Official 3DMark Scores Database


Recommended Posts

From what I see, PhysX doesn't boost GPU score, but the CPU score by taking the load off the CPU and putting it onto the GPU.

Thats exactly right. Its a bit of a dodgy thing to look at realistically though, because in the real world youe GPU cant do physX and graphics with its full power as it does with this test, if you see what I mean. Having physX enabled in game will lead to some detriment of frames, just depends how powerful the GPU is.

Any how, some more for the table shift: This is my Uni PC (PC2 in my sig)

Neowin Username: Hawker1986

CPU: Q6600 (333x9)

Processor Heatsink/Fan or Watercooling Setup: Silverstone NT06-E + 1600rpm Scythe S-Flex fan

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-G33M-DS2R

RAM: 4x2GB (total 8GB) 416mhz 5-5-5-15

Video Card: Nvidia 8800GT 700/1750/1950 - Zalman VF-1000

OS: Windows Vista Ultimate x64

3DMark 2006 Score: 13402

3DMark Vantage Score: 7486

Hawker

post-252282-1235413114_thumb.jpg

Will update as soon as I get home.

But yeah, 3DMark is a really general gauge of computer performance. There ARE some flaws with the way the tests are run in that they are quite heavily weighted upon CPU. When in real word performance testing, a 3.0GHz + Core 2 Duo would perform just as well as a 3.0GHz + Core 2 Quad; at that point the GPU really becomes the main deciding factor in performance.

  • 2 weeks later...

Well...I just installed my Evga GTX 260 SC. No other hardware changes.

I want to ask before I post a screen shot: My previous score was something like 14,475 and now it's 14,946...Is that really the maximum increase? I only ask because I expected a higher one. I know it's just a silly benchmarking result and doesn't reflect gaming performance but...Yeah. I was hoping for 16k or so heh.

post-45347-1236909542_thumb.jpg

nothing overclocked or any fancy stuff

You're going to have to submit that with the required information. Thanks!

Things you forgot to include is a GPU-Z screenshot as well as the submission format that I've requested. Sorry for the inconvenience but it's for consistency sake.

@ DigitalManifestation

Are you using PhysX? You're only about ~100 points off from the 15k mark so maybe not bad of an increase.

Things I would try are to try and push your CPU more as well as maybe overclock your video card as well. Might yield a couple hundred more points.

Edited by shift.

Hey digitalmanifestation, the reason there is little improvement is because 3dmark06 is very CPU limited with modern hardware, so the fact your CPU is at the same speed explains it. If you benchmarked vantage you would have seen a good improvement in score, so dont worry. If you want the extra points in 06 the only way to get it is to boost up your CPU speed :s.

Hawker

Okay, here's the new 3DMark results and the new 3DMark Vantage results.

Neowin Username: DigitalManifestations

CPU: Intel Core 2 Quad @ 3.2GHz (356 x 9)

Processor Heatsink/Fan Setup:Stock Intel cooling

Motherboard:Gigabyte EP45-UD3LR

RAM: 2X2GB DDR2-800 4-4-4-15

Video Card: EVGA GTX 260 SC @626/1350 /1053(Factory OC)

OS: Windows Vista Ultimate x64

3DMark 2006 Score: 15680

3DMark Vantage Score: P12230.

I ran Vantage with the performance settings as my monitor does not support the resolutions used for high.

post-45347-1236998816_thumb.jpg

post-45347-1236998831_thumb.jpg

Speed step kicked in on the last screen shot.

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 4 weeks later...

Neowin Username: SMELTN

CPU: E6750 @ 3.2GHz (400 x 8)

Processor Heatsink: Stock Intel Cooling

Motherboard: Gigabyte EP35-DS3L

RAM: 2X1GB OCZ Platinum DDR2-400 4-4-4-15

Video Card: BFG GeForce 8800 GT 512MB @625/1566/900 (Factory)

OS: Windows 7 Beta 7100 (32bit)

3DMark06 Score: 10291

3DVantage Score: P5981 - GPU: 4768 - CPU: 25293

post-119661-1241368629_thumb.jpg

post-119661-1241368653_thumb.jpg

  • 3 weeks later...

Neowin Username: Lyric

CPU: i7 920 @ 4GHz - (191 x 21)

CPU Cooler: CoolerMaster V8

Motherboard: EVGA X58 3x SLI (B2-BL-E758-TR)

RAM: 3x2GB (1600mhz) Corsair Triple Channel kit

Video Card(s): Tri-SLI GTX-260 SSC Cards (55nm, Core 216) @ 702/1404/1053

OS: Windows 7 Ultimate (64bit)

3DMark 2006 Score: 26,513

3DMark06.jpg

3DMark Vantage Score: P31,536

3DVantagePhysx.jpg

Haven't had time to update due to work, doing that right now :)

By the way, NICE Tri-SLI score.

