Recommended Posts

There's nothing wrong with preferring the old menu because you're used to it, but don't pretend like it's more efficient or faster than the new setup, because it's not, and Microsoft would have done a plethora of usability studies before making the decision.

It's quite amusing how a lot of the people whining about the classic menu also disable the search indexer.

For organized users such as myself, the classic start menu is faster and we don't need search functionality; we already know where everything is, thank you for very.

I realize and respect that many users run a much larger number of programs than I do and having a good search index improves their usability. I'm not trying to stand in the way of Microsoft innovating new solutions for those users.

I will be honest and say that once in a while I do use classic search in Windows XP. I like the classic search. But I don't like the indexing service running in the background and even when I've tried to use the indexing service, it doesn't work quite like I would expect it to. But I have no complaints that Microsoft offers the new search interface to users. I'm just happy that Microsoft also allows a registry setting to enable the classic search. Like the classic start menu, it is simple and code has already been written for it besides so it is less prone to bugs and not as difficult to maintain.

I'm sure that Microsoft has a very solid code foundation for the classic start menu as well. Does it cost Microsoft a little bit of money to keep it in new versions of Windows to make users such as myself happy? Yes it does. And Microsoft has a perfect right to say, "well, users such as yourself aren't worth this minimal cost for us." That's fine. I'm very happy that Microsoft at least took the time for Windows XP x86-64 edition; I may be using it for a long time to come.

Awesome! Die classic start menu, die! I always was depressed when I saw someone using XP w/the classic menu. For sure its time for users to adapt.

That's unfortunate if you get depressed when seeing users use what they themselves prefer. I guess you're more enlightened than they are? Time for them to adapt? I see.

Were you happy when Microsoft removed Windows XP from the consumer market? Happy that when I purchased my Dell laptop, Vista was the only option available to me?

I'm glad that Microsoft has made new things that you enjoy. For years I've been a first adopter for a lot of Microsoft's products. I think is was 1992 (I could be way off) when I obtained an early alpha of Chicago. It ran like **** but I was very enthusiastic at many of the changes I saw. I realized that it would help me to work faster and improve my productivity. But I guess I don't know what's best for myself, anymore. For some reasons I don't like my computer to be too dynamic (eg personalized menus). For some reason I like the GUI but I still like having shortcut keys because for whatever reason a shortcut key is often faster for me than the mouse.

Linus Torvalds seems even worse than me. He used the pine email client for years, and now he uses the Alpine email client, both text based email clients. He believes all email should be in plain text. I suppose I must be dumb, and he must be even dumber, huh?

Awesome! Die classic start menu, die! I always was depressed when I saw someone using XP w/the classic menu. For sure its time for users to adapt.

I never liked the WinXP Luna interface, I always switched it to classic. I've never changed the appearance of Vista though, stuck with the fancy interface on it since the betas and I'll do the same with Win7. I like the new interfaces quite a bit... but Luna was just not something I liked.

Keyboard: Easy, type the first two letters of the program name - it'll be at or near the top of the list. This if you're suggesting every single program is right at the top level of your All Programs menus, which invariably it won't be.

Mouse: Click on your pinned program: option one, only one click. Click on the all programs button then your program: option two. Plus your mouse hardly moves to navigate around the all programs menu, unlike in XP.

And while this may be about your specific experience, where I'm sure you optimise your start menu to hell and back, normal users would see even more benefit.

Btw, my name is just "Kirkburn".

I was actually including pressing the [Windows Key] to bring up the start menu as one of the two keystrokes. I place my most often used programs at the top of my start menu. I don't even have to press the enter key provided each shortcut is named with a unique starting letter. I place less used programs into submenus off the start menu, so those will often require three keystrokes.

But yes, I organize my start menu and most users do not. I'm a minority.

I actually like certain features of the new start menu. I would be very happy if Microsoft offered settings for the new start menu that created more of a compromise. I don't like how it defaults to the search when I press the [Windows Key], for example. Even an unsupported registry tweak to allow for simple things like this would be appreciated.

