Official 3DMark Scores Database


Recommended Posts

  • 4 weeks later...

Neowin Username: rm20010

CPU: Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 @ 3000 MHz (333 MHz x 9)

Processor Heatsink: OCZ Vanquisher

Motherboard: Gigabyte P35C-DS3R F12e

RAM: 2 x 1 GB Crucial Ballistix Tracer, 800 MHz, 4-4-4-12 @ 2.2v (that's what CPU-Z reports for voltage)

Video Card: XFX GeForce 8800 GT XXX @ 700/1000/1753 MHz

OS: Windows 7 RC x86

3DMark2006 Score: 13607

3DMark Vantage Score: P7542

Screenshot of 3DMark Vantage with CPU-Z and GPU-Z

Screenshot of 3DMark2006 score

  • 2 months later...

Hey Shift! =?

I have seen your thread a while back but only now got 3dmark:DD

i wanted to ask a question and leave a suggestion:))

First of all, would it be ok to post 2 different runs? (1 overclock, 1 normal)

also you should make 2 tables, for those who can run on High

Sorry, was in Hong Kong for the past month and school starting up right now so will be a bit busy.

As for running the test on High, not everyone is able to run it at that resolution.

The purpose isn't to show off how high your score is but more to compare what effect hardware changes have on synthetic benchmark scores.

Sorry, was in Hong Kong for the past month and school starting up right now so will be a bit busy.

Excuses... you still haven't got mine up and you've had two months to do it. :p

  • 4 months later...

Neowin Username: revanmj

CPU: Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 3.0 GHz MHz (333 MHz x 9)

Processor Heatsink: Default Intel's one

Motherboard: ASUS P5B-E

RAM: 2 x 2 GB Kingston, 800 MHz, 5-6-6-15 1.8 V

Video Card: Palit GeForce 9600 GT 1 GB @ 650/1600/800 MHz

OS: Windows 7 Ultimate x64

3DMark2006 Score: 7960 (Screen / Link)

3DMark Vantage Score: P3311 (Screen / Link)

Hmm.. I guess i'll post new scores with the hardware changes since last time. Anyway...

Neowin Username: Blackhearted

CPU: AMD Athlon II X4 620 @ 3.4GHz (262 x 13)

Processor Heatsink: Arctic Freezer 64 Pro

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-MA770-UD3 Rev 2.0

RAM: 2x2GB Gksill ddr2-800 + 2x1Gb Adata ddr2-800 @ 700mhz 5-4-4-12

Video Card: Sapphire Radeon HD 4850 512MB @ 665/1000

OS: Windows 7 64bit

3DMark06 Score: 13488 Pic & link

3DMark Vantage Score: P8176 Pic

Neowin Username: Anarkii

CPU: Intel Core i7 @ 3.4GHz

Processor Heatsink: Noctua CP12

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD5 F9 Bios

RAM: 12GB Corsair Dominator 1333Mhz DDR3 default timings.

Video Cards: 2x XFX GTX 275 in SLI

Physx Card: Asus 9800GTX+ 512MB

OS: Windows 7 64bit Ultimate

3DMark06 Score: Haven't ran it yet. Ill edit this post once I do :)

3DMark Vantage Score: P24177 Pic

Neowin Username: Anarkii

CPU: Intel Core i7 @ 3.4GHz

Processor Heatsink: Noctua CP12

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD5 F9 Bios

RAM: 12GB Corsair Dominator 1333Mhz DDR3 default timings.

Video Cards: 2x XFX GTX 275 in SLI

Physx Card: Asus 9800GTX+ 512MB

OS: Windows 7 64bit Ultimate

3DMark06 Score: Haven't ran it yet. Ill edit this post once I do :)

3DMark Vantage Score: P24177 Pic

What i7 do you have? I'm assuming it's a 920 that's running at 161x21? What are the default timings as well for your RAM.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Updated with new database entries for the following users: Anarkii (3DMark06 results pending), Blackhearted

Changes: Organized results via dual core / quad core processors in order of CPU type and clock-speed.

Edited by shift.

Neowin Username: tsupersonic

CPU: Intel Core i7 860 3.08GHz (140 MHz bclock)

Processor Heatsink: Arctic Freezer 7 Pro. Rev. 2

Motherboard: MSI P55-GD65

RAM: 4 x 2 GB GSkill Ripjaws DDR3-1333MHz @ 9-9-9-24

Video Card: EVGA Nvidia GeForce GTX 260 Superclock 896 MB @ 626/1350/2106 MHz

OS: Windows 7 Professional x64

3DMark2006 Score: Don't have a screenshot, but got 17k

3DMark Vantage Score: P13333 and 3DMark Link

Updated with new database entries for the following users: Anarkii (3DMark06 results pending), Blackhearted

Changes: Organized results via dual core / quad core processors in order of CPU type and clock-speed.

