Official 3DMark Scores Database


Recommended Posts

  • 4 weeks later...

Neowin Username: rm20010

CPU: Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 @ 3000 MHz (333 MHz x 9)

Processor Heatsink: OCZ Vanquisher

Motherboard: Gigabyte P35C-DS3R F12e

RAM: 2 x 1 GB Crucial Ballistix Tracer, 800 MHz, 4-4-4-12 @ 2.2v (that's what CPU-Z reports for voltage)

Video Card: XFX GeForce 8800 GT XXX @ 700/1000/1753 MHz

OS: Windows 7 RC x86

3DMark2006 Score: 13607

3DMark Vantage Score: P7542

Screenshot of 3DMark Vantage with CPU-Z and GPU-Z

Screenshot of 3DMark2006 score

  • 2 months later...

Hey Shift! =?

I have seen your thread a while back but only now got 3dmark:DD

i wanted to ask a question and leave a suggestion:))

First of all, would it be ok to post 2 different runs? (1 overclock, 1 normal)

also you should make 2 tables, for those who can run on High

Sorry, was in Hong Kong for the past month and school starting up right now so will be a bit busy.

As for running the test on High, not everyone is able to run it at that resolution.

The purpose isn't to show off how high your score is but more to compare what effect hardware changes have on synthetic benchmark scores.

Sorry, was in Hong Kong for the past month and school starting up right now so will be a bit busy.

Excuses... you still haven't got mine up and you've had two months to do it. :p

  • 4 months later...

Neowin Username: revanmj

CPU: Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 3.0 GHz MHz (333 MHz x 9)

Processor Heatsink: Default Intel's one

Motherboard: ASUS P5B-E

RAM: 2 x 2 GB Kingston, 800 MHz, 5-6-6-15 1.8 V

Video Card: Palit GeForce 9600 GT 1 GB @ 650/1600/800 MHz

OS: Windows 7 Ultimate x64

3DMark2006 Score: 7960 (Screen / Link)

3DMark Vantage Score: P3311 (Screen / Link)

Hmm.. I guess i'll post new scores with the hardware changes since last time. Anyway...

Neowin Username: Blackhearted

CPU: AMD Athlon II X4 620 @ 3.4GHz (262 x 13)

Processor Heatsink: Arctic Freezer 64 Pro

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-MA770-UD3 Rev 2.0

RAM: 2x2GB Gksill ddr2-800 + 2x1Gb Adata ddr2-800 @ 700mhz 5-4-4-12

Video Card: Sapphire Radeon HD 4850 512MB @ 665/1000

OS: Windows 7 64bit

3DMark06 Score: 13488 Pic & link

3DMark Vantage Score: P8176 Pic

Neowin Username: Anarkii

CPU: Intel Core i7 @ 3.4GHz

Processor Heatsink: Noctua CP12

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD5 F9 Bios

RAM: 12GB Corsair Dominator 1333Mhz DDR3 default timings.

Video Cards: 2x XFX GTX 275 in SLI

Physx Card: Asus 9800GTX+ 512MB

OS: Windows 7 64bit Ultimate

3DMark06 Score: Haven't ran it yet. Ill edit this post once I do :)

3DMark Vantage Score: P24177 Pic

Neowin Username: Anarkii

CPU: Intel Core i7 @ 3.4GHz

Processor Heatsink: Noctua CP12

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD5 F9 Bios

RAM: 12GB Corsair Dominator 1333Mhz DDR3 default timings.

Video Cards: 2x XFX GTX 275 in SLI

Physx Card: Asus 9800GTX+ 512MB

OS: Windows 7 64bit Ultimate

3DMark06 Score: Haven't ran it yet. Ill edit this post once I do :)

3DMark Vantage Score: P24177 Pic

What i7 do you have? I'm assuming it's a 920 that's running at 161x21? What are the default timings as well for your RAM.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Updated with new database entries for the following users: Anarkii (3DMark06 results pending), Blackhearted

Changes: Organized results via dual core / quad core processors in order of CPU type and clock-speed.

Edited by shift.

Neowin Username: tsupersonic

CPU: Intel Core i7 860 3.08GHz (140 MHz bclock)

Processor Heatsink: Arctic Freezer 7 Pro. Rev. 2

Motherboard: MSI P55-GD65

RAM: 4 x 2 GB GSkill Ripjaws DDR3-1333MHz @ 9-9-9-24

Video Card: EVGA Nvidia GeForce GTX 260 Superclock 896 MB @ 626/1350/2106 MHz

OS: Windows 7 Professional x64

3DMark2006 Score: Don't have a screenshot, but got 17k

3DMark Vantage Score: P13333 and 3DMark Link

Updated with new database entries for the following users: Anarkii (3DMark06 results pending), Blackhearted

Changes: Organized results via dual core / quad core processors in order of CPU type and clock-speed.