I wonder how Microsoft selects participants for their usability studies. There is some logic to having a specific usability study for what I guess might be called power users. It makes sense for Microsoft to offer priority consideration to 80% of its userbase or whatever, but that doesn't mean that the usability for the rest of the users can't at least be considered. Of course, they don't have to. They can do as they please. Just a perspective.

I will miss the classic start menu, like many users I don't remember the names of all the small apps I use occasionally and the cascade effect just worked for me. I think seven has lost some of the user interface in areas such as the start menu and toolbars and I don't really know why as its not like its a huge part of code that couldn't be cleaned up and refreshed. I use Windows 90% of the time, I don't need different ways of doing the same thing because it happens to appeal to the current designer. I just find it annoying and no matter what anyone says its going to effect my use, I cant help that.

I actually like certain features of the new start menu. I would be very happy if Microsoft offered settings for the new start menu that created more of a compromise. I don't like how it defaults to the search when I press the [Windows Key], for example. Even an unsupported registry tweak to allow for simple things like this would be appreciated.

I agree with this one. I like the new menu, but I'm annoyed that the search box doesn't behave exactly like the run box did, which is what I would expect it to do. I could Win-r, but I'm more used to doing Crtl-Esc, R which no longer works, similarly Ctrl-Esc, A to favorites (which aren't even pinned to the menu by default anymore, haven't been in two versions...but nonetheless).

It makes sense for it to behave the way it does, but that doesn't mean that I'm not still attached to my old ways (which only worked at all for compatibility reasons).

I actually like certain features of the new start menu. I would be very happy if Microsoft offered settings for the new start menu that created more of a compromise.

I think you hit the nail on the head. We need more options and in built tweaking like any normal app provides, I mean look at stuff such as photoshop, its used a lot so allows users to tweak it.

I agree with this one. I like the new menu, but I'm annoyed that the search box doesn't behave exactly like the run box did, which is what I would expect it to do. I could Win-r, but I'm more used to doing Crtl-Esc, R which no longer works, similarly Ctrl-Esc, A to favorites (which aren't even pinned to the menu by default anymore, haven't been in two versions...but nonetheless).

It makes sense for it to behave the way it does, but that doesn't mean that I'm not still attached to my old ways (which only worked at all for compatibility reasons).

In what ways doesn't it behave like the 'run' box did? I was under the impression it did :)

I was actually including pressing the [Windows Key] to bring up the start menu as one of the two keystrokes. I place my most often used programs at the top of my start menu. I don't even have to press the enter key provided each shortcut is named with a unique starting letter. I place less used programs into submenus off the start menu, so those will often require three keystrokes.

I fail to see how that's any different to the current start menu, which, if anything, if even more designed towards putting important shortcuts on the very first level.

I count twenty applications showing on my immediate view of my Windows Vista menu, and that's barely customized.

Real men shun Explorer altogether and use an alternative shell :p /jk

Seriously though, with very little effort Litestep can easily imitate the classic start menu. You can have all the best bits from your shiny new OS, but with a GUI you're already familiar with.

And what will Windows Server use? Aero?!

Classic is going to stay. I don't see how they could replace it.

Actually, Windows Server can use Aero (and has been able to since 2003); it's just not active by default. After all, under *normal* circumstances, of what use would Aero be in a server?

If basic hardware for servers ever includes the Aero-minimimum graphical requirements (and that isn't farfetched in the least), Classic even in Windows Server could find itself going the way of the passenger pigeon.

Great

Since this is my first post I read all discussion in this tread.

Most of you miss point.

OK let start from beginning.

Statement Microsoft do comprehensive search. WRONG. They use public relation/marketing agency to do this which present only results which customer (in this case MS) like to hear. Why I put this statement? Simple answer they do not like to lose this job which gives them lot of money. I think of marketing agency or company which does this. Anyone who work in some marketing department can testify about nonsense which some agency can present like your brand is in first place anyone know about it but your income from that brand make considerable drop down.

Where is proof for this. Vista. Simple proof. Vista was dead born at start.

What they (MS) do?

