Recommended Posts

I'm guessing Windows7 works the same way as Vista. To see the information you want to see in the status bar (size in folder, files, etc) you actually need to highlight the files. Yes, it kind of annoys me to, i use Vista.

So, a lot of times i just have to 'ctrl + a' to select all.

i get what your saying but in windows 7 microsoft is making it more of the idea you no longer have to go look for your stuff but more that it is right in front of you so havening the information ya want while good is not useful anymore and is useless and beside that why should ya worry about HDD space if you got like 1TB of it he he

i get what your saying but in windows 7 microsoft is making it more of the idea you no longer have to go look for your stuff but more that it is right in front of you so havening the information ya want while good is not useful anymore and is useless and beside that why should ya worry about HDD space if you got like 1TB of it he he

Dude...I don't get why you keep replying, despite the fact that you have absolutely nothing useful to say.

If you don't have any ideas on how to remedy the situation, then I believe you ought to limit yourself to one fanboi reply per thread.

they do show ya the size of a file when ya have it selected as shown here

sizeq.th.jpg

True, we determined that. But it not as useful as what we had before, as witnessed by deepblue's pic

download.php?file=post-35006-1237826471.jpg&name=untitled.JPG

Naturally, what I'm hoping, is that someone much smarter than me(yea yea, move along :D) will come along and show me how to fix it...

True, we determined that. But it not as useful as what we had before, as witnessed by deepblue's pic

download.php?file=post-35006-1237826471.jpg&name=untitled.JPG

Naturally, what I'm hoping, is that someone much smarter than me(yea yea, move along :D) will come along and show me how to fix it...

and how is it not useful i would like to know as it does exactly the same thing you want but at the same time can provide more informations by the means of Meta data .

and how is it not useful i would like to know as it does exactly the same thing you want but at the same time can provide more informations by the means of Meta data .

ouch.gifouch.gifouch.gif I'll try it one more time.

Picture it. You're in windows. You're moving files into a given folder. Ya wanna keep track of how big that folder is getting...you simply glance at the bottom of the page. It could not be easier...and it is not easier in 7, which begs the question...why remove something like that..??

Replacing it with something better, is fine. But replacing it with...nothing, is moronic...

I right clicked on it and it gave me an option large/medium/small - I selected small - nothing happened - wtf. Also the new explorer needs more right click functionality - lost of places do no react to right clicks. :(

Added right-click functionality has been added in the latest build 7057.

One of the largest things that bugs me in Explorer 7 is that there's no space usage total when entering a folder like there was in the old NT5.x status bar. A simple line like "24 Items, 43.1MB + Subfolders" would suffice, with the size linking to a properties window to total up the subfolders. Even more perplexing is how when you select 16 files or more, the space usage isn't totaled automatically (you have to click "more details"), and selecting a folder causes size to disappear from the details pane entirely.

The details pane: not enough details. :wacko:

Why are people having such a hard time understanding Rickkins' request?

He does not want single or grouped file sizes.

He does not want "the statusbar back"

He does not want to replace the details pane.

He wants the current free disk space of the currently explored hard drive to be displayed in the details pane when browsing the drive in explorer.

This won't be redundant information because the only way to see free disk space is by either going to "Computer" or going to the drive's properties. The information won't be displayed on the "Computer" window because you're not exploring a particular drive at the time.

This could easily be displayed in the details pane where the other old statusbar information is currently kept, such as file sizes, file counts etc.

This was one of the features I missed when I upgraded to Vista and have since gotten over it, but would gladly like to see if back in 7.

I'm sure that drive screenshots being censored, the drive's title will either be something about porn or pirated stuffs? lol

Dont go there ;) ;) ;) ;)

Jokes aside though,

Enabled the status bar in Windows 7 earlier...it only displayed the items, but there was small bevels/borders/bumps on it at some places, indicating that it should show more information?

Send Feedback?

Added right-click functionality has been added in the latest build 7057.

There was less of it? I mean the organize / new library / view toolbar / get help toolbar - it ain't right clickable and it would be nice if I could customize it a bit.

The status bar should have an option to make it smaller at the very least. Yes/No?

fine if you must have the windows 95 to windows XP status bar back in any given explorer window click on organize go to layout click on menu bar go to view and click on status bar simple as that

Wow. Three pages, and that's all you got...?? :no:

The point, again, is that the damn status bar does not display what is should.

Wow. Three pages, and that's all you got...?? :no:

The point, again, is that the damn status bar does not display what is should.

ok well here is some advice go ask Brandon live and maby he can relay it to the proper team at Microsoft cause obviously your not gonna be happy with anything .

in cause your wondering Brandon live here o n neowin works for Microsoft so yea

ok well here is some advice go ask Brandon live and maby he can relay it to the proper team at Microsoft cause obviously your not gonna be happy with anything .

in cause your wondering Brandon live here o n neowin works for Microsoft so yea

Right you are. Because asking that the "new and improved" version of windows not lose a piece of functionality that the "old and in need of improving" version had is so utterly impetuous.

Perhaps the Brandon fellow will happen by.

It's obvious what Rikkins means!

I too would like to see more info here .. seems to be wasted space when you are 'drilling' down into sub-folders .. all you get is the folder icon and how many files ithere are.

capturewuq.jpg

Yes, wasted space indeed. It would be better if it said:

16 items

12.34 MB in total

Perhaps even with "Disk free space: 34.56 GB" as third line.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I used to use Google assistant, not on the phone i have now, but about 7 years ago, then I decided it did not really do anything for me. Because i had Echo units over the house I added Alexa to the phone to control stuff and that is how it is now. Not the new Alexa+, as that is not really available in the U.K yet apart from on new units and to be honest, not interested in it. I went though the stage years ago of using voice to do text and call people, quicker to do it using my hands. I had a muck about with Siri on my Mac when I first got it, but not having a microphone permanently plugged in makes it a pain. I know it can be used by text. Siri like Apple AI is disabled on my Mac and will stay disabled.
    • I have a TV, but it is not used for normal linear TV, only streaming and it is not a Samsung and the best bit is, I don;'t and never have had a Instagram account. The only thing I have to do with Meta is Faceache and I only keep that just for the messaging part.
    • But building your own.. what? You can't build anything like the Steam Machine yourself. Even trying to get close costs a good deal more. Even just the CPU cooler in their price comparison is as big as the entire Steam Machine. If you want a regular gaming PC, then by all means, build that. If you want a a small console-like PC for the living room that is good for gaming, I'm not sure what else is a better deal. In the GN review, they only mentioned a small form factor Dell, which is like twice the size and hundreds of dollars more expensive.
    • Those are some popular multiplayer games. But hardly "all". Just those that don't work on Linux currently due to specific anti-cheat implementations. I think it's also fair to point out the literally thousands of games that don't work on the PS5. And it's not locked at 1080p. That's the default, which you can change.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
    • Dedicated
      tuben earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      497
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      205
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      94
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      89
    5. 5
      neufuse
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!