Recommended Posts

Geez, some people have reading difficulties. I read his first post and instantly know what he is talking about.

I had the same reaction when Vista was in beta.

Say you want to copy a folder to a memory stick. Is there a 1TB memory stick around? So you want to know how big a folder is before copying it to the stick without having to right-click Properties. In XP, the size of the open folder is right there in the status bar without clicking anything. So that's one or two clicks more in 7 to find out how big a folder is. (like I said in my thread that Windows is getting more tiresome and harder to use in terms of usability).

Have a look at the status bar in those two shots:

thumbnail%20support.jpg

(image found via google) This tells the user how much hard disk space this folder is taking up.

Now look in Win7

Untitled.jpg

46 Items of what? Not enough information. What kind of folder is this? how much is this folder taking up of my hard drive? To find these out, I have to right-click on EACH of those folders I want to know the size of and click on Properties.

Yeah the Recycle Bin in XP and 9x tells you how much space the rubbish is taking up of your HD. In 7 I don't know but I WANT to know!

Now look in Win7

<picture>

46 Items of what? Not enough information. What kind of folder is this? how much is this folder taking up of my hard drive? To find these out, I have to right-click on EACH of those folders I want to know the size of and click on Properties.

Yeah the Recycle Bin in XP and 9x tells you how much space the rubbish is taking up of your HD. In 7 I don't know but I WANT to know!

Just right-click on any of the white space in the view and click Properties. That will show you the amount of space used by the folder you're looking at and all of its children.

Just right-click on any of the white space in the view and click Properties. That will show you the amount of space used by the folder you're looking at and all of its children.

Yes, but ozgeek is still right, the user has to do more. The details pane is mostly empty, it would've been nice to have that. :(

In XP, the size of the open folder is right there in the status bar without clicking anything. So that's one or two clicks more in 7 to find out how big a folder is. (like I said in my thread that Windows is getting more tiresome and harder to use in terms of usability).
Just right-click on any of the white space in the view and click Properties. That will show you the amount of space used by the folder you're looking at and all of its children.

I don't wanna have to do this, plus this, to still give my less info than I had. This is a no-brainer.(one would think...)

But there's more. This software you hope to sell, does not come cheap. It takes a lot of nerve to take away basic functionality such as this, but still have the gall to ask folks to shell out the big bucks to switch to your new product. Have you guys really learned so little from your vista fiasco...??

I find that un-freakin' believable.

I don't mean to be harsh, it's been a long day...

I realize that you don't have personal responsibility for every little bit of code in this thing, and I thank you for taking the time to look.

But this little thing just drives me nuts (ya ya, short trip, I know). There's gotta be a way to fix such a simple thing.

Edited by Rickkins
Yeah the Recycle Bin in XP and 9x tells you how much space the rubbish is taking up of your HD. In 7 I don't know but I WANT to know!

That's right, you can't see how much space the rubbish is currently taking up.

If you rightclick-Properties, it only shows you the configuration dialog, no mention of the space used.

What's on your secret drive?

I bet it's pr0n :hump:

Just right-click on any of the white space in the view and click Properties. That will show you the amount of space used by the folder you're looking at and all of its children.

Not true for the Recycle Bin. If you select in in Explorer and rightclick Properties on an empty white space, it only gives you the Recycle Bin configuration dialog. No mention of the space used up!

I don't wanna have to do this, plus this, to still give my less info than I had. This is a no-brainer.(one would think...)

But there's more. This software you hope to sell, does not come cheap. It takes a lot of nerve to take away basic functionality such as this, but still have the gall to ask folks to shell out the big bucks to switch to your new product. Have you guys really learned so little from your vista fiasco...??

I find that un-freakin' believable.

Sad but true :(

What's even worse than this is that they took away your ability to customise the Explorer toolbar and replaced it with the (mostly) useless toolbar that is now in its place :pinch:

This super-duper "intelligent" (ahem) toolbar has such ultra-important shortcuts like "Email" and "Burn", because people use them countless times every day, and got rid of "Cut", "Copy", "Paste" and "Copy to"/"Move to" :argh:

I really don't know which crack-addicted monkey came up with the idea for that toolbar :x

I don't wanna have to do this, plus this, to still give my less info than I had. This is a no-brainer.(one would think...)