To correct mistake they enforced OEM to implement Vista on new machines simply cutting off XP. What was result? OEM enforces MS to go back to XP so you now can order machine with XP or VISTA. You can ask why this happen? Reason is very simple. They did not listen corporate consumers. They try to enforce some policies which are not acceptable and they come there where they did not want to be. MS live from corporate consumers (not as most of you may think home users) and they as first kill most of old hardware. Anyone who know how corporate think know that corporate like to minimize expenses. If you are some corporate executive and your machines is as time of deployment of vista old from 1 to 5 years only 1/5 of machines can except vista as OS and you need to invest in 4/5 of machines to renew them just to deploy vista and to spend more money to OS ex 40 $ more you just make decision NO GO. And at the end they get no go for vista in corporate environment. So they decide to make new OS. I think they did not learned from first and they lunch another which can make same mistake in this case Win 7.

I really like vista and win 7 in this beta stage but. Great features. But IT is not this that makes decisions in companies.

Corporate managers do this. So if some and most of them use win since win not or win 98 and they used to classic menu and see new 7 and I can?t find my programs etc you get another NO GO . If you do not know how managers think you should learn because they have limited time to learn new features and use of computer is just use of a tool which fit or not fit in their hands. If not fit find something which will fit. This why XP is still most used corporate OS. It meets IT, managers and end users requirements.

Someone point out that this is time for *nix desktops to be introduced in companies and he is right. Companies in time of crisis make decisions which cost less, and not make more expenses which may be win 7 if cost more than vista and we may see more corporate to be turnover to *nix systems then ever before.

Like it or not home users are just less part of segment of market pie. Most of us here are what someone call early user (buyers) on which companies make lot of money (ex new graphic card which cost more than 400$ buy just 1% of market but profit is more than 100% when this graphic card get final projected price ex 150$ reach 90% of market). Point is even with vista MS never make OS public like this before. They trying to get more people in this but now they do not listen. Or they are def to user?s wishes.

Everyone who tells it is time to move on is right. But some stupid GUI missing feature can cost someone great deal. Why not let user is judge what he will use new or classic this is simple. This feature as it is in Office is main obstacle for old users to get new and great features in Office. Why I pointing this in Office 2007. Office 2007 has great features but an advanced user of office 2003 can it find difficult to manage. Why you may ask? Simple. An advanced user used to some organization of office and find difficult to find some feature even it is ?natural sorted?, and he get loose much time to make simple tasks, what his decision is go back to 2003 or purchase classic menu for this idiotic software. You may ask why this is simple you have time limit to do some tasks and if you get loose time to learn new software you are unproductive and you may break deadline and you are responsible. People?s habit is something on what MS should pay great attention.

So end of line. They should leave classic start menu. This is not security problem. This is not much code to work on since this is old code which needs to be rewritten. This is just simple option.

Great

Since this is my first post I read all discussion in this tread.

Most of you miss point.

OK let start from beginning.

Statement Microsoft do comprehensive search. WRONG. They use public relation/marketing agency to do this which present only results which customer (in this case MS) like to hear. Why I put this statement? Simple answer they do not like to lose this job which gives them lot of money. I think of marketing agency or company which does this. Anyone who work in some marketing department can testify about nonsense which some agency can present like your brand is in first place anyone know about it but your income from that brand make considerable drop down.

Where is proof for this. Vista. Simple proof. Vista was dead born at start.

I suppose that's why nearly 400 million copies of Vista have been sold to date. Clearly the consumers are out to punish Microsoft for making such a horrible OS.

What they (MS) do?

To correct mistake they enforced OEM to implement Vista on new machines simply cutting off XP. What was result? OEM enforces MS to go back to XP so you now can order machine with XP or VISTA. You can ask why this happen? Reason is very simple. They did not listen corporate consumers. They try to enforce some policies which are not acceptable and they come there where they did not want to be. MS live from corporate consumers (not as most of you may think home users) and they as first kill most of old hardware. Anyone who know how corporate think know that corporate like to minimize expenses. If you are some corporate executive and your machines is as time of deployment of vista old from 1 to 5 years only 1/5 of machines can except vista as OS and you need to invest in 4/5 of machines to renew them just to deploy vista and to spend more money to OS ex 40 $ more you just make decision NO GO. And at the end they get no go for vista in corporate environment. So they decide to make new OS. I think they did not learned from first and they lunch another which can make same mistake in this case Win 7.

