Official 3DMark Scores Database


Recommended Posts

Noticed we don't have a thread for this yet, so post your 3DMark 2006/Vantage Scores!

This thread is not quite a "who can get the highest 3DMark score" thread, but rather a database where members can compare 3DMark Scores.

CLICK HERE TO ACCESS DATABASE

Requirements

1. Processor as well as speed. CPU-Z screenshot required.

2. Processor Heatsink/fan or Watercooling setup (if it applies).

3. Motherboard - Brand and model

4. RAM - How much RAM you have (Example: 1x4GB or 2x2GB), Speed of the RAM (The actual speed of the RAM NOT the effective speed so DDR2/3-XXXX with he XXXX divided by 2), Latencies, MODEL OF RAM AS WELL; FOR EXAMPLE: CORSAIR XMS2 DOMINATOR IS DIFFERENT FROM CORSAIR XMS2

CPU-Z Screenshot of the MEMORY tab

5. Video Card - Video card that you have as well as how much vRAM it has and overclocks that you have made on it. GPU-Z screenshot required.

GPU-Z can be downloaded at the following link: http://www.techpowerup.com/downloads/1304/...U-Z_v0.3.1.html

Make sure you download the latest version - the link I've provided may be for an older version

6. Operating system, 32bit or 64bit.

7. 3DMark 2006 Score - Screenshot of your score required.

8. 3DMark Vantage Score - Screenshot of your score required.

For #5 and 6, If you are using the trial version to run these tests, follow Lyric's example

9. In your post, have the above information in the following format:

Neowin Username: shift.

CPU: CPU Model @ Clock Speed (FSB x Multiplier)

The above FSB value refers to the "Bus Speed" number in the CPU tab of CPU-Z; this is also known as BCLK for i5/i7 CPUs

Processor Heatsink/Fan or Watercooling Setup: Noctua NH-U12P w/ Noctua NF-P12 or Swiftech Apogee (For example)

Motherboard: Brand + Model Number

RAM: BRAND + MODEL, Volume (2x1GB or 2x2GB for example), Speed (how many MHz, so take DDR2/3-XXXX and divide the XXXX by 2), Latencies (tCAS-tRCD-tRP-tRAS format)

Video Card: Sapphire HD 4870 1GB @ Core Clock/Shader Clock/Memory Clock (if your card is not overclocked, just write stock)

Note: Currently, ATI cards have linked Core and Shader clocks. So for those with ATI cards your Shader clock will be left blank.

OS: Windows Vista Ultimate x86 for example.

3DMark 2006 Score: Just write your score, remember to provide screenshot.

3DMark Vantage Score: All tests will be run using the PERFORMANCE preset.

NOTES:: This is not a thread where you test your setup for the highest score. Do all your fine tuning first AND THEN post your final submission. If you happen to upgrade your system, feel free to make a new post with above information.

GUIDELINES:

1. System must be able to fully complete 3DMark Test

2. Those running Windows XP may post 3DMark 2006 score only.

3. Those using Vista please try to run both tests (2006 + Vantage) and put all information in one post.

4. Have all your GPU-Z and CPU-Z windows in one screenshot.

5. Fill in ALL appropriate information.

3DMark 2006 Settings to use:

Resolution: 1280x1024

AA: None

Texture Filtering: Optimal

VS Profile: 3_0

PS Profile: 3_0

But I don't want to buy 3DMark!

A free trial can be acquired here:

3DMark Vantage: http://service.futuremark.com/3dmvantage-trial.action

3DMark 2006: http://www.futuremark.com/benchmarks/3dmark06/download/

Some additional information:

The list will be arranged according to your motherboard model as well as the processor used. So everything will be arranged according to motherboard, and then further arranged according to your respective processor.

As well, for those running 64bit Vista and are getting the "Missing OpenAL32.dll" error when trying to run 3DMark2006 . I suggest you follow these steps:

1. Go to http://www.openal.org and download the installer binary.

2. Right click, go to properties, and run it in Windows XP SP2 compatibility mode.

*Caution* This will replace OpenAL32.dll in your Windows Directory.

