbar — hide elements you don’t need. Smooth and stable — no flicker, lag, or animation glitches. Comfort-focused experience — intuitive and unobtrusive. Privacy & Security Best privacy by default — blocks ads, trackers, phishing, and third-party cookies. Unbiased ad-blocking — powered by community filters and uBlock Origin. No telemetry or analytics — zero background web requests on first launch. Strict HTTPS enforcement — warns for insecure sites. Passkeys supported — modern authentication made simple. No built-in password manager or cloud sync — your data stays yours. Extension Compatibility Full Chromium extension support — including MV2 extensions. Anonymized Chrome Web Store requests — Google can’t track extension installs. Extended MV2 support — maintained for as long as possible. Smart Features Native !bangs — browse faster using 13,000+ offline-ready shortcuts. AI integration — use !chatgpt and others directly from the address bar. Offline functionality — bangs work without an Internet connection. Philosophy People-first design — open source, transparent, and community-driven. No ads, no noise, no bias — privacy and honesty over profit. Helium Browser 0.13.4.1 changelog: 0a4f1149 revision: bump to 4 (#1969) 4848de1f helium/core: enable the chromium screenshot feature (#1968) e0dec3f5 onboarding: integrate strings to i18n system (#1948) 417fa5bc i18n: fix newline parsing for onboarding 7a339b39 i18n: add foraged translations for onboarding 4f090cff i18n/generate: add handling for onboarding strings bfe48d58 i18n_apply: manually override parent grd logic for onboarding strings ab214e3c onboarding: bump in deps, wire up grdp afa6a059 helium/core: disable pdf infobar feature (#1965) eba585e7 helium/ui/vertical: fix new tab button alignment and icon size (#1964) 6ecfc9e0 helium/ui/tabs: fix horizontal tab hover background color (#1963) 3db87dc0 helium/ui/tabs: fix new tab button hover/press colors (#1962) 6bbdcc3e helium/ui: improve tab group UI in all layouts (#1961) 53deb314 helium/ui/tabs: enable tab group hover cards e93aece7 helium/ui/vertical: fix tab group appearance, prevent line overlap 629f5495 helium/ui/tabs: restore solid group header colors, enable new colors 961c962e helium/ui/tabs: move horiz tab group underline to bottom, make it thick c96deab6 merge: update to chromium 149.0.7827.155 (#1959) 36db56b4 i18n: update source.gen.json 5ce006ae patches: refresh for chromium 149.0.7827.155 b4c1ea62 merge: update ungoogled-chromium to 149.0.7827.155 4e5e8671 Update to Chromium 149.0.7827.155 08a3e7da helium/ui/layout: disable mute on collapsed vertical tabs (#1778) a0a5bbaf helium/core: simplify context menu and prevent huge widths (#1951) c4732aac devutils/i18n: add forage command (#1944) 11d16986 devutils/i18n: add an option to translate using local CLI tools (#1942) d820c3a2 i18n/prompt: tighten translation rules to prevent common errors (#1940) cf827007 Update to Chromium 149.0.7827.114 6e3d5164 Update to Chromium 149.0.7827.102 Download: Helium 64-bit | Portable 64-bit |~100.0 MB (Open Source) Download: Helium ARM64 | Portable ARM64 Links: Helium Home Page | macOS | Linux | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Glow 26.10 by Razvan Serea Glow provides detailed reporting on every hardware component in your computer, saving you valuable time typically spent searching for CPU, motherboard, RAM, graphics card, and other stats. With Glow, all the information is conveniently presented in one clean interface, allowing you to easily access and review the comprehensive hardware details of your system. Glow provides detailed information on various system aspects, including OS, motherboard, processor, memory, graphics card, storage, network, battery, drivers, and services. The well-organized format ensures easy access to the required information. You can export all the gathered data to a plain text file, facilitating sharing with others for troubleshooting purposes. No installation needed. Just decompress the archive, launch the executable, and access computer-related information. Glow runs on Windows 11 and Windows 10 64-bit versions. Glow 26.10 changelog: New Features The bootstrapping algorithm has been completely redesigned. The software can now launch directly without requiring TS Preloader. As part of this change, the startup splash screen displayed during initialization has been removed. In addition, spikes in CPU usage have been eliminated, resulting in a more stable architecture with significantly lower memory consumption. The Microsoft Office detection infrastructure within the Operating System section has been enhanced. Additional detection support has been added for Office C2R (Click-to-Run) installations. Furthermore, the license status evaluation system has been improved, and the priority order has been revised as follows: Licensed > Grace Period > Other (NOTIFICATIONS, EVALUATION, etc.). Glow now includes preliminary support for Wi-Fi 8 technology, allowing more detailed information to be displayed for Wi-Fi 8-compatible network adapters. Glow now provides full support for Bluetooth 6.2. Adapters supporting Bluetooth 6.2 can be analyzed in greater detail and with improved accuracy. The disk distribution view in the Disk section has been modernized, replacing the traditional table layout with a new 2×2 card-based design. The TS Custom Controls module has been updated to v26.7. Thanks to the new custom controls, all Türkaysoft applications now offer a more modern and consistent user interface aligned with Windows 11 design standards. Bug Fixes Potential line-ending handling issues in the Office detection code within the Operating System section have been resolved. Additionally, the output format has been standardized to UTF-8 to prevent character encoding issues and ensure consistent data processing. Several stability and file management issues within the Debugging infrastructure have been addressed. Problems that prevented new log files from being created after Debugging was disabled, as well as issues causing debug records to be lost, have been fixed. File deletion and reaccess issues that occurred after file locks were released have also been resolved. In addition, a bug that caused newly recreated log files to remain locked after deletion has been eliminated. Unnecessary blank lines within debug logs and the extra empty line that could appear at the end of log files have also been corrected. A shortcut key conflict caused by assigning identical hotkeys to both the DNS Test Tool and the Donation page has been fixed. The DNS Test Tool can now be accessed using CTRL + Shift + D, while the Donation page is available via CTRL + Alt + D. Changes The service responsible for providing the Public IP Address and Internet Service Provider information in the Network section has been updated to use the ipinfo.io infrastructure. This change improves the accuracy and consistency of the displayed data. (No external requests are made while Hiding Mode is enabled.) Some terms in the Dutch and Korean language files have been updated to make them clearer and more user-friendly. [TS Updater] Before the update process begins, users are now prompted to choose whether they would like to view the release notes. Note: Always unzip the program before using it. Otherwise you may get an error. Download: Glow 26.10 | 1.8 MB (Open Source) Links: Glow Homepage | Screenshot | Github Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Maradona if hydration breaks had existed in Mexico 86.