Yes, market drives demand, which, for better or for worse, drives the products. Corporations will always be slow to update, because they value familiarity beyond anything else. Large companies also abide by equipment upgrade cycles which can be around five years, though typically anything greater than three years is normal. Since Vista has been out for a while, the rate of corporate adoption may very well increase. Don't expect Windows 7 to be picked up immediately either, it will experience the exact same delay as every other OS upgrade.

I really like vista and win 7 in this beta stage but. Great features. But IT is not this that makes decisions in companies.

Corporate managers do this. So if some and most of them use win since win not or win 98 and they used to classic menu and see new 7 and I can?t find my programs etc you get another NO GO . If you do not know how managers think you should learn because they have limited time to learn new features and use of computer is just use of a tool which fit or not fit in their hands. If not fit find something which will fit. This why XP is still most used corporate OS. It meets IT, managers and end users requirements.

Someone point out that this is time for *nix desktops to be introduced in companies and he is right. Companies in time of crisis make decisions which cost less, and not make more expenses which may be win 7 if cost more than vista and we may see more corporate to be turnover to *nix systems then ever before.

So here you are arguing for changing to *nix. But later on, you're arguing that Microsoft should keep the Classic start menu because change means lost productivity. Look back at this argument you just made here, and explain why moving to *nix will not result in lost productivity as well?

Like it or not home users are just less part of segment of market pie. Most of us here are what someone call early user (buyers) on which companies make lot of money (ex new graphic card which cost more than 400$ buy just 1% of market but profit is more than 100% when this graphic card get final projected price ex 150$ reach 90% of market). Point is even with vista MS never make OS public like this before. They trying to get more people in this but now they do not listen. Or they are def to user?s wishes.

Everyone who tells it is time to move on is right. But some stupid GUI missing feature can cost someone great deal. Why not let user is judge what he will use new or classic this is simple. This feature as it is in Office is main obstacle for old users to get new and great features in Office. Why I pointing this in Office 2007. Office 2007 has great features but an advanced user of office 2003 can it find difficult to manage. Why you may ask? Simple. An advanced user used to some organization of office and find difficult to find some feature even it is ?natural sorted?, and he get loose much time to make simple tasks, what his decision is go back to 2003 or purchase classic menu for this idiotic software. You may ask why this is simple you have time limit to do some tasks and if you get loose time to learn new software you are unproductive and you may break deadline and you are responsible. People?s habit is something on what MS should pay great attention.

So end of line. They should leave classic start menu. This is not security problem. This is not much code to work on since this is old code which needs to be rewritten. This is just simple option.

Your post is painful to read. This argument also doesn't work. Office 2007 was a great jump ahead in usability. Yes, it looks different than Office 2003. Windows 3.11 looked different than MS DOS. Windows 95 looked different than Windows 3.11, and Windows 2000 looked different than Windows 95. Windows XP looked different than Windows 2000, and Vista looks different than Windows XP. Have we lost HUGE amounts of productivity due to these changes? Surely the graphical user interface we have now is so completely alien, compared to plain old text-based interfaces, that no one should be able to figure out how to use it. The point is that people learn and adapt, and Vista and Windows 7 are not huge leaps to deal with.

Please come up with a better argument than "change leads to lost productivity, thus we should fear progress and change."

I suppose that's why nearly 400 million copies of Vista have been sold to date. Clearly the consumers are out to punish Microsoft for making such a horrible OS.

How many were sold with a new pc ? How many customers decided to upgrade by going out and purchasing the software ?

I was actually including pressing the [Windows Key] to bring up the start menu as one of the two keystrokes. I place my most often used programs at the top of my start menu. I don't even have to press the enter key provided each shortcut is named with a unique starting letter. I place less used programs into submenus off the start menu, so those will often require three keystrokes.

