Recommended Posts

I have Nvidia 7300GT 512MB, so no sharing there, i don't have an Intel Chipset. I suppose its to do with the bios, its just my testing machine so its not that important but i was curious to know if that's got to be a problem, it shows fine on vista 64.

I think its a cheap motherboard, bought it a while ago, I've tried doodling around with overclocking before and it was a no go, so i guess it is the bios limitation.

post-65695-1236184435.png

Edited by M.F.D.K

You are using a 32 bit OS. Which means at the most you can address 4 gigabyte of memory. 2^32

However as the main ram isn't the only memory in your computer you have to substract the videomemory and other IO memory from your main memory, which apparently leaves you with 3.25 gb of USABLE memory.

That's it, nothing wrong with your hardware, nothing wrong with windows, pure mathematics.

Use windows 7 64 bit and you can use all your memory. A CPU just sees all your memory (RAM, GPU memory, network controller memory, IO devices) as one big block of memory, in the case of a 32 bit system this block has a maximum size of 2^32 bits which is more or less 4 gigabyte.

You are using a 32 bit OS. Which means at the most you can address 4 gigabyte of memory. 2^32

However as the main ram isn't the only memory in your computer you have to substract the videomemory and other IO memory from your main memory, which apparently leaves you with 3.25 gb of USABLE memory.

That's it, nothing wrong with your hardware, nothing wrong with windows, pure mathematics.

Use windows 7 64 bit and you can use all your memory

No he's not, check what he posted. Clearly says "64-bit operating system".

You are using a 32 bit OS. Which means at the most you can address 4 gigabyte of memory. 2^32

However as the main ram isn't the only memory in your computer you have to substract the videomemory and other IO memory from your main memory, which apparently leaves you with 3.25 gb of USABLE memory.

That's it, nothing wrong with your hardware, nothing wrong with windows, pure mathematics.

Use windows 7 64 bit and you can use all your memory

Mate, i think you didn't read my post...? It is 64bit that I'm using.

You are using a 32 bit OS. Which means at the most you can address 4 gigabyte of memory. 2^32

However as the main ram isn't the only memory in your computer you have to substract the videomemory and other IO memory from your main memory, which apparently leaves you with 3.25 gb of USABLE memory.

That's it, nothing wrong with your hardware, nothing wrong with windows, pure mathematics.

Use windows 7 64 bit and you can use all your memory

Did you even look at the image provided?

hmmm, looked over it, my bad :blush: . In that case ome 32 bit driver probably or indeed bios limitation of 4 gigabyte?

Not even sure if its the bios, I just checked it, and the bios is actually reading as something 4096MB. As i said in my previous post, i remember trying to fiddle around with overclocking and the motherboard is so limited that it doesn't allow one bit of overclocking, whether it would be GPU. CPU or RAM.

What model of computer do you have? (or if you built it, what type of motherboard) and I'll try and look into it.

I'm getting curious about this :D No Core 2 Quad architecture should be based on a 32-bit chipset far as I know.

What model of computer do you have? (or if you built it, what type of motherboard) and I'll try and look into it.

I'm getting curious about this :D No Core 2 Quad architecture should be based on a 32-bit chipset far as I know.

Its my own build for testing purpose only.

post-65695-1236185988.png

Since this will probably affect other people in the near future (with RAM being so cheap nowadays), it would be very nice if you if you could try to fix it and post the fix, MFDK.

Yeah will do that.

have you updated your BIOS to the latest version from the manufacturers web site?

Yeah that has been done.

See if there is an option for "Memory Remapping" under the BIOS, it should be enabled for 64-bit OS'es but disabled for 32-bit OS'es.

Radish?

I'm going to have a look at it right now.

I just checked the bios, there isn't such a feature as "Memory Remapping" or anything that has to do with 64-bit.

Okay just looking at the product specifications for this board, is your Integrated Video card (regardless of whether you are using it or not) actually disabled in the BIOS?

