windows 7 build 7061 out int the wild ?

[timster]

lol ... 7061 is so last Wednesday

6.1.7064.0.winmain.090316-1936

6.1.7065.0.winmain.090317-1835

source: www.wzor.net

Edited March 20, 2009 by timster

[wguimb]

lol ... 7061 is so last Wednesday

6.1.7064.0.winmain.090316-1936

6.1.7065.0.winmain.090317-1835

source: www.wzor.net

7067 was the build for 090317-1922 is what I understand. If that is the case then today's build is 7069 for internal, private, ISV, hardware partners, and developers. Not likely to leak.

There is a fake torrent purported to be build 7061 in the wild which is FAKE and a trojan is reported in the downloaded files. However, I did see on Connect bug reports that an internal tester has submitted a bug for build 7061. So, the build is real just not leaked.

I am using 7057 x86 and no bugs to speak of. Rock solid for me.

[xJakex]

I honestly don't care too much about what build it is, as long as it's higher than 7057 and legit, then I'm alright. If it's the latest, that's even better :D

[wguimb]

My research indicates the following builds:

(Bold text indicates released or leaked)

6.1.7000.0.081212-1400

6.1.7015.0.winmain.081218-1724

6.1.7022.0.winmain.090115-1850

6.1.7025.0.x86fre.winmain.090120-1850

6.1.7032.0.winmain.090129-1812_client_en-us_OEM_Ultimate-GB1CULFREO_EN_DVD.iso

6.1.7034.0.winmain.090202-1920

6.1.7036.0.winmain.??????-????

6.1.7041.0.winmain.090211-????

6.1.7046.0.winmain.??????-????

6.1.7047.0.winmain.090218-1900

6.1.7048.0.winmain.090219-1845

6.1.7048.0.x86fre.winmain.090219-1845

6.1.7048.0.090219-1845_x64fre_client_en-us_Retail_Ultimate-GB1CULXFRER_EN_DVD

6.1.7050.0.winmain.??????-????

6.1.7052.0.winmain.090225-1640

6.1.7054.0.winmain.??????-????

6.1.7057.0.090305-2000_x86fre_client_en-us_Retail_Ultimate-GB1CULFRER_EN_DVD

6.1.7057.0.090305-2000_x64fre_client_en-us_Retail_Ultimate-GB1CULXFRER_EN_DVD

6.1.7058.0.winmain.090307-1140

6.1.7059.0.winmain.090309-1815

6.1.7060.0.winmain.090310-1910

6.1.7061.0.090311-1856_x86fre_client_en-us_Retail_Ultimate-GB1CULFRER_EN_DVD

6.1.7062.0.winmain.090312-1900

6.1.7063.0.winmain.090313-1842

Edited March 20, 2009 by wguimb

[xJakex]

I don't see why any of the people that got 7061, didn't post any screen shots anywhere :blink:

Although the same thing went with 7057 where they didn't have screen shots until after it was released.

[Brandon Live Veteran]

Would people please stop claiming that every build you hear about is "the RC" or an "RC esrow" build?

And while you're at it, stop making up build numbers. There was no build numbered 7067 on the 17th, so obviously someone just made that up. What I can't figure out is why.

[wguimb]

......There was no build numbered 7067 on the 17th, so obviously someone just made that up. What I can't figure out is why.

Just passing along something I found. I didn't say I downloaded it or it leaked. :)

[Lord Ba'al]

7067 was the build for 090317-1922 is what I understand. If that is the case then today's build is 7069 for internal, private, ISV, hardware partners, and developers. Not likely to leak.

There is a fake torrent purported to be build 7061 in the wild which is FAKE and a trojan is reported in the downloaded files. However, I did see on Connect bug reports that an internal tester has submitted a bug for build 7061. So, the build is real just not leaked.

I am using 7057 x86 and no bugs to speak of. Rock solid for me.

Even if it was real (which it isn't), the changes from 7057 to 7061 would be pretty little... 7069 would already be more interesting there.

[notuptome2004]

never mind

Edited March 20, 2009 by notuptome2004

[+kpo6969 Subscriber¹]

My research indicates the following builds:

(Bold text indicates released or leaked)

6.1.7000.0.081212-1400

6.1.7015.0.winmain.081218-1724

6.1.7022.0.winmain.090115-1850

6.1.7025.0.x86fre.winmain.090120-1850

6.1.7032.0.winmain.090129-1812_client_en-us_OEM_Ultimate-GB1CULFREO_EN_DVD.iso

6.1.7034.0.winmain.090202-1920

6.1.7036.0.winmain.??????-????