I agree with you, we expect more out of the details pane. It replaced the status bar and does less. It wastes space and does not aid power users.

Really, it should do everything the original status bar did plus allow customizing on what content to show. It should show how much disk space is used in a folder and more. Without the basics, its worthless.

This super-duper "intelligent" (ahem) toolbar has such ultra-important shortcuts like "Email" and "Burn", because people use them countless times every day, and got rid of "Cut", "Copy", "Paste" and "Copy to"/"Move to" :argh:

I really don't know which crack-addicted monkey came up with the idea for that toolbar :x

There are really popular keyboard shortcuts for 'Cut', 'Copy' and 'Paste'. 'Ctrl-X', 'Ctrl-C' and 'Ctrl-V'. In fact, I think just about every person I know uses those, even people who aren't very good with computers; I know my Mum uses them and I never even told her about them.

Because so many people already use these shortcuts, it makes sense to use that toolbar for other things which people may find somewhat useful.

Are you telling me you don't use the keyboard shortcuts for 'Cut', 'Copy' and 'Paste'?

Edited by Calum
There are really popular keyboard shortcuts for 'Cut', 'Copy' and 'Paste'. 'Ctrl-X', 'Ctrl-C' and 'Ctrl-X'. In fact, I think just about every person I know uses those, even people who aren't very good with computers; I know my Mum uses them and I never even told her about them.

Because so many people already use these shortcuts, it makes sense to use that toolbar for other things which people may find somewhat useful.

Are you telling me you don't use the keyboard shortcuts for 'Cut', 'Copy' and 'Paste'?

That would be "Ctrl-V" for Paste :p

Yes, I *do* know them, but I don't like using keyboard shortcuts *at all* :pinch:

I greatly prefer using the mouse over finger acrobatics on the keyboard.

I also don't like other people forcing me to do things the way they think I should be doing them.

Besides that, do you have anything to back up your claim that many people use those shortcuts?

There are really popular keyboard shortcuts for 'Cut', 'Copy' and 'Paste'. 'Ctrl-X', 'Ctrl-C' and 'Ctrl-V'. In fact, I think just about every person I know uses those, even people who aren't very good with computers; I know my Mum uses them and I never even told her about them.

Because so many people already use these shortcuts, it makes sense to use that toolbar for other things which people may find somewhat useful.

Are you telling me you don't use the keyboard shortcuts for 'Cut', 'Copy' and 'Paste'?

I have never once used a keyboard shortcut for 'Cut', 'Copy' and 'Paste', never seen anyone I know ever use keyboard shortcuts for 'Cut', 'Copy' and 'Paste', and cannot see why the average user would. And frankly, I don't care.

Not to mention the fact, that this has nothing to do with this thread, which is about functionality of the status bar in windows explorer having been stripped out in the new windows...

I have never once used a keyboard shortcut for 'Cut', 'Copy' and 'Paste', never seen anyone I know ever use keyboard shortcuts for 'Cut', 'Copy' and 'Paste', and cannot see why the average user would. And frankly, I don't care.

Not to mention the fact, that this has nothing to do with this thread, which is about functionality of the status bar in windows explorer having been stripped out in the new windows...

I would love to see the level of customization available in XP in 7. Also, has anyone compared classic search (Windows 2000 one or XP Style - If Enabled) with the current search? One of those requires less clicking although look uglier also I do not get how to make it search Computer by default. Those are good features for power users.

That would be "Ctrl-V" for Paste :p

Yes, I *do* know them, but I don't like using keyboard shortcuts *at all* :pinch:

I greatly prefer using the mouse over finger acrobatics on the keyboard.

I also don't like other people forcing me to do things the way they think I should be doing them.

Besides that, do you have anything to back up your claim that many people use those shortcuts?

You call those acrobatics? It's no different from capitalizing a letter by pressing shift+letter...

I suppose you'd prefer clicking an on-screen keyboard instead as well? :p .

Just right-click on any of the white space in the view and click Properties. That will show you the amount of space used by the folder you're looking at and all of its children.

See what I mean?! That's two click to get what I wanted in Win7. In XP that info is right there in the status bar and I don't need to do the above.

