Recommended Posts

64 bit builds are always bigger. They contain 32 bit binaries (the syswow64 folder) for the WOW64 emulator that actually enables 32 bit applications to run in Win64, and 32 bit versions of IE and WMP. Remove those bits and the 32 and 64 bit builds would be pretty close.

Hopefully they fixed performance issues / made it faster.

@Lord Ba'al - Hwaaa?! 64-bit build is bigger?!

Yeah 64bit usually is 3GB and higher and 32 bit is usually lower than 3GB. As shown in the picture, it's about 3.23GB.

At the rate the guy is going, he should be done within the next 30 mins. If he installs it right away, which he probably will, that will take another 30 mins or so, so about 12pm(CST)/1am(EST) we will find out more about that time hopefully.

reidtheweed01, not everyone has 64bit, like me ;)

Edited by xJakex

A photo might make it seem more legit....no clean line photoshopping? If you calculate the time remaing, it seems in line with the estimate, so it seems half legit at least :p.

71.9534045 minutes.

Edited by Intelman
why would you people NOT want 64bit?

some people run older computer and most laptops done have more then 3gb of RAM.

Im running 32bit because my mate wanted windows 7 but he only has a 32bit laptop, so to save my self another download i just kept to 32bit as well, im only missing out on about 1gb of ram so it doesnt really worry me

some people run older computer and most laptops done have more then 3gb of RAM.

Im running 32bit because my mate wanted windows 7 but he only has a 32bit laptop, so to save my self another download i just kept to 32bit as well, im only missing out on about 1gb of ram so it doesnt really worry me

RAM isn't the only reason to go 64-bit though, it offers better performance (for 64-bit optimized code) better security etc as well, of the 3 machines I have running 64-bit Windows (7 and Vista) only 1 has 4Gb RAM, the others have 1.5Gb and 3Gb respectively. In your case though I can understand why your running 32-bit, I just mean in general. Providing you got a 64-bit CPU and 64-bit drivers for your hardware, going 64-bit is definitely worth considering, it's not just for people who want more then ~3Gb of RAM.

Why do most threads about Windows 7 turn into 64bit verses 32bit? Anyway, I'm using both architectures with build 7057 on identical hardware and I see no real difference.

Uh...you mean other than the fact that you can see 3+ GB of system memory, right? Isn't that the real reason we run 64 bit?

When I do virtualization x64 not only allows more ram, but it offers a smoother experience when running 2 or more virtual machines. And I run both x86 and x64 and under normal load you really don't see much of a difference. Also since there is more support for x86 I can see why people want it. Just my opinion though.

AMD x86-64 branding isn't much of an indication but intels branding of EM64T which stands for Extended Memory 64 Technology is more or less the indication of what current so called hybrid "64bit" is. The apparent speed improvements are because it allows higher amount of memory to be used that's all. Without the higher amount of memory it is pretty much pointless that's why we still have x86 and why i still use it since 2GB is plenty for me at the moment.

AMD x86-64 branding isn't much of an indication but intels branding of EM64T which stands for Extended Memory 64 Technology is more or less the indication of what current so called hybrid "64bit" is. The apparent speed improvements are because it allows higher amount of memory to be used that's all. Without the higher amount of memory it is pretty much pointless that's why we still have x86 and why i still use it since 2GB is plenty for me at the moment.

No.

Straight out of hte Wiki article (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X86-64#Architectural_features)

64-bit integer capability (which means everything can be computed at, at least, 64-bit length)

Additional registers

Instruction pointer relative data access

I don't know where you got the idea that "x64"was just a physical memory extension.

No.

Straight out of hte Wiki article (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X86-64#Architectural_features)

64-bit integer capability (which means everything can be computed at, at least, 64-bit length)

Additional registers

Instruction pointer relative data access

I don't know where you got the idea that "x64"was just a physical memory extension.

