Official 3DMark Scores Database


Recommended Posts

Noticed we don't have a thread for this yet, so post your 3DMark 2006/Vantage Scores!

This thread is not quite a "who can get the highest 3DMark score" thread, but rather a database where members can compare 3DMark Scores.

CLICK HERE TO ACCESS DATABASE

Requirements

1. Processor as well as speed. CPU-Z screenshot required.

2. Processor Heatsink/fan or Watercooling setup (if it applies).

3. Motherboard - Brand and model

4. RAM - How much RAM you have (Example: 1x4GB or 2x2GB), Speed of the RAM (The actual speed of the RAM NOT the effective speed so DDR2/3-XXXX with he XXXX divided by 2), Latencies, MODEL OF RAM AS WELL; FOR EXAMPLE: CORSAIR XMS2 DOMINATOR IS DIFFERENT FROM CORSAIR XMS2

CPU-Z Screenshot of the MEMORY tab

5. Video Card - Video card that you have as well as how much vRAM it has and overclocks that you have made on it. GPU-Z screenshot required.

GPU-Z can be downloaded at the following link: http://www.techpowerup.com/downloads/1304/...U-Z_v0.3.1.html

Make sure you download the latest version - the link I've provided may be for an older version

6. Operating system, 32bit or 64bit.

7. 3DMark 2006 Score - Screenshot of your score required.

8. 3DMark Vantage Score - Screenshot of your score required.

For #5 and 6, If you are using the trial version to run these tests, follow Lyric's example

9. In your post, have the above information in the following format:

Neowin Username: shift.

CPU: CPU Model @ Clock Speed (FSB x Multiplier)

The above FSB value refers to the "Bus Speed" number in the CPU tab of CPU-Z; this is also known as BCLK for i5/i7 CPUs

Processor Heatsink/Fan or Watercooling Setup: Noctua NH-U12P w/ Noctua NF-P12 or Swiftech Apogee (For example)

Motherboard: Brand + Model Number

RAM: BRAND + MODEL, Volume (2x1GB or 2x2GB for example), Speed (how many MHz, so take DDR2/3-XXXX and divide the XXXX by 2), Latencies (tCAS-tRCD-tRP-tRAS format)

Video Card: Sapphire HD 4870 1GB @ Core Clock/Shader Clock/Memory Clock (if your card is not overclocked, just write stock)

Note: Currently, ATI cards have linked Core and Shader clocks. So for those with ATI cards your Shader clock will be left blank.

OS: Windows Vista Ultimate x86 for example.

3DMark 2006 Score: Just write your score, remember to provide screenshot.

3DMark Vantage Score: All tests will be run using the PERFORMANCE preset.

NOTES:: This is not a thread where you test your setup for the highest score. Do all your fine tuning first AND THEN post your final submission. If you happen to upgrade your system, feel free to make a new post with above information.

GUIDELINES:

1. System must be able to fully complete 3DMark Test

2. Those running Windows XP may post 3DMark 2006 score only.

3. Those using Vista please try to run both tests (2006 + Vantage) and put all information in one post.

4. Have all your GPU-Z and CPU-Z windows in one screenshot.

5. Fill in ALL appropriate information.

3DMark 2006 Settings to use:

Resolution: 1280x1024

AA: None

Texture Filtering: Optimal

VS Profile: 3_0

PS Profile: 3_0

But I don't want to buy 3DMark!

A free trial can be acquired here:

3DMark Vantage: http://service.futuremark.com/3dmvantage-trial.action

3DMark 2006: http://www.futuremark.com/benchmarks/3dmark06/download/

Some additional information:

The list will be arranged according to your motherboard model as well as the processor used. So everything will be arranged according to motherboard, and then further arranged according to your respective processor.

As well, for those running 64bit Vista and are getting the "Missing OpenAL32.dll" error when trying to run 3DMark2006 . I suggest you follow these steps:

1. Go to http://www.openal.org and download the installer binary.

2. Right click, go to properties, and run it in Windows XP SP2 compatibility mode.

*Caution* This will replace OpenAL32.dll in your Windows Directory.

3. Navigate to Windows/System32, and take the OpenAL32.dll file out of there and drop it into the 3DMark06 directory.

4. Disable compatibility mode on the installer, re-run it so it reinstalls the 64-bit version.

Source: http://www.yougamers.com/forum/showthread.php?p=362114

Edited by shift.
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/736930-official-3dmark-scores-database/
Share on other sites

Neowin Username: Lyric

CPU: E8400 @ 4.0GHz (445 x 9)

Processor Heatsink: Zalman 9700 LED (110mm fan)

Motherboard: Gigabyte EP45T-DS3R

RAM: 2x1GB Patriot Extreme Performance DDR3-PC3-10666, 1333mhz @ 7-7-7-18 (1.8v)

Video Card: PNY GeForce 9600 GSO 768MB @ 710/1750/950

OS: Windows Vista SP1 (32bit)

3DMark06 Score: 11919

3DVantage Score: P5825 - GPU: 4599 - CPU: 29027

bench.jpg

orb.jpg

First i should probably point out: Those who use the free version cannot provide a screenshot of their score within the app itself, atleast not with '06(i can't speak for vantage). So you'll have to deal with test result links for those who aren't going to buy it.