Regarding the keyboard shortcuts, who have their hands on their keyboard every second they're on the PC? I don't. I just it find it faster to use what is available to me right in my hand - the mouse. Yeah keyboard to type, but mouse to navigate.

Since he posted this in windows 7's group, I'd assume he's not talking about XP anymore, but W7.. and in W7 the status bar is replaced by the details pane

Wrong. Detail pane and status bar are two different things. The latter is still available in W7 but is off by default. To turn it on, press Alt (to show menus), then View > and check 'Status bar'. Status bar is currently the only way in W7 to show the actual specific details of Undo operations (e.g. Undo Copy X to C:\Y)--other places would only show you 'Undo Copy' with no details.

As much as I love Win 7, I would have to agree with the TS about the Detail pane not showing enough information, and even regressing in some functionality as compared to Windows XP's status bar. When entering any folder, the detail pane should show how many files and folders (or items) exist in this current folder (which is present now), and the total size of all the objects in this folder. The right side of the detail pane could have a section which shows the current free disk space in that particular disk partition.

Moreover, when selecting 16 files or more, one should not have to click on "Show more details" just to check the total size of all the files selected. It becomes an absolute irritant when trying to decide on the number of media files to select to burn into a disk - clicking a few extra files and overshooting the limit, whoops, unselect one and click "Show more details" again, whoops, still not enough, gotta unselect another and click again... aargh carpal tunnel syndrome. It would be so much better if I could just select the first file, press Shift and Down Arrow, and slowly watch as the total file size increase (>15 items).

I think the details pane should be used much much more. It's a pain (pun intended) when it just sit down there occupying so much space without giving more than one single bit of useful information ("x items"). And please, when selecting on a folder, give the size the folder currently occupies! Why oh why hasn't that been incorporated?

That would be "Ctrl-V" for Paste :p

Yes, I *do* know them, but I don't like using keyboard shortcuts *at all* :pinch:

I greatly prefer using the mouse over finger acrobatics on the keyboard.

I also don't like other people forcing me to do things the way they think I should be doing them.

Besides that, do you have anything to back up your claim that many people use those shortcuts?

I agree with you you in some respects, but lets not forget that other people do things in different ways!

A friend of mine works in the print industry and uses keyboard shortcuts over mouse in Adobe on the office Macs all the time .. thats the way he's done it for years!

Wrong. Detail pane and status bar are two different things. The latter is still available in W7 but is off by default. To turn it on, press Alt (to show menus), then View > and check 'Status bar'. Status bar is currently the only way in W7 to show the actual specific details of Undo operations (e.g. Undo Copy X to C:\Y)--other places would only show you 'Undo Copy' with no details.

There is nothing "wrong" with what I said, MS is replacing the status bar with the details pane... yes they are two different physical things, but eventually in explorer the statusbar will be gone completely

We're going off-topic here. We're talking about how the details pane could actually hold more details than the amount of files in a folder For example show the size of the files in the current folder, like it was in Windows XP.

Actually, we were talking about the lack of information in win7's status bar compared to what was available in xp's...

I'm not even sure what "details pane" refers to...

It's obvious what Rikkins means!

I too would like to see more info here .. seems to be wasted space when you are 'drilling' down into sub-folders .. all you get is the folder icon and how many files ithere are.

capturewuq.jpg

I guess it depends on what you have open. My bottom space is always full of some various info:

9kquep.jpg

cnot2.jpg

I guess it depends on what you have open. My bottom space is always full of some various info:

Specifically, it is the lack of info when a folder is selected....

see this post for good example.

https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?show...amp;p=590752514