I'm aware of 64 bit architecture but again has hardly any relevancy since four fifth of screw all people make native 64 bit applications for this specific hybrid architecture (which is different in several ways to IA-64 due their incompatibility). I was talking about the technology implementation of it. It's designed to extend the memory support more then anything else.

Anyway back on topic... Quite honestly I don't think any leaks are needed between now and public/widespread RC testing. I don't think it's really worth downloading 2-3GB to have maybe desktop.ini bug fixed.

I'm aware of 64 bit architecture but again has hardly any relevancy since four fifth of screw all people make native 64 bit applications for this specific hybrid architecture (which is different in several ways to IA-64 due their incompatibility). I was talking about the technology implementation of it. It's designed to extend the memory support more then anything else.

Anyway back on topic... Quite honestly I don't think any leaks are needed between now and public/widespread RC testing. I don't think it's really worth downloading 2-3GB to have maybe desktop.ini bug fixed.

I was not refering to a general 64bit architecture or IA-64. I was referring to "this specific hybrid architecture" otherwise known as: x86-64

It's not just about giving access to more ram (which is technically possible with 32-bit systems using Physical Address Extension)

this hybrid architecture allowed us the capability of full 64bit length arithmetic in addition to various modernizations of the architecture.

While, I agree that the merits of running x64 builds of windows vs x86 builds can be underwhelming in most general circumstances (4gb or below) This doesn't mean that this stuff is just a slapdash memory extension to x86 its a full blown update.

I'm aware of 64 bit architecture but again has hardly any relevancy since four fifth of screw all people make native 64 bit applications for this specific hybrid architecture (which is different in several ways to IA-64 due their incompatibility). I was talking about the technology implementation of it. It's designed to extend the memory support more then anything else.

Anyway back on topic... Quite honestly I don't think any leaks are needed between now and public/widespread RC testing. I don't think it's really worth downloading 2-3GB to have maybe desktop.ini bug fixed.

Don't mean to go to far off-topic, but just wanted to clear things up a bit...

You shouldn't think of x64 as being a "specific hybrid architecture" because it's become the standard. In the beginning, Intel's IA-64 and AMD's AMD64 competed against one another, but IA-64 ultimately flopped, and AMD licensed their AMD64 design to Intel for their own chips, which Intel has since put their own spin on and now calls Intel 64. Now that most modern chips (Athlon 64/Pentium 4 "Prescott"s and up) support the x64 (AMD64/Intel 64) architectures, 64-bit applications are becoming increasingly more common. Adobe Photoshop CS4 has a native 64-bit version, and Office 14 is also going to have a 64-bit version.

Oh, and x64 is much more than just "more memory".

why would you people NOT want 64bit?

Sorry, not everyone in the world needs a super computer. Oh wait, your the person who said the moon doesn't exist! That makes perfect sense now (:

RAM isn't the only reason to go 64-bit though, it offers better performance (for 64-bit optimized code) better security etc as well, of the 3 machines I have running 64-bit Windows (7 and Vista) only 1 has 4Gb RAM, the others have 1.5Gb and 3Gb respectively. In your case though I can understand why your running 32-bit, I just mean in general. Providing you got a 64-bit CPU and 64-bit drivers for your hardware, going 64-bit is definitely worth considering, it's not just for people who want more then ~3Gb of RAM.

And on x32bit it offers worse performance. And compatibility.

Because the drivers available to me for my laptop are sh*tty in 64 bit mode.

That's the main legitimate reason for sticking with 32-bit. Unless you have a more recent computer with high-profile parts, 64-bit drivers are still lacking in many cases, even if you have a processor which supports 64 bits. That said, Windows 7 drivers of any kind, 32 or 64 bit, are still pretty scarce at this point.

I have a 64 bit processor but I prefer to install 32 bit. It seems faster than the 64bit. And I don't like to have two part "program files" one for 32 pros and one for 64 pros. Since the majority of apps are for 32bits, it seems more pluasible to use the x86 one.

Sorry, not everyone in the world needs a super computer. Oh wait, your the person who said the moon doesn't exist! That makes perfect sense now (:

And on x32bit it offers worse performance. And compatibility.

:/ I've experienced the complete opposite on that front, more programs (namely games) that either refused point black to work in 32-bit Windows or didn't work correctly, work flawlessly in Vista x64.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Opinion. All you did was blame Democrats for everything. You offered nothing but a hit piece to support your pro Trump, anti union right wing ideology.
    • Excuse me for having an opinion, fella'... (Why am I not surprised?...) Congrats on your very informative post however...
    • By the sounds of that wall of Fox News propaganda gibberish attacking the Democratic Party you've already had plenty of "juices" flowing this morning. You've ruined what could have been a productive comment thread.
    • (Topic to get the juices flowing this Sunday morning!...) Actually, the situation has almost nothing to do with "lack of skills", especially since assembly-line skills can be taught to anyone, including Americans, certainly. Rather, the inadequacy-to-impossibility of large-scale tech manufacturing in America today, and the reasons why America finds tech manufacturing completely onerous in the 21st century, has to do with politically driven laws amid a plethora of non-scientific, utterly politicized "science-fact" that is patently false, punitive business taxation at every turn, an array of judicial fines of unimaginable scope and complexity, and, last but not least, American unionization strictures that serve to actually slay job creation and hobble all such manufacturing endeavors in America before they can get off the ground. Globalism emerged, they tell us, as the needed answer to American hubris and an unholy American drive to excel. Unless one is buried under mounds of political propaganda, it's easy to see the absurdity of labeling the employees of SpaceX, for instance, as "unskilled labor"... Etc. ad infinitum. At one time in the recent past, American manufacturing prowess was the envy of the world in a wide variety of technical fields! The current federal and state government roadblocks against America becoming competitive globally in tech manufacturing are considerable, it's true, as anyone with a working brain knows. But remarkably, that is only half the story! The other half of the story is, of course, the corporations themselves... Chinese tech manufacturing is simply unassailable in terms of profits, because the Chinese government wants to see its tech manufacturing second-to-none globally so that no companies/nations can compete in terms of ROI, and China has completely succeeded in that goal. Let's tic-off a few things: *Chinese tariff policies are set according to what is considered best for Chinese business, Chinese employees, and the Chinese people. Huge difference with how things are done with tariffs in the US--as the US government (SCOTUS in this case, Congress in others) plainly feels that tariffs are "unfair" for the limited number of citizens who may pay them, whereas nothing is "unfair" when Congress considers the Personal Income Tax rates to be infinitely hike-able, along with infinitely enlarging annual budget deficits. *The Chinese government boldly subsidizes Chinese companies to artificially amplify their profits. *The Chinese government deliberately refuses to avidly demonize Chinese businesses and does not consider Chinese businesses "the enemy", so very unlike American (D)s these days. *Chinese labor laws and businesses are allowed to set their own labor policies according to what Chinese companies consider is best for companies and their employees... Simply put, American workers in tech manufacturing are not allowed to set their own labor policies! * One additional problem corporations have that I also do not sympathize with is they don't want to pay to train their American employees. They could easily do so, but would rather not have to pay for it. I find that pathetic, actually. It is the height of hypocrisy for Americans to decry working conditions in China while simultaneously ensuring that American products are manufactured in China, not in the US, simply to maximize profits. There is nothing wrong with making a profit, of course, absolutely nothing. But there is plenty wrong with attempts to normalize hypocrisy of this kind! But rank hypocrisy and the (D) party in the US are longtime bedfellows... The current government in Washington is working overtime to see if it can toss out the horribly poor, failed economic policies of the past, while the (D)s still in Washington work very hard to bring back the stupidity whenever possible. With the right policies in place, America can be an infinitely competitive manufacturer.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      508
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      152
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      73
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      62
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!