    • The quantum search for Time's origin had an equally mind-boggling conclusion by Sayan Sen Image by Steve Johnson via Pexels A theoretical study from researchers at the University of Surrey suggested that the direction of time may not be fundamentally fixed in certain quantum systems. The work, published in Scientific Reports, examined how the “arrow of time” could emerge from microscopic physics and found that time-reversal symmetry can remain intact even in models used to describe processes such as energy loss and thermalisation. The arrow of time refers to the observed one-way direction from past to future in everyday life. In macroscopic processes, this is easy to see. Spilled milk spreads across a table and does not gather back into a glass, and heat flows from hotter objects to colder ones. These processes shape the common sense idea that time moves in a single direction. However, at the level of fundamental physics, many equations do not prefer a direction of time. Time-reversal symmetry means that the same physical laws can describe a system whether time moves forward or backward. This has made it difficult to explain why irreversible behaviour appears in the large-scale world even when the underlying rules do not require it. Dr Andrea Rocco, Associate Professor in Physics and Mathematical Biology at the University of Surrey, described this contrast: "One way to explain this is when you look at a process like spilt milk spreading across a table, it's clear that time is moving forward. But if you were to play that in reverse, like a movie, you'd immediately know something was wrong – it would be hard to believe milk could just gather back into a glass. However, there are processes, such as the motion of a pendulum, that look just as believable in reverse. The puzzle is that, at the most fundamental level, the laws of physics resemble the pendulum; they do not account for irreversible processes. Our findings suggest that while our common experience tells us that time only moves one way, we are just unaware that the opposite direction would have been equally possible." The study focused on open quantum systems, which are quantum systems that interact with a surrounding environment. This environment, often described as a heat bath, can exchange energy and information with the system. The researchers used this framework to study how a direction of time might appear even when the underlying physics does not enforce one. A key part of the analysis involved the Markov approximation. This is a simplification used in many models where the system is assumed not to retain memory of its past states. The idea is that changes depend only on the current state, not on earlier history. This is commonly used when studying thermalisation, which is the process where a system settles into equilibrium with its environment. The study also used concepts such as master equations, including the Lindblad and Pauli equations, which describe how probabilities of different quantum states change over time. Another related model discussed was quantum Brownian motion, which describes the random-like movement of a quantum particle interacting continuously with its environment. In these descriptions, a “memory kernel” can appear, which is a mathematical term that accounts for how past states influence current behaviour. The researchers found that applying the Markov approximation did not break time-reversal symmetry. Even when the system interacted with an effectively infinite heat bath, the resulting equations of motion remained symmetric in time. This meant that the same mathematical description could, in principle, run forward or backward in time without contradiction. The study further showed that standard frameworks used in open quantum systems, including quantum Brownian motion and master equations like the Lindblad and Pauli forms, could be written in a time-symmetric way. These equations are typically used to describe processes that look irreversible, such as dissipation and thermalisation, but the results suggested they can also be interpreted as allowing evolution in both time directions. Thomas Guff, Research Fellow in Quantum Thermodynamics, said: "The surprising part of this project was that even after making the standard simplifying assumption to our equations describing open quantum systems, the equations still behaved the same way whether the system was moving forwards or backwards in time. When we carefully worked through the maths, we found that this behaviour had to be the case because a key part of the equation, the "memory kernel," is symmetrical in time. We also found a small but important detail which is usually overlooked – a time discontinuous factor emerged that kept the time-symmetry property intact. It’s unusual to see such a mathematical mechanism in a physics equation because it's not continuous, and it was very surprising to see it appear so naturally." The researchers also noted that deriving a one-way arrow of time from time-reversal symmetric microscopic dynamics remains an open problem across fields such as thermodynamics, statistical mechanics, particle physics, and cosmology. Their results suggested that some standard descriptions of irreversible behaviour in open quantum systems may be better understood using a time-symmetric formulation of Markovianity. According to the study, processes such as thermalisation, which are usually treated as irreversible, could in theory be described in a way that allows evolution in either time direction under the same rules. This does not imply that time reversal occurs in everyday life, but rather that the underlying equations do not strictly enforce a single direction. Overall, the findings suggested that the perceived direction of time may emerge from how physical systems are modelled and approximated, rather than from a fundamental asymmetry in the laws themselves. The researchers noted that this perspective could have implications for ongoing work in quantum mechanics, thermodynamics, and cosmology on the origin of time’s arrow. Source: University of Surrey, Nature This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      581
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      75
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      73
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!