Recommended Posts

Ditto, it would be nice to be able to customize which links on the start menu end up as library views, and have some as the normal designated folders within your personal area.

For example. All my music is in one place, but my vids are split over two disks. It would be handy to have the video link act as a library browser, but the music link just take me to the My Music folder like it did in Vista.

Does it matter, if you have all the music in one place, that's all you get in the library anyway and it will act exactly the same way as if it was the folder.

to top it off right click an empty area in the left side panel in explorer (where the lirbaries and folders are shown) and choose "expand to current folder" to make the treeview automaticalluy track and expand to where you are like it did before.

Can't you just go to the folder? How is it any different? Create a shortcut on the desktop..I don't think any functionailty has been removed in implementing this?

Libraries just aggregate the folders into a nice view. If you don't want it in the library, don't add that folder to be monitored. The folder/file is still in it's original location.

So, in pasty2k2's case, tell Videos in Libraries to monitor the two seperate locations. Tell Music to monitor your folder. When you click Music, it will show you the folder and you can expand and collapse the folder. Same with Videos.

OK, I could get used to the library thing, but it would still be nice. I dont like the idea that what I am looking at isnt a "hard folder" if you get me. Its like im using a database or something, and I just dont like that idea.

Regardless of that, I would want the personal (your name) folder to point to your actual personal location where you can see the 11 standard folders for music, pics, vids, saved games, docs etc. At the moment I can do everything from the start menu except get to that folder.

OK, I could get used to the library thing, but it would still be nice. I dont like the idea that what I am looking at isnt a "hard folder" if you get me. Its like im using a database or something, and I just dont like that idea.

Regardless of that, I would want the personal (your name) folder to point to your actual personal location where you can see the 11 standard folders for music, pics, vids, saved games, docs etc. At the moment I can do everything from the start menu except get to that folder.

It is actually a "Hard", or rather, "Real" folder when you drag and drop stuff into there. It goes into a real folder called, "My (Whatever)", or whatever folder you choose as the default.

If you don't want to have any other folders show up, or feel like opening a database when you open "Pictures/Videos/Music/Documents", I would just remove the other default library location (There's two by default I think.) so you just work with the one real one. "My Pictures/Videos/Music/Documents."

I can get used to the links on the start menu pointing to Music/Vids etc, but I mean the top one - the actual personal folder. If you click it in the start menu, it shows your libraries that are set up - by default, 4. If you open the personal folder via the desktop, it actually goes to the C:\Users\Username folder. That is what I want the start menu to do, be it in library form or as an actual folder. At the moment, all clicking your personal folder icon will do is load up a list of libraries (as icons). Any way I can get this to act as a normal link to my C:\Users\Username folder?

Access to the user folder is something I know the Explorer UX folks are watching and thinking carefully about.

As for the libraries themselves, if you only have one location in them, they should work just like regular folders (plus the added capabilities of the Arrange By views, and better search capabilities).

True, however I dont know why you can only arrange by Album, Artist, Genre, Folder, Song and Rating. Where is Album Artist? Composer? You could do this using the Details list method.

If they bring Album Artist into it, and also have the Personal folder shortcut on the start menu point to the actual folder, Im sold already.

For the mean time, just pin your personal folder from the desktop to the top left of your start menu - itll do for now. Its only to the left instead of the right, hardly a problem as a short term solution. Ive reported the issue.

OK, I could get used to the library thing, but it would still be nice. I dont like the idea that what I am looking at isnt a "hard folder" if you get me. Its like im using a database or something, and I just dont like that idea.

Regardless of that, I would want the personal (your name) folder to point to your actual personal location where you can see the 11 standard folders for music, pics, vids, saved games, docs etc. At the moment I can do everything from the start menu except get to that folder.

I can understand being upset with the change in the Personal Folder Start Menu link, since I already have quick access to my Library and it would be nice to see my personal folder sometimes. I don;t feel it's that big a deal though, since many times the Libraries way will be more convenient. In the meantime, I just use a shortcut to that folder. So whatever, I understand both sides.

What I find amusing however is what you said first: "I just don't like that idea". I mean, nothing's 'hard' anyway, it's all software.. once you get used to it and appreciate it you'll wonder what you were being superstitious about.

True, however I dont know why you can only arrange by Album, Artist, Genre, Folder, Song and Rating. Where is Album Artist? Composer? You could do this using the Details list method.