6.1.7041.0.winmain.090211-????

6.1.7046.0.winmain.??????-????

6.1.7047.0.winmain.090218-1900

6.1.7048.0.winmain.090219-1845

6.1.7048.0.x86fre.winmain.090219-1845

6.1.7048.0.090219-1845_x64fre_client_en-us_Retail_Ultimate-GB1CULXFRER_EN_DVD

6.1.7050.0.winmain.??????-????

6.1.7052.0.winmain.090225-1640

6.1.7054.0.winmain.??????-????

6.1.7057.0.090305-2000_x86fre_client_en-us_Retail_Ultimate-GB1CULFRER_EN_DVD

6.1.7057.0.090305-2000_x64fre_client_en-us_Retail_Ultimate-GB1CULXFRER_EN_DVD

6.1.7058.0.winmain.090307-1140

6.1.7059.0.winmain.090309-1815

6.1.7060.0.winmain.090310-1910

6.1.7061.0.090311-1856_x86fre_client_en-us_Retail_Ultimate-GB1CULFRER_EN_DVD

6.1.7062.0.winmain.090312-1900

6.1.7063.0.winmain.090313-1842

6.1.7067.0.winmain.090317-1922

Would people please stop claiming that every build you hear about is "the RC" or an "RC esrow" build?

And while you're at it, stop making up build numbers. There was no build numbered 7067 on the 17th, so obviously someone just made that up. What I can't figure out is why.

All you need to do is use Google and you can find anything (true or untrue):

http://www.aeroxp.org/board/index.php?show...0706&st=630

[notuptome2004]

All i can say and i will post this in the windows 7 disabling service thread is that Brandon live for those who dont know Works @ Microsoft so i think he would havea better hand knowlage if a version build of 7 is real or not real and you better believe him if he came out and said the first build of windows 8 was compiled today and is build 7781 or what ever that it is true.

[wguimb]

@kpo6969

Thanks for the link. I have updated my build list. :)

@Brandon Live

Thanks for clearing that up. I removed 7067 from my list.

I think a lot of us know Brandon works for MS. His input on this forum is regarded highly, at least by me and I'm sure many others. :)

[Lord Ba'al]

All i can say and i will post this in the windows 7 disabling service thread is that Brandon live for those who dont know Works @ Microsoft so i think he would havea better hand knowlage if a version build of 7 is real or not real and you better believe him if he came out and said the first build of windows 8 was compiled today and is build 7781 or what ever that it is true.

You should be careful there, or some will come and claim he has that Windows 8 build :laugh:

[wguimb]

Back on topic...

This rumor is FALSE. It's not worth discussing. I'm going to bed. <snore>

[raj1402]

RC- Escrow---The Escrow Build is a build where development halts and developers & beta testers start testing the product for any show-stopper bugs

[Lord Ba'al]

RC- Escrow---The Escrow Build is a build where development halts and developers & beta testers start testing the product for any show-stopper bugs

According to the updated schedule going around, it's supposed to be ready in the last week of April.

[gregrocker]

600mb of iso? :) thats some vliting!

Spent weeks vliting 7000 and 7022 and 1.43g is the smallest it gets and stays functional. Ironically, when I got a stable build where everything worked around 1.5g, I discovered that the 208mb ram it uses at idle is about the same as the full win7 with sec. ctr., firewall, offline files, indexing, defender turned off and graphics edited way down. Even with Avast it idles at less than half the ram with 528mb using full win7057.

[Windows7even]

Would people please stop claiming that every build you hear about is "the RC" or an "RC esrow" build?

And while you're at it, stop making up build numbers. There was no build numbered 7067 on the 17th, so obviously someone just made that up. What I can't figure out is why.

amen to that...they compile a new build pretty much everyday...we don't have to get a day by day breakdown...it will be rc when they decide it is so...for now just wait

[Owen W Veteran]

Would people please stop claiming that every build you hear about is "the RC" or an "RC esrow" build?

And while you're at it, stop making up build numbers. There was no build numbered 7067 on the 17th, so obviously someone just made that up. What I can't figure out is why.

Agreed. Google does produce truth, and fiction.