Apple responds to Microsoft ads: "a PC is no bargain"


Recommended Posts

Out of the box = Natively. OSX cannot run the vast majority of programs and/or games and that "PC" users can, and until it can, installing Windows on a Mac does not equal out of the box. Installing Windows on a Mac defeats the purpose of having a Mac in the first place, does it not?

I certainly don't agree. Installing Windows on a Mac is the same as on a regular PC.

It also does not defeat the purpose of having a Mac. I probably spend more time running Windows on my MacBook than OSX, and I'm very satisfied with it. I bought it mostly for the hardware, being able to run OSX is just the cherry on top.

For me, there's no better laptop than this one on the market right now (according to my needs and taste). Yours will differ I imagine.

Microsoft could always ship Office with Windows... oh wait, everyone would cry foul.

Notably the shareholders: packing office free with windows would reduce Microsoft revenue by about 35% (based on their latest 10Q). I think they'd notice $15 billion dollars a year just vanishing.

I'd personally like them to include applications, or lower the price of Windows one or the other. I don't think Vista was worth its retail price for what it included.

Something is worth what people are willing to pay for it. You might not be see the value in a $5—$3,500 Windows license but the overwhelming majority of computer owners do.

I think the prices for Windows are a little on the steep side if you're picking up a retail boxed copy but most computer users don't have a need for that. The majority of computer users will be getting an OEM license from HP, Dell, etc. which costs only a few dollars, and 'upgraders' have discounted versions available to them. Roughly $100 for an operating system upgrade doesn't seem outlandish to me.

Exactly. I agree. But it should also be recognised that iLife comes with a Mac in the same statement which includes many Applications that Windows users would have to purchase if they wanted to do serious Video editing or Photo manipulation, DVD Authoring or learning an Instrument. In the same vain Mac users would have to spend money if they wanted to play Games and by that I mean obviously a license to XP or Vista.

In my opinion if your looking for a Gaming computer get a PC. You can paint a horse to look like a zebra but it's still a Horse at the end of the day and Mac's are just not very good for Gaming as they ship with only Optical out when it comes to more then 2.1 Sound (so you can't use 5.1 or 7.1 gaming headsets) the Graphics cards are very slow and in all but one of the computers (Mac Pro) cannot be changed from the default that the Machine ships with. And of course no SLI/Crossfire support.

iMovie is not for serious video editing - no matter what Apple claims. It is in equal league as WMM. DVD authoring is included in Vista/7.

iMovie is not for serious video editing - no matter what Apple claims. It is in equal league as WMM. DVD authoring is included in Vista/7.

Last time I used WMM, it could only import/edit/export Windows Media formats or DV AVIs. Simple MP4 H.264 video or AAC audio, which is a pretty common standard today, wasn't supported. Is that still the case today?

Well, if you want good components PC's can get quite expensive too.

By good you mean "Any off the shelf component that apple uses" its moronic to define every intel processor not used by apple as bad or any other manufacturer for that matter .

Your right though PC's can get quite expensive too but the difference is you wont end up with bog standard mid range components .

By good you mean "Any off the shelf component that apple uses" its moronic to define every intel processor not used by apple as bad or any other manufacturer for that matter .

Your right though PC's can get quite expensive too but the difference is you wont end up with bog standard mid range components .

May I point you back to https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?show...amp;p=590900946?

Something is worth what people are willing to pay for it. You might not be see the value in a $5—$3,500 Windows license but the overwhelming majority of computer owners do.

I think the prices for Windows are a little on the steep side if you're picking up a retail boxed copy but most computer users don't have a need for that. The majority of computer users will be getting an OEM license from HP, Dell, etc. which costs only a few dollars, and 'upgraders' have discounted versions available to them. Roughly $100 for an operating system upgrade doesn't seem outlandish to me.

I don't think a lot of people would pay for it if they knew how much it cost but most will never know the true cost as they get it with a Hardware purchase (A Computer) and its already an OEM version that ships with that hardware. Like I said in my post I don't think the Retail copy was worth the cost. ?350 for Ultimate and ?220 or so for Premium was a bit of a joke. Again Retail. If you got the OEM copies Ultimate was ?120 but then you couldn't use it on any computer except the one you already had as the next activation would be blocked. Not exactly consumer friendly and definitely not good for money. The high Piracy levels of Windows in general are a good indicator that people are just not willing to pay for it but they do want/need it. The monopoly that Microsoft have built around their Operating System has allowed them to charge almost extortionate prices for new OS editions in my opinion.

And this isn't a Windows vs Mac opinion this is just a Windows user unhappy with the inflated pricing. Yes I know Microsoft spends a lot of money on research and development and they are a business not a charity. But I also think that Microsoft wastes to much money on R&D with reckless spending on projects that they could never hope to commercialise. I don't think the Consumers of Windows should have to eat the bill for all this bad accounting.

Here are the main pitfalls.

You want a Retail edition so you can take your Windows copy and install it on a new PC you buy. That costs 2-3x more then an OEM copy.

OEM Copies only allow you to install it on one computer (But you can reinstall it on that computer as many times as you want)

Upgrade copies require a previous installation of Windows before the Install will even begin so you have to keep an old disc around of XP or Vista so that you can install Vista in the future event that you need/want to format

You can buy a cheaper Retail copy but that may not have all the features you want

You may have to buy a more expensive copy to get just 1 feature that the lower-priced SKU doesn't support (Microsoft doesn't allow you to pay the difference to unlock just 1 or 2 features)

I'm not saying any other license is better just that Microsoft have a problem here. They keep banging on about Piracy but do nothing to stop the real reason for it (In the western world) which is highly inflated retail prices. They recognise emerging markets as using Pirated copies because the price is to high but what about the rest of the world? - Again I don't think Windows is worth ?200 or ?300 especially when I can run all the same software that Vista will run on XP (Except DX10 Games).

So the $1,188.00 price difference between a Dell XPS 16 and the corosponding MBP is explained through a magnetic power connector and a glass track:rolleyes:eyes:

I thought you wanted to discuss reliability differences not price differences.

Well it does if you actually read what I said. Magnetically held in connectors wear less then plastic and metal ones which are subject to heavy friction when pluggin in and pulled out of the notebook. The trackpad is made of Glass which is more resistant to wear then plastic. The notebooks also lack a latching mechanism which is another point of failure on PC notebooks due to wear.

Just like the hinge on your special HDX is different to the average PC hinge it in itself can be considered a more/less reliable part then a normal hinge.

This is just basic science fact m8, I dunno why you're swearing there is no need for it.

By good you mean "Any off the shelf component that apple uses" its moronic to define every intel processor not used by apple as bad or any other manufacturer for that matter .

Your right though PC's can get quite expensive too but the difference is you wont end up with bog standard mid range components .

Totally correct.. Here's what expensive on PC side will get you.. cause I was thinking of upgrading my Mac Pro but I'll probably go with my own PC build this time.

Newest Mac Pro (that I wanted)

  • Two 2.93GHz Quad-Core Intel Xeon
  • 12GB (6x2GB) 1066Mhz DDR3
  • 640GB 7200-rpm Serial ATA 3Gb/s
  • 1TB 7200-rpm Serial ATA 3Gb/s
  • ATI Radeon HD 4870 512MB
  • ATI Radeon HD 4870 512MB (additional purchase +$349)
  • One 18x SuperDrive (no Blu-Ray)

$7,048.00

The PC workstation I will most likely get:

[*]Two Intel Xeon X5570 Nehalem 2.93GHz LGA 1366 95W Quad

[*]SUPERMICRO MBD-X8DA3-O Dual LGA 1366 Intel 5520 Extended ATX - RAID Controller SAS 8 drives

[*]12GB Corsair (6 x 2GB) 240-Pin DDR3 1333Mhz

[*]WD VelociRaptor 300GB 10000 RPM Hard Drive (Raid 0)

[*]WD VelociRaptor 300GB 10000 RPM Hard Drive

[*]Western Digital Caviar Black 1TB 7200RPM 32mb Cache

[*]XFX GeForce GTX 285 1GB GDDR3

[*]XFX GeForce GTX 285 1GB GDDR3

[*]LG Black Blu-ray/HD DVD-ROM & 16X DVD?R DVD Burner SATA

[*]COOLER MASTER 1100W ATX12V / EPS12V SLI Certified CrossFire Ready PSU

[*]COOLER MASTER ATCS 840 Silver all aluminum case

$5,437.89>

I also have TechNet description for $349 a year which gives me full Office 2007 Ultimate + all Windows versions and a bunch of other tools. Something Apple doesn't offer.

So when I include Technet (I already have it though) my PC price goes to$5,786.89>

We don't really have to discuss anything else hardware wise. This is pretty telling and I picked the BEST parts you can get for PC and the difference in price is not even worth discuss how big it is.

You should look at the Lenovo D20 Boz it's very high-end but amazing expansion and 4 years next business day warranty. It trashes the Mac Pro and I think it may also do better then self-builds simply based on the enterprise level support that comes standard.

Because its pointless to worry about the lifetime of the power connector when the internal components (Hard Disk and RAM) are far more likely to fail.

Says who? - It depends how much you're willing to spend and who your supplier is. I bought a Medion notebook a while ago and the power connector on that broke. Wasn't good. And I also had an iBook where the Power Connector broke twice. The Magsafe however I owned for 3 years and it never looked warn at all.

I also have a friend who had two laptops running in her living room connected to AC power when her dog ran in and hit the wires breaking them both which required replacement connectors for both notebooks. In this case had she had Magsafe it would have come free from the notebook with zero damage to the connector, the port or the animal. Total price for the two replacement adapters (One from HP and one from Acer) was about ?86.

So a Hard Drive is your argument? - What a Joke.

May I also point out that the Hard Disk is easily removable from the MacBooks and MacBook Pros while some other manufacturers require you to take apart the entire notebook to replace that part.

Also I would argue that post is based on assumptions. As can be seen by my post the Notebooks power connector is likely to fail in many different normal usage scenarios.

You should look at the Lenovo D20 Boz it's very high-end but amazing expansion and 4 years next business day warranty. It trashes the Mac Pro and I think it may also do better then self-builds simply based on the enterprise level support that comes standard.

Don't talk crap, how the hell does a single 1.86GHz Xeon trash a Mac Pro? It certainly isn't very high end or it would have dual CPU's and they'd be 3GHz.

So a Hard Drive is your argument? - What a Joke.

May I also point out that the Hard Disk is easily removable from the MacBooks and MacBook Pros while some other manufacturers require you to take apart the entire notebook to replace that part.

Also I would argue that post is based on assumptions. As can be seen by my post the Notebooks power connector is likely to fail in many different normal usage scenarios.

Shame you can't do something simple like swap the battery without undoing about a dozen screws though isn't it?

Don't talk crap, how the hell does a single 1.86GHz Xeon trash a Mac Pro? It certainly isn't very high end or it would have dual CPU's and they'd be 3GHz.

Perhaps you should actually click on Configure and see that it is a Dual Socket system which will take CPU's up to 3.2GHz just like the Mac Pro.

How it beats the Mac Pro:

Same price in same configuration. But it includes more Hard Disk bays and connectors, 3x the RAM capacity, much more expansion, 1200Watt power supply, 4 year next day buisness support.

Totally correct.. Here's what expensive on PC side will get you.. cause I was thinking of upgrading my Mac Pro but I'll probably go with my own PC build this time.

Newest Mac Pro (that I wanted)

  • Two 2.93GHz Quad-Core Intel Xeon
  • 12GB (6x2GB) 1066Mhz DDR3
  • 640GB 7200-rpm Serial ATA 3Gb/s
  • 1TB 7200-rpm Serial ATA 3Gb/s
  • ATI Radeon HD 4870 512MB
  • ATI Radeon HD 4870 512MB (additional purchase +$349)
  • One 18x SuperDrive (no Blu-Ray)

$7,048.00

No one in their right mind buys RAM from Apple.

Shame you can't do something simple like swap the battery without undoing about a dozen screws though isn't it?

With an Eight hour battery I never need/want to do that. Plus I chose to buy the new model after already owning the older model which had an easily accessible and replaceable battery. I never replaced that one. The only event that would make me want to change the battery would be if the one already in the notebook failed in which case I could remove the bottom panel and do that.

Absolutely platters that spin 7,200 rpm when the drive is operating , a read head that flicks out 50 times per second . Its a mericle these things actually work . Hard Disks have a MTBF, power connectors do not .

Yes they have MTBF's etc but I've owned something like 40 hard disks in my life and never had a single one fail. But if you look at the notebooks I've had 2 have had the Power connector fail. One of those notebooks had it fail twice in-fact. (Apple iBook)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Motrix Next 3.9.6 by Razvan Serea Motrix Next is a modern, open-source cross-platform download manager built as the official next-generation successor to the original Motrix project. It has been completely rewritten using Tauri 2, Vue 3, TypeScript, and Rust, while still relying on the powerful Aria2 download engine for high-speed multi-protocol transfers. The app supports HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, BitTorrent, ED2K and magnet links, offering advanced features like multi-connection acceleration, task scheduling, bandwidth control, and batch download management. With a significantly reduced install size (around 20MB), it focuses on being lightweight, fast, and resource-efficient compared to traditional Electron-based download tools. Designed for Windows, macOS, and Linux, Motrix Next delivers a clean, modern UI inspired by Material Design 3 principles, with smooth animations and a minimal workflow. It improves usability through better download organization, system tray integration, and enhanced torrent handling including selective file downloads and tracker management. Motrix Next features: Multi-protocol downloads — HTTP, FTP, BitTorrent, Magnet, .torrent, ED2K, and Metalink tasks BitTorrent — Selective file download, DHT, peer exchange, encryption controls, metadata caching, GeoIP peer flags, and tracker probing Browser extension integration — Embedded Extension API with independent authentication, download confirmation, smart auto-submit, filename hints, referer/cookie forwarding, and real-time controls (Chrome Web Store · Edge Add-ons) Safe filename handling — Content-Disposition, RFC 2047, non-UTF-8, percent-encoded, and extensionless URL resolution with path traversal sanitization Download organization — Favorite and recent folders, optional file-type categorization, stale-record cleanup, and completed history backed by SQLite Concurrent downloads — Independent controls for active tasks, HTTP connections per server, segments per file, and BT peer limits Speed control — Global and per-task upload/download limits with day-of-week and time-of-day scheduling System integration — Tray operation, optional tray speed display, macOS Dock badge/progress, protocol handlers for magnet://, thunder://, and motrixnext:// Lightweight mode — Destroys the WebView on minimize-to-tray while Rust keeps the engine, task monitor, notifications, history, and extension routing alive Notifications and power options — Native task start/complete/failure notifications, keep-awake during downloads, and optional shutdown after completion Network controls — Scoped proxy support for downloads, app updates, and tracker updates, plus system proxy detection Auto-update channels — Stable, Beta, and Latest Across Channels policies with separate download and install phases Diagnostics — Structured logs, exportable diagnostic ZIPs, database integrity checks, automatic DB rebuild, and Linux GPU rendering fallback Personalization — Light/dark/system theme, 10 color schemes, 26 languages, and first-launch system language detection Motrix Next 3.9.6 changelog: New Features Clipboard management — App-owned copy actions no longer trigger the Add Task auto-detect popup. aria2 input compatibility — Multi-line aria2-style task input is supported for URLs with per-task options such as out=. BitTorrent IPv6 DHT — Added IPv6 DHT support and related configuration. File category URL patterns — File category rules can match URL patterns with validation and localized hints. Task status tags — Added clearer waiting and sharing states for task cards. Download event bridge — Added an aria2 WebSocket event bridge for faster download notifications. Improvements Improved task list transitions and preserved task state during tab switches. Kept RPC origin access enabled for local integrations. Restored AppImage stripping in release builds after beta validation. Added localized preference guidance across supported languages. Download: Motrix Next 64-bit | ARM64 | macOS ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Links: Website | macOS / Linux | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Segra 1.6.2 by Razvan Serea Segra is a free, open-source OBS-powered game recorder offering fast gameplay capture, instant clips, AI highlights, deep game integration, and seamless uploads—perfect for gamers, streamers, and content creators. Lightweight, fast, zero bloat. Segra key features: Automatic Game Recording: Begin capturing gameplay the moment your game launches, with zero manual setup. Instant Clipping: Save important moments instantly using a customizable hotkey—perfect for highlights, montages, or quick shares. Segra AI Highlights: Let Segra automatically detect kills, assists, deaths, and key events to generate polished highlight reels without manual editing. Gameplay Uploads: Upload recordings and clips directly to Segra.tv for fast sharing and cloud access. Deep Game Integration: Enjoy advanced game-data tracking across hundreds of supported titles, enabling smart highlight generation and stat-informed clipping. High-Performance Capture: Record up to 4K at 144 FPS using OBS-powered technology with minimal performance impact, supporting NVENC, AMD VCE, and custom quality controls. Segra Editor: Edit recordings easily with timeline controls, segment management, and event-based navigation to build the perfect clip. Customization Options: Adjust hotkeys, output formats, storage paths, codecs, capture quality, and performance settings for a tailored recording experience. Segra 1.6.2 changelog: UI: Improved the transition from the loading skeleton to the real content card. Security: Added Segra.dll code signing and automatic VirusTotal upload. Settings: Fixed the settings header to highlight Account when scrolled to the top. Recording: Updated OBSKit.NET to 1.4.1. Download: Segra 1.6.2 | 74.5 MB (Open Source) View: Segra Homepage | Github | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Hey Google, these are the Gemini features I want in 2026 by Aditya Tiwari Google Gemini has been around for over three years. The AI chatbot started its journey back in 2023 (as Bard) when ChatGPT was already a talk of the town. However, it quickly attracted criticism after misrepresenting facts about the James Webb Space Telescope. The search giant spent a year fine-tuning Bard before rebranding the chatbot and its underlying generative AI model to Gemini, drawing inspiration from NASA's first human spaceflight program. Note that Bard was initially powered by LaMDA and PaLM 2; Google has since added several new features and integrations to Gemini. That said, there is scope for improvement and a gap for new features. I have been using Gemini for a while now and have realized that the chatbot lacks several features, making it harder for me to research across topics. These are mostly function-over-form updates that can improve the overall experience. Delete individual messages from a conversation Image via DepositPhotos.com One good thing about Gemini is that it can maintain context throughout the conversation. But things might get chaotic when you want to ask a related question, but don't want it to be part of your conversation in the long run. You can't ask that related question in a fresh chat because Gemini will lose the active conversation context of what you're trying to research. If Google allowed you to delete individual question/answer pairs, you could simply ask about a sub-topic and remove it from the conversation to create a smooth flow of important stuff. Offline mode Image via DepositPhotos.com A big pain of using Gemini daily is that everything loads from the cloud. It takes time for your chats to appear, and you can't view your conversation history while offline. To get a better idea, you can open the Gemini app and see how it looks without an internet connection. While Gemini models run in the cloud, it wouldn't hurt if Google could store chats (at least the text part) on the device so we can refer to them when offline. Google can also offer a lightweight version of its AI model to help with basic drafting, summarization, and other tasks. It has the Gemini Nano model, which can perform on-device processing on Google Pixel, Samsung, and some other Android brands, but it's a system feature and not related to the cloud-based Gemini app. Make temporary chats permanent I can't thank Google enough for taking the time and effort to add incognito mode or temporary chat mode to the Gemini app. It lets you have conversations without worrying that the topics will end up in your chat history or used for model training (at least on paper). Google claims that it doesn't use your temporary chats to "personalize your Gemini experience or train Google’s AI models." However, the data is stored "up to 72 hours to respond to you and to process any feedback you choose to provide." That said, I often start researching something in a temporary chat, only to realize the chatbot's answer is good enough to refer to later. Sadly, Gemini doesn't have an option to make such temporary chats permanent. In other words, I won't be able to follow up on it if I close the temporary chat. I'm left with alternatives like copying the answers into notes or another app. My digital life will get a lot better if Gemini gets a button to make temporary chats permanent. Collapse answers for a cleaner view You're heavily invested in your research game and suddenly feel the need to go up in the chat to recall something. This is when the conversation thread starts to feel like an overwhelming, unending wall of questions and answers. What if Google added a way to collapse Q&A pairs in the Gemini chat thread? It would look quite clean and easy to navigate. You'll quickly get an overview of everything you have discussed with the chatbot. Add buttons to jump between messages Suggested mockup of the feature. This reminds me of a small but useful Gemini feature that Google could add to its chatbot: the ability to hop between prompts in a conversation. Just add simple up- and down-arrow buttons, similar to YouTube Shorts, so people can quickly scroll through the messages. A table of contents or Chat Overview It's hard to get a bird's-eye view of everything you have discussed with the chatbot during a lengthy conversation. This is where a table of contents, or Chat Overview, displayed at the top of the screen, possibly in a drop-down button, might come in handy. You'll be able to get an overview of the chat and jump between messages, serving as an alternative to the up/down arrow buttons. Temporary mode for Gemini Live Image: Google You can use Gemini Live to have real-time conversations with the chatbot, which feels like you're talking to someone in the same room. However, a downside is that Gemini Live doesn't work in Temporary Chat mode, so all your conversations end up in the chat history. