Recommended Posts

Ditto, it would be nice to be able to customize which links on the start menu end up as library views, and have some as the normal designated folders within your personal area.

For example. All my music is in one place, but my vids are split over two disks. It would be handy to have the video link act as a library browser, but the music link just take me to the My Music folder like it did in Vista.

Does it matter, if you have all the music in one place, that's all you get in the library anyway and it will act exactly the same way as if it was the folder.

to top it off right click an empty area in the left side panel in explorer (where the lirbaries and folders are shown) and choose "expand to current folder" to make the treeview automaticalluy track and expand to where you are like it did before.

Can't you just go to the folder? How is it any different? Create a shortcut on the desktop..I don't think any functionailty has been removed in implementing this?

Libraries just aggregate the folders into a nice view. If you don't want it in the library, don't add that folder to be monitored. The folder/file is still in it's original location.

So, in pasty2k2's case, tell Videos in Libraries to monitor the two seperate locations. Tell Music to monitor your folder. When you click Music, it will show you the folder and you can expand and collapse the folder. Same with Videos.

OK, I could get used to the library thing, but it would still be nice. I dont like the idea that what I am looking at isnt a "hard folder" if you get me. Its like im using a database or something, and I just dont like that idea.

Regardless of that, I would want the personal (your name) folder to point to your actual personal location where you can see the 11 standard folders for music, pics, vids, saved games, docs etc. At the moment I can do everything from the start menu except get to that folder.

OK, I could get used to the library thing, but it would still be nice. I dont like the idea that what I am looking at isnt a "hard folder" if you get me. Its like im using a database or something, and I just dont like that idea.

Regardless of that, I would want the personal (your name) folder to point to your actual personal location where you can see the 11 standard folders for music, pics, vids, saved games, docs etc. At the moment I can do everything from the start menu except get to that folder.

It is actually a "Hard", or rather, "Real" folder when you drag and drop stuff into there. It goes into a real folder called, "My (Whatever)", or whatever folder you choose as the default.

If you don't want to have any other folders show up, or feel like opening a database when you open "Pictures/Videos/Music/Documents", I would just remove the other default library location (There's two by default I think.) so you just work with the one real one. "My Pictures/Videos/Music/Documents."

I can get used to the links on the start menu pointing to Music/Vids etc, but I mean the top one - the actual personal folder. If you click it in the start menu, it shows your libraries that are set up - by default, 4. If you open the personal folder via the desktop, it actually goes to the C:\Users\Username folder. That is what I want the start menu to do, be it in library form or as an actual folder. At the moment, all clicking your personal folder icon will do is load up a list of libraries (as icons). Any way I can get this to act as a normal link to my C:\Users\Username folder?

Access to the user folder is something I know the Explorer UX folks are watching and thinking carefully about.

As for the libraries themselves, if you only have one location in them, they should work just like regular folders (plus the added capabilities of the Arrange By views, and better search capabilities).

True, however I dont know why you can only arrange by Album, Artist, Genre, Folder, Song and Rating. Where is Album Artist? Composer? You could do this using the Details list method.

If they bring Album Artist into it, and also have the Personal folder shortcut on the start menu point to the actual folder, Im sold already.

For the mean time, just pin your personal folder from the desktop to the top left of your start menu - itll do for now. Its only to the left instead of the right, hardly a problem as a short term solution. Ive reported the issue.

OK, I could get used to the library thing, but it would still be nice. I dont like the idea that what I am looking at isnt a "hard folder" if you get me. Its like im using a database or something, and I just dont like that idea.

Regardless of that, I would want the personal (your name) folder to point to your actual personal location where you can see the 11 standard folders for music, pics, vids, saved games, docs etc. At the moment I can do everything from the start menu except get to that folder.

I can understand being upset with the change in the Personal Folder Start Menu link, since I already have quick access to my Library and it would be nice to see my personal folder sometimes. I don;t feel it's that big a deal though, since many times the Libraries way will be more convenient. In the meantime, I just use a shortcut to that folder. So whatever, I understand both sides.

What I find amusing however is what you said first: "I just don't like that idea". I mean, nothing's 'hard' anyway, it's all software.. once you get used to it and appreciate it you'll wonder what you were being superstitious about.

