Prepare yourselves, the old skins are going bye bye!


Recommended Posts

When is IPB3 hitting?

Sometime before June.

What is the main benefit for using 3.0 instead of 2.3? From the looks of 3.0 I'm not that impressed yet.

It's a complete re-write of the original code base. It's faster, cleaner, and way more user friendly. Plugs a lot of security holes and is just a better piece of software. Trust me ... once it's here on Neowin and properly configured/skinned, you'll love it.

The default theme on the 3.0 doesn't do it justice.

IPB3 is in no way perfect, but it's an improvement. The templates are cleaned up, code is (presumably) cleaner (but they haven't allowed us to actually *view* the code yet), and it's faster. All of these things are major problems we have with IPB2.

Sure, I can PM him. Do you have an actual .PSD layered?

I've done some design work in the past for the staffers and stuff, and I could be wrong, but I do not think there is a layered version of the logo. Just flattened already. When I needed to make it a different color, which I did quite a bit as I made the businsess cards for everyone, I made it greyscale, played with the levels a bit to get a nice contrast, then put a solid color over it on another layer and change that layer to color or multiply depending on the color itself.

I've done some design work in the past for the staffers and stuff, and I could be wrong, but I do not think there is a layered version of the logo. Just flattened already. When I needed to make it a different color, which I did quite a bit as I made the businsess cards for everyone, I made it greyscale, played with the levels a bit to get a nice contrast, then put a solid color over it on another layer and change that layer to color or multiply depending on the color itself.

I'll probably end up doing that then, if no .PSD exists. If the original .PSD was lost, then that was an epic fail though. ;)

Either I'll do something very similar or I'll re-design the entire damn logo. Well now ... now that I think about that ... that might not be a bad idea. Hm.

It scares me that you are comparing Finity to Windows ME :(

Well, I loved Finity and thought it was pretty well integrated with the new Neowin, but if you're saying you have something better soon, I'm totally looking forward into it !

I like Finity as well.

History lesson time :p

Neowin's swift skin started off on vbulletin2, which was then ported over to ipb1. We kept the same look and style of vbulletin with that transition (very small tweaks). Then ipb2 came around, and once again we did slight tweaks, but this time we had shift. Shift was built off of the old swift skin, which still pretty much had the same vbulletin2 look to it. Then Finity what we're using now was built off of shift. We never did start from scratch again, just off of swift (which was completely redone when we upgraded to 2.0).

But now with ipb3, we have to start from scratch, which is a wonderful thing. Means we can use this time to change more than the header/footer and colors/graphics. So even if we port finity over, it'll be different than what we're using now.

As for the other color schemes, no promises. But if someone does the graphics/colors/css should be very simple to add.

I had to switch back to Shift when I visted the forums today, I wondered why then saw this thread. Bad idea, and what's the overhead for maintaining it when you had it around for long and ironed out to perfection just to ditch it. I like it and it's far more suited for my viewing preferences than Finity. Guess I must be the only one to feel this way, but please don't take it away from me. :(

I like Finity, it was a time when Neowin members changed view points and you saw the number of flame wars reach 0, it was peace between PC and Mac. I can say Finity is nice, but it was done really quickly, it was a minor update. I can tell it was built from Shift and only the look changed, all the icons and everything stayed the same as Shift, it didn't feel different when I switched to it from Shift, it isn't as mindblowing as the switch from Swift Refresh to Shift.

I dislike the colors of the themes, why are they always as shameful as Gnome? Look at Windows Live Wave 3, it is full of *glossy* colors, they look beautiful. The only good looking color is the default blue, and sometimes that looks somewhat dismal too.

Which brings me to why Neowin loves blue like Microsoft does, this is Neowin, it should look unique. It looks unique already, but it holds a color that Microsoft adores. The next theme should be built from scratch with the concept of unique, a simple color is not unique. Aqua has metal, and makes it stand out unique as Mac OS X Aqua. Blue was just Microsoft's way of being lazy, they started Aero Glass, they still use blue sometimes, but it isn't blue everywhere. Neowin should have a theme that is unique, and if you insist on using a color, blue isn't smart, Finity reminds me of MSN Hotmail's dismal blue, equals depressing.

I still wonder why this place is called Neowin when we have *daily* news about the iPhone, call it Neomin. Neomin could be a symbol for MinWin (the effort to make Windows cleaner and smaller), Mac (the m could be for Mac, who knows...), Windows (the in could be for Windows, who knows...), Min (you could combine Windows and Mac together to represent a community that speaks PC and Mac together in a happy community).