If they bring Album Artist into it, and also have the Personal folder shortcut on the start menu point to the actual folder, Im sold already.

Album Artist sounds fair enough, though most of the time Artist should do. Composer is a little out there though, IMO. Anyway, what I would do for any such specific desire is right-click and Sort or Group away.

Artist is no good for compilations, whereas Album Artist will show the "artist" for those compilations as "Various Artists", and then show all the compilations within there. Thats one reason, I have many others.

By "hard" folder I mean a physical location on my hard disk - I dont like the idea of having my items organised for me, I already have all my different types of data organised my own way, and that means using the Personal folder to access it. I agree that libraries are useful, just not a one-for-all solution. I want both :)

I know I came across as being "superstitious" about it, but nobody likes a change in the way they do things if its not a change for the best. Example, I have loads of PSX ISOs in my Documents/ISO Images folder that I have backed up to play on an emulator. I cant get to them through libraries any easier than I could with normal browsing.

By "hard" folder I mean a physical location on my hard disk - I dont like the idea of having my items organised for me, I already have all my different types of data organised my own way, and that means using the Personal folder to access it. I agree that libraries are useful, just not a one-for-all solution. I want both :)

The By Folder view of a library should give you a physical representation of its contents (and if you have only one location in the library, then that's exactly what it is).

I know I came across as being "superstitious" about it, but nobody likes a change in the way they do things if its not a change for the best. Example, I have loads of PSX ISOs in my Documents/ISO Images folder that I have backed up to play on an emulator. I cant get to them through libraries any easier than I could with normal browsing.

Maybe it doesn't make it easier (although arguably the By Type view may be helpful in this situation), but it certainly shouldn't be any harder. I guess that's the part I'm confused about... do you feel accessing these via the Documents library is harder somehow than via the "normal" folder view?

I know I came across as being "superstitious" about it, but nobody likes a change in the way they do things if its not a change for the best. Example, I have loads of PSX ISOs in my Documents/ISO Images folder that I have backed up to play on an emulator. I cant get to them through libraries any easier than I could with normal browsing.

Step 1: Create a new Library, or leave it in the Documents Library if you prefer

Step 2: Add ISO Images Folder to Library. This step is obsolete if youleft your ISos in Documents

Step 3: Bam! Two clicks and you're in :)

By "hard" folder I mean a physical location on my hard disk - I dont like the idea of having my items organised for me, I already have all my different types of data organised my own way, and that means using the Personal folder to access it.

I meant that even regular folders are software abstractions, it's not like you physically know where your files are on the disk. The thing about Libraries is that it doesn't actually move or "organize" anything at all for you... ALL it does is show you what you ask it to show, all in one place. Again, they don't act like a database, and they organize nothing for you. They just allow you to show as many or as few folders as you choose in one view. "Both" and "easier" fulfilled. You could even create a Library and say "point to my user folder"... and you're back exactly where you wanted to be.

Artist is no good for compilations, whereas Album Artist will show the "artist" for those compilations as "Various Artists", and then show all the compilations within there.

Off topic:

Why is it that in Windows Media Player, whenever I edit the Album Artists column, the Contributing Artists column always changes? Many times i've lost good data because I want to change a compilation to "Various Artists" and it'll automatically replace all the individual artists names with "Various Artists".. for all the songs. It's a royal pain in the rear, and the foremost reason I miss Advanced Tag Editor. I don't want to do all my metadata editing in Explorer (though I may have to since WMP still doesn't automatically write changes back to the real files in the Library).

  • 6 months later...

DISABLING LIBRARIES IN WINDOWS 7

Just paste this into a text file, rename it to 'anything.reg' and run it:

Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00

[-HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Explorer\Desktop\NameSpace\{031E4825-7B94-4dc3-B131-E946B44C8DD5}]

[-HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\CLSID\{031E4825-7B94-4dc3-B131-E946B44C8DD5}]

[-HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Classes\CLSID\{031E4825-7B94-4dc3-B131-E946B44C8DD5}]

[-HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Explorer\FolderDescriptions\{2112AB0A-C86A-4ffe-A368-0DE96E47012E}]

[-HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Explorer\FolderDescriptions\{491E922F-5643-4af4-A7EB-4E7A138D8174}]

[-HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Explorer\FolderDescriptions\{7b0db17d-9cd2-4a93-9733-46cc89022e7c}]