True, however I dont know why you can only arrange by Album, Artist, Genre, Folder, Song and Rating. Where is Album Artist? Composer? You could do this using the Details list method.

If they bring Album Artist into it, and also have the Personal folder shortcut on the start menu point to the actual folder, Im sold already.

Album Artist sounds fair enough, though most of the time Artist should do. Composer is a little out there though, IMO. Anyway, what I would do for any such specific desire is right-click and Sort or Group away.

Artist is no good for compilations, whereas Album Artist will show the "artist" for those compilations as "Various Artists", and then show all the compilations within there. Thats one reason, I have many others.

By "hard" folder I mean a physical location on my hard disk - I dont like the idea of having my items organised for me, I already have all my different types of data organised my own way, and that means using the Personal folder to access it. I agree that libraries are useful, just not a one-for-all solution. I want both :)

I know I came across as being "superstitious" about it, but nobody likes a change in the way they do things if its not a change for the best. Example, I have loads of PSX ISOs in my Documents/ISO Images folder that I have backed up to play on an emulator. I cant get to them through libraries any easier than I could with normal browsing.

By "hard" folder I mean a physical location on my hard disk - I dont like the idea of having my items organised for me, I already have all my different types of data organised my own way, and that means using the Personal folder to access it. I agree that libraries are useful, just not a one-for-all solution. I want both :)

The By Folder view of a library should give you a physical representation of its contents (and if you have only one location in the library, then that's exactly what it is).

I know I came across as being "superstitious" about it, but nobody likes a change in the way they do things if its not a change for the best. Example, I have loads of PSX ISOs in my Documents/ISO Images folder that I have backed up to play on an emulator. I cant get to them through libraries any easier than I could with normal browsing.

Maybe it doesn't make it easier (although arguably the By Type view may be helpful in this situation), but it certainly shouldn't be any harder. I guess that's the part I'm confused about... do you feel accessing these via the Documents library is harder somehow than via the "normal" folder view?

I know I came across as being "superstitious" about it, but nobody likes a change in the way they do things if its not a change for the best. Example, I have loads of PSX ISOs in my Documents/ISO Images folder that I have backed up to play on an emulator. I cant get to them through libraries any easier than I could with normal browsing.

Step 1: Create a new Library, or leave it in the Documents Library if you prefer

Step 2: Add ISO Images Folder to Library. This step is obsolete if youleft your ISos in Documents

Step 3: Bam! Two clicks and you're in :)

By "hard" folder I mean a physical location on my hard disk - I dont like the idea of having my items organised for me, I already have all my different types of data organised my own way, and that means using the Personal folder to access it.

I meant that even regular folders are software abstractions, it's not like you physically know where your files are on the disk. The thing about Libraries is that it doesn't actually move or "organize" anything at all for you... ALL it does is show you what you ask it to show, all in one place. Again, they don't act like a database, and they organize nothing for you. They just allow you to show as many or as few folders as you choose in one view. "Both" and "easier" fulfilled. You could even create a Library and say "point to my user folder"... and you're back exactly where you wanted to be.

Artist is no good for compilations, whereas Album Artist will show the "artist" for those compilations as "Various Artists", and then show all the compilations within there.

Off topic:

Why is it that in Windows Media Player, whenever I edit the Album Artists column, the Contributing Artists column always changes? Many times i've lost good data because I want to change a compilation to "Various Artists" and it'll automatically replace all the individual artists names with "Various Artists".. for all the songs. It's a royal pain in the rear, and the foremost reason I miss Advanced Tag Editor. I don't want to do all my metadata editing in Explorer (though I may have to since WMP still doesn't automatically write changes back to the real files in the Library).

  • 6 months later...

