Prepare yourselves, the old skins are going bye bye!


Recommended Posts

When is IPB3 hitting?

Sometime before June.

What is the main benefit for using 3.0 instead of 2.3? From the looks of 3.0 I'm not that impressed yet.

It's a complete re-write of the original code base. It's faster, cleaner, and way more user friendly. Plugs a lot of security holes and is just a better piece of software. Trust me ... once it's here on Neowin and properly configured/skinned, you'll love it.

The default theme on the 3.0 doesn't do it justice.

IPB3 is in no way perfect, but it's an improvement. The templates are cleaned up, code is (presumably) cleaner (but they haven't allowed us to actually *view* the code yet), and it's faster. All of these things are major problems we have with IPB2.

Sure, I can PM him. Do you have an actual .PSD layered?

I've done some design work in the past for the staffers and stuff, and I could be wrong, but I do not think there is a layered version of the logo. Just flattened already. When I needed to make it a different color, which I did quite a bit as I made the businsess cards for everyone, I made it greyscale, played with the levels a bit to get a nice contrast, then put a solid color over it on another layer and change that layer to color or multiply depending on the color itself.

I've done some design work in the past for the staffers and stuff, and I could be wrong, but I do not think there is a layered version of the logo. Just flattened already. When I needed to make it a different color, which I did quite a bit as I made the businsess cards for everyone, I made it greyscale, played with the levels a bit to get a nice contrast, then put a solid color over it on another layer and change that layer to color or multiply depending on the color itself.

I'll probably end up doing that then, if no .PSD exists. If the original .PSD was lost, then that was an epic fail though. ;)

Either I'll do something very similar or I'll re-design the entire damn logo. Well now ... now that I think about that ... that might not be a bad idea. Hm.

It scares me that you are comparing Finity to Windows ME :(

Well, I loved Finity and thought it was pretty well integrated with the new Neowin, but if you're saying you have something better soon, I'm totally looking forward into it !

I like Finity as well.

History lesson time :p

Neowin's swift skin started off on vbulletin2, which was then ported over to ipb1. We kept the same look and style of vbulletin with that transition (very small tweaks). Then ipb2 came around, and once again we did slight tweaks, but this time we had shift. Shift was built off of the old swift skin, which still pretty much had the same vbulletin2 look to it. Then Finity what we're using now was built off of shift. We never did start from scratch again, just off of swift (which was completely redone when we upgraded to 2.0).

But now with ipb3, we have to start from scratch, which is a wonderful thing. Means we can use this time to change more than the header/footer and colors/graphics. So even if we port finity over, it'll be different than what we're using now.

As for the other color schemes, no promises. But if someone does the graphics/colors/css should be very simple to add.

I had to switch back to Shift when I visted the forums today, I wondered why then saw this thread. Bad idea, and what's the overhead for maintaining it when you had it around for long and ironed out to perfection just to ditch it. I like it and it's far more suited for my viewing preferences than Finity. Guess I must be the only one to feel this way, but please don't take it away from me. :(

I like Finity, it was a time when Neowin members changed view points and you saw the number of flame wars reach 0, it was peace between PC and Mac. I can say Finity is nice, but it was done really quickly, it was a minor update. I can tell it was built from Shift and only the look changed, all the icons and everything stayed the same as Shift, it didn't feel different when I switched to it from Shift, it isn't as mindblowing as the switch from Swift Refresh to Shift.

I dislike the colors of the themes, why are they always as shameful as Gnome? Look at Windows Live Wave 3, it is full of *glossy* colors, they look beautiful. The only good looking color is the default blue, and sometimes that looks somewhat dismal too.

Which brings me to why Neowin loves blue like Microsoft does, this is Neowin, it should look unique. It looks unique already, but it holds a color that Microsoft adores. The next theme should be built from scratch with the concept of unique, a simple color is not unique. Aqua has metal, and makes it stand out unique as Mac OS X Aqua. Blue was just Microsoft's way of being lazy, they started Aero Glass, they still use blue sometimes, but it isn't blue everywhere. Neowin should have a theme that is unique, and if you insist on using a color, blue isn't smart, Finity reminds me of MSN Hotmail's dismal blue, equals depressing.

I still wonder why this place is called Neowin when we have *daily* news about the iPhone, call it Neomin. Neomin could be a symbol for MinWin (the effort to make Windows cleaner and smaller), Mac (the m could be for Mac, who knows...), Windows (the in could be for Windows, who knows...), Min (you could combine Windows and Mac together to represent a community that speaks PC and Mac together in a happy community).