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Google Pixel 11 series: Here's what to expect by Hamid Ganji Google Pixel 10 series In recent years, Google has successfully turned its Pixel devices into worthy contenders in the smartphone market. The search giant is now preparing to launch the Pixel 11 series in just a few months, and many Pixel fans are likely wondering what Google has in store for them this year. The next lineup of Google smartphones includes four devices: the Pixel 11, Pixel 11 Pro, Pixel 11 Pro XL, and Pixel 11 Pro Fold. This year, we don’t expect Google to bring revolutionary upgrades to its handsets, and the Pixel 11 series is likely to receive modest hardware improvements alongside a slew of AI-powered features. Here are the rumored specifications of the Google Pixel 11 series ahead of its official debut: When will the new Pixel phones be unveiled? The last two generations of Google Pixel phones (Pixel 9 series and Pixel 10 series) were launched in August, unlike the previous three generations that debuted in October. With that in mind, we expect Google to unveil the Pixel 11 series sometime in August 2026. The exact launch date has yet to be confirmed. Google Pixel 11 CAD renders - Image via AndroidHeadlines How much will the Pixel 11 series cost? Predicting the final price of upcoming smartphones has become increasingly difficult. As you may know, RAM and memory prices are rising sharply, leading to significant increases in the cost of consumer electronics. Recently, Apple CEO Tim Cook said that price increases for some future Apple products are unavoidable, suggesting that the iPhone 18 series could become more expensive. Google has remained tight-lipped about any potential price increases for the Pixel 11 series. If the company manages to maintain last year’s pricing structure, here’s what the lineup could cost: Pixel 11: $799 Pixel 11 Pro: $999 Pixel 11 Pro XL: $1,199 Pixel 11 Pro Fold: $1,799 Given current market conditions, it may be difficult for Google to avoid raising prices unless it adopts cost-saving measures, such as equipping the base model with 8GB of RAM. Google Pixel 11 series anticipated specs: We expect the Google Pixel 11 series to debut with a new Tensor G6 processor as well as an upgraded camera system. The overall design, however, is expected to remain largely unchanged across the lineup. Specifications Pixel 11 Pixel 11 Pro Pixel 11 Pro XL Pixel 11 Pro Fold Display 6.3-inch LTPO AMOLED / 120Hz refresh rate / up to 3100 nits of brightness 6.3-inch Super Actua LTPO OLED, 120Hz refresh rate, up to 3600 nits of brightness 6.8-inch Super Actua LTPO OLED, 120Hz refresh rate, up to 3600 nits of brightness 8-inch inner screen and 6.4-inch outer display, 120Hz refresh rate, up to 3600 nits of brightness RAM & Processor Tensor G6 / 8-12GB of RAM Tensor G6 / 12-16GB of RAM Tensor G6 / 12-16GB of RAM Tensor G6 / 16GB of RAM Storage options 128GB or 256GB 256GB, 512GB, 1TB 256GB, 512GB, 1TB 256GB, 512GB, 1TB Camera 50MP main sensor, 13MP ultra-wide, 10.8MP 5x telephoto, 10.5MP front camera 50MP main camera, 48MP ultra-wide, 48MP telephoto with 5x optical zoom, 42MP selfie camera 50MP main camera, 48MP ultra-wide, 48MP telephoto with 5x optical zoom, 42MP selfie camera 50MP main camera, 10.5MP ultra-wide camera, 10.8MP telephoto camera, 10MP front camera, 10MP inner camera Battery 4,840 mAh 4,707 mAh 5,000 mAh 4,658 mAh Software Android 17 Android 17 Android 17 Android 17 The Pixel 11 series won’t be a major departure from its predecessor, with Google instead focusing on subtle improvements and AI additions such as Gemini Intelligence. However, a patent filed by Google suggests the company is working on a removable battery for its smartphones, and we could see this feature make its way to the Pixel 11 Pro Fold. Given that nearly all smartphones today lack removable batteries, such a feature would be a welcome addition to future Pixel devices. That said, it may not arrive with this year’s lineup after all, and the final decision is yet to be made by Google. The Pixel 11 series could also face an uphill battle in the market. In the Android segment, Samsung is performing well with the Galaxy S26 series, while the Galaxy Z Fold 8 lineup is also expected to launch next month. On the other hand, Apple is preparing to unveil the iPhone 18 Pro and iPhone 18 Pro Max in September alongside its first foldable iPhone.
    • At least AMD is still taking Windows 10 seriously (after the oops) before it consumer extended support ends.
    • So size is the ONLY selling point????? People have been plugging in PC's to TV's in living rooms for 20+ years. I would take a bigger box for more peformance. Also lot and lots of SFF/Mini ITX build guides out there.
    • My point is, if you buying this instead of a console for TV purposes, that you need to understand that you will not be able to play the most popular MP games with Steam OS. Now if you are not into those games, and into some of the perputual alpha/beta games on Steam then this is an option. I would argue a gaming PC would be the better route, more expensive but take the 1k -1.4k you are about to spend on this thing and build a better one. Because it is running Linux you can overide its 1080p settings. However The Verge complained about its 1080p cap and how you would have to get around it at the CLI, so someone buying this instead of a PS5 or Xbox might have a challege on their hands.
