Prepare yourselves, the old skins are going bye bye!


Recommended Posts

You guys do need to realize that it is simply impractical for us to port all of our old skins. It's not because we think "change is good", although this one will be. The real reason is that we need to start IPB from scratch. Simple as that. We will have a database to work with, and that will need to be upgraded. The rest is 100% new code. Not only are our current themes useless, but all of our PHP hacks will need to be rewritten too.

It wouldn't simply be a matter of copying and pasting a few skins to IPB3. It would be remaking each and every one so that it could work with the new IPB3 features. Our hands are tied, and when so few people actually use those skins, it simply isn't worth it. We have statistics... basically no one uses the skins, especially when you take into account how many thousands of people use the site daily and are happy enough with Finity.

I understand your attachments to the old skins, but as developers we don't have time to do all of that for a select few users. It usually comes down to one, maybe two people doing the skins, and we think we can put that time to better use. You'll see what I mean.

Small point:

When you opened a closed thread in Shift you would see that the reply button, now carrying the text "closed", was a little faded. This is not done with the Infinity skin. Is there a reason for this action? I always thought it gave something extra and you could easily notice that the thread was closed. :blush:

Just asking, definitely no critique.

  • 2 months later...

So... Now that IPB 3.0.0 has been released, when will you guys make the transition? Will you guys also release a new Neowin Mobile webapp along side the transition? The current webapp is outdated and does not work on iPhone OS 3.0, it only works on 2.2.1 and below.

I'd expect the guys who control Neowin are waiting for 3.0.1 to arrive, which according to IPB staff is 'Quite soon'. So I'd recommend waiting on that. Numerous problems occur when upgrading to 3.0 anyway, including the breaking of most BBCodes.

I'd expect the guys who control Neowin are waiting for 3.0.1 to arrive, which according to IPB staff is 'Quite soon'. So I'd recommend waiting on that. Numerous problems occur when upgrading to 3.0 anyway, including the breaking of most BBCodes.

I'm pretty sure they'll start upgrading step by step. This forum has a lot of self-written modifications which all - or at least, many - have to be re-written. It will take time to develop those modifications, the skin and other aspects needed before they can upgrade. However, I'll be waiting as I'm more anxious for the new skin instead of the whole update.

I like Shift for the Forum and not Finity, but Finity for the main page.

So OS terms, im sticking to XP(ironically lol) and Finity ='s Vista. So I hope the new theme will be Windows 7(a blend of both).

Anyway, OS Metaphors aside, I hope you guys make it a nice theme. Shift and Finity! Remember that!

Shinity? Fift? lol Shifty?

anyway, reading through this whole topic gave me such flashbacks of programming Myboard, VBulitin, and other forum software ive used, and it was generally just me and one or two other guys, granted we never had a userbase as large as neowin, but i understand upgrade and porting processes, i had enough one day and left the "internetz" behind for several months.

Anyway, i Hope you Dev guys don't go nutz, just have fun and make a great forum, thats all we can really ask as users

IPB 3.0 is missing stuff like the Subscriber management, which we really do need as you'll know.. We won't be on 3.0 but we'll most likely be on 3.0.1 or later version.

The new IPB is good, but it still doesn't have most of our custom hacks which members have gotten used to and will miss if we just go and upgrade to Vanilla IPB and do a skin later.

Remember that we also didn't upgrade to 2.0 for months after it came out, because of the amount of work it requires to upgrade.

Those commenting about the slow DB, this is still be looked into and we've made significant improvements already, and from my understanding, 3.0 has been coded specifically to help large sites much more than 2.0 versions :D

  • 2 weeks later...
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I have a Motorola, one of the lower end ones, it works fine. It is possible to get rid of the Gemini app and also to disable googles assistant , but A.i is still apps. I try to avoid all LLM A.I, is i can, I use no Ai duck duck go.
    • Free Software Foundation Europe pushes EU to force Google to allow AI uninstalls on Android by Paul Hill Credit: Pexels Users should be able to fully uninstall AI-based features from Android devices and be able to access interoperability functions, free from Google’s verification requirements, the European Commission has heard as part of an Android interoperability consultation under the Digital Markets Act. These measures were proposed by the Free Software Foundation Europe (FSFE) last week when it submitted its documentation. The FSFE noted that Google had started silently installing AI models without telling users. It noted that the EU’s DMA requires companies like Google to allow users to uninstall pre-loaded software from their devices, but in the case of the AI models Google is installing, they reinstall if you delete them, contravening the DMA. To get Google back under control, the FSFE has told the European Commission that there needs to be improvements within the Android Open Source Project (AOSP). First, it said that users should be able to fully remove pre-loaded AI components from their devices, with companies being prohibited from silently reinstalling or reactivating them. Second, access to Android interoperability features should not be contingent on registration, authorization, or contractual relationships with Google. This pertains to Google’s attempt to force developers to register with Google, even to publish apps to alternative app stores like F-Droid. Discussing its submission, Lucas Lasota, FSFE Legal Programme Manager, said: Google is planning to roll out its Android Developer Certification in September 2026. This will force every Android app developer to register with Google before their software can be installed on certified Android devices, but it should affect those who have removed Google Apps from their device. The program is controversial because it entails the signing of contracts and payment of account fees to Google, as well as the handing over of the identities of developers. It said: The FSFE said that if the Commission’s draft measures remain unchanged, then Google will be allowed to make developers verify their identity. The FSFE believes that asking developers to register is contrary to the text and spirit of the law. In summary, the FSFE has told the Commission that no developer should need a Google account, a Play Store presence, or any agreement with Google to access Android’s interoperability features.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      519
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      87
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      81
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!