Official 3DMark Scores Database


Recommended Posts

  • 4 weeks later...

Neowin Username: rm20010

CPU: Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 @ 3000 MHz (333 MHz x 9)

Processor Heatsink: OCZ Vanquisher

Motherboard: Gigabyte P35C-DS3R F12e

RAM: 2 x 1 GB Crucial Ballistix Tracer, 800 MHz, 4-4-4-12 @ 2.2v (that's what CPU-Z reports for voltage)

Video Card: XFX GeForce 8800 GT XXX @ 700/1000/1753 MHz

OS: Windows 7 RC x86

3DMark2006 Score: 13607

3DMark Vantage Score: P7542

Screenshot of 3DMark Vantage with CPU-Z and GPU-Z

Screenshot of 3DMark2006 score

  • 2 months later...

Hey Shift! =?

I have seen your thread a while back but only now got 3dmark:DD

i wanted to ask a question and leave a suggestion:))

First of all, would it be ok to post 2 different runs? (1 overclock, 1 normal)

also you should make 2 tables, for those who can run on High

Sorry, was in Hong Kong for the past month and school starting up right now so will be a bit busy.

As for running the test on High, not everyone is able to run it at that resolution.

The purpose isn't to show off how high your score is but more to compare what effect hardware changes have on synthetic benchmark scores.

Sorry, was in Hong Kong for the past month and school starting up right now so will be a bit busy.

Excuses... you still haven't got mine up and you've had two months to do it. :p

  • 4 months later...

Neowin Username: revanmj

CPU: Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 3.0 GHz MHz (333 MHz x 9)

Processor Heatsink: Default Intel's one

Motherboard: ASUS P5B-E

RAM: 2 x 2 GB Kingston, 800 MHz, 5-6-6-15 1.8 V

Video Card: Palit GeForce 9600 GT 1 GB @ 650/1600/800 MHz

OS: Windows 7 Ultimate x64

3DMark2006 Score: 7960 (Screen / Link)

3DMark Vantage Score: P3311 (Screen / Link)

Hmm.. I guess i'll post new scores with the hardware changes since last time. Anyway...

Neowin Username: Blackhearted

CPU: AMD Athlon II X4 620 @ 3.4GHz (262 x 13)

Processor Heatsink: Arctic Freezer 64 Pro

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-MA770-UD3 Rev 2.0

RAM: 2x2GB Gksill ddr2-800 + 2x1Gb Adata ddr2-800 @ 700mhz 5-4-4-12

Video Card: Sapphire Radeon HD 4850 512MB @ 665/1000

OS: Windows 7 64bit

3DMark06 Score: 13488 Pic & link

3DMark Vantage Score: P8176 Pic

Neowin Username: Anarkii

CPU: Intel Core i7 @ 3.4GHz

Processor Heatsink: Noctua CP12

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD5 F9 Bios

RAM: 12GB Corsair Dominator 1333Mhz DDR3 default timings.

Video Cards: 2x XFX GTX 275 in SLI

Physx Card: Asus 9800GTX+ 512MB

OS: Windows 7 64bit Ultimate

3DMark06 Score: Haven't ran it yet. Ill edit this post once I do :)

3DMark Vantage Score: P24177 Pic

Neowin Username: Anarkii

CPU: Intel Core i7 @ 3.4GHz

Processor Heatsink: Noctua CP12

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD5 F9 Bios

RAM: 12GB Corsair Dominator 1333Mhz DDR3 default timings.

Video Cards: 2x XFX GTX 275 in SLI

Physx Card: Asus 9800GTX+ 512MB

OS: Windows 7 64bit Ultimate

3DMark06 Score: Haven't ran it yet. Ill edit this post once I do :)

3DMark Vantage Score: P24177 Pic

What i7 do you have? I'm assuming it's a 920 that's running at 161x21? What are the default timings as well for your RAM.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Updated with new database entries for the following users: Anarkii (3DMark06 results pending), Blackhearted

Changes: Organized results via dual core / quad core processors in order of CPU type and clock-speed.

Edited by shift.

Neowin Username: tsupersonic

CPU: Intel Core i7 860 3.08GHz (140 MHz bclock)

Processor Heatsink: Arctic Freezer 7 Pro. Rev. 2

Motherboard: MSI P55-GD65

RAM: 4 x 2 GB GSkill Ripjaws DDR3-1333MHz @ 9-9-9-24

Video Card: EVGA Nvidia GeForce GTX 260 Superclock 896 MB @ 626/1350/2106 MHz

OS: Windows 7 Professional x64

3DMark2006 Score: Don't have a screenshot, but got 17k

3DMark Vantage Score: P13333 and 3DMark Link

Updated with new database entries for the following users: Anarkii (3DMark06 results pending), Blackhearted

Changes: Organized results via dual core / quad core processors in order of CPU type and clock-speed.