You put my second results in the wrong category of those two btw. The AII X4 is a quad.

  • 2 weeks later...

I just ran mine with 2x5770's. After some research, you get a over all of '0' if you change any of the settings. If you select a preset you actually get a result.

My Results: http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dmv=1877605

  • 4 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...

Neowin Username: Dynamism

CPU: i7-930 @ 2800 (21 x 133) and 3569 (22 x 170),

Processor Heatsink/Fan or Watercooling Setup: Corsair H50

Motherboard: Gigabyte X58A-UD3R

RAM: Corsair Dominator DHX+ 1600 MHz, 3x2GB

Video Card: XFX Radeon HD5870, Stock in two lowest results, 890 MHz (GPU) and 1250 MHz (Memory) in the last result.

OS: Windows 7 Pro x64

3DMark 2006 Score: 23760 (Only tested with both CPU and GPU overclocked)

3DMark Vantage: P17353 (Stock), P18590 (CPU overclocked) and P19162 (Both CPU and GPU overclocked)

benchmarks.jpg

  • 2 weeks later...

CPU: Phenom II X4 955 @ 3.780 Mhz

Processor Heatsink/Fan or Watercooling Setup: Arctic Cooling Pro 64

Motherboard: MSI 790XT-G45

RAM: Mixed OCZ2G8002G (4GB) Patriot 6400LL Series (4G) Total 8GB DDR2

Video Card: XFX Radeon 4770 Crossfire'd (Overclocked 830 core 850 mem)

OS: Windows 7 Pro x64

3DMark 2006 Score: 19657

Drivers: Cat 10.4

http://img26.imageshack.us/i/27397500.png/

post-9573-12731934048632.png

Neowin Username: Yinchie

CPU: Intel Core i7 920 D0 @ 4200MHz (21 x 200)

