Recommended Posts

I'm guessing Windows7 works the same way as Vista. To see the information you want to see in the status bar (size in folder, files, etc) you actually need to highlight the files. Yes, it kind of annoys me to, i use Vista.

So, a lot of times i just have to 'ctrl + a' to select all.

i get what your saying but in windows 7 microsoft is making it more of the idea you no longer have to go look for your stuff but more that it is right in front of you so havening the information ya want while good is not useful anymore and is useless and beside that why should ya worry about HDD space if you got like 1TB of it he he

i get what your saying but in windows 7 microsoft is making it more of the idea you no longer have to go look for your stuff but more that it is right in front of you so havening the information ya want while good is not useful anymore and is useless and beside that why should ya worry about HDD space if you got like 1TB of it he he

Dude...I don't get why you keep replying, despite the fact that you have absolutely nothing useful to say.

If you don't have any ideas on how to remedy the situation, then I believe you ought to limit yourself to one fanboi reply per thread.

they do show ya the size of a file when ya have it selected as shown here

sizeq.th.jpg

True, we determined that. But it not as useful as what we had before, as witnessed by deepblue's pic

download.php?file=post-35006-1237826471.jpg&name=untitled.JPG

Naturally, what I'm hoping, is that someone much smarter than me(yea yea, move along :D) will come along and show me how to fix it...

True, we determined that. But it not as useful as what we had before, as witnessed by deepblue's pic

download.php?file=post-35006-1237826471.jpg&name=untitled.JPG

Naturally, what I'm hoping, is that someone much smarter than me(yea yea, move along :D) will come along and show me how to fix it...

and how is it not useful i would like to know as it does exactly the same thing you want but at the same time can provide more informations by the means of Meta data .

and how is it not useful i would like to know as it does exactly the same thing you want but at the same time can provide more informations by the means of Meta data .

ouch.gifouch.gifouch.gif I'll try it one more time.

Picture it. You're in windows. You're moving files into a given folder. Ya wanna keep track of how big that folder is getting...you simply glance at the bottom of the page. It could not be easier...and it is not easier in 7, which begs the question...why remove something like that..??

Replacing it with something better, is fine. But replacing it with...nothing, is moronic...

I right clicked on it and it gave me an option large/medium/small - I selected small - nothing happened - wtf. Also the new explorer needs more right click functionality - lost of places do no react to right clicks. :(

Added right-click functionality has been added in the latest build 7057.

One of the largest things that bugs me in Explorer 7 is that there's no space usage total when entering a folder like there was in the old NT5.x status bar. A simple line like "24 Items, 43.1MB + Subfolders" would suffice, with the size linking to a properties window to total up the subfolders. Even more perplexing is how when you select 16 files or more, the space usage isn't totaled automatically (you have to click "more details"), and selecting a folder causes size to disappear from the details pane entirely.

The details pane: not enough details. :wacko:

Why are people having such a hard time understanding Rickkins' request?

He does not want single or grouped file sizes.

He does not want "the statusbar back"

He does not want to replace the details pane.

He wants the current free disk space of the currently explored hard drive to be displayed in the details pane when browsing the drive in explorer.

This won't be redundant information because the only way to see free disk space is by either going to "Computer" or going to the drive's properties. The information won't be displayed on the "Computer" window because you're not exploring a particular drive at the time.

This could easily be displayed in the details pane where the other old statusbar information is currently kept, such as file sizes, file counts etc.

This was one of the features I missed when I upgraded to Vista and have since gotten over it, but would gladly like to see if back in 7.

I'm sure that drive screenshots being censored, the drive's title will either be something about porn or pirated stuffs? lol

Dont go there ;) ;) ;) ;)

Jokes aside though,

Enabled the status bar in Windows 7 earlier...it only displayed the items, but there was small bevels/borders/bumps on it at some places, indicating that it should show more information?

Send Feedback?

Added right-click functionality has been added in the latest build 7057.

There was less of it? I mean the organize / new library / view toolbar / get help toolbar - it ain't right clickable and it would be nice if I could customize it a bit.