You put my second results in the wrong category of those two btw. The AII X4 is a quad.

  • 2 weeks later...

I just ran mine with 2x5770's. After some research, you get a over all of '0' if you change any of the settings. If you select a preset you actually get a result.

My Results: http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dmv=1877605

  • 4 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...

Neowin Username: Dynamism

CPU: i7-930 @ 2800 (21 x 133) and 3569 (22 x 170),

Processor Heatsink/Fan or Watercooling Setup: Corsair H50

Motherboard: Gigabyte X58A-UD3R

RAM: Corsair Dominator DHX+ 1600 MHz, 3x2GB

Video Card: XFX Radeon HD5870, Stock in two lowest results, 890 MHz (GPU) and 1250 MHz (Memory) in the last result.

OS: Windows 7 Pro x64

3DMark 2006 Score: 23760 (Only tested with both CPU and GPU overclocked)

3DMark Vantage: P17353 (Stock), P18590 (CPU overclocked) and P19162 (Both CPU and GPU overclocked)

benchmarks.jpg

  • 2 weeks later...

CPU: Phenom II X4 955 @ 3.780 Mhz

Processor Heatsink/Fan or Watercooling Setup: Arctic Cooling Pro 64

Motherboard: MSI 790XT-G45

RAM: Mixed OCZ2G8002G (4GB) Patriot 6400LL Series (4G) Total 8GB DDR2

Video Card: XFX Radeon 4770 Crossfire'd (Overclocked 830 core 850 mem)

OS: Windows 7 Pro x64

3DMark 2006 Score: 19657

Drivers: Cat 10.4

http://img26.imageshack.us/i/27397500.png/

post-9573-12731934048632.png

Neowin Username: Yinchie

CPU: Intel Core i7 920 D0 @ 4200MHz (21 x 200)

Processor Heatsink/Fan or Watercooling Setup: Custom watercooling setup

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD5

RAM: OCZ Gold Series CL8 DDR3-1600 6GB (3x2GB) @ 7-7-7-19 1600MHz

Video Card: Zotac (NVIDIA) GeForce GTX480 @ 850/1000/1700MHz

OS: Windows 7 Enterprise X64

3DMark 2006 Score: 26992

3DMark Vantage Score: P24864

3dmarks06.png

3dmarksvantage.png

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • IBM reveals sub-1nm chip technology, production expected in another 5 years by Pradeep Viswanathan TSMC is now leading the chip manufacturing industry with its 2nm-class process node called N2. Samsung Foundry also has a 2nm-class process node called SF2. TSMC says N2 entered volume production in Q4 2025. Samsung says SF2 started mass production in 2025. Today, IBM announced the world’s first sub-1-nanometer chip technology, marking another major semiconductor research milestone. The new technology is based on a 0.7nm, or 7-angstrom, node and uses a new transistor architecture called “nanostack.” The new design vertically stacks and staggers nanosheet-based transistors so that more components can fit into the same chip area while also improving performance and power efficiency. IBM claims that this new sub-1nm chip can pack nearly 100 billion transistors onto a chip the size of a fingernail. This offers almost twice the density, up to 50 percent higher performance, or 70 percent better energy efficiency when compared to IBM's 2nm node design announced back in 2021. Also, IBM mentioned that this new architecture can deliver 40 percent SRAM scaling. It is important to consider that this announcement from IBM is a research milestone rather than a near-term process node launch. Back in 2021, IBM unveiled the world’s first 2nm chip design, claiming 50 billion transistors on a fingernail-sized chip and major performance and efficiency gains. Five years later, IBM’s 2nm technology has still not entered mainstream commercial production. That is because IBM is no longer a major commercial chip manufacturer. It sold its chip manufacturing business to GlobalFoundries years ago and has since then focused only on semiconductor research, IP development, and partnerships. To productize its 2-nm chip technology, IBM partnered with Japan’s Rapidus, but it has not resulted in anything shipping at scale. IBM says that its new sub-1nm technology can reach production as early as within the next five years. If that happens, it will likely depend on manufacturing partners, advanced EUV tooling, and years of yield improvements.
    • It's funny when thieves accuse other thieves of stealing. Ai companies just blatantly siphoned all the knowledge of the internet without consent and are now selling it with their service... so excuse me if I find this a bit ironic.
    • TeraCopy 4.0 Build 27 is out.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Meta Plast earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      kinowa earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      454
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      135
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!