But yes, I organize my start menu and most users do not. I'm a minority.

I don't understand why you wouldn't just pin these and then let Win+# (it's like, one and a half keystrokes) bring up your application. If the frequent apps have to stay in your start menu and not on the taskbar (which is fine), then I still don't see the issue. When I type my first letter, my most frequently used app is what's highlighted and I can just click enter. It's not alphabetical, it's optimized. Less used programs that would be 3 keystrokes away are now so much closer.

It's cool that you optimize the heck out of your setup from years in your old environment, but if the Windows team has worked hard to remove the need for you to spend time doing this, why wouldn't you just take it and run? Everytime I reinstall an OS (on my PC or phone) or a piece of software, I re-evaluate whether or not I need to spend the kind of time optimizing settings that I used to. The answer is usually no. I think many of the other commenters giving you a hard time or treating you like 'a dinosaur' just don't understand why you stick to a personal convention that's filled with effort when the replacement is better. You don't have to move everything around and then remember where it all is. When you get ready to install new programs, you don't have to brainstorm about where the shortcuts will fall in your new hierarchy. I'm sure you're proud of knowing where everything is, but you can have this knowledge and have stuff easier to find at the same time (not mutually exclusive).

I suppose that's why nearly 400 million copies of Vista have been sold to date.

*********. If you really believe that crap, I have some beachfront property to sell you.(oh and please, don't bother providing some ms provided stats to support your claim...it won't make you seem right.)

Your post is painful to read. This argument also doesn't work. Office 2007 was a great jump ahead in usability. Yes, it looks different than Office 2003.

Office 2007 better that 2003....??? Keep your hands where I can see them, and step away from the bong...

Office 2007 better that 2003....??? Keep your hands where I can see them, and step away from the bong...

:blink:

How was Office 2007 not an improvement over 2003? Especially in the usability area? Did you not see the guy, in his presentation with half his screen covered by toolbars and different configurations of toolbars?

The UI of version 2003 and below was extremely impractical in an Office suite. In fact, that whole design concept is awful and I look forward to it being removed from Visual Studio at some point in the future (the 'ribbon' interface is not practical in a development environment, according to MS, but another type of interface may be).

Rickkins, please let me know what makes you think version 2003 is better than 2007. I'm interested in your reasons as it shocks me.

Reason for edit - another typo :rolleyes:

Edited by C.J
*********. If you really believe that crap, I have some beachfront property to sell you.(oh and please, don't bother providing some ms provided stats to support your claim...it won't make you seem right.)

Take 1.6 billion relatively modern (can connect to the web) computer users in the world (rounded down: http://50x15.com/en-us/internet_usage.aspx). Take the market share of Vista, 24% (rounded down: http://marketshare.hitslink.com/operating-....aspx?qprid=10). Take 24% of the total estimated number of online users. You get about 380 million.

Office 2007 better that 2003....??? Keep your hands where I can see them, and step away from the bong...