Anyway, as for my less than amazing score:

Neowin Username: Blackhearted

CPU: Athlon 64 x2 4000+ @ 2825mhz

Processor Heatsink: Arctic Freezer 64 Pro

Motherboard: MSI K9N4 SLI

RAM: 2GB DDR2-800 @ ~807mhz 5-6-5-18

Video Card: PNY Geforce 9600GT 512MB @ 700/1750/925

OS: Windows XP Pro (32bit of course)

3DMark06 Score: 9137 - Link: http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=10045931

And Here's the cpu/gpu-z stuff:

3d06-9600gt.jpg

First i should probably point out: Those who use the free version cannot provide a screenshot of their score within the app itself, atleast not with '06(i can't speak for vantage). So you'll have to deal with test result links for those who aren't going to buy it.

That is exactly the page I am referring to, for those who have not bought the full version. :)

I've updated your two scores.

As well I've decided that the list will be arranged according to motherboard model and processor used.

Edited by shift.

Neowin Username: Obi Wong

CPU: E8400 @ 4GHz (500 x 8)

Processor Heatsink/Fan: Noctua NH-U12P

Motherboard: Asus P5K-E wifi/ap

RAM: Corsair Dominators DDR2-1066 @ 5-5-5-15 1000MHz

Video Card: BFG 280GTX OC @ 700/1425/1125

OS: Windows Vista Ultimate x64

3DMark 2006 Score: 16925

3DMark Vantage Score: H9165

post-7648-1234998788_thumb.jpg

post-7648-1234998800_thumb.jpg

I'll have to submit 2 screenshots.

Neowin Username: DigitalManifestations

CPU: Intel Core 2 Quad @ 3.0GHz (333 x 9)

Processor Heatsink/Fan Setup:Stock Intel cooling

Motherboard:Gigabyte EP45-UD3LR

RAM: 2X2GB DDR2-800 4-4-4-15

Video Card: EVGA 9800 GTX+ @820/2090/1208 (Factory OC)

OS: Windows Vista Ultimate x64

3DMark 2006 Score:14479

3DMark Vantage Score:P8668

If cpuz is reporting 333x6 in one of the screenshots it's because of speedstep being enabled.

post-45347-1235013606_thumb.jpg

For the record, I'm posting the 3DMark Vantage results based off of "performance" as I'm unable to choose any other setting.

post-45347-1235014446_thumb.jpg

Edited by DigitalManifestations

Hey Shift:

Neowin Username: Hawker1986

CPU: Intel Core 2 Quad [email protected] (340 x 10)

Processor Heatsink/Fan Setup: TRUE push pull with Scythe Sflex 1200rpm fans

Motherboard:Gigabyte EP45-DS3R

RAM: G.Skill 4X2GB DDR2-1000 5-5-5-15

Video Card: HIS ATI 4850 512mb (685/2200) x2 Crossfire + Aegia PhysX accelerator

OS: Windows Vista Ultimate x64

3DMark 2006 Score: 18077

3DMark Vantage Score: P13152

06.jpg

vantage1.jpg

Are you able to run your test on HIGH? Cause that is the requirement unless for some reason you're not able to run it on High. As well what is the specific model of your RAM?

Send me a PM, thanks :)

Important for anyone posting in the future to make sure you run your test on HIGH, include volume of RAM (how many sticks and of what volume), the NAME and BRAND of your RAM.

The exception would be Lyric who is going to redo his 3DMark Vantage test after his video card arrives, and DigitalManifestation whom cannot run the High test.

Edited by shift.

3dmark.jpg

I couldn't run 2006 for some odd reason, if i can get that working, I'll post it as well...

Neowin Username: Mindovermaster

CPU: Intel C2Q Q6600 @ 3068.8 MHz (341 x 9)

The above FSB value refers to the "Bus Speed" number in the CPU tab of CPU-Z

Processor Heatsink/Fan or Watercooling Setup: Xigmatek S1283

Motherboard: ASUS P5E

RAM: G.Skill 4GB DDR2 800mhz 4-4-4-12 (2 x 2)

Video Card: ASUS 8800GTS G80 320MB

OS: Windows Vista Ultimate x64

3DMark Vantage Score: 0?!

Oh, ok, I wasn't sure what that meant, thank you.

edit:

Now it worked...

3dmark2.jpg

edit2: crap, it wasnt on high, let me do that again...

Edited by Mindovermaster
Wait, so basically, people could do a low-settings run and claim to score to be on high settings?

yeah, you could... There may be a way to check, but I don't know, Shift?

Neowin Username: Tel

CPU: Q6600 @ 3.4GHz (378 x 9)

Processor Heatsink/Fan: TRUE120 W/ 2x Noctua NF-SF12

Motherboard: Asus P5E

RAM: Corsair Dominator 2x2GB DDR2-1066 @ 5-5-5-15 1011MHz

Video Card: BFG 9800GTX+ @ Stock

OS: Windows Vista Ultimate x86

3DMark 2006 Score: 14785

3DMark Vantage Score: H4862

post-72897-1235081658_thumb.jpg

yeah, you could... There may be a way to check, but I don't know, Shift?

No you can't. The letter before your score indicates the preset you used. E for extreme, H for high, P for performance. So far I'll only be taking P and H scores.

Will think about a section for laptops, not sure how much value you'd get out of a database for that.

Nice to finally see someone with the same GPU as me Tel...But your score is higher dammit :p.

In regards to people lying, your score has a letter indicating what it was run at - High, performance, etc. Are people using the trial version limited to performance?

Edit: Damn you Shift. That's what I get for leaving my post field blank for a few minutes while I got side tracked :p.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Dude, im talking about simply disable it from settings app. Because of the eu regulation, you could disable it here for years.
    • One big question about Mars was answered thanks to Einstein's 100 year old theory by Sayan Sen Image via DepositPhotos Scientists at the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) have calculated how time passes on Mars compared with Earth, adding detail to how timekeeping would need to work beyond Earth’s orbit. The study, published in The Astronomical Journal, found that clocks on Mars run an average of 477 microseconds, or millionths of a second, faster per day than clocks on Earth. A microsecond is one millionth of a second, a very small unit used in precise scientific timing systems such as atomic clocks, which measure time using consistent atomic behavior. This difference is not constant. Because Mars moves around the Sun in a non-circular path (an eccentric orbit, meaning its distance from the Sun changes over time instead of staying fixed) and is affected by gravity from other bodies, the daily difference can vary by as much as 226 microseconds over a Martian year. The study also identifies smaller repeating changes of about 40 microseconds per day linked to synodic cycles (repeating periods that describe how planets line up with each other as they orbit the Sun from different positions). These longer patterns affect how time differences slowly rise and fall. To make these estimates, researchers compared Mars with Earth and the Moon. The work looks at relativistic proper time (the time actually measured by a clock depending on its speed and the strength of gravity where it is located, as described in Einstein’s relativity). This shows that each world has its own slightly different “rate” of time. This becomes more important as space missions expand into cislunar space (the region between Earth and the Moon) and toward Mars. On Earth, time systems rely on atomic clocks and satellites, which stay closely synchronized for navigation and communication. The study is based on Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity, which shows that time is affected by gravity and motion. Stronger gravity makes clocks run slower, while weaker gravity makes them run faster. “The time is just right for the Moon and Mars,” said NIST physicist Bijunath Patla. “This is the closest we have been to realizing the science fiction vision of expanding across the solar system.” A day on Mars is about 40 minutes longer than on Earth, and a Martian year lasts 687 Earth days. But the main question is not just about days and years, but how fast time itself passes. An atomic clock placed on Mars would function normally, but compared with one on Earth, the two would slowly drift apart due to differences in gravity and motion. This requires careful calculation of what is similar to a time-zone difference across planets. Researchers modeled Mars using a reference surface and included gravitational effects from the Sun, Earth, the Moon, and other planets. This includes a multi-body gravitational system (often described as a three-body or four-body problem, where predicting motion becomes difficult because multiple large objects all pull on each other at the same time through gravity). Mars also follows a Keplerian orbit (an idealized elliptical orbit based on simple gravitational laws that assume smooth motion, before adding real-world disturbances from other bodies). In addition, the researchers accounted for solar tides (small changes in gravitational force caused by the Sun that slightly distort planetary motion and timing, especially in systems involving Earth and the Moon). These combined effects are described as relativistic proper-time offsets (small but measurable differences in elapsed time between locations caused by gravity and motion), which must be included when comparing clocks across planets. “But for Mars, that’s not the case. Its distance from the Sun and its eccentric orbit make the variations in time larger. A three-body problem is extremely complicated. Now we’re dealing with four: the Sun, Earth, the Moon and Mars,” Patla explained. “The heavy lifting was more challenging than I initially thought.” Although the differences are extremely small, they matter for navigation and communication systems that depend on precise timing. Even modern networks on Earth, such as mobile systems, rely on timing accuracy at very small fractions of a second. Communication between Earth and Mars currently takes about four to 24 minutes or more depending on planetary positions, meaning signals are not real-time. A shared and accurate time system could help future missions reduce confusion in navigation and data exchange. “If you get synchronization, it will be almost like real-time communication without any loss of information. You don’t have to wait to see what happens,” Patla said. Researchers note that fully developed interplanetary communication networks are still far in the future. However, understanding how time behaves across planets helps prepare for those systems. “It may be decades before the surface of Mars is covered by the tracks of wandering rovers, but it is useful now to study the issues involved in establishing navigation systems on other planets and moons,” said Neil Ashby. “Like current global navigation systems like GPS, these systems will depend on accurate clocks, and the effects on clock rates can be analyzed with the help of Einstein’s general theory of relativity.” Patla added that the results also help improve understanding of time itself under relativity. “It's good to know for the first time what is happening on Mars timewise. Nobody knew that before. It improves our knowledge of the theory itself, the theory of how clocks tick and relativity,” he said. Source: NIST, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 by Razvan Serea TeraCopy is a compact program designed to copy and move files at the maximum possible speed, also providing you with a lot of features. Copy files faster. TeraCopy uses dynamically adjusted buffers to reduce seek times. Asynchronous copy speeds up file transfer between two physical hard drives. Pause and resume transfers. Pause copy process at any time to free up system resources and continue with a single click. Error recovery. In case of copy error, TeraCopy will try several times and in the worse case just skips the file, not terminating the entire transfer. Interactive file list. TeraCopy shows failed file transfers and lets you fix the problem and recopy only problem files. Shell integration. TeraCopy can completely replace Explorer copy and move functions, allowing you work with files as usual. TeraCopy is free for non-commercial use only. For commercial use you need to buy a license. The paid version of the program includes the following features: Copy/move to your favorite folders. Save reports as HTML and CSV files. Select files with the same extension/folder. Remove the selected files from the copy queue. TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 changelog: Added support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. Improved exception handling and automated bug report upload. Fixed several minor bugs and small memory leaks. Build 26 (June 24) Fixed a rare exception when a transfer completed. Features added since version 3.17: Enhanced speed graph. New multi-threaded copy engine. Support for copying to multiple targets. Queue system for managing multiple copy operations. Support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. TeraCopy entry in the modern Windows Explorer context menu. Integrated toolbar in the title bar. Why receive LocalSend transfers with TeraCopy? Handle file conflicts: Skip, overwrite, or rename files when a file with the same name already exists. LocalSend always creates another copy, which can waste time and disk space, especially when resuming an interrupted transfer. Filter unwanted files: Apply ignore lists or remove files manually before accepting a transfer, so unnecessary files are not downloaded. Better performance on fast networks: In tests over a 10 Gbps connection, TeraCopy received files several times faster than the standard LocalSend app on Windows. Download: TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 | 14.5 MB (Freeware, paid upgrade available) View: TeraCopy Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Briefly used Turbo Pascal (and Turbo C++) in 97 and soon after that I bought PC magazine that included a full version of Delphi 2. I still use Delphi today, some 29 years later.
    • Age of Empires Mobile comes to PC, here's how to carry over progress from your phone by Ivan Jenic Image: YouTube/Microsoft Microsoft just released Age of Empires Mobile for PC. The game, officially called Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, is available for free on Steam and Microsoft Store, almost two years after its initial release for handheld devices. Age of Empires is one of those franchises that entire generations grew up with. The original came out in 1997, and immediately got people hooked to building civilizations and crushing their enemies on the battlefield. However, the franchise today is a far cry from its roots, as Age of Empires Mobile is, well, a game optimized for handheld devices, and not a classic RTS title we’ve all loved for years. And, of course, it includes in-game purchases. The PC version is still a mobile game at its core, but it’s been optimized for desktop play. There’s mouse control, full keyboard compatibility, and a refined UI. Microsoft also refreshed the visuals with some 4k textures, so the game should look better on larger screens. The game supports Crossplay, so you can switch between your phone, tablet, and PC without losing anything. But linked progress doesn’t come out of the box, as you have to enable it first. Here’s how to link your progress: On your mobile device, open Age of Empires Mobile. Go to Settings (Gear icon) > Account. Select Bind Account and choose a sign-in option. Once you enable account binding, sign in on PC using the same method, and your progress will be accessible across all your devices. Xbox Game Pass subscribers also get a bonus reward pack on PC, which includes: 1 Monthly Pass Token 1 Custom Resource Chest 10 Universal 60-Minute Speed-Ups 1,000 Empire Coins Exclusive Player Portrait Frame You can find more info about Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, as well as download links, on the Age of Empires official website.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      460
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!