Recommended Posts

Not.

Don't blody answer without getting it yourself. The person who made it could have stripped it using vlite, just go get it and confirm it then right click on setup and check release date, file size, and digital signature.

It's confirmed it's out in the wild but seeable not sure.

I can confirm the file Extract and repair.exe inside the torrent is a Trojan but what exactly is the ISO i do not know, they might not be linked some idiot just might of chucked it in there to be some smart ass, ISO could be real or false don't know without someone testing.

Don't blody answer without getting it yourself. The person who made it could have stripped it using vlite, just go get it and confirm it then right click on setup and check release date, file size, and digital signature.

It's confirmed it's out in the wild but seeable not sure.

That must be why it's been removed. :laugh:

He had no proof of the existence anyways. I don't see why you would strip down the ISO first before you release the actual ISO first, kind of stupid IMO.

About 7061 and higher, I'm sure we will see something by the latest, Sunday; my guess is Friday. :)

Don't blody answer without getting it yourself. The person who made it could have stripped it using vlite, just go get it and confirm it then right click on setup and check release date, file size, and digital signature.

It's confirmed it's out in the wild but seeable not sure.

600mb of iso? :) thats some vliting! but anyway you see fake as soon as you see some .exe file called "repair and extract.exe", i wonder what that does! Anyway if its not full iso then its already suspicious in any case.

When people are looking for iso you need to know 2 things. First x86 version will be from ~2.5gb-2.65gb and x64 version will be from ~3.2gb-3.3gb. Then is anything matches this sizes on picuture is fake in advance, since having 2 isos SAME size will probably never happen.

Then is anything matches this sizes on picuture is fake in advance, since having 2 isos SAME size will probably never happen.

That's what made me laugh when i spotted many builds that were supposedly another build, especially for those who actually downloaded it, which also made me laugh. :laugh:

That's what made me laugh when i spotted many builds that were supposedly another build, especially for those who actually downloaded it, which also made me laugh. :laugh:

heh :) This builds are all real tho. Im saving all this builds just, so i can find out in advance if something is for sure fake or not :p Ill probably erase them all after rtm.

Bad?

Something must be wrong with your system..., the OS appears to be very stable and complete, except for some minor issues that are still being worked out.

i also had tons of issues with 7057.

build 7000 was tons better for me.

7057 had my wifi and bluetooth on my laptop always on without me turning it on, and i had to reset to use my flash drive and mouse...wouldnt detect from normal plug and play.

i also had tons of issues with 7057.

build 7000 was tons better for me.

7057 had my wifi and bluetooth on my laptop always on without me turning it on, and i had to reset to use my flash drive and mouse...wouldnt detect from normal plug and play.

It's more of the opposite for me. I noticed all kinds of bugs with build 7000. Locked/"In Use" issues when trying to modify Start Menu items, extra-wide right-click menus, etc.

With 7057, all the issues I had with build 7000 were fixed. However, there was the weird "unhidden Desktop.ini" issue.

That must be why it's been removed. :laugh:

He had no proof of the existence anyways. I don't see why you would strip down the ISO first before you release the actual ISO first, kind of stupid IMO.

About 7061 and higher, I'm sure we will see something by the latest, Sunday; my guess is Friday. :)

confirmed 7061 is BS, the exe is 2 diff trogens, the iso is corrupt, i downloaded it myself......

post-285628-1237430056.jpg

I agree with you Build 7057 is by far the best build of Windows 7 I have used so far!!! :)

Build 7057 fixes almost all the bugs I have found in early builds!

Yeah, it does.

If you did an upgrade from earlier builds, that is your problem. Fresh installs only for 7057 from what I know.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • TeraCopy 4.0 Build 27 is out.
    • My ice blue precision 3550 laptop
    • A coalition of publishers sued OpenAI and Microsoft over scraping content without consent by Hamid Ganji Image via Depositphotos.com AI companies often rely on readily available internet content to train their chatbots and provide users with instant answers. This method of AI training is fast and relatively inexpensive, but using a website’s content without permission or compensation is not something publishers like to see, and this is exactly why Microsoft and OpenAI are now being sued. As reported by Bloomberg, a group of publishers that collectively own nearly 400 newspapers has filed a lawsuit against OpenAI and Microsoft. The coalition argues that the two companies scraped their content to build AI chatbots like ChatGPT and Copilot without paying any compensation. The complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, argues that while AI products have generated billions of dollars in market value using publishers’ work, none of that value has been shared with the publishers. The plaintiffs are seeking statutory damages and injunctive relief for alleged copyright infringement and violations of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. “Defendants systematically and secretly crawled the Publishers’ websites—including content behind paywalls and other access restrictions—and copied the Publishers’ articles, stories, and other original works onto their own servers without authorization,” the complaint states. The publishers also described the AI boom as a “death knell for local journalism” if AI companies that scrape content for free are not held accountable. Former New Jersey Attorney General Matthew Platkin and his law firm, Platkin LLP, are representing the publishers. “Our models empower innovation, are trained on publicly available data, and are grounded in fair use,” OpenAI spokesperson Drew Pusateri told Bloomberg. This is not the first lawsuit involving the unauthorized use of publishers’ content by AI firms, but it is one of the largest coalitions ever formed against the free use of content by AI chatbots. In 2024, OpenAI and Microsoft also faced a similar lawsuit from eight newspapers that claimed AI products were benefiting from their content without permission.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      444
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      173
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      134
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!