Care to elaborate, or are you just in the "changes scare me" fanclub? Oh, I also don't have a bong. Grow up.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • On the topic of being locked out of a service. Recently two different friends of mine got locked out of their Google accounts. Both were hack attempts and one of them is waiting 30 days before he can get back in. He had backup codes and MFA but not a passkey. It was a browser token hack. Anyhow he has to wait 30 days for the dispute or whatever to end. The other person only had a password and is screwed losing all of the email, docs and years of photos. Google won’t help her at all. Her fault because she had no backup/recovery setup. Enable passkeys if possible. Also do NOT use browser based password managers. If using a cloud service make sure it is one you can fully sync to one of your devices so you can back it up. Like a PC or Mac with some backup drive plugged into it. Google is the worst to use IMHO. You can’t sync your photos at all. You have to use the “Take Out” service which is manual and takes days. That service strips the meta data from your photos. Also Google Docs synced to a device are useless without a Google accounts. MS Office/Libre Office is not going to open a link to a Google doc to a dead account.
    • Why you need to take back control of your synced passwords and how to go about doing that by Paul Hill Credit: Pixabay Last month, when Google decided to introduce daily and weekly caps for Gemini, it reignited an anxiety of mine, that you can’t really depend on service providers to maintain features forever, and it got me looking into free software (as in freedom) in other areas too. One app I quickly came across was KeePassXC on desktop and KeePassDX on Android as an alternative to password manager lock-in within the Chrome or Firefox ecosystems. I personally like to switch around with browsers, and using either password manager is inconvenient, so something like KeePassXC was interesting to me. The main issue with it now is syncing; I was not sure how to do that. After a bit of research, I came across Syncthing, a tool I was vaguely familiar with but had never used because it seemed complicated. However, I was completely wrong, and honestly, I think everyone should use it if they use multiple devices. It essentially lets you share folders peer to peer across all of your devices, no cloud services that you don’t control necessary! And it was fairly simple to set up, if not a bit clunky. Since setting it up, I’ve also started using Syncthing to back up other apps too, so don’t think it’s limited to just saving password databases. You can use it for pretty much anything you use Dropbox or Google Drive for. Before continuing to talk about those apps a bit more, let’s walk back a bit and talk about browser sync. Ever since the late 2000s and early 2010s, really, since we have been using smartphones, browser sync has been a necessity of life. I don’t know about you, but I have hundreds of passwords saved. For the most part, they’re all unique, so I don’t remember them and rely on software to manage them for me. Until recently, I’ve relied on password managers in Chrome and Firefox, but what I always found annoying was that it can be hard to transfer them between browsers. Sure, on Windows it is simple enough, but on Linux, exporting bookmarks has been temperamental. It works OK nowadays, but not too long ago, Chrome required you to enable exporting passwords in chrome://flags. The situation is even worse on mobile; there is no exporting or importing of passwords of any kind. You literally have to do it on a desktop, which is incredibly annoying in our mobile-first world. Sync also lets us take out bookmarks, history, tabs, and autofill data easily. To enable sync, it’s just a matter of signing into the browser once, and it handles the rest. It’s nice and easy. Obviously, all this has some issues, including those I’ve outlined above about it being hard to transfer data between browsers, but also things such as account suspension, lost account passwords, and other lock-in mechanisms, such as passkeys, being tied to a specific browser. On a sidenote, I have just removed all of my passkeys because they can make it harder to move browsers. I think the biggest threat to your synced passwords, especially if doing this with Google, is having your account suspended. I don’t ever expect mine to be suspended, but you do hear horror stories on Reddit where people lose access to their Google accounts. Imagine if you have hundreds of passwords, then suddenly lose access to them because Google froze your account, what would you do? So yes, it can be nice to use these syncing services for their convenience, but they also have risks. You may have seen me going on about free software quite a bit in my editorials. It’s essentially a concept championed by the Free Software Foundation. It’s software under particular licenses that grant you four freedoms: run the program for any purpose (0), study and change the source code (1), redistribute copies to others (2), and the freedom to distribute modified copies to others (3). For example, if there is an app I use and one day it gets abandoned by the developer, I can keep running it or even clone the software and continue developing it. Look at the myriad of cool services Google has run over the years before killing them. You can’t take the source code for those because they are proprietary, for the most part. Both KeePassXC and Syncthing are free software, so I get the freedoms listed above. In my use case where I’m syncing a database full of my passwords, I also