Recommended Posts

lol ... 7061 is so last Wednesday

6.1.7064.0.winmain.090316-1936

6.1.7065.0.winmain.090317-1835

source: www.wzor.net

7067 was the build for 090317-1922 is what I understand. If that is the case then today's build is 7069 for internal, private, ISV, hardware partners, and developers. Not likely to leak.

There is a fake torrent purported to be build 7061 in the wild which is FAKE and a trojan is reported in the downloaded files. However, I did see on Connect bug reports that an internal tester has submitted a bug for build 7061. So, the build is real just not leaked.

I am using 7057 x86 and no bugs to speak of. Rock solid for me.

My research indicates the following builds:

(Bold text indicates released or leaked)

6.1.7000.0.081212-1400

6.1.7015.0.winmain.081218-1724

6.1.7022.0.winmain.090115-1850

6.1.7025.0.x86fre.winmain.090120-1850

6.1.7032.0.winmain.090129-1812_client_en-us_OEM_Ultimate-GB1CULFREO_EN_DVD.iso

6.1.7034.0.winmain.090202-1920

6.1.7036.0.winmain.??????-????

6.1.7041.0.winmain.090211-????

6.1.7046.0.winmain.??????-????

6.1.7047.0.winmain.090218-1900

6.1.7048.0.winmain.090219-1845

6.1.7048.0.x86fre.winmain.090219-1845

6.1.7048.0.090219-1845_x64fre_client_en-us_Retail_Ultimate-GB1CULXFRER_EN_DVD

6.1.7050.0.winmain.??????-????

6.1.7052.0.winmain.090225-1640

6.1.7054.0.winmain.??????-????

6.1.7057.0.090305-2000_x86fre_client_en-us_Retail_Ultimate-GB1CULFRER_EN_DVD

6.1.7057.0.090305-2000_x64fre_client_en-us_Retail_Ultimate-GB1CULXFRER_EN_DVD

6.1.7058.0.winmain.090307-1140

6.1.7059.0.winmain.090309-1815

6.1.7060.0.winmain.090310-1910

6.1.7061.0.090311-1856_x86fre_client_en-us_Retail_Ultimate-GB1CULFRER_EN_DVD

6.1.7062.0.winmain.090312-1900

6.1.7063.0.winmain.090313-1842

Edited by wguimb

Would people please stop claiming that every build you hear about is "the RC" or an "RC esrow" build?

And while you're at it, stop making up build numbers. There was no build numbered 7067 on the 17th, so obviously someone just made that up. What I can't figure out is why.

7067 was the build for 090317-1922 is what I understand. If that is the case then today's build is 7069 for internal, private, ISV, hardware partners, and developers. Not likely to leak.

There is a fake torrent purported to be build 7061 in the wild which is FAKE and a trojan is reported in the downloaded files. However, I did see on Connect bug reports that an internal tester has submitted a bug for build 7061. So, the build is real just not leaked.

I am using 7057 x86 and no bugs to speak of. Rock solid for me.

Even if it was real (which it isn't), the changes from 7057 to 7061 would be pretty little... 7069 would already be more interesting there.

My research indicates the following builds:

(Bold text indicates released or leaked)

6.1.7000.0.081212-1400

6.1.7015.0.winmain.081218-1724

6.1.7022.0.winmain.090115-1850

6.1.7025.0.x86fre.winmain.090120-1850

6.1.7032.0.winmain.090129-1812_client_en-us_OEM_Ultimate-GB1CULFREO_EN_DVD.iso

6.1.7034.0.winmain.090202-1920

6.1.7036.0.winmain.??????-????

6.1.7041.0.winmain.090211-????

6.1.7046.0.winmain.??????-????

6.1.7047.0.winmain.090218-1900

6.1.7048.0.winmain.090219-1845

6.1.7048.0.x86fre.winmain.090219-1845

6.1.7048.0.090219-1845_x64fre_client_en-us_Retail_Ultimate-GB1CULXFRER_EN_DVD

6.1.7050.0.winmain.??????-????

