Recommended Posts

Not.

Don't blody answer without getting it yourself. The person who made it could have stripped it using vlite, just go get it and confirm it then right click on setup and check release date, file size, and digital signature.

It's confirmed it's out in the wild but seeable not sure.

I can confirm the file Extract and repair.exe inside the torrent is a Trojan but what exactly is the ISO i do not know, they might not be linked some idiot just might of chucked it in there to be some smart ass, ISO could be real or false don't know without someone testing.

Don't blody answer without getting it yourself. The person who made it could have stripped it using vlite, just go get it and confirm it then right click on setup and check release date, file size, and digital signature.

It's confirmed it's out in the wild but seeable not sure.

That must be why it's been removed. :laugh:

He had no proof of the existence anyways. I don't see why you would strip down the ISO first before you release the actual ISO first, kind of stupid IMO.

About 7061 and higher, I'm sure we will see something by the latest, Sunday; my guess is Friday. :)

Don't blody answer without getting it yourself. The person who made it could have stripped it using vlite, just go get it and confirm it then right click on setup and check release date, file size, and digital signature.

It's confirmed it's out in the wild but seeable not sure.

600mb of iso? :) thats some vliting! but anyway you see fake as soon as you see some .exe file called "repair and extract.exe", i wonder what that does! Anyway if its not full iso then its already suspicious in any case.

When people are looking for iso you need to know 2 things. First x86 version will be from ~2.5gb-2.65gb and x64 version will be from ~3.2gb-3.3gb. Then is anything matches this sizes on picuture is fake in advance, since having 2 isos SAME size will probably never happen.

Then is anything matches this sizes on picuture is fake in advance, since having 2 isos SAME size will probably never happen.

That's what made me laugh when i spotted many builds that were supposedly another build, especially for those who actually downloaded it, which also made me laugh. :laugh:

That's what made me laugh when i spotted many builds that were supposedly another build, especially for those who actually downloaded it, which also made me laugh. :laugh:

heh :) This builds are all real tho. Im saving all this builds just, so i can find out in advance if something is for sure fake or not :p Ill probably erase them all after rtm.

Bad?

Something must be wrong with your system..., the OS appears to be very stable and complete, except for some minor issues that are still being worked out.

i also had tons of issues with 7057.

build 7000 was tons better for me.

7057 had my wifi and bluetooth on my laptop always on without me turning it on, and i had to reset to use my flash drive and mouse...wouldnt detect from normal plug and play.

i also had tons of issues with 7057.

build 7000 was tons better for me.

7057 had my wifi and bluetooth on my laptop always on without me turning it on, and i had to reset to use my flash drive and mouse...wouldnt detect from normal plug and play.

It's more of the opposite for me. I noticed all kinds of bugs with build 7000. Locked/"In Use" issues when trying to modify Start Menu items, extra-wide right-click menus, etc.

With 7057, all the issues I had with build 7000 were fixed. However, there was the weird "unhidden Desktop.ini" issue.

That must be why it's been removed. :laugh:

He had no proof of the existence anyways. I don't see why you would strip down the ISO first before you release the actual ISO first, kind of stupid IMO.

About 7061 and higher, I'm sure we will see something by the latest, Sunday; my guess is Friday. :)

confirmed 7061 is BS, the exe is 2 diff trogens, the iso is corrupt, i downloaded it myself......

post-285628-1237430056.jpg

I agree with you Build 7057 is by far the best build of Windows 7 I have used so far!!! :)

Build 7057 fixes almost all the bugs I have found in early builds!

Yeah, it does.

If you did an upgrade from earlier builds, that is your problem. Fresh installs only for 7057 from what I know.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Blast from the past.
    • Hello, Were you using a product or service from one of the companies affected by the Klue data breach?  See https://klue.com/blog/an-update-on-recent-klue-security-incident for the company's public statement.  That blog post does not list affected customer. From looking around at reports, I created this list: Gong HackerOne Huntress Insurity Jamf LastPass OneTrust Recorded Future ReliaQuest Salesforce Snyk Sprout Social Tanium It is likely there are other companies affected as well. Regards, Aryeh Goretsky  
    • SpaceX reportedly plans a Starlink mobile service for U.S. consumers by Karthik Mudaliar SpaceX reportedly wants to sell mobile phone plans directly to consumers in the United States as part of a wider expansion of Starlink. According to a report from the Financial Times, SpaceX president Gwynne Shotwell discussed the plan with investors during the company’s recent IPO roadshow. The company is also said to be considering building a terrestrial mobile network to complement Starlink’s satellite coverage. The plan is quite different from how Starlink currently operates in the U.S. mobile market. SpaceX already provides satellite connectivity for T-Mobile’s T-Satellite service, but T-Mobile remains responsible for the subscription, billing, and customer support. A Starlink-branded mobile service would give SpaceX control of the customer relationship instead. It could also turn the company from a partner of traditional mobile operators into a direct competitor. T-Mobile also began testing its Starlink-powered satellite service in early 2025. The beta was initially limited to text messaging and was also available to some AT&T and Verizon customers. The service has since expanded to support limited data access through selected apps, including WhatsApp, Google Maps, AccuWeather, and AllTrails. It is designed to provide a connection in areas where normal cell towers are unavailable, rather than replace a conventional mobile network. However, if SpaceX actually has a plan to serve nationwide, it needs to do more than just satellite networks and actually support on-ground operations. It can also partner up with existing carriers and become a mobile virtual network operator (MVNO). With that said, SpaceX has already spent heavily to support its mobile ambitions. Just last year, the company agreed to acquire wireless spectrum licences from EchoStar in deals worth a combined $19.6 billion. EchoStar's spectrum includes AWS-4, H-Block, and AWS-3 frequencies that could be used for both satellite and terrestrial communications. According to a SpaceX securities filing, the Federal Communications Commission approved the transaction in May 2026, although it is not expected to close until late 2027. There's no official statement by SpaceX for now. Pricing, availability, and other details remain unknown. Source: Financial Times
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      xvvxcvv earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      xvvxcvv earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Enthusiast
      Xonos went up a rank
      Enthusiast
    • Conversation Starter
      Admir earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      400
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      127
    4. 4
      neufuse
      69
    5. 5
      Xenon
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!