You put my second results in the wrong category of those two btw. The AII X4 is a quad.

  • 2 weeks later...

I just ran mine with 2x5770's. After some research, you get a over all of '0' if you change any of the settings. If you select a preset you actually get a result.

My Results: http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dmv=1877605

  • 4 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...

Neowin Username: Dynamism

CPU: i7-930 @ 2800 (21 x 133) and 3569 (22 x 170),

Processor Heatsink/Fan or Watercooling Setup: Corsair H50

Motherboard: Gigabyte X58A-UD3R

RAM: Corsair Dominator DHX+ 1600 MHz, 3x2GB

Video Card: XFX Radeon HD5870, Stock in two lowest results, 890 MHz (GPU) and 1250 MHz (Memory) in the last result.

OS: Windows 7 Pro x64

3DMark 2006 Score: 23760 (Only tested with both CPU and GPU overclocked)

3DMark Vantage: P17353 (Stock), P18590 (CPU overclocked) and P19162 (Both CPU and GPU overclocked)

benchmarks.jpg

  • 2 weeks later...

CPU: Phenom II X4 955 @ 3.780 Mhz

Processor Heatsink/Fan or Watercooling Setup: Arctic Cooling Pro 64

Motherboard: MSI 790XT-G45

RAM: Mixed OCZ2G8002G (4GB) Patriot 6400LL Series (4G) Total 8GB DDR2

Video Card: XFX Radeon 4770 Crossfire'd (Overclocked 830 core 850 mem)

OS: Windows 7 Pro x64

3DMark 2006 Score: 19657

Drivers: Cat 10.4

http://img26.imageshack.us/i/27397500.png/

post-9573-12731934048632.png

Neowin Username: Yinchie

CPU: Intel Core i7 920 D0 @ 4200MHz (21 x 200)