DISABLING LIBRARIES IN WINDOWS 7

Just paste this into a text file, rename it to 'anything.reg' and run it:

Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00

[-HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Explorer\Desktop\NameSpace\{031E4825-7B94-4dc3-B131-E946B44C8DD5}]

[-HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\CLSID\{031E4825-7B94-4dc3-B131-E946B44C8DD5}]

[-HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Classes\CLSID\{031E4825-7B94-4dc3-B131-E946B44C8DD5}]

[-HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Explorer\FolderDescriptions\{2112AB0A-C86A-4ffe-A368-0DE96E47012E}]

[-HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Explorer\FolderDescriptions\{491E922F-5643-4af4-A7EB-4E7A138D8174}]

[-HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Explorer\FolderDescriptions\{7b0db17d-9cd2-4a93-9733-46cc89022e7c}]

[-HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Explorer\FolderDescriptions\{A302545D-DEFF-464b-ABE8-61C8648D939B}]

[-HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Explorer\FolderDescriptions\{A990AE9F-A03B-4e80-94BC-9912D7504104}]

[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Explorer\HideDesktopIcons\NewStartPanel]

"{031E4825-7B94-4dc3-B131-E946B44C8DD5}"=-

thnx for the fix if i need it ever, i am loving the concept of library & in fact it is the one feature that i like the most.

i have put up my songs scattered at different folders & library magically brings them into one roof, nice!. also i created downloads library (one appeared i pre-beta leaks) to keep track of all my downloads i put in different folders. library has made sharing in home group fun & also now i dont need to add folders manually for indexing which is done at default for all folders in library.

don't know why would anyone wants to do away with this!

Never use Libraries. I don't see the point. I just go to the actual folder in question. The whole idea of the Libraries just seems like an extra step to get somewhere I can get to easily already.

Having said that, I don't see a need to disable Libraries. I just ignore the Libraries all together.

Edited by UncleSpellbinder
Never use Libraries. I don't see the point. I just go to the actual folder in question. The whole idea of the Libraries just seems like an extra step to get somewhere I can get to easily already.

Having said that, I don't see a need to disable Libraries. I just ignore the Libraries all together.

Right so going to a 3rd HDD < Example to grab a song or movie you wish to watch is much easier then going to your videos in libraries 1 maby 2 clicks away if that and getting the same thing .

in case you been gone on a trip somewhere the past year Quote MS site A library gathers files from different locations and displays them as a single collection, without moving them from where they're stored

In some ways, a library is similar to a folder. For example, when you open a library, you'll see one or more files. However, unlike a folder, a library gathers files that are stored in several locations. This is a subtle, but important, difference. Libraries don't actually store your items. They monitor folders that contain your items, and let you access and arrange the items in different ways. For instance, if you have music files in folders on your hard disk and on an external drive, you can access all of your music files at once using the Music library.

ill be honest, i dont like the libraries feature at all. i want to be able to look at my documents like i did in vista/xp. i know i can access a regular folder in an explorer window but i want to be able to access it in the start menu and desktop.

so any help?

I'd just try get used to it. It's a change, I know.......but it's a good one. Srsly, 2 clicks is better than 5, whatever way you look at it.

"i know i can access a regular folder in an explorer window but i want to be able to access it in the start menu and desktop."

Your user folder doesn't appear at the top right of your start menu? 7, as regards this detail, is identical to Vista. In fact, one could pretty much ignore the Libraries if one wanted to, no? Unless, of course, I'm misunderstanding the complaint. Wouldn't be the first time :)

Right so going to a 3rd HDD < Example to grab a song or movie you wish to watch is much easier then going to your videos in libraries 1 maby 2 clicks away if that and getting the same thing .

in case you been gone on a trip somewhere the past year Quote MS site A library gathers files from different locations and displays them as a single collection, without moving them from where they're stored

In some ways, a library is similar to a folder. For example, when you open a library, you'll see one or more files. However, unlike a folder, a library gathers files that are stored in several locations. This is a subtle, but important, difference. Libraries don't actually store your items. They monitor folders that contain your items, and let you access and arrange the items in different ways. For instance, if you have music files in folders on your hard disk and on an external drive, you can access all of your music files at once using the Music library.

Point taken. Maybe I've just not played around with it much. Just added a new library called Film. It contains movies from 2 external HD's.

So I guess the whole Library concept isn't that much different than Winamp's "watched folders"? I'll give it another shot. Perhaps I've been

to hasty on this.

Thanks, notuptome2004

Point taken. Maybe I've just not played around with it much. Just added a new library called Film. It contains movies from 2 external HD's.

So I guess the whole Library concept isn't that much different than Winamp's "watched folders"? I'll give it another shot. Perhaps I've been

to hasty on this.