[-HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Explorer\FolderDescriptions\{A302545D-DEFF-464b-ABE8-61C8648D939B}]

[-HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Explorer\FolderDescriptions\{A990AE9F-A03B-4e80-94BC-9912D7504104}]

[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Explorer\HideDesktopIcons\NewStartPanel]

"{031E4825-7B94-4dc3-B131-E946B44C8DD5}"=-

thnx for the fix if i need it ever, i am loving the concept of library & in fact it is the one feature that i like the most.

i have put up my songs scattered at different folders & library magically brings them into one roof, nice!. also i created downloads library (one appeared i pre-beta leaks) to keep track of all my downloads i put in different folders. library has made sharing in home group fun & also now i dont need to add folders manually for indexing which is done at default for all folders in library.

don't know why would anyone wants to do away with this!

Never use Libraries. I don't see the point. I just go to the actual folder in question. The whole idea of the Libraries just seems like an extra step to get somewhere I can get to easily already.

Having said that, I don't see a need to disable Libraries. I just ignore the Libraries all together.

Edited by UncleSpellbinder
Never use Libraries. I don't see the point. I just go to the actual folder in question. The whole idea of the Libraries just seems like an extra step to get somewhere I can get to easily already.

Having said that, I don't see a need to disable Libraries. I just ignore the Libraries all together.

Right so going to a 3rd HDD < Example to grab a song or movie you wish to watch is much easier then going to your videos in libraries 1 maby 2 clicks away if that and getting the same thing .

in case you been gone on a trip somewhere the past year Quote MS site A library gathers files from different locations and displays them as a single collection, without moving them from where they're stored

In some ways, a library is similar to a folder. For example, when you open a library, you'll see one or more files. However, unlike a folder, a library gathers files that are stored in several locations. This is a subtle, but important, difference. Libraries don't actually store your items. They monitor folders that contain your items, and let you access and arrange the items in different ways. For instance, if you have music files in folders on your hard disk and on an external drive, you can access all of your music files at once using the Music library.

ill be honest, i dont like the libraries feature at all. i want to be able to look at my documents like i did in vista/xp. i know i can access a regular folder in an explorer window but i want to be able to access it in the start menu and desktop.

so any help?

I'd just try get used to it. It's a change, I know.......but it's a good one. Srsly, 2 clicks is better than 5, whatever way you look at it.

"i know i can access a regular folder in an explorer window but i want to be able to access it in the start menu and desktop."

Your user folder doesn't appear at the top right of your start menu? 7, as regards this detail, is identical to Vista. In fact, one could pretty much ignore the Libraries if one wanted to, no? Unless, of course, I'm misunderstanding the complaint. Wouldn't be the first time :)

Right so going to a 3rd HDD < Example to grab a song or movie you wish to watch is much easier then going to your videos in libraries 1 maby 2 clicks away if that and getting the same thing .

in case you been gone on a trip somewhere the past year Quote MS site A library gathers files from different locations and displays them as a single collection, without moving them from where they're stored

In some ways, a library is similar to a folder. For example, when you open a library, you'll see one or more files. However, unlike a folder, a library gathers files that are stored in several locations. This is a subtle, but important, difference. Libraries don't actually store your items. They monitor folders that contain your items, and let you access and arrange the items in different ways. For instance, if you have music files in folders on your hard disk and on an external drive, you can access all of your music files at once using the Music library.

Point taken. Maybe I've just not played around with it much. Just added a new library called Film. It contains movies from 2 external HD's.

So I guess the whole Library concept isn't that much different than Winamp's "watched folders"? I'll give it another shot. Perhaps I've been

to hasty on this.

Thanks, notuptome2004

Point taken. Maybe I've just not played around with it much. Just added a new library called Film. It contains movies from 2 external HD's.

So I guess the whole Library concept isn't that much different than Winamp's "watched folders"? I'll give it another shot. Perhaps I've been

to hasty on this.