get proper ownership over my data, there is no losing access to the database due to a frozen account, I can access the code of the tools I’m using, and I can get support from real people online if I run into issues, rather than having to consult a vague help page from an opaque company. With the KeePassXC password manager, you create a .kdbx file, which is what will be synced between devices. KeePassXC has cross-platform apps and also has browser extensions so that the browser can fetch passwords from the database once it is unlocked. Meanwhile, Syncthing is a peer-to-peer file sync tool where you can select folders to sync between your devices. Just pop files in the folders you choose, and then they will be available across your other devices whenever they come online. Syncthing is resilient as it works over both LAN and the internet and only ever sends content between your devices, never to a third-party server somewhere else. By combining these two pieces of software, you can essentially replicate the browser sync functionality. I have had a weird, conflicting issue where a new file is appearing, but it doesn’t seem to be impacting my main password database, which is updating between devices just fine. If you want to get a setup similar to what I have, you will need to go here to download KeePassXC for your computer. Once you have that, you will need to download your passwords from your web browser to a CSV file. In Chrome, you can type chrome://password-manager/settings into the URL bar, and you should see an option to download your passwords under Export Passwords. This will give you the CSV file you need for importing into KeePassXC. If you use a different browser, just use a search engine and type “browser-name export passwords” and muddle along. In KeePassXC, you’ll want to press Import File from the home screen, select the CSV file, and create a new database from it. On one of the screens of the wizard, there will be a Title field with a drop-down selected to none. Change this to Title and continue. You’ll select a name for the database, the encryption level (the defaults are fine), and then you will pick a password. I would choose four unrelated words that are easy for you to remember, as you’ll be typing them fairly often to access your passwords. When you have all your passwords in your new database, you will want to set up the browser extension so that your browser can fetch passwords from KeePassXC. Rather than explain how to do that here, refer to KeePassXC’s guide on how to set it up properly. Once you’ve got that set up, you want to install KeePassDX on Android. You can grab it on the F-Droid store and the Google Play Store. For iPhone users, there are other .kdbx-supporting apps, but I haven’t tried any of them, so have a look around and use what suits you. Once you have that done, you will want to install Syncthing on your computer and find a third-party app for your mobile device. On Android, I use an app called BasicSync; there are also options for iOS, but again, I’ve not tried these. Once you’ve got SyncThing, you’ll want to set it up and connect all of your devices together and share a folder between your gadgets. PCWorld has a good tutorial on setting up a synchronized file between your devices using SyncThing. Once you’ve set it up, congrats, you’ll never have to touch that stuff again except for adding or removing devices. I’ll be honest, I didn’t particularly like setting up Syncthing. It didn’t take me a massive amount of time, but I think I had to check online because I found it a bit confusing. That said, I’ve had it running for several weeks now and never need to touch the Syncthing settings, so that’s very nice. I also mentioned a conflicting file. I’m not sure why this is appearing, but the main .kdbx file seems to be updating and syncing just fine. What’s nice is that both KeePassXC and Syncthing are free software, so they won’t just vanish one day; you can take the code and fork the project or use a range of alternative implementations that others have made. It’s also nice that it works over LAN, so even if your ISP is having problems, your passwords will still sync. One area where you will want to be a bit more careful with this setup is if you only have one device. I am OK because I have a computer and two phones, all synced up. If you just have one device, you will probably want to store a backup of your .kdbx file somewhere else. Obviously, you’ll also want to remember your password really well, too. If you get locked out, it's game over. Overall, if you want to take back control of your computing from big tech, taking control of your passwords is an important part of this. You don’t need to immediately clear out your browser’s password manager; try running KeePassXC and the password manager concurrently for a while to see if you run into any problems. If you do try this out, let us know some other creative ways to use Syncthing. I haven’t really come up with a solution about what to do with my bookmarks, for example.
    • If the price was a dollar, someone would complain "Why isn't it free?" If it was free, someone would complain they weren't being paid to play it.
    • That lens of history will burn if you hold it at the right angle... Warn users too late: Shame, Microsoft! That extremely minor update to an obscure Control Panel widget required 2 years of warning. Warn users too early: Shame, Microsoft! We've got better things to do. Pipeline and process be damned, we'll just always be disappointed, eh?