Thanks, notuptome2004

Hmm, kinda like the watched folders, but really well aggregated and usable across the whole OS, even if they don't use the fancy new Windows 7 dialogues. Let us know how you go :)

On a sidenote: I've been holding off setting up lots of libraries for the RTM, so that I don't have to do it twice.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Sandboxie Plus 1.17.8 / Classic 5.72.8 by Razvan Serea Run programs in a sandbox to prevent malware from making permanent changes to your PC. Sandboxie allows you to run your browser, or any other program, so that all changes that result from the usage are kept in a sandbox environment, which can then be deleted later. Sandboxie is a sandbox-based isolation software for 32- and 64-bit Windows NT-based operating systems. It is being developed by David Xanatos since it became open source, before that it was developed by Sophos (which acquired it from Invincea, which acquired it earlier from the original author Ronen Tzur). It creates a sandbox-like isolated operating environment in which applications can be run or installed without permanently modifying the local or mapped drive. An isolated virtual environment allows controlled testing of untrusted programs and web surfing. Sandboxie is available in two flavors Plus and Classic. Both have the same core components, this means they have the same level of security and compatibility. What's different is the user interface the Plus build has a modern Qt based UI which supports all new features that have been added since the project went open source. The Classic build has the old no longer developed MFC based UI, hence it lacks support for modern features, these features can however still be used when manually configured in the Sandboxie.ini. Sandboxie Plus 1.17.8 / Classic 5.72.8 release notes: Added added DisableCustomTitleOpt=[process,][y|n] to allow [#] sandboxie title markers on custom-titlebar windows (Delphi VCL, Qt, Electron) that were previously skipped to prevent DWM repaint CPU loops #5387 Changed updated bundled ImDisk driver to 3.0.2 #5419 Fixed fix Suppress logs for expected non-user SIDs #5422 SbieSvc.exe: SBIE2218/2219 error when run program as administrator #5417 fixed explorer.exe crashes in Application Compartment when Huorong Security is installed #5423 Download: Sandboxie Plus (64-bit) | 23.5 MB (Open Source) Download: Sandboxie Classic (64-bit) | 3.0 MB Links: Sandboxie Website | GitHub | ARM64 | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Hello, Christian Maas' XVI32 is a nice (and very small) hex editor. Speaking of hex editors, many years ago a colleague and I who both worked at Tribal Voice managed to edit a copy of the company's PowWow instant messaging client to make it behave better now that all of its lookup servers and other server-side tech was gone.  The program didn't support NAT (RFC-3022 was introduced in January 2001, the same time Tribal Voice was shuttered), but it still worked okay if you manually set up port-forwarding on your router.  The server at http://powwow.jazy.net/ hosts a copy (usual warnings about downloading and running untrusted code from random internet servers apply). I occasionally use some tools like Funduc Software's Search and Replace and Application Mover when I need to make mass-edits to text-based files or move programs with a hard-coded installation directories, respectively.  When I need to figure out the exact LCD panel inside of a laptop, EnTech Taiwan's Monitor Asset Manager is my go-to tool for that purpose. JD Design's website (now hosted on github.io) has a number of interesting freeware and shareware utilities.  I used to use their TouchPro utility to set the file timestamps on software I was mastering to match its version number (e.g., version 3.00 of a program had all of its files dates set to 3:00AM, and so forth). Karenware has a number of interesting freeware utilities, too. Regards, Aryeh Goretsky  
    • I still use HexChat! Not really as ancient as the 1994 AutoCAD above my post, but I have never found anything better to replace it. Yes we still operate an IRC server https://www.neowin.net/irc/ 😛 
    • At work we still have a couple of people that use a version of AutoCAD LT purchased in 1994. This predates Windows 95 and works fine on versions of Windows up to XP. Its long since run in an locked down isolated XP VM, accessible via RDP. I did install LibreCAD for them, however they said it was just too different to get to grips with. In all fairness one of them is now 75 and the other is almost 60.
    • On my music making (non internet) PC Sony Acid Pro 7.0 Adobe Audition 2015 Korg Legacy Collection Windows 7 SP1
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Jeroen Wilms earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      509
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      138
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      90
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      82
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!