The status bar should have an option to make it smaller at the very least. Yes/No?

fine if you must have the windows 95 to windows XP status bar back in any given explorer window click on organize go to layout click on menu bar go to view and click on status bar simple as that

Wow. Three pages, and that's all you got...?? :no:

The point, again, is that the damn status bar does not display what is should.

Wow. Three pages, and that's all you got...?? :no:

The point, again, is that the damn status bar does not display what is should.

ok well here is some advice go ask Brandon live and maby he can relay it to the proper team at Microsoft cause obviously your not gonna be happy with anything .

in cause your wondering Brandon live here o n neowin works for Microsoft so yea

ok well here is some advice go ask Brandon live and maby he can relay it to the proper team at Microsoft cause obviously your not gonna be happy with anything .

in cause your wondering Brandon live here o n neowin works for Microsoft so yea

Right you are. Because asking that the "new and improved" version of windows not lose a piece of functionality that the "old and in need of improving" version had is so utterly impetuous.

Perhaps the Brandon fellow will happen by.

It's obvious what Rikkins means!

I too would like to see more info here .. seems to be wasted space when you are 'drilling' down into sub-folders .. all you get is the folder icon and how many files ithere are.

capturewuq.jpg

Yes, wasted space indeed. It would be better if it said:

16 items

12.34 MB in total

Perhaps even with "Disk free space: 34.56 GB" as third line.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • If you have a TV in your living room, chances are you can probably just use the Steam Link app and play your huge PC in big picture mode, effectively giving you the Steam Machine experience to see if you'd actually like it. The good news is the Steam Machine can have it's drives upgraded. It has a USB-C 10Gbs port as well, so the 512GB drive could be quickly moved to an external enclosure and repurposed.
    • This machine could very well be a second gaming PC for their living room as a console experience. So we would have to assume their main PC exists as well; With that said, I have 10gb home network with a 2.5gigabit internet connection here so we tend to have more than enough speed to download games. However, we can't make use of the 10gb LAN using Steam's built in transfer tool because it always compresses transfers and that slows the transfer down to well below a standard gigabit port speeds, sometimes as slow as 200-300Mb/s transfers. While that's probably still faster than most internet connections anyway, if they'd fix the LAN transfer issue it'd be upto x5 faster even on a gigabit LAN, than simply dropping a 2.5gbe port on there with hopes of a few people having fast internet connections. There are solutions, work arounds, like using LANCache if you run a NAS... or simply copying the files over manually using a network share.
    • Samsung announces ultra-fast UFS 5.0 storage to supercharge mobile AI by Paul Hill Local AI models tend to run a lot more slowly than cloud services like Claude and Gemini; however, Samsung has just announced that it has developed its UFS 5.0 solution, which increases data transfer to speeds of 10.8GB/s, enabling faster storage and processing in mobile memory that has the potential to provide more optimal local AI experiences. Commenting on this development, Jangseok Choi, head of Memory Product Planning at Samsung Electronics, said: If you’ve tried local AI, you’ll know it can be quite slow, especially if using the larger parameter models. By developing this new solution, Samsung says that storage is evolving from just storing data to a core piece of infrastructure that supports AI computation, too. The Korean company said that UFS 5.0 integrates the latest embedded memory interface standard from JEDEC and achieves up to 10.8 gigabytes per second (GB/s) transfer speeds. Regarding write speeds, Samsung UFS 5.0 can reach 9.5 GB/s. Both the read and write speeds are twice as fast as those of the previous UFS 4.1 standard. Aside from being ideal for local AI, Samsung’s UFS 5.0 is more power efficient by 40% compared to UFS 4.1. Samsung achieved this by implementing innovations such as clock gating and multi-voltage technologies. UFS 5.0 is also ultra-compact at just 7.5mm x 13mm x 0.9mm; that is 16.7% smaller than UFS 4.1. The company said it will be bringing it to multiple devices in the future, including mobile, wearable, and extended reality.
    • A bit like the steamdeck, this probably isn't for you.
    • Gamers Nexus already did their review, and building your own will be faster and cheaper, so not very convincing.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
    • Dedicated
      tuben earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      mnsgroup earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      496
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      209
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      99
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      86
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!