Recommended Posts

I don't know if its just me but grabbed the md5sum off of my Windows 7 build 7000 torrent and it wasn't the same but the file name is different.

Info I got from it:

7000.0.081212-1400_client_en-us_Ultimate-GB1CULFRE_EN_DVD.iso

f9dce6ebd0a63930b44d8ae802b63825

I think you have the 32-bit and he has the 64-bit.

I think you have the 32-bit and he has the 64-bit.

Ahh, my mistake with the tricky wording. Anyways, if anyone needs it that is the md5 hash for the x86 version I got from torrents.

7000.0.081212-1400_client_en-us_Ultimate-GB1CULFRE_EN_DVD.iso

f9dce6ebd0a63930b44d8ae802b63825

Threelies, my Torrent has the same MD5 Checksum as yours.

I want to know if the official beta actually has the same checksum, then people can use Torrents instead of the bloated MS servers.

I've been on this forum since 12 CST (I know, I need a life...LOL) and I think people mentioned that the leaked 7000 build is the same as the "official" Beta build that was available today from Microsoft. I had the leaked one and I downloaded the one released today and yep, they were the same.

I've been on this forum since 12 CST and I think people mentioned that the leaked 7000 build is the same as the "official" Beta build that was available today from Microsoft.

Yes, I have seen this aswell. Apparently Microsoft purposely leaked it to get enthusiasts psyched out about Windows 7. After all, the betas of Windows 7 seem to have much more running for them compared to Windows Vista betas.

FordGT, the chances of many people getting a key is slim to none. Microsoft may extend the distribution of serials because of what we're going through.

Also, for C4C, what string do you have selected to look for the change? I have the Error string selected, hopefully that is enough. :s

I've been on this forum since 12 CST (I know, I need a life...LOL) and I think people mentioned that the leaked 7000 build is the same as the "official" Beta build that was available today from Microsoft. I had the leaked one and I downloaded the one released today and yep, they were the same.

I'm pretty sure it's the same exact build.

it's nice to see the forums running smoothly again. I've been watching this forum since 11 Am EST it's now Saturday 2 Am. I think I'm ready to install. I got the key and the ISO. Can I just run the setup from my vista partition to overwrite my old pre-beta 7 install, or do i need to burn a disk to accomplish that? thanx

Here are my md5 checksums:

Windows 7 Public Beta Build 7000 32-bit: f9dce6ebd0a63930b44d8ae802b63825

Windows 7 Public Beta Build 7000 64-bit: 773fc9cc60338c612af716a2a14f177d

I haven't seen anyone give out both checksums yet, so I wanted to throw them both out there in one post.

I've been on this forum since 12 CST (I know, I need a life...LOL) and I think people mentioned that the leaked 7000 build is the same as the "official" Beta build that was available today from Microsoft. I had the leaked one and I downloaded the one released today and yep, they were the same.

Thanks that helps me out a lot for waiting time downloading it again from official Microsoft.

Best way to go right now is torrents because its in fact the exact same content. Its something Microsoft didn't think this over ahead of time and implement some type of P2P style downloader for it, would have helped shared the bandwidth cost for them and prevent flooding.

Here are my md5 checksums:

Windows 7 Public Beta Build 7000 32-bit: f9dce6ebd0a63930b44d8ae802b63825

Windows 7 Public Beta Build 7000 64-bit: 773fc9cc60338c612af716a2a14f177d

I haven't seen anyone give out both checksums yet, so I wanted to throw them both out there in one post.

well so far it seems all of ours match.

iirc MS will provide official hashes on the public download page?

To those who have gotten their keys for both versions are you getting two completely different keys?

I did and was curious if that will give us a total of 6 system activations since each key can be used for 3 system activations...

I think I've read some people mentioning how their keys were identical, but mine were not so I was just curious!

well so far it seems all of ours match.

iirc MS will provide official hashes on the public download page?

They should.

Running check4change overnight. Good night everyone; it's late here on the east coast (USA).

I was lucky enough to get a working CD key from another forum poster (thanks!!) so if I manage to get any keys, I will be giving them out later since I will not need them.