    • A review of Synology's BeeCamera software for the BeeStation Plus by Christopher White Synology is leaning into the BeeStation and the BeeStation Plus, and it's easy to understand why. While power users will want something more customizable, the BeeStation and its more powerful sibling, the BeeStation Plus, are great for those who want a device they can simply plug in, click a few buttons, and have it work as their own personal cloud. Until recently, the device was mostly used for the storage of files, photos, and videos, and with the Plus model, you could install and stream media through Plex. Synology recently released a new free application for the BeeStation Plus called BeeCamera, which is basically a stripped-down version of Surveillance Station. First, let's get the confusing naming out of the way. While you might initially think that BeeCamera is a physical device, perhaps a camera that Synology created specifically for the BeeStation Plus, that would be incorrect. BeeCamera is simply the name for the application that runs on the NAS and on your mobile device. I think the marketing team missed the mark here, but it does fit the other naming on the device, like BeePhotos and BeeFiles, I guess. Camera Support As of right now, only Synology-branded cameras are supported, which many will see as a callback to the drive locking the company implemented and then backtracked on. That said, while I 100% disagree on drive locking, I agree that camera locking for a device made to simply plug and play is the right decision. The whole point of the BeeStation line is simplicity. There are currently three camera model lines available, a wireless device for indoor use, and two PoE models for external use. CC400W (Wi-Fi): Plug it into power using the included power adapter, and connect it to your wireless network. This camera is rated only for indoor use and is the one I was provided to review the BeeCamera. $198.36, in line with the Unifi G6 Compact. BC510 (PoE): A bullet-style camera. Connect it to an Ethernet cable that is providing Power over Ethernet (PoE). This camera is rated for both indoor and outdoor use. $240. TC510 (PoE): A dome-style camera. Connect it to an Ethernet cable that is providing Power over Ethernet (PoE). This camera is rated for both indoor and outdoor use. $240. Although this isn't a review of the actual Synology camera, I did want to note that a positive for the Synology CC400W is that it uses a magnetic base. This means you can mount it on any magnetic surface, which is pretty handy. However, a downside to the camera is that it's powered by a built-in USB cable that's about six and a half feet (two meters) long. This means that the cable will probably be either too long or too short, but more importantly, if the cable is damaged at all, you'll likely need to buy an entirely new camera because there doesn't appear to be a way to replace it, unlike many competitors, like the Unifi G6 Instant. Hopefully, this is something Synology addresses in a future revision of the hardware. The BeeStation Plus supports up to four cameras. Setup The setup of BeeCamera is, like everything in the BeeStation family, very straightforward. Simply make sure you're on at least version 1.5 of the BeeStation OS, and BeeCamera is automatically installed on the device. BeeCamera Setup Screenshots Setting up the CC400W was just as easy. Plug it in, open up the BeeCamera app, and follow the on-screen steps to add the camera. During this process, you'll configure the camera name and how many days of retention you want to keep. The system will also automatically update the firmware for you. The whole thing took only a couple of minutes, excluding the time it took for the camera to update the firmware. Once the camera is connected to the BeeStation Plus, you can manage the various camera settings within the app, although there aren't many to choose from. You're able to configure whether the microphone will record audio (some privacy laws may preclude you from recording it), select what codec to use (H.264 or H.265), configure the color and exposure of the camera, and determine what data you want to overlay onto the video. Finally, you can set up AI detections so that BeeCamera will alert you if it sees certain things. These are all of the common detections you would expect in a camera system, such as people, pets, and vehicles. Under people and vehicles, you can also add extra monitoring for lingering and congestion detection, although pets are currently in "Lab" and therefore have no extra features yet. Recording in 4K using H.265 for 30 days will take roughly 300 GB of storage, which is very reasonable for most regular households, as the BeeStation Plus has 8TB of native storage. If you want to set up detection zones, you can. These are areas that BeeCamera will look at for the various detections, and are helpful if, for example, there's a tree in your frame and you don't want to be notified each time the wind makes the branches move around in the frame. Finally, you can also schedule when the camera should and should not be recording, which is a very useful feature. For example, you may want to record only at night when you're sleeping, but not during the day when you're up and about the house, so you can easily shut the