I feel that Finity was a chance to refresh Shift, but it looks the same, the 'Add Reply' button below this post I'm typing is tinted blue, and has blue font. So ugly... Now the Finity color blue is glossy, it reminds me of Windows 7 somewhat, looks nice. The graphite and green theme are both ugly with this ugly Shift feeling, Finity has this blue that is one of the only noticable changes really, and is actually glossy, it stands out as Finity. Neowin should go ahead and create a theme that looks neat and built from the ground up, I think Finity was just a Shift Refresh, even Neobond's sig contains an image that symbolizes the Swift Refresh theme.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

When you look at what I said, it might contain a lot, but it shows what Neowin should become and what it looks like right now, it looks like a refresh of Shift. What it should become is a rebranded community opened to PC and Mac users equally, that includes the name and skin. Plus, Neowin reminds me of those programs called Win..., the only program I use today that is called that is WinRAR, other-than that, it sounds kind of ghettoish and reminds of Windows 98/2000.

Wait a minute, I'm afraid I can't follow the flow.

I just read and replied to a topic stating that Neowin ran the skin tool forcing everyone to use the Finity skin unless they change it manually. However, upon reading this topic we're going to lose Finity and have another theme again? Sorry but Finity is great and I'd bother upgrading it for IPB 3.0 instead of designing a new template. Don't kill the new, save the concepts for later.

Or am I misreading some information?

Finity was designed to be a transition skin. Were on to much better things after Finity.

I will not question that there will be better. The fact that this skin, which is pretty good, disappears so fast is what bothers me. For once, I 'm hoping on a release delay. ;)

Here is the PSD I found while browsing in my Neowin graphics folder. Hope it helps.

neowin4logo.psd.zip

Many thanks!

I'll be watching for IPB3 and I'll be in contact with you guys after it's released. I got a nice idea for a darkish theme. Darker blues with lighter blues, and the like. I even have something nifty planned for the logo. So stay tuned. ;)

Once IPB3 hits, we are gong to do a major overhaul of the site, we will spend time making a new theme for it but it will be the only choice once we have upgraded.

The old skins simply are too much work to maintain and Finity is a stop-gap (kinda like Windows ME) :p

