Recommended Posts

Not.

Don't blody answer without getting it yourself. The person who made it could have stripped it using vlite, just go get it and confirm it then right click on setup and check release date, file size, and digital signature.

It's confirmed it's out in the wild but seeable not sure.

I can confirm the file Extract and repair.exe inside the torrent is a Trojan but what exactly is the ISO i do not know, they might not be linked some idiot just might of chucked it in there to be some smart ass, ISO could be real or false don't know without someone testing.

Don't blody answer without getting it yourself. The person who made it could have stripped it using vlite, just go get it and confirm it then right click on setup and check release date, file size, and digital signature.

It's confirmed it's out in the wild but seeable not sure.

That must be why it's been removed. :laugh:

He had no proof of the existence anyways. I don't see why you would strip down the ISO first before you release the actual ISO first, kind of stupid IMO.

About 7061 and higher, I'm sure we will see something by the latest, Sunday; my guess is Friday. :)

Don't blody answer without getting it yourself. The person who made it could have stripped it using vlite, just go get it and confirm it then right click on setup and check release date, file size, and digital signature.

It's confirmed it's out in the wild but seeable not sure.

600mb of iso? :) thats some vliting! but anyway you see fake as soon as you see some .exe file called "repair and extract.exe", i wonder what that does! Anyway if its not full iso then its already suspicious in any case.

When people are looking for iso you need to know 2 things. First x86 version will be from ~2.5gb-2.65gb and x64 version will be from ~3.2gb-3.3gb. Then is anything matches this sizes on picuture is fake in advance, since having 2 isos SAME size will probably never happen.

Then is anything matches this sizes on picuture is fake in advance, since having 2 isos SAME size will probably never happen.

That's what made me laugh when i spotted many builds that were supposedly another build, especially for those who actually downloaded it, which also made me laugh. :laugh:

That's what made me laugh when i spotted many builds that were supposedly another build, especially for those who actually downloaded it, which also made me laugh. :laugh:

heh :) This builds are all real tho. Im saving all this builds just, so i can find out in advance if something is for sure fake or not :p Ill probably erase them all after rtm.

Bad?

Something must be wrong with your system..., the OS appears to be very stable and complete, except for some minor issues that are still being worked out.

i also had tons of issues with 7057.

build 7000 was tons better for me.

7057 had my wifi and bluetooth on my laptop always on without me turning it on, and i had to reset to use my flash drive and mouse...wouldnt detect from normal plug and play.

i also had tons of issues with 7057.

build 7000 was tons better for me.

7057 had my wifi and bluetooth on my laptop always on without me turning it on, and i had to reset to use my flash drive and mouse...wouldnt detect from normal plug and play.

It's more of the opposite for me. I noticed all kinds of bugs with build 7000. Locked/"In Use" issues when trying to modify Start Menu items, extra-wide right-click menus, etc.

With 7057, all the issues I had with build 7000 were fixed. However, there was the weird "unhidden Desktop.ini" issue.

That must be why it's been removed. :laugh:

He had no proof of the existence anyways. I don't see why you would strip down the ISO first before you release the actual ISO first, kind of stupid IMO.

About 7061 and higher, I'm sure we will see something by the latest, Sunday; my guess is Friday. :)

confirmed 7061 is BS, the exe is 2 diff trogens, the iso is corrupt, i downloaded it myself......

post-285628-1237430056.jpg

I agree with you Build 7057 is by far the best build of Windows 7 I have used so far!!! :)

Build 7057 fixes almost all the bugs I have found in early builds!

Yeah, it does.

If you did an upgrade from earlier builds, that is your problem. Fresh installs only for 7057 from what I know.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Plans. Christ at least editorialise this tripe for what it is or put your own journalistic take on it.
    • If you have a TV in your living room, chances are you can probably just use the Steam Link app and play your huge PC in big picture mode, effectively giving you the Steam Machine experience to see if you'd actually like it. The good news is the Steam Machine can have it's drives upgraded. It has a USB-C 10Gbs port as well, so the 512GB drive could be quickly moved to an external enclosure and repurposed.
    • This machine could very well be a second gaming PC for their living room as a console experience. So we would have to assume their main PC exists as well; With that said, I have 10gb home network with a 2.5gigabit internet connection here so we tend to have more than enough speed to download games. However, we can't make use of the 10gb LAN using Steam's built in transfer tool because it always compresses transfers and that slows the transfer down to well below a standard gigabit port speeds, sometimes as slow as 200-300Mb/s transfers. While that's probably still faster than most internet connections anyway, if they'd fix the LAN transfer issue it'd be upto x5 faster even on a gigabit LAN, than simply dropping a 2.5gbe port on there with hopes of a few people having fast internet connections. There are solutions, work arounds, like using LANCache if you run a NAS... or simply copying the files over manually using a network share.
    • Samsung announces ultra-fast UFS 5.0 storage to supercharge mobile AI by Paul Hill Local AI models tend to run a lot more slowly than cloud services like Claude and Gemini; however, Samsung has just announced that it has developed its UFS 5.0 solution, which increases data transfer to speeds of 10.8GB/s, enabling faster storage and processing in mobile memory that has the potential to provide more optimal local AI experiences. Commenting on this development, Jangseok Choi, head of Memory Product Planning at Samsung Electronics, said: If you’ve tried local AI, you’ll know it can be quite slow, especially if using the larger parameter models. By developing this new solution, Samsung says that storage is evolving from just storing data to a core piece of infrastructure that supports AI computation, too. The Korean company said that UFS 5.0 integrates the latest embedded memory interface standard from JEDEC and achieves up to 10.8 gigabytes per second (GB/s) transfer speeds. Regarding write speeds, Samsung UFS 5.0 can reach 9.5 GB/s. Both the read and write speeds are twice as fast as those of the previous UFS 4.1 standard. Aside from being ideal for local AI, Samsung’s UFS 5.0 is more power efficient by 40% compared to UFS 4.1. Samsung achieved this by implementing innovations such as clock gating and multi-voltage technologies. UFS 5.0 is also ultra-compact at just 7.5mm x 13mm x 0.9mm; that is 16.7% smaller than UFS 4.1. The company said it will be bringing it to multiple devices in the future, including mobile, wearable, and extended reality.
    • A bit like the steamdeck, this probably isn't for you.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
    • Dedicated
      tuben earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      mnsgroup earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      496
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      209
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      99
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      86
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!