Official 3DMark Scores Database


Recommended Posts

Neowin Username: Jakesnake3037

CPU: Athlon 64 X2 4850e @ 2800 MHz (224 x 12.5)

Processor Heatsink: stock

Motherboard: MSI DKA790GX

RAM: 2x2GB A-DATA DDR2-800 5-5-5-18

Video Card: PALIT 9600GT 1GB SONIC @ 700/1750/1000 FACTORY OC

OS: WINDOWS 7 ULTIMATE x64

3DMark06 Score: 9192

3DVantage Score: P4204 - GPU: 4180 - CPU: 4278

post-132782-1235089499_thumb.png

If in fact those that are running the trial version are limited to only the PERFORMANCE preset I can change the requirements such that only the PERFORMANCE setting is required. If someone running the trial version please let me know if that's the case.

It would require those that did the benchmark using HIGH to redo theirs though.

I am noticing that A LOT of people are not including ALL the information in the format I have requested. For the future, those that have not provided adequate information will not be posted. I will send you a PM if any information needs to be added.

Things such as Brand + model of RAM have bearing on what your score may be. And for an accurate database I need information as adequate as possible. Not necessarily down to the MHz, but at least get your brand + models correct.

Edited by shift.

Hey Shift,

Im not sure what you meant in your last PM, my vantage screenshot clearly shows all four (2GPU + 2 CPU) tests it would not give you a score had it not run all the basic tests, ive not run the feature tests because they dont alter the score and just take time. Also this screenshot is on High not performance as I didnt see your changes, but nothing has changed so you can leave the score as it stands or I can run it again if you want, just let me know. Also I realised my RAM is running 510Mhz not 500 and timings are 5-5-5-18 (seems my memory is getting bad in my old age :s). Hope thats ok

Hawker

post-252282-1235161804_thumb.jpg

I dont think you can even do them on the most basic license, certainly not on a free copy, even on 3dmark 06 you could ignore the feature tests :). Oh any my RAM is G.Skill PQ stuff, i dont think it has a proper name as far as im aware.

Hawker

Yup, I found out why I thought your score was so abnormally (which is not so abnormal anymore) high you're running 4850's in CF. I misread your post and put it as only 1x4850 :p

Will update when I get home, posting from school right now.

here is my performance score for Vantage

Hey Obi Wong,

At some point when you get the time could you run it without PhysX enabled, Im curious how much of a difference that would make (no need for a screenshot Ill believe what you write down :)).

Thanks.

Hawker

I'ts about 1000 points. I think someone was able to install PhysX for NVIDIA on an ATI card (or at least the drivers for it? not sure what he did) but he got PhysX enabled and got ~1000 point Performance test boost.

EDIT: http://www.tomshardware.com/news/nvidia-physx-ati,5764.html

Here's the link.

I'm not sure, the difference in the article was 1000, actually even less than that P4262 with PhysX and P3800 without.

Going to check out how I can get this enabled on my HD 4870.

EDIT: Looks like not yet as far as I know, someone had modded drivers for ATI 3800 series, not not for 4800 series yet and there's no estimated time at which PhysX drivers for ATI 4800 series will be provided.

Obi Wong, i'm curious as to why your CPU score was 36,000 in the first test, but now 7,6xx in the 2nd? somethings is wrong for your score to drop 28k points

The reason is he had physX enabled initially so the program was using his graphics card to run the CPU tests as well, which boosts the performance figures.

I guess the difference in points is related to the power of the graphics card being used, more points for more power crunching the numbers and Obi Wongs 280 is a meaty GPU :)

Hawker

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • For me, the fundamental problems with these "smartglasses" is that they really don't work well for people with significant prescriptions and massively up the price if you use attached lenses if they have displays, and if they don't, then they're not actually "smart" anything, rather just connecting to your phone and relaying voice to an AI. In a few cases like this, they throw in small cameras to feed video to the AI. All around, these feel like both a solution looking for a problem, and the problems it tries to solve seem more easily solved by different approaches and designs. Oddly, if the rumours are true, Apple may actually have invented something for once and it kind of does this right: put cameras in ear buds and manage the interface to AI exactly as most of us do: tapping on an ear bud and saying "Hey Google" or "Hey Siri." That makes them compatible with almost everyone, can double up as a hearing assist device, an impaired vision assist device, a "smart" device... and answer your phone and play music. That just seems like a better solution all around.
    • Usually the bigger ones with many fixes/changes take a few, theyre an exception to the rule most likely
    • If you don’t get lucky with Valve’s Steam Machine reservation system, you can make your own Steam Machine instead. Valve says that “starting with the SteamOS 3.8 release, you can put together your own Steam Machine using whatever PC parts you want.” SteamOS 3.8.10 launched last week with a slew of updates, including “improved compatibility with recent Intel and AMD platforms.” Alongside that improved compatibility, Valve is giving gamers the green light to install SteamOS on their own desktops. In an interview with The Verge, Valve’s Pierre-Loup Griffais said Valve has been “rolling out improvements to [SteamOS] so it’s more compatible with desktop hardware,” including eventual support for Nvidia graphics. Griffais says Valve has “a growing team” working on Nvidia driver support for SteamOS, adding, “We’re collaborating with Nvidia very closely.” While he mentioned that Nvidia support might not come this year, Griffais emphasized that “it’s certainly something that we’re working on in the background.”     Subscription not needed: https://archive.fo/Tssfc Subscription needed: https://www.theverge.com/games/953411/valve-steamos-desktop-nvidia
    • I thought they were supposed to reduce the amount of restarts needed to install these updates? It took 3 restarts to install this update...
    • I know an idiot at work who is "Director for innovation projects" and inevitably has been tasked with following up on this whole trend of "AI and its work applicability". He recently sent out a survey on the topic, for the workforce to disclose their usage and attitudes towards AI. The survey was badly, sloppily typed out, the questions and answers (when multiple choices) were loosely correlated and, all and all, it would already be miserable in the times of MS Office Autocorrect alone. Then, I had AI responding to it all (on the open-ended questions) with beautiful, to-the-point prose after I provided it with minor but proper guidance, taking me under 10 minutes. All this to say that I am sure that if AI comes to replace someone, it will still be me, and the other idiot will still stay.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      454
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      162
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      107
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      84
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!