UPDATED - May 20th 2009 @ 1:00AM

Notes: Lyric's i7 database entry incomplete. Memory timing + RAM model required as well as total graphics memory (896MB assumed)

Edited by shift.
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Xbox Insiders get Xbox 360 achievements and Gamertag character upgrades by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe Microsoft is continuing its fast-paced update schedule for Xbox Insiders. Today, the company announced a new slate of features it is rolling out to Xbox Insiders in the Alpha Skip-Ahead ring, which includes an expansion to the gamertag system, Xbox 360 achievements, and more. The unique Gamertag that Xbox users can choose for their profile is getting more characters. Instead of the 12-character limit, Insiders will now be able to get a Gamertag that's 15 characters long. The 12-character limit will still apply to Gamertags that are not unique or contain any non-Latin characters. Meanwhile, Microsoft is adding Xbox 360 game support to its Game Hubs. Selecting an installed Xbox 360 game on a modern Xbox console will now show achievement progress, captures, and other information. Achievement pop-ups are back for these classics too, which should be good news for achievement hunters. The next change is for Xbox players who can't wait to jump into their games when an update is required. "If a game requires an update and is available to stream through your Game Pass membership, you can start playing immediately with cloud gaming while the update downloads in the background," explains Microsoft. The final change of this Insider update is once again to the game cards. Insiders will find that all games, both released and upcoming, will now have a simple button to add to their profile's wishlist, making the process much easier from a single place. This Xbox update is rolling out today to Insiders in the Alpha Skip-Ahead ring. As usual, Microsoft aims to bring it to more Insiders over time before they reach all Xbox owners. Head here to find out how to join the Xbox Insider Program to get a chance to test these features and upcoming ones on both consoles and PC.
    • In the boot options in the UEFI is set to legacy or CMS? It needs to be set to UEFI if it's not already.
    • Researchers claim Microsoft's quantum breakthrough is flawed by basic Python errors by Karthik Mudaliar Microsoft's aggressive roadmap to deliver a commercial quantum supercomputer by 2029 has now hit a bit of a snag, and it's not because of a complex sub-zero dilution refrigerator, but rather because of a few lines of basic Python code. A new critique published in the scientific journal Nature argues that simple software errors effectively manufactured the breakthrough that Microsoft's foundational research claimed back in 2025 into Majorana-based topological qubits. Topological quantum computing, the path that Microsoft chose for its research, relies on creating and controlling "Majorana zero modes." These are exotic quasiparticles that theoretically offer vastly superior error resistance compared to the highly sensitive superconducting qubits currently being championed by rivals like Google and IBM. However, physically proving you have created these particles requires sifting through massive amounts of complex electrical conductance data to isolate a specific "topological gap." Because of the sheer volume of data, physicists rely heavily on custom software pipelines to process the results. This is where the Python scripts come in. Now, according to the critique, Microsoft’s data processing software contained fundamental programming errors that ultimately skewed the published results. By mishandling data arrays or deploying incorrect logic within the Python script, the software supposedly discarded "noisy" or contradictory data. Which is why it only highlighted the specific electrical measurements that supported the topological-gap claim. The researchers behind the critique argued that this makes the findings invalid, suggesting the heralded "quantum leap" was actually a false positive generated by bad code and not a product of groundbreaking physics. However, Microsoft is pushing back hard against these allegations. The Redmond giant has formally rejected the criticism, saying that it's just a minor anomaly rather than a fatal flaw. According to the company, while there may have been a minor oversight in the data parsing scripts, it does not alter the fundamental reality of their physical experiment. Just weeks ago, Microsoft unveiled the Majorana 2 quantum processor, a milestone so significant that the company boldly accelerated its timeline for a commercial quantum supercomputer from 2035 down to 2029. But the new software allegations reopen an old wound. Microsoft's quantum division faced a remarkably similar crisis when a landmark 2018 paper on Majorana particles was famously retracted in 2021 after independent physicists discovered the data had been inappropriately cropped. That historical baggage makes the current Python-related allegations particularly sensitive. If the foundational math and data processing for the 2025 breakthrough are genuinely flawed, the highly anticipated 2029 commercial timeline could easily be delayed or, worse, cancelled.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      463
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      123
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      81
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!