I feel that Finity was a chance to refresh Shift, but it looks the same, the 'Add Reply' button below this post I'm typing is tinted blue, and has blue font. So ugly... Now the Finity color blue is glossy, it reminds me of Windows 7 somewhat, looks nice. The graphite and green theme are both ugly with this ugly Shift feeling, Finity has this blue that is one of the only noticable changes really, and is actually glossy, it stands out as Finity. Neowin should go ahead and create a theme that looks neat and built from the ground up, I think Finity was just a Shift Refresh, even Neobond's sig contains an image that symbolizes the Swift Refresh theme.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

When you look at what I said, it might contain a lot, but it shows what Neowin should become and what it looks like right now, it looks like a refresh of Shift. What it should become is a rebranded community opened to PC and Mac users equally, that includes the name and skin. Plus, Neowin reminds me of those programs called Win..., the only program I use today that is called that is WinRAR, other-than that, it sounds kind of ghettoish and reminds of Windows 98/2000.

Wait a minute, I'm afraid I can't follow the flow.

I just read and replied to a topic stating that Neowin ran the skin tool forcing everyone to use the Finity skin unless they change it manually. However, upon reading this topic we're going to lose Finity and have another theme again? Sorry but Finity is great and I'd bother upgrading it for IPB 3.0 instead of designing a new template. Don't kill the new, save the concepts for later.

Or am I misreading some information?

Finity was designed to be a transition skin. Were on to much better things after Finity.

I will not question that there will be better. The fact that this skin, which is pretty good, disappears so fast is what bothers me. For once, I 'm hoping on a release delay. ;)

Here is the PSD I found while browsing in my Neowin graphics folder. Hope it helps.

neowin4logo.psd.zip

Many thanks!

I'll be watching for IPB3 and I'll be in contact with you guys after it's released. I got a nice idea for a darkish theme. Darker blues with lighter blues, and the like. I even have something nifty planned for the logo. So stay tuned. ;)

Once IPB3 hits, we are gong to do a major overhaul of the site, we will spend time making a new theme for it but it will be the only choice once we have upgraded.

The old skins simply are too much work to maintain and Finity is a stop-gap (kinda like Windows ME) :p