Thanks, notuptome2004

Hmm, kinda like the watched folders, but really well aggregated and usable across the whole OS, even if they don't use the fancy new Windows 7 dialogues. Let us know how you go :)

On a sidenote: I've been holding off setting up lots of libraries for the RTM, so that I don't have to do it twice.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Linux 7.1 arrives with an NTFS overhaul and major hardware performance boosts by Paul Hill The founder of the Linux kernel has just announced the availability of Linux 7.1. This is a stable version of the kernel that will now be tested by various Linux distributions before it is shipped to users through update managers. Some users, like those on Debian, for example, might not get it for a long time, if at all, while Fedora users can expect it in the near future. With Linux 7.1 out on time, the merge window for Linux 7.2 is now open, giving contributors the opportunity to send in major new features that have been waiting for the last two months. Torvalds warned that he is currently travelling and will be in another timezone, so timing for the merge window may be irregular due to timezone differences and limited internet access. Torvalds said that he has already fetched early pull requests to allow him to do some offline work, but the travel could still cause disruption. Right now, he is not planning to extend the release, but did consider it. He said he might later regret not extending, though. In terms of this last week of development for Linux 7.1, Torvalds said there were no major or alarming changes. This week consisted mostly of smaller driver updates to GPU, networking, and sound, networking fixes, trace tooling fixes, and misc minor fixes. The shortlog this week lists fixes for driver bugs, memory leaks, I/O and USB fixes, networking and RDMA fixes, DRM/graphics fixes, and tooling and verification improvements. Specific fixes include USB series heap-overflow and buffer overflow fixes, and multiple use-after-free, memory-leak, and refcount corrections across subsystems such as i2c, zram, gpio, and net. There are fixes for graphics drivers, including amdgpu, i915, and virtio, as well as hypervisor and virtualization tweaks affecting mshv, vmbus, and hyperv. According to Phoronix, anyone running Linux 7.1 should look out for the new NTFS driver, Intel FRED for improved performance on Panther Lake and future CPUs, faster graphics with Intel Arc Battlemage, and improvements for older AMD Radeon GPUs. If you are running Linux on your computer and everything is fine, then you don’t need to worry about updating to Linux 7.1 as a priority; just wait for it to be pushed to you. If you have tried Linux on hardware but it didn’t work properly, trying again with a distro that uses Linux 7.1 could cause Linux to work on your machine, thanks to the new hardware support.
    • you can also do this with this tool: PowerSettingsExplorer made by mbk1969 at 3dguru forum.. I found it by accident researching on modern standby and annoying quirks of it in 2022
    • AB Download Manager 1.9.1 by Razvan Serea AB Download Manager is an open-source, feature-rich download manager designed to accelerate downloads, organize files efficiently, and provide seamless control over downloads. With support for multiple connections, resume capability, and an intuitive interface, it enhances the downloading experience for users seeking speed and reliability. The software integrates with various browsers, enabling quick link grabbing and batch downloading. It supports HTTP, HTTPS, and FTP protocols, ensuring broad compatibility with different file sources. Users can schedule downloads, set speed limits, and categorize files automatically for better organization. AB Download Manager is lightweight yet powerful, making it a great alternative to proprietary download managers. Its open-source nature allows developers to contribute, customize, and improve the software as needed. Whether you're downloading large files, managing multiple downloads at once, or seeking an ad-free experience, this tool offers a practical and efficient solution. Key features of AB Download Manager: Multi-Connection Support – Accelerates downloads by splitting files into multiple segments. Resume Capability – Allows paused or interrupted downloads to be resumed without starting over. Batch Downloading – Supports downloading multiple files at once for improved efficiency. Browser Integration – Captures download links directly from browsers for seamless operation. HTTP, HTTPS, and FTP Support – Ensures compatibility with a wide range of file sources. Download Scheduling – Enables users to automate downloads at specific times. Speed Limiting – Lets users control bandwidth usage for optimized performance. File Categorization – Automatically organizes downloaded files into designated folders. User-Friendly Interface – Simple and intuitive design for easy navigation. Cross-Platform Compatibility – Works on multiple operating systems. Ad-Free Experience – No intrusive ads or tracking for a clean user experience. AB Download Manager 1.9.1 changelog: Added An option to customize notification sounds (#1259) Fixed Ongoing notification was laggy on Samsung One UI devices (#1269) Improved Updated Translations Minor UI/UX improvements Download: AB Download Manager 1.9.1 | Portable | ~80.0 MB (Open Source) Download: ARM64 | Portable ARM64 | Android Links: AB Download Manager Website | Github Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • watching him because of the Mr Klinton cat
    • yup dude, ADS on this website are terrible
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      140
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      90
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      81
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!