So, the next theme will blow our minds out? :)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • A 13 billion year old secret about our Universe's origin was revealed by Sayan Sen Image by Pascal Küffer via Pexels Researchers at the Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik (MPIK) in Heidelberg had recreated a key chemical reaction from the early universe, producing results that could change scientists' understanding of how the first stars formed. The study focused on the helium hydride ion (HeH⁺), which is widely regarded as the first molecule to form in the universe. Scientists believe HeH⁺ appeared around 380,000 years after the Big Bang, when the universe had cooled enough for electrons and atomic nuclei to combine into neutral atoms in a period known as recombination. This marked the beginning of chemistry in the cosmos. Immediately after the Big Bang about 13.8 billion years ago, the universe was extremely hot and dense. As it expanded and cooled, hydrogen and helium became the dominant elements. Once neutral helium atoms formed, they could react with ionised hydrogen nuclei, or protons, to create helium hydride ions. Although simple in structure, HeH⁺ played an important role in the young universe. It was the first step in a chain of reactions that eventually produced molecular hydrogen (H₂), a molecule made up of two hydrogen atoms and now the most abundant molecule in the universe. Molecular hydrogen later became a key ingredient in the formation of the first stars. At the time, the universe had entered a phase often called the cosmological "dark age." Matter had become transparent to light following recombination, but there were still no stars or galaxies producing visible light. Several hundred million years would pass before the first stars appeared. For those first stars to form, large clouds of gas had to collapse under their own gravity. To do that, the gas needed to cool by releasing energy. While hydrogen atoms can help with this process at high temperatures, they become less effective below about 10,000 degrees Celsius. Molecules can continue the cooling process by releasing energy through rotational and vibrational motions. Scientists have long considered HeH⁺ a potentially important coolant because of its comparatively large dipole moment, a property that describes how electric charge is distributed within a molecule and allows it to release energy efficiently. The amount of helium hydride present in the early universe may therefore have influenced how easily the first stars could form. At the same time, HeH⁺ was constantly being destroyed. Under primordial conditions, its main destruction mechanisms were recombination with free electrons and chemical reactions with hydrogen atoms. These reactions ultimately helped produce molecular hydrogen, linking the formation and destruction of HeH⁺ to the chemistry that shaped the early universe. For many years, theoretical studies suggested that reactions between HeH⁺ and hydrogen atoms would become much slower at low temperatures. Scientists believed there was an energy barrier along the reaction pathway that reduced the chances of the reaction taking place in the cold conditions of the early universe. The new study suggests otherwise. To investigate the process, researchers recreated a closely related reaction using deuterium, a naturally occurring isotope of hydrogen that contains one proton and one neutron in its nucleus. When HeH⁺ collides with deuterium, it forms an HD⁺ ion and a neutral helium atom. This allows scientists to study the reaction in a controlled way while closely mimicking the behaviour of the original reaction involving hydrogen. The experiments were carried out at the Cryogenic Storage Ring (CSR) at MPIK, a specialised facility designed to recreate conditions similar to those found in space. Researchers stored HeH⁺ ions in the 35-metre storage ring for up to 60 seconds at temperatures just a few kelvins above absolute zero and merged them with a beam of neutral deuterium atoms. By adjusting the speeds of the two particle beams, the team measured how the reaction rate changed with collision energy, which is directly related to temperature. The researchers found that the reaction rate remains almost constant as temperatures decrease. In other words, the reaction does not slow down at low temperatures as earlier models predicted. “Previous theories predicted a significant decrease in the reaction probability at low temperatures, but we were unable to verify this in either the experiment or new theoretical calculations by our colleagues,” explained Dr Holger Kreckel of MPIK. “The reactions of HeH⁺ with neutral hydrogen and deuterium therefore appear to have been far more important for chemistry in the early universe than previously assumed,” he continued. According to the researchers, the reaction appears to be barrierless, meaning there is no energy obstacle preventing it from taking place efficiently even at very low temperatures. The findings support recent theoretical work led by physicist Yohann Scribano, whose group identified an error in a widely used potential energy surface, a mathematical model used to describe how the energy of a system changes during a chemical reaction. The error appears to have caused previous studies to significantly underestimate reaction rates under primordial conditions. The new calculations closely match the experimental results. Together, they suggest that helium chemistry in the early universe may need to be re-evaluated. Because molecules such as HeH⁺ and molecular hydrogen played an important role in cooling primordial gas clouds, the findings could help scientists build more accurate models of how the first stars formed. By showing that helium hydride was likely destroyed more efficiently than previously thought, the study offers new insight into the chemical processes that shaped the universe during its earliest stages and helped set the conditions for the emergence of the first stars. Source: Max-Planck Institute, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "What an interesting smell you've discovered"
    • It could EASILY be 70 for the base game BUT + lots of FOMO to make it up to 100-120, like a few days Early Access, online money, pre-order bonus cars, weapons, missions, clothing, avatars or profile stuff, etc... And still WAY TOO MANY people would buy those and make Rockstar insane money.
    • Just to understand: your solution to getting rid of an online password manager is...another online password manager?
    • Cjam 2.5.0.0 by Razvan Serea Cjam is a lightweight and fast MP3 editor for Windows that lets you cut, join, and edit MP3 files without re-encoding. This means your audio quality remains untouched, and edits happen instantly. Cjam is ideal for quick, lossless edits—whether you're trimming music, combining tracks, or preparing audio for learning tools or podcasts. It features batch processing, scripting support, cue and playlist file handling, and a simple interface. Cjam is perfect for anyone who needs efficient MP3 editing without the complexity of full audio suites. Cjam requires a PC running Windows 10 or later and Microsoft .NET 6.0 or later. Key features for Cjam: No Re-encoding: Edit MP3 files without losing quality. Cut and Join MP3: Easily cut, trim, and combine MP3 tracks. Batch Processing: Edit multiple files at once for faster workflows. Scriptable Interface: Automate tasks with a custom command language. Cue and Playlist Support: Handle CUE and playlist files for seamless audio management. Fast and Lightweight: Quick processing with minimal system resources. Lossless Audio Editing: Ensure your edits don't affect audio quality. Simple User Interface: Clean, intuitive design for easy navigation. File Format Support: Works with MP3, Cjam-specific file formats (CJAMC, CJAMJ, CJAM). Cjam 2.5.0.0 changelog: Added clipboard-based import/export support for mp3DirectCut Added clipboard-based export support for REAPER Added support for naming IMP3 elements Changed the Reset behavior to preserve Undo/Redo history; use Shift key + Reset button to clear it Added a new command parameter (qcp) Added 8 new entries to lang.txt (main_c124-126, main_d150-151, main_m082, vme_c014, vme_d005) Fixed a bug where the il parameter was incorrectly applied when pasting VMP3s into the main list Fixed several other minor bugs Download: Cjam 2.5.0.0 | 1.4 MB (Freeware) Links: Cjam Home Page | Cjam Manual | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      91
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!