6.1.7052.0.winmain.090225-1640

6.1.7054.0.winmain.??????-????

6.1.7057.0.090305-2000_x86fre_client_en-us_Retail_Ultimate-GB1CULFRER_EN_DVD

6.1.7057.0.090305-2000_x64fre_client_en-us_Retail_Ultimate-GB1CULXFRER_EN_DVD

6.1.7058.0.winmain.090307-1140

6.1.7059.0.winmain.090309-1815

6.1.7060.0.winmain.090310-1910

6.1.7061.0.090311-1856_x86fre_client_en-us_Retail_Ultimate-GB1CULFRER_EN_DVD

6.1.7062.0.winmain.090312-1900

6.1.7063.0.winmain.090313-1842

6.1.7067.0.winmain.090317-1922

Would people please stop claiming that every build you hear about is "the RC" or an "RC esrow" build?

And while you're at it, stop making up build numbers. There was no build numbered 7067 on the 17th, so obviously someone just made that up. What I can't figure out is why.

All you need to do is use Google and you can find anything (true or untrue):

http://www.aeroxp.org/board/index.php?show...0706&st=630

All i can say and i will post this in the windows 7 disabling service thread is that Brandon live for those who dont know Works @ Microsoft so i think he would havea better hand knowlage if a version build of 7 is real or not real and you better believe him if he came out and said the first build of windows 8 was compiled today and is build 7781 or what ever that it is true.

@kpo6969

Thanks for the link. I have updated my build list. :)

@Brandon Live

Thanks for clearing that up. I removed 7067 from my list.

I think a lot of us know Brandon works for MS. His input on this forum is regarded highly, at least by me and I'm sure many others. :)

All i can say and i will post this in the windows 7 disabling service thread is that Brandon live for those who dont know Works @ Microsoft so i think he would havea better hand knowlage if a version build of 7 is real or not real and you better believe him if he came out and said the first build of windows 8 was compiled today and is build 7781 or what ever that it is true.

You should be careful there, or some will come and claim he has that Windows 8 build :laugh:

RC- Escrow---The Escrow Build is a build where development halts and developers & beta testers start testing the product for any show-stopper bugs

According to the updated schedule going around, it's supposed to be ready in the last week of April.

600mb of iso? :) thats some vliting!

Spent weeks vliting 7000 and 7022 and 1.43g is the smallest it gets and stays functional. Ironically, when I got a stable build where everything worked around 1.5g, I discovered that the 208mb ram it uses at idle is about the same as the full win7 with sec. ctr., firewall, offline files, indexing, defender turned off and graphics edited way down. Even with Avast it idles at less than half the ram with 528mb using full win7057.

Would people please stop claiming that every build you hear about is "the RC" or an "RC esrow" build?

And while you're at it, stop making up build numbers. There was no build numbered 7067 on the 17th, so obviously someone just made that up. What I can't figure out is why.

amen to that...they compile a new build pretty much everyday...we don't have to get a day by day breakdown...it will be rc when they decide it is so...for now just wait

Would people please stop claiming that every build you hear about is "the RC" or an "RC esrow" build?

And while you're at it, stop making up build numbers. There was no build numbered 7067 on the 17th, so obviously someone just made that up. What I can't figure out is why.