    • Microsoft Paint used to be my favorite Windows app as a kid, and it's still pretty good by Usama Jawad I have been using Windows since the early 2000s, when I was around 10 years old or so. I vaguely remember playing around with Windows 98 and Windows 2000, but that may have been on school PCs which had old operating systems installed. My main OS on the home PC, and the one I recall spending most time with, was Windows XP. At that time, I used the home PC to create Word and PowerPoint documents for school, but a lot of the time, I simply used it to play games. My dad would bring game discs which we would try and install on the PC, sometimes unsuccessfully, and sometimes, we would rely on flash games in the browser, like Bubble Trouble on Miniclip. However, the problem with the latter approach was the internet speed. On a good day, our dial-up internet would offer us speeds of 56 kbps, but on most days, it was closer to 33 kbps. This did not facilitate online gaming as I would often have to wait minutes for a game to load or "draw" on the screen, and trying to download pirated games wasn't simple either. I remember getting tired of waiting for online games to load and just downloading simulator games from the Big Fish Games website instead, only to be disappointed after finding out that I was just being given access to trial versions of the title, and I needed to fork out money to pay for the full version. All of this is to say that it wasn't very easy to find entertainment options on the home PC when I was a kid, due to a number of reasons, mostly outside of my control. This situation pushed me towards a rather unconventional ally: Microsoft Paint. Whenever the internet wasn't working as good as I expected, I would simply spin up Paint and draw complete rubbish on the canvas. Of course, that wasn't always the intention, but it usually happened when I messed up drawing a straight line or something, and then I would give up on that particular piece and simply draw a random collection of objects. Microsoft Paint was extremely accessible and easy to use. Even if you weren't an artist, you could quickly understand the tools at your disposal and how to leverage them on a canvas. The absolute breadth on offer ensured that each painting was truly unique, as you could utilize various combinations of tools like the pencil, paint, spray paint, and more to truly personalize your creation. Since I wasn't particularly good at drawing both on digital screen or a physical screen, I remember that my main style of art would be to insert a bunch of randomly intersecting lines and then fill them with random colors through the paint can. I have trying to replicate that art style in the latest version of Paint below, and as you can see, it's truly Pablo Picasso-esque. The human imagination truly knows no bounds Microsoft Paint kept me occupied for hours and was my best friend when video games on the home PC were inaccessible for one reason or the other. There was no academic or professional reason for which I would need to use Paint, but I still loved using it in my personal time, even if what I created wasn't worth being shown to anyone. It was simply fun. Fast-forward to today, and the situation is mostly the same. Now that I am almost 29 years old, and I still have no reason to use Microsoft Paint in a professional capacity. In fact, I don't even use it in a personal capacity, except to dabble with it from time to time, just to see if core functionalities are still intact. And I'm happy to say that I think Microsoft Paint still offers the same accessibility and inviting experience that it did to me a couple of decades ago, even though its UX has been refreshed and it's been integrated with Copilot features. Interestingly, things could have been a lot different, had Microsoft had its way. Microsoft Paint was marked for deprecation with the Windows 10 Fall Creators Update in 2017, and even began displaying a product retirement alert, urging customers to shift to Paint 3D instead. Fortunately, after consumer backlash, Microsoft reversed course on this decision, and Paint continues to be a native app inside Windows installations that can also be updated quite frequently through the Microsoft Store. Instead, Paint 3D ended up on the chopping block, which is for the better, I think. I have intermittently played around with Microsoft's refreshed Paint experience in the past few years, and I do think it has received worthwhile upgrades. the UI and the UX has been modernized while retaining core functionality, and the app is still fairly easy to use. It doesn't meet any of my use-cases, but I've never really had any use-cases ever, as described previously. Of course, the elephant in the room is the Copilot integration. Personally, I believe that this is one place where Copilot does make sense, environmental concerns aside. I know that a lot of creatives use AI to generate images, and while some may be using professional alternatives, Paint still offers a decent casual experience, with the power of Copilot. Of course, you do need to have a valid Microsoft 365 Copilot license and available credits to use it, but even if you don't, you still get the big Copilot button in the toolbar, unfortunately. All in all, I am glad that Microsoft Paint continues to be a native feature in Windows 11, and a piece of software that has evolved to meet modern needs without cutting off its own roots. It's just an iconic piece of Windows history that was an essential part of my childhood, and while I don't use it anymore, I'm just glad it is still there.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      514
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      88
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!