So, the next theme will blow our minds out? :)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Segra 1.6.2 by Razvan Serea Segra is a free, open-source OBS-powered game recorder offering fast gameplay capture, instant clips, AI highlights, deep game integration, and seamless uploads—perfect for gamers, streamers, and content creators. Lightweight, fast, zero bloat. Segra key features: Automatic Game Recording: Begin capturing gameplay the moment your game launches, with zero manual setup. Instant Clipping: Save important moments instantly using a customizable hotkey—perfect for highlights, montages, or quick shares. Segra AI Highlights: Let Segra automatically detect kills, assists, deaths, and key events to generate polished highlight reels without manual editing. Gameplay Uploads: Upload recordings and clips directly to Segra.tv for fast sharing and cloud access. Deep Game Integration: Enjoy advanced game-data tracking across hundreds of supported titles, enabling smart highlight generation and stat-informed clipping. High-Performance Capture: Record up to 4K at 144 FPS using OBS-powered technology with minimal performance impact, supporting NVENC, AMD VCE, and custom quality controls. Segra Editor: Edit recordings easily with timeline controls, segment management, and event-based navigation to build the perfect clip. Customization Options: Adjust hotkeys, output formats, storage paths, codecs, capture quality, and performance settings for a tailored recording experience. Segra 1.6.2 changelog: UI: Improved the transition from the loading skeleton to the real content card. Security: Added Segra.dll code signing and automatic VirusTotal upload. Settings: Fixed the settings header to highlight Account when scrolled to the top. Recording: Updated OBSKit.NET to 1.4.1. Download: Segra 1.6.2 | 74.5 MB (Open Source) View: Segra Homepage | Github | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Hey Google, these are the Gemini features I want in 2026 by Aditya Tiwari Google Gemini has been around for over three years. The AI chatbot started its journey back in 2023 (as Bard) when ChatGPT was already a talk of the town. However, it quickly attracted criticism after misrepresenting facts about the James Webb Space Telescope. The search giant spent a year fine-tuning Bard before rebranding the chatbot and its underlying generative AI model to Gemini, drawing inspiration from NASA's first human spaceflight program. Note that Bard was initially powered by LaMDA and PaLM 2; Google has since added several new features and integrations to Gemini. That said, there is scope for improvement and a gap for new features. I have been using Gemini for a while now and have realized that the chatbot lacks several features, making it harder for me to research across topics. These are mostly function-over-form updates that can improve the overall experience. Delete individual messages from a conversation Image via DepositPhotos.com One good thing about Gemini is that it can maintain context throughout the conversation. But things might get chaotic when you want to ask a related question, but don't want it to be part of your conversation in the long run. You can't ask that related question in a fresh chat because Gemini will lose the active conversation context of what you're trying to research. If Google allowed you to delete individual question/answer pairs, you could simply ask about a sub-topic and remove it from the conversation to create a smooth flow of important stuff. Offline mode Image via DepositPhotos.com A big pain of using Gemini daily is that everything loads from the cloud. It takes time for your chats to appear, and you can't view your conversation history while offline. To get a better idea, you can open the Gemini app and see how it looks without an internet connection. While Gemini models run in the cloud, it wouldn't hurt if Google could store chats (at least the text part) on the device so we can refer to them when offline. Google can also offer a lightweight version of its AI model to help with basic drafting, summarization, and other tasks. It has the Gemini Nano model, which can perform on-device processing on Google Pixel, Samsung, and some other Android brands, but it's a system feature and not related to the cloud-based Gemini app. Make temporary chats permanent I can't thank Google enough for taking the time and effort to add incognito mode or temporary chat mode to the Gemini app. It lets you have conversations without worrying that the topics will end up in your chat history or used for model training (at least on paper). Google claims that it doesn't use your temporary chats to "personalize your Gemini experience or train Google’s AI models." However, the data is stored "up to 72 hours to respond to you and to process any feedback you choose to provide." That said, I often start researching something in a temporary chat, only to realize the chatbot's answer is good enough to refer to later. Sadly, Gemini doesn't have an option to make such temporary chats permanent. In other words, I won't be able to follow up on it if I close the temporary chat. I'm left with alternatives like copying the answers into notes or another app. My digital life will get a lot better if Gemini gets a button to make temporary chats permanent. Collapse answers for a cleaner view You're heavily invested in your research game and suddenly feel the need to go up in the chat to recall something. This is when the conversation thread starts to feel like an overwhelming, unending wall of questions and answers. What if Google added a way to collapse Q&A pairs in the Gemini chat thread? It would look quite clean and easy to navigate. You'll quickly get an overview of everything you have discussed with the chatbot. Add buttons to jump between messages Suggested mockup of the feature. This reminds me of a small but useful Gemini feature that Google could add to its chatbot: the ability to hop between prompts in a conversation. Just add simple up- and down-arrow buttons, similar to YouTube Shorts, so people can quickly scroll through the messages. A table of contents or Chat Overview It's hard to get a bird's-eye view of everything you have discussed with the chatbot during a lengthy conversation. This is where a table of contents, or Chat Overview, displayed at the top of the screen, possibly in a drop-down button, might come in handy. You'll be able to get an overview of the chat and jump between messages, serving as an alternative to the up/down arrow buttons. Temporary mode for Gemini Live Image: Google You can use Gemini Live to have real-time conversations with the chatbot, which feels like you're talking to someone in the same room. However, a downside is that Gemini Live doesn't work in Temporary Chat mode, so all your conversations end up in the chat history. Google should consider expanding the temporary chat mode to include Gemini Live. Default to a specific chat One thing that feels somewhat annoying to me is that Gemini always opens in a new chat, whether on web or mobile. Sometimes, you want to return to your last chat. Google can take cues from web browsers, which let you choose whether you want to go to a new tab or a specific web page(s). Gemini can also have options to default to a specific chat when reopened. That said, generative AI chatbots have endless possibilities given the vagueness of their work. You can mold them the way you want by attaching different connectors, adding custom instructions, and including source files. It remains to be seen what Google has in store for future updates and whether anything from this wishlist gets the green light. The search giant released a stream of new Gemini updates in recent months, including Gemini 3.5 Flash and Gemini Omni Spark, adding that it now has 13 products with more than a billion users each. What do you want to see in the Gemini app? Tell us in the comments.
    • Thank you for the post. Just a FYI that links to an outside site or promoting specific software is considered spamming here. Asking general questions is fine.
    • I have been thinking about AI detector tools as a software workflow rather than a single "AI score" widget. When someone pastes text or uploads a document, the UI can return a report with a probability-style score, sentence highlights, reliability notes, and limitations. The useful part is that it can point a reviewer toward passages worth reading again. The risky part is that a polished score can look more certain than it really is. For people who build or review web apps, what should happen before the user copies or exports that kind of report? The minimum I would expect is: A clear input boundary for pasted text versus document files. Limits shown near the workflow, including minimum text length and maximum file size. A report label that says the result is a signal, not proof of who wrote the text. Sentence highlights and evidence notes alongside the global score. Reliability notes when the sample is too short or lacks enough sentence variety. False-positive and false-negative caveats that remain visible in copied/exported summaries. I am trying to avoid the pattern where a clean report card becomes the whole product story. For AI detection, "review this evidence in context" seems more honest than "trust this score." Would you keep the warning text visible on every report, or make it collapsible so the main result stays easier to scan? Disclosure: I work on a small AI detector/reporting workflow, but I am intentionally not linking it here. I am asking about software and report design, not promoting a site.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      507
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      181
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      86
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!