Processor Heatsink/Fan or Watercooling Setup: Custom watercooling setup

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD5

RAM: OCZ Gold Series CL8 DDR3-1600 6GB (3x2GB) @ 7-7-7-19 1600MHz

Video Card: Zotac (NVIDIA) GeForce GTX480 @ 850/1000/1700MHz

OS: Windows 7 Enterprise X64

3DMark 2006 Score: 26992

3DMark Vantage Score: P24864

3dmarks06.png

3dmarksvantage.png

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Google adds built-in computer control to Gemini 3.5 flash by Karthik Mudaliar Google has added Computer Use as a built-in tool in Gemini 3.5 Flash, giving developers a single model that can reason about a task and operate graphical interfaces across browsers, mobile devices, and desktop environments. The feature is available through the Gemini API and Google’s Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform, although it remains a preview feature for now. Computer Use enables an AI agent to examine screenshots and return actions such as mouse clicks, scrolling, and keyboard input. A developer’s application must execute those actions, capture the resulting screen, and send it back to Gemini, creating a continuous loop until the task is completed. Google says the integration can be used for activities including repetitive form filling, application testing, research across multiple websites, and longer enterprise workflows. Gemini 3.5 Flash can work with browser, mobile, and desktop environments, whereas Google’s earlier standalone Computer Use model was primarily positioned around browser interaction. The main change is consolidation. Computer control was previously offered through the separate Gemini 2.5 Computer Use preview model. As Neowin reported when that model was introduced, it was designed to interpret a visual interface and generate actions without requiring a website-specific API. Google later brought Computer Use to preview versions of Gemini 3 Pro and Gemini 3 Flash in January 2026. The latest release now incorporates the tool into the stable Gemini 3.5 Flash model rather than requiring developers to select a specialized model solely for interface automation. Gemini 3.5 Flash itself was announced in May as Google’s latest fast model for coding and multi-step agent workflows. It supports a one-million-token input context window and up to 65,000 output tokens, along with adjustable thinking levels that let developers trade additional reasoning for lower latency and cost. Google also added that Gemini 3.5 Flash received targeted adversarial training for computer-use scenarios. The company is also offering safeguards that can require user confirmation before sensitive or irreversible actions and automatically stop a workflow when suspected prompt injection is detected. Its developer documentation describes configurable protections for areas such as financial transactions and changes to sensitive records. Google isn't the first to bring Computer Use to its platform. Anthropic has made computer control available through Claude, while OpenAI has continued improving computer-use performance in its recent models. Microsoft has also applied the concept to business workflows, including a Computer Use capability for the Researcher agent in Microsoft 365 Copilot.
    • After I installed KB5095093, the volume on my ARM laptop won't go above 20%. It's stuck on the hearing protection level, which is pretty much useless if you want to listen to anything. I rolled back.
    • Amazon Prime Day slashes Samsung's newest Galaxy Watch Ultra by 45 percent by Karthik Mudaliar Samsung’s flagship Android smartwatch has received one of its steepest Prime Day cuts. Amazon has dropped the 2025 Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra in Titanium Blue to $357.24, saving buyers around $292 from its $649.99 list price. That's a 45 percent discount (purchase link below). The 47mm Galaxy Watch Ultra uses a titanium casing and a 1.5-inch Super AMOLED display with a resolution of 480 x 480 and peak brightness of 3,000 nits. It includes LTE connectivity, Bluetooth 5.3, Wi-Fi, NFC, and dual-frequency L1+L5 GPS for more accurate outdoor route tracking. The 2025 model has 64GB of storage, a 590mAh battery, sapphire crystal glass, 10ATM water resistance, IP68 protection, and MIL-STD-810H durability testing. Its health and fitness tools include heart rate monitoring, sleep coaching, Energy Score, Running Coach, body composition analysis, temperature sensing, and ECG support, where available. This model is best suited to Android users who regularly run, hike, cycle, or train outdoors and want cellular access without carrying a phone. The larger battery, rugged construction, bright display, and dedicated Quick Button also make it a stronger option than Samsung’s regular Galaxy Watch models for extended workouts and demanding environments. Grab the Titanium Blue Galaxy Watch Ultra before the Prime Day price resets: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025) [Sold and Shipped by Amazon] Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Google begins rolling out its post-Epic Play Store billing model next week by Karthik Mudaliar Google has confirmed that its redesigned Play Store billing and fee structure will take effect on June 30, 2026, in the United States, the United Kingdom, and the European Economic Area. The changes will let eligible developers offer their own payment systems or send users to an external website for purchases, while separating Google’s platform service fee from the cost of using Google Play Billing. The rollout puts concrete dates and detailed rate cards behind the broader Android policy overhaul Google announced in March. That announcement followed a proposed settlement with Epic Games intended to resolve their long-running disputes over app distribution and payments, although the U.S. portion of the agreement still requires court approval. Under the new billing choice program, developers selling digital content or services can display an alternative payment option alongside Google Play Billing. They may also direct users to their own websites to complete a purchase. Developers can use Google’s standard payment-choice screen or design one that complies with the company’s user-interface rules. Choosing another payment processor does not eliminate Google’s cut altogether. The company will continue charging a service fee for transactions associated with apps distributed through Google Play, regardless of whether payment is handled by Google, an alternative provider, or a developer’s website. Google argues that this fee covers the value and infrastructure provided by Android and the Play Store. For developers earning up to $1 million annually, the service fee will generally be 10 percent. That rate also applies to auto-renewing subscriptions. When Google Play Billing is used in the U.S., U.K., or EEA, Google will add a separate 5 percent billing fee, and developers processing payments elsewhere will not pay that additional charge. This means Google’s familiar flat 30 percent commission is disappearing, but developers will not necessarily see a dramatic reduction on every transaction. An in-app purchase from an existing user processed through Google Play Billing can still reach a combined 30 percent. The biggest savings are likely to come from subscriptions, smaller developers covered by the $1 million tier, and companies able to move customers to their own payment infrastructure. Google is also offering lower rates through its Apps Experience and revamped Games Level Up programs. Apps and games that satisfy the company’s requirements can qualify for 15 percent service fees on new-install transactions and 20 percent on existing-install transactions. The criteria include performance and reliability standards, support for additional Android device categories, and selected platform features. Those program rates are scheduled to become available in the initial markets and Australia on September 30. For consumers, the immediate effect will depend on whether developers adopt alternative payments and pass any savings on through lower prices. For developers, however, June 30 begins a more flexible but considerably more complicated Play Store economy in which distribution, billing, install dates, revenue thresholds, and program participation can each affect Google’s final cut. Google is also separately developing a Registered App Stores program designed to simplify the installation of qualifying third-party stores. That initiative is expected to arrive with a major Android release later in 2026 and will launch outside the U.S. first. Google says the rest of the world will receive the changes by September 30, 2027, although billing rates for markets outside the US, UK, and EEA have not yet been announced.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      464
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      81
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!