Agreed. Google does produce truth, and fiction.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • After I installed KB5095093, the volume on my ARM laptop won't go above 20%. It's stuck on the hearing protection level, which is pretty much useless if you want to listen to anything. I rolled back.
    • Amazon Prime Day slashes Samsung's newest Galaxy Watch Ultra by 45 percent by Karthik Mudaliar Samsung’s flagship Android smartwatch has received one of its steepest Prime Day cuts. Amazon has dropped the 2025 Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra in Titanium Blue to $357.24, saving buyers around $292 from its $649.99 list price. That's a 45 percent discount (purchase link below). The 47mm Galaxy Watch Ultra uses a titanium casing and a 1.5-inch Super AMOLED display with a resolution of 480 x 480 and peak brightness of 3,000 nits. It includes LTE connectivity, Bluetooth 5.3, Wi-Fi, NFC, and dual-frequency L1+L5 GPS for more accurate outdoor route tracking. The 2025 model has 64GB of storage, a 590mAh battery, sapphire crystal glass, 10ATM water resistance, IP68 protection, and MIL-STD-810H durability testing. Its health and fitness tools include heart rate monitoring, sleep coaching, Energy Score, Running Coach, body composition analysis, temperature sensing, and ECG support, where available. This model is best suited to Android users who regularly run, hike, cycle, or train outdoors and want cellular access without carrying a phone. The larger battery, rugged construction, bright display, and dedicated Quick Button also make it a stronger option than Samsung’s regular Galaxy Watch models for extended workouts and demanding environments. Grab the Titanium Blue Galaxy Watch Ultra before the Prime Day price resets: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025) [Sold and Shipped by Amazon] Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Google begins rolling out its post-Epic Play Store billing model next week by Karthik Mudaliar Google has confirmed that its redesigned Play Store billing and fee structure will take effect on June 30, 2026, in the United States, the United Kingdom, and the European Economic Area. The changes will let eligible developers offer their own payment systems or send users to an external website for purchases, while separating Google’s platform service fee from the cost of using Google Play Billing. The rollout puts concrete dates and detailed rate cards behind the broader Android policy overhaul Google announced in March. That announcement followed a proposed settlement with Epic Games intended to resolve their long-running disputes over app distribution and payments, although the U.S. portion of the agreement still requires court approval. Under the new billing choice program, developers selling digital content or services can display an alternative payment option alongside Google Play Billing. They may also direct users to their own websites to complete a purchase. Developers can use Google’s standard payment-choice screen or design one that complies with the company’s user-interface rules. Choosing another payment processor does not eliminate Google’s cut altogether. The company will continue charging a service fee for transactions associated with apps distributed through Google Play, regardless of whether payment is handled by Google, an alternative provider, or a developer’s website. Google argues that this fee covers the value and infrastructure provided by Android and the Play Store. For developers earning up to $1 million annually, the service fee will generally be 10 percent. That rate also applies to auto-renewing subscriptions. When Google Play Billing is used in the U.S., U.K., or EEA, Google will add a separate 5 percent billing fee, and developers processing payments elsewhere will not pay that additional charge. This means Google’s familiar flat 30 percent commission is disappearing, but developers will not necessarily see a dramatic reduction on every transaction. An in-app purchase from an existing user processed through Google Play Billing can still reach a combined 30 percent. The biggest savings are likely to come from subscriptions, smaller developers covered by the $1 million tier, and companies able to move customers to their own payment infrastructure. Google is also offering lower rates through its Apps Experience and revamped Games Level Up programs. Apps and games that satisfy the company’s requirements can qualify for 15 percent service fees on new-install transactions and 20 percent on existing-install transactions. The criteria include performance and reliability standards, support for additional Android device categories, and selected platform features. Those program rates are scheduled to become available in the initial markets and Australia on September 30. For consumers, the immediate effect will depend on whether developers adopt alternative payments and pass any savings on through lower prices. For developers, however, June 30 begins a more flexible but considerably more complicated Play Store economy in which distribution, billing, install dates, revenue thresholds, and program participation can each affect Google’s final cut. Google is also separately developing a Registered App Stores program designed to simplify the installation of qualifying third-party stores. That initiative is expected to arrive with a major Android release later in 2026 and will launch outside the U.S. first. Google says the rest of the world will receive the changes by September 30, 2027, although billing rates for markets outside the US, UK, and EEA have not yet been announced.
    • 38% off a super insane price is still an INSANE price.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      464
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      81
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!