Thanks a ton Clete2! So the leaked downloads before Christmas are actually the real beta versions.

ThreeLies, that will never work with a closed-source company.

Yea, that would probably see it as a security risk seeing how it most P2P contact you would be able to get a IP address. Instead they just try to work it out and get hammered with requests.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I think it depends on what you're looking for to do, and the time you have to spare. With my Dwarf 3, I easily spend 3-4 hour sessions; half an hour driving to an un-light polluted place, another half hour unpacking and setting up the smart scope + tripod for equatorial tracking, then 15 more minutes mucking around with settings and shooting calibration frames, spending a few hours shooting, merging with past photo sessions, etc. It's crazy how time flies and I often get home later than I expected. It's something I still need to set aside a good part of an evening to do, all in all. For one session, where you often need like four for best results when it comes to deep space objects. Even with a smart scope like Dwarf 3, regular non-astro photography is still way more approachable to people getting into photography. I find this is a time consuming niche no matter how I go about it. With practice, I can probably begin cutting time here but I think where smart scopes find their home is among people who love to shoot the night sky but don't have the spare time to go deep with the "navigator level" attunement to the night sky itself in addition to everything else. Having said this, _if_ you have even more time to spend on this hobby, it will probably be even more rewarding to do it more by hand and learn the skies and the details of how it all works.
    • I misread the title and thought Teams itself would be redesigned. Imagine having this one as a native WinUI app.
    • Dell, HP PCs ran into endless reboot, BitLocker recovery loops but Windows 11 isn't to blame by Sayan Sen Last month Neowin reported on a major issue on Dell systems wherein a bug in its official support tool was leading to endless blue screen of death (BSOD) and restarts. Following our report, Dell officially acknowledged its SupportAssist-related crash issue, confirming that the culprit is not Microsoft's operating system but rather a faulty version of its own remediation software. In a newly published support advisory, Dell stated that version 5.5.16.0 of Dell SupportAssist Remediation and Alienware SupportAssist Remediation can trigger blue screen errors and unexpected system restarts. The company notes that the problematic component operates independently of the main SupportAssist application, meaning users should not remove the primary SupportAssist software when troubleshooting the issue. According to Dell, the crashes are linked specifically to the SupportAssist Remediation service, which is bundled with SupportAssist OS Recovery Tools, and as such it has since released an updated version, 5.5.16.1, which is said to resolve the problem. Affected users are advised to first verify whether version 5.5.16.0 is installed by checking the Installed Apps section in Windows Settings. If so, Dell recommends updating SupportAssist OS Recovery Tools through either SupportAssist's "Update Software" feature or Dell Command Update. Dell also advises users to back up important data before performing the update and to ensure systems remain connected to power throughout the installation process. If you are still having issues though make sure to report to the Dell support forum. As it turns out though Dell is not the only PC maker currently dealing with update-related headaches as HP is also facing a separate but probably equally frustrating issue involving recent Windows Secure Boot updates that were released with recent Windows 11 Patch Tuesdays. Similar to Dell, HP also put up its own support article where it explains the issue. The company says that affected devices could hit a brick wall when booting as they run into a BitLocker recovery loop after the April 2026 updates. The problem appears to affect systems wherein the new UEFI Secure Boot CA 2023 certificates fail to apply properly. As such affected users will find themselves entering their recovery key over and over again despite the system otherwise functioning normally. HP says such PCs should be updated to the latest available BIOS version and configured with the necessary Secure Boot certificates before installing Microsoft's Windows 11 Patch Tuesday updates. Systems that are already experiencing the problem may require BIOS configuration changes to restore normal boot behavior. Admins can find information regarding that in the support article here on HP's official website.
    • Getting further away from the artistic study of mental disease that was the first game... (which never needed any sequels to begin with) But I get it, a company has to make money. And the second was at least visually impressive, if not in any other way.
    • If its the devs fault you would think Unreal would help M$ take full advantage of Unreal and work with them to fix the performance issues. Otherwise they are catching unwarranted bad press.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      246
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!