camera off between 8 am and 10 pm. Each hour of each day can be configured to record continuously, only upon a detection event, or disabled completely. You can't fine-tune to record at a specific time, though, only hourly blocks on the hour. Daily Use The best part of BeeCamera is that it's easy and just works. If you only care about being notified when things happen, the mobile app sends those notifications and lets you click the button to bring up the video and see what's going on. For example, when I went out of town and had the camera pointed at the cat tower in our hallway, it was nice to be able to drop in and check that my furry friends were doing okay without me. Initiating the remote connection to the BeeStation Plus through the app is very responsive, but this will heavily depend on your ISP. In my case, using Xfinity, I'm able to go from starting the app to seeing live video in roughly three seconds, which is about the same amount of time it takes to connect to my Unifi UNVR system that costs much more. If you want to see footage from a specific day and time, you can do so using the calendar icon. You can also scroll through the timeline, looking for detections that are labeled in blue (vs. the normal gray when there's nothing of interest). There are buttons that let you go to the last/next detection on the timeline, which is helpful if you missed the notification on your mobile device. That's where the ease of use stops, though. While you can download clips that are flagged by detection, there's apparently no way to select generic time frames you're interested in, and the only place to download is to your phone. In addition, sharing a video shares the actual video, not just a link back to your BeeStation Plus. While that's good from a security and privacy perspective, it's a little awkward for sharing large videos. Limitations While the ease of implementation is great, there are some things that are lacking from BeeCamera. The most obvious is that there is no way to view the footage on the desktop. You can log in to the BeeStation Plus to see how much storage BeeCamera is using, but unlike BeePhotos and BeeFiles, there is no BeeCamera on the web console to manage or view footage. This means you'll be viewing all of your security footage on your mobile device, which is pretty limiting. In addition, there's no way to download the video to your PC without first using your phone as the intermediary. The one exception to this is that you can use BeeFiles to see the raw MP4 files. They're saved in 5-minute increments, and it's just raw data with no detection information or any other way to identify what any of them are. The lack of a way to interact with BeeCamera on the desktop also makes configuration of the cameras more difficult. For example, trying to set up detection zones using a tiny screen and your finger to draw boxes is more cumbersome than it needs to be. This reinforces the idea that BeeCamera is not made for power users. It's also missing some of the more advanced functionality of Surveillance Station. For example, I couldn't find a way to say, "Alert me if the thing in this zone is no longer there." Another major deficiency with BeeCamera, and a feature I suspect may come out in the future, is that while it can detect generic people, there is no specific facial recognition yet. This is an interesting omission, given the fact that other Synology tools can detect specific individuals, and competitors such as Unifi Protect also do it. This is probably a software limitation, so we will have to wait and see if this feature is added in the future. Conclusion If you need a security guard to monitor surveillance cameras to make sure your property is secure, then BeeCamera is not the solution for you. That said, you probably wouldn't be using a BeeStation Plus as the brains behind the system either. BeeCamera (and BeeStation in general) is clearly aimed at households that want to avoid sending personal data to Google and Amazon, and now want to add some cameras to keep an eye on their home and their pets while they're away. BeeCamera excels at doing this. The target market isn't interested in creating cases, tying multiple views together in a single pane of glass, or the like, and for the intended use case, the system works great. Where it starts to fall apart a bit is with more advanced features. Not being able to use a desktop app is a major compromise in my opinion, and having to do all of the configuration on a mobile device is annoying, but not impossible. If you don't want to have a full-fledged NAS device in your home, but still want control over your data (or maybe want an easy way to backup your data for World Backup Day), and want to add a couple of cameras to keep an eye on your house and your pets, this is a great, cheap, and easy way to go, and I suspect more functionality will come over time. If Synology releases a desktop app or at least a way to configure cameras and view footage on a desktop browser, this would be a near-perfect solution for a general home user. As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      476
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      172
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      104
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      88
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!