Its automatically disabled when I connect my PCI/e. I have to go now but i will report back about this seee if i find a solution.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Not even an OLED display on the laptops. Also it seems that the laptop design isn't the same as the Surface Ultra model. Looks like bargain bin at high prices.
    • make your own notch - it's not that hard
    • VirtualBox 7.2.10 by Razvan Serea VirtualBox is a powerful x86 and AMD64/Intel64 virtualization product for enterprise as well as home use. Targeted at server, desktop and embedded use, it is now the only professional-quality virtualization solution that is also Open Source Software. Presently, VirtualBox runs on Windows, Linux, macOS, and Solaris hosts and supports a large number of guest operating systems including but not limited to Windows (NT 4.0, 2000, XP, Server 2003, Vista, 7, 8, Windows 10 and Windows 11), DOS/Windows 3.x, Linux (2.4, 2.6, 3.x, 4.x, 5.x and 6.x), Solaris and OpenSolaris, OS/2, OpenBSD, NetBSD and FreeBSD. Some of the features of VirtualBox are: Modularity. VirtualBox has an extremely modular design with well-defined internal programming interfaces and a client/server design. This makes it easy to control it from several interfaces at once: for example, you can start a virtual machine in a typical virtual machine GUI and then control that machine from the command line, or possibly remotely. VirtualBox also comes with a full Software Development Kit: even though it is Open Source Software, you don't have to hack the source to write a new interface for VirtualBox. Virtual machine descriptions in XML. The configuration settings of virtual machines are stored entirely in XML and are independent of the local machines. Virtual machine definitions can therefore easily be ported to other computers. VirtualBox 7.2.10 changelog: VMM: Fixed issue when CentOS 10 VM was not booting due to the message "Fatal glibc error: CPU does not support x86-64-v3" (​github:gh-642) Devices/EFI: Fixed booting issue when ARM VM had less than 1024 MiB of RAM assigned (​github:gh-679) USB: Fixed issue when it was not possible to attach USB device to headless VM on Apple Silicon/macOS 26.4.1 (​github:gh-631) Storage: Fixed issue when VIRTIO-SCSI device was not recognized as SSD device by guest system (​github:gh-634) Network: Fixed issue in E1000 emulation code which triggered debug log creation (​github:gh-645) Network: Fixed issue in E1000 emulation code which prevented OS/2 guest from booting (​github:gh-683) Linux Host: Fixed issue when VMs could not be started due to kernel oops (​github:gh-639) Linux Host and Guest: Fixed issue when kernel modules were failing to build with openSUSE 16.0 kernel Linux Host and Guest: Added initial support for kernel 7.1 Linux Host and Guest: Added extra fixes for RHEL 9.8 kernel (​github:gh-676) Linux Host and Guest: Added possibility to build source code using NASM instead of YASM as the assembler (​github:gh-520) Linux Guest Additions: Added initial support for Extended Data Control Protocol for clipboard sharing with Plasma on Wayland guests (​github:gh-33) Linux Guest Additions: Added extra fixes for preventing vboxvideo kernel module build with kernel version 7.0 and newer (​github:gh-655) OS/2 Guest Additions: Fixed issue when Shared Folders automount and clipboard sharing stopped working (​github:gh-551) Download: VirtualBox 7.2.10 | 170.0 MB (Open Source) Download: VirtualBox 7.2.10 Extension Pack | 19.1 MB View: VirtualBox Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • OK, now ask yourself how are they going to enforce that law? By requiring every single adult to prove their age and provide their legal identity documents to an UNREGULATED 3rd party company that already has a long track record of multiple data breaches. Not to mention, parliament have voted AGAINST this ban, twice, and Starmer is going ahead anyway. So, where's the democracy here, because that looks like dictatorship to me. The solution here is parental responsibility, not government control. Run some public service announcements on TV and UK social media teaching parents how to setup parental controls. That's already been proven to actually work. But the, this is not and has NEVER been about keeping kids safe. It's about control and monitoring. Watching what you're doing online and controlling what you can see and what you can say.
    • Interesting read. I knew the adware was quite controversial at the time, however never realised to the point The Guardian wrote an article about Patchou. I just said no and enjoyed his creation, I’d probably be a lot more wary of something like that today though.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      suprememobiles48 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Prasann earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      Dys Topia earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      525
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      180
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      105
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      89
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!