Processor Heatsink/Fan or Watercooling Setup: Custom watercooling setup

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD5

RAM: OCZ Gold Series CL8 DDR3-1600 6GB (3x2GB) @ 7-7-7-19 1600MHz

Video Card: Zotac (NVIDIA) GeForce GTX480 @ 850/1000/1700MHz

OS: Windows 7 Enterprise X64

3DMark 2006 Score: 26992

3DMark Vantage Score: P24864

3dmarks06.png

3dmarksvantage.png

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Indeed. But note that this has Wifi7, HDMI 2.1, BlueTooth 5.4, and 5G Ethernet, so even in the additional features list this bundle blows the Steam Machine away. And, with the money saved, one could improve this dramatically.
    • One of the strangest galaxies in our Universe could help answer some long overdue questions by Sayan Sen Image by Pixabay via Pexels | Not representative An international team of astronomers led by the Department of Astronomy at Tsinghua University has discovered an unusually metal-poor galaxy that may contain signs of first-generation star formation. The galaxy, named Metal-Pristine Galaxy COSMOS Redshift 3 (MPG-CR3), or CR3, was identified using observations from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), the Very Large Telescope (VLT), and the Subaru Telescope. The findings, published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters, describe CR3 as the most metal-poor galaxy known from the period known as "cosmic noon," around 11.5 billion years ago. Cosmic noon refers to a period when the universe was producing stars at its highest rate and galaxies were growing rapidly. In astronomy, "metals" refers to all elements heavier than helium, including oxygen, carbon, and iron. Because CR3 contains so few of these heavier elements, researchers say it closely resembles what scientists expect the earliest galaxies in the universe may have looked like. The discovery is significant because it could offer clues about Population III (Pop III) stars, the first generation of stars thought to have formed after the Big Bang. These stars are believed to have formed from gas made almost entirely of hydrogen and helium, before heavier elements were created inside stars and spread across the universe through supernova explosions. Hence this is why CR3 has been referred to as a "living fossil." Scientists have long believed that Population III stars existed only in the very early universe. As more generations of stars formed and died, they enriched surrounding gas with heavier elements, making the conditions needed for metal-free star formation increasingly rare. Because of this, researchers expected the formation of such stars to have largely ended after the epoch of reionization, a period when radiation from the first stars and galaxies transformed the neutral hydrogen filling the universe and made it largely transparent to ultraviolet light. CR3 appears to challenge that idea. The galaxy was observed at a redshift of z = 3.193 ± 0.016. Redshift measures how much light from a distant object has been stretched as the universe expands and helps astronomers determine how far back in time they are looking. In this case, the redshift corresponds to roughly 11.5 billion years ago during cosmic noon. Although the universe was already several billion years old by that point, CR3 shows characteristics more commonly associated with much earlier galaxies. Observations revealed exceptionally strong emissions from hydrogen and helium, including Lyα, Hα, and He I λ10830. Lyα, or Lyman-alpha emission, is a specific wavelength of light produced by hydrogen and is widely used to study distant galaxies. Hα emission is another hydrogen signature commonly used to trace active star formation, while He I λ10830 is produced by helium and can indicate the presence of very hot, young stars. The measured equivalent widths of EW₀(Lyα) = 822 ± 101 Å and EW₀(Hα) = 2814 ± 327 Å are among the highest ever observed in star-forming galaxies. Equivalent width is a measure of the strength of an emission line relative to the surrounding light, and such large values are typically associated with intense and very recent star formation. At the same time, researchers found no statistically significant detections of metal emission lines, including [O III] λλ4959, 5007 and C IV λλ1548, 1550. Emission lines act as chemical fingerprints that reveal which elements are present in a galaxy. Oxygen and carbon lines are commonly seen in galaxies that have already undergone significant chemical enrichment. Their absence in CR3 suggests an unusually pristine environment. Using abundance calibration methods developed with JWST observations, the team placed a 2σ upper limit on the galaxy's gas-phase metallicity of 12+log(O/H)<6.52, corresponding to less than 0.7% of the Sun's metallicity (Z < 7 × 10⁻³ Z⊙). Gas-phase metallicity measures the abundance of heavy elements in a galaxy's gas. A 2σ upper limit indicates that the true value is very unlikely to be higher than the quoted threshold. Even when accounting for uncertainties in the calibration methods, the most conservative limit remains 12+log(O/H)<6.95, making CR3 the most metal-poor galaxy identified at cosmic noon. The galaxy also appears to contain very little dust. Researchers measured a Lyα/Hα flux ratio of 13.9 ± 2.5, a result that suggests negligible dust attenuation, meaning very little of the galaxy's light is being absorbed or scattered by cosmic dust. Because dust is usually produced by earlier generations of stars, this finding further supports the idea that CR3 has experienced very little chemical enrichment. Further analysis using spectral energy distribution modelling, a technique that compares observed light with theoretical models, suggests that CR3 contains an extremely young stellar population only around 2 million years old. The modelling, which used Population III stellar templates, also indicates the galaxy has a stellar mass of approximately 6.1 × 10⁵ M⊙. The symbol M⊙ represents one solar mass, or the mass of the Sun. One of the key questions raised by the discovery is how such a chemically primitive galaxy could exist in a universe that had already spent billions of years producing heavier elements. To investigate this, the researchers examined CR3's surroundings. Their analysis suggests the galaxy may lie in a slightly underdense environment, with a density contrast of roughly δ ≈ −0.12. An underdense region contains less matter and fewer galaxies than average. The team suggests that this relative isolation may have helped preserve pockets of pristine gas. Metal-rich material expelled from nearby galaxies may never have reached CR3, while the lower rate of galaxy mergers and interactions could have slowed the mixing of enriched gas into the system. If future observations confirm these findings, CR3 could provide some of the strongest evidence yet that first-generation star formation continued well after the epoch of reionization. Such a result would challenge the conventional view that pristine star formation ended by z ≳ 6 and suggest that small pockets of metal-free gas survived much longer than previously thought. Researchers stress that more observations will be needed to determine the galaxy's true nature. Future spectroscopic studies with higher resolution and better signal quality could help confirm whether CR3 is genuinely hosting Population III star formation. The discovery is also expected to encourage searches for other similar galaxies, which could help astronomers better understand how the first stars formed and how galaxies evolved in the early universe. Source: Tsinghua University, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "I think in the immediate absence of a partner to apply relief" In the words of Sterling Archer... "Phrasing!"
    • For me, the fundamental problems with these "smartglasses" is that they really don't work well for people with significant prescriptions and massively up the price if you use attached lenses if they have displays, and if they don't, then they're not actually "smart" anything, rather just connecting to your phone and relaying voice to an AI. In a few cases like this, they throw in small cameras to feed video to the AI. All around, these feel like both a solution looking for a problem, and the problems it tries to solve seem more easily solved by different approaches and designs. Oddly, if the rumours are true, Apple may actually have invented something for once and it kind of does this right: put cameras in ear buds and manage the interface to AI exactly as most of us do: tapping on an ear bud and saying "Hey Google" or "Hey Siri." That makes them compatible with almost everyone, can double up as a hearing assist device, an impaired vision assist device, a "smart" device... and answer your phone and play music. That just seems like a better solution all around.
    • Usually the bigger ones with many fixes/changes take a few, theyre an exception to the rule most likely
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      452
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      161
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      107
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      84
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!