3. Navigate to Windows/System32, and take the OpenAL32.dll file out of there and drop it into the 3DMark06 directory.

4. Disable compatibility mode on the installer, re-run it so it reinstalls the 64-bit version.

Source: http://www.yougamers.com/forum/showthread.php?p=362114

Edited by shift.
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/736930-official-3dmark-scores-database/
Share on other sites

Neowin Username: Lyric

CPU: E8400 @ 4.0GHz (445 x 9)

Processor Heatsink: Zalman 9700 LED (110mm fan)

Motherboard: Gigabyte EP45T-DS3R

RAM: 2x1GB Patriot Extreme Performance DDR3-PC3-10666, 1333mhz @ 7-7-7-18 (1.8v)

Video Card: PNY GeForce 9600 GSO 768MB @ 710/1750/950

OS: Windows Vista SP1 (32bit)

3DMark06 Score: 11919

3DVantage Score: P5825 - GPU: 4599 - CPU: 29027

bench.jpg

orb.jpg

First i should probably point out: Those who use the free version cannot provide a screenshot of their score within the app itself, atleast not with '06(i can't speak for vantage). So you'll have to deal with test result links for those who aren't going to buy it.

Anyway, as for my less than amazing score:

Neowin Username: Blackhearted

CPU: Athlon 64 x2 4000+ @ 2825mhz

Processor Heatsink: Arctic Freezer 64 Pro

Motherboard: MSI K9N4 SLI

RAM: 2GB DDR2-800 @ ~807mhz 5-6-5-18

Video Card: PNY Geforce 9600GT 512MB @ 700/1750/925

OS: Windows XP Pro (32bit of course)

3DMark06 Score: 9137 - Link: http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=10045931

And Here's the cpu/gpu-z stuff:

3d06-9600gt.jpg

First i should probably point out: Those who use the free version cannot provide a screenshot of their score within the app itself, atleast not with '06(i can't speak for vantage). So you'll have to deal with test result links for those who aren't going to buy it.

That is exactly the page I am referring to, for those who have not bought the full version. :)

I've updated your two scores.

As well I've decided that the list will be arranged according to motherboard model and processor used.

Edited by shift.

Neowin Username: Obi Wong

CPU: E8400 @ 4GHz (500 x 8)

Processor Heatsink/Fan: Noctua NH-U12P

Motherboard: Asus P5K-E wifi/ap

RAM: Corsair Dominators DDR2-1066 @ 5-5-5-15 1000MHz

Video Card: BFG 280GTX OC @ 700/1425/1125

OS: Windows Vista Ultimate x64

3DMark 2006 Score: 16925

3DMark Vantage Score: H9165

post-7648-1234998788_thumb.jpg

post-7648-1234998800_thumb.jpg

I'll have to submit 2 screenshots.

Neowin Username: DigitalManifestations

CPU: Intel Core 2 Quad @ 3.0GHz (333 x 9)

Processor Heatsink/Fan Setup:Stock Intel cooling

Motherboard:Gigabyte EP45-UD3LR

RAM: 2X2GB DDR2-800 4-4-4-15

Video Card: EVGA 9800 GTX+ @820/2090/1208 (Factory OC)

OS: Windows Vista Ultimate x64

3DMark 2006 Score:14479

3DMark Vantage Score:P8668

If cpuz is reporting 333x6 in one of the screenshots it's because of speedstep being enabled.

post-45347-1235013606_thumb.jpg

For the record, I'm posting the 3DMark Vantage results based off of "performance" as I'm unable to choose any other setting.

post-45347-1235014446_thumb.jpg

Edited by DigitalManifestations

Hey Shift:

Neowin Username: Hawker1986

CPU: Intel Core 2 Quad [email protected] (340 x 10)

Processor Heatsink/Fan Setup: TRUE push pull with Scythe Sflex 1200rpm fans

Motherboard:Gigabyte EP45-DS3R

RAM: G.Skill 4X2GB DDR2-1000 5-5-5-15

Video Card: HIS ATI 4850 512mb (685/2200) x2 Crossfire + Aegia PhysX accelerator

OS: Windows Vista Ultimate x64

3DMark 2006 Score: 18077

3DMark Vantage Score: P13152

06.jpg

vantage1.jpg

Are you able to run your test on HIGH? Cause that is the requirement unless for some reason you're not able to run it on High. As well what is the specific model of your RAM?

Send me a PM, thanks :)

Important for anyone posting in the future to make sure you run your test on HIGH, include volume of RAM (how many sticks and of what volume), the NAME and BRAND of your RAM.

The exception would be Lyric who is going to redo his 3DMark Vantage test after his video card arrives, and DigitalManifestation whom cannot run the High test.

Edited by shift.

3dmark.jpg

I couldn't run 2006 for some odd reason, if i can get that working, I'll post it as well...

Neowin Username: Mindovermaster

CPU: Intel C2Q Q6600 @ 3068.8 MHz (341 x 9)

The above FSB value refers to the "Bus Speed" number in the CPU tab of CPU-Z

Processor Heatsink/Fan or Watercooling Setup: Xigmatek S1283

Motherboard: ASUS P5E

RAM: G.Skill 4GB DDR2 800mhz 4-4-4-12 (2 x 2)

Video Card: ASUS 8800GTS G80 320MB

OS: Windows Vista Ultimate x64

3DMark Vantage Score: 0?!

Oh, ok, I wasn't sure what that meant, thank you.

edit:

Now it worked...

3dmark2.jpg

edit2: crap, it wasnt on high, let me do that again...

Edited by Mindovermaster
Wait, so basically, people could do a low-settings run and claim to score to be on high settings?

yeah, you could... There may be a way to check, but I don't know, Shift?

Neowin Username: Tel

CPU: Q6600 @ 3.4GHz (378 x 9)

Processor Heatsink/Fan: TRUE120 W/ 2x Noctua NF-SF12

Motherboard: Asus P5E

RAM: Corsair Dominator 2x2GB DDR2-1066 @ 5-5-5-15 1011MHz

Video Card: BFG 9800GTX+ @ Stock

OS: Windows Vista Ultimate x86

3DMark 2006 Score: 14785

3DMark Vantage Score: H4862

post-72897-1235081658_thumb.jpg

yeah, you could... There may be a way to check, but I don't know, Shift?

No you can't. The letter before your score indicates the preset you used. E for extreme, H for high, P for performance. So far I'll only be taking P and H scores.

Will think about a section for laptops, not sure how much value you'd get out of a database for that.

Nice to finally see someone with the same GPU as me Tel...But your score is higher dammit :p.

In regards to people lying, your score has a letter indicating what it was run at - High, performance, etc. Are people using the trial version limited to performance?

Edit: Damn you Shift. That's what I get for leaving my post field blank for a few minutes while I got side tracked :p.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • One of the strangest galaxies in our Universe could help answer some long overdue questions by Sayan Sen Image by Pixabay via Pexels | Not representative An international team of astronomers led by the Department of Astronomy at Tsinghua University has discovered an unusually metal-poor galaxy that may contain signs of first-generation star formation. The galaxy, named Metal-Pristine Galaxy COSMOS Redshift 3 (MPG-CR3), or CR3, was identified using observations from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), the Very Large Telescope (VLT), and the Subaru Telescope. The findings, published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters, describe CR3 as the most metal-poor galaxy known from the period known as "cosmic noon," around 11.5 billion years ago. Cosmic noon refers to a period when the universe was producing stars at its highest rate and galaxies were growing rapidly. In astronomy, "metals" refers to all elements heavier than helium, including oxygen, carbon, and iron. Because CR3 contains so few of these heavier elements, researchers say it closely resembles what scientists expect the earliest galaxies in the universe may have looked like. The discovery is significant because it could offer clues about Population III (Pop III) stars, the first generation of stars thought to have formed after the Big Bang. These stars are believed to have formed from gas made almost entirely of hydrogen and helium, before heavier elements were created inside stars and spread across the universe through supernova explosions. Hence this is why CR3 has been referred to as a "living fossil." Scientists have long believed that Population III stars existed only in the very early universe. As more generations of stars formed and died, they enriched surrounding gas with heavier elements, making the conditions needed for metal-free star formation increasingly rare. Because of this, researchers expected the formation of such stars to have largely ended after the epoch of reionization, a period when radiation from the first stars and galaxies transformed the neutral hydrogen filling the universe and made it largely transparent to ultraviolet light. CR3 appears to challenge that idea. The galaxy was observed at a redshift of z = 3.193 ± 0.016. Redshift measures how much light from a distant object has been stretched as the universe expands and helps astronomers determine how far back in time they are looking. In this case, the redshift corresponds to roughly 11.5 billion years ago during cosmic noon. Although the universe was already several billion years old by that point, CR3 shows characteristics more commonly associated with much earlier galaxies. Observations revealed exceptionally strong emissions from hydrogen and helium, including Lyα, Hα, and He I λ10830. Lyα, or Lyman-alpha emission, is a specific wavelength of light produced by hydrogen and is widely used to study distant galaxies. Hα emission is another hydrogen signature commonly used to trace active star formation, while He I λ10830 is produced by helium and can indicate the presence of very hot, young stars. The measured equivalent widths of EW₀(Lyα) = 822 ± 101 Å and EW₀(Hα) = 2814 ± 327 Å are among the highest ever observed in star-forming galaxies. Equivalent width is a measure of the strength of an emission line relative to the surrounding light, and such large values are typically associated with intense and very recent star formation. At the same time, researchers found no statistically significant detections of metal emission lines, including [O III] λλ4959, 5007 and C IV λλ1548, 1550. Emission lines act as chemical fingerprints that reveal which elements are present in a galaxy. Oxygen and carbon lines are commonly seen in galaxies that have already undergone significant chemical enrichment. Their absence in CR3 suggests an unusually pristine environment. Using abundance calibration methods developed with JWST observations, the team placed a 2σ upper limit on the galaxy's gas-phase metallicity of 12+log(O/H)<6.52, corresponding to less than 0.7% of the Sun's metallicity (Z < 7 × 10⁻³ Z⊙). Gas-phase metallicity measures the abundance of heavy elements in a galaxy's gas. A 2σ upper limit indicates that the true value is very unlikely to be higher than the quoted threshold. Even when accounting for uncertainties in the calibration methods, the most conservative limit remains 12+log(O/H)<6.95, making CR3 the most metal-poor galaxy identified at cosmic noon. The galaxy also appears to contain very little dust. Researchers measured a Lyα/Hα flux ratio of 13.9 ± 2.5, a result that suggests negligible dust attenuation, meaning very little of the galaxy's light is being absorbed or scattered by cosmic dust. Because dust is usually produced by earlier generations of stars, this finding further supports the idea that CR3 has experienced very little chemical enrichment. Further analysis using spectral energy distribution modelling, a technique that compares observed light with theoretical models, suggests that CR3 contains an extremely young stellar population only around 2 million years old. The modelling, which used Population III stellar templates, also indicates the galaxy has a stellar mass of approximately 6.1 × 10⁵ M⊙. The symbol M⊙ represents one solar mass, or the mass of the Sun. One of the key questions raised by the discovery is how such a chemically primitive galaxy could exist in a universe that had already spent billions of years producing heavier elements. To investigate this, the researchers examined CR3's surroundings. Their analysis suggests the galaxy may lie in a slightly underdense environment, with a density contrast of roughly δ ≈ −0.12. An underdense region contains less matter and fewer galaxies than average. The team suggests that this relative isolation may have helped preserve pockets of pristine gas. Metal-rich material expelled from nearby galaxies may never have reached CR3, while the lower rate of galaxy mergers and interactions could have slowed the mixing of enriched gas into the system. If future observations confirm these findings, CR3 could provide some of the strongest evidence yet that first-generation star formation continued well after the epoch of reionization. Such a result would challenge the conventional view that pristine star formation ended by z ≳ 6 and suggest that small pockets of metal-free gas survived much longer than previously thought. Researchers stress that more observations will be needed to determine the galaxy's true nature. Future spectroscopic studies with higher resolution and better signal quality could help confirm whether CR3 is genuinely hosting Population III star formation. The discovery is also expected to encourage searches for other similar galaxies, which could help astronomers better understand how the first stars formed and how galaxies evolved in the early universe. Source: Tsinghua University, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "I think in the immediate absence of a partner to apply relief" In the words of Sterling Archer... "Phrasing!"
    • For me, the fundamental problems with these "smartglasses" is that they really don't work well for people with significant prescriptions and massively up the price if you use attached lenses if they have displays, and if they don't, then they're not actually "smart" anything, rather just connecting to your phone and relaying voice to an AI. In a few cases like this, they throw in small cameras to feed video to the AI. All around, these feel like both a solution looking for a problem, and the problems it tries to solve seem more easily solved by different approaches and designs. Oddly, if the rumours are true, Apple may actually have invented something for once and it kind of does this right: put cameras in ear buds and manage the interface to AI exactly as most of us do: tapping on an ear bud and saying "Hey Google" or "Hey Siri." That makes them compatible with almost everyone, can double up as a hearing assist device, an impaired vision assist device, a "smart" device... and answer your phone and play music. That just seems like a better solution all around.
    • Usually the bigger ones with many fixes/changes take a few, theyre an exception to the rule most likely
    • If you don’t get lucky with Valve’s Steam Machine reservation system, you can make your own Steam Machine instead. Valve says that “starting with the SteamOS 3.8 release, you can put together your own Steam Machine using whatever PC parts you want.” SteamOS 3.8.10 launched last week with a slew of updates, including “improved compatibility with recent Intel and AMD platforms.” Alongside that improved compatibility, Valve is giving gamers the green light to install SteamOS on their own desktops. In an interview with The Verge, Valve’s Pierre-Loup Griffais said Valve has been “rolling out improvements to [SteamOS] so it’s more compatible with desktop hardware,” including eventual support for Nvidia graphics. Griffais says Valve has “a growing team” working on Nvidia driver support for SteamOS, adding, “We’re collaborating with Nvidia very closely.” While he mentioned that Nvidia support might not come this year, Griffais emphasized that “it’s certainly something that we’re working on in the background.”     Subscription not needed: https://archive.fo/Tssfc Subscription needed: https://www.theverge.com/games/953411/valve-steamos-desktop-nvidia
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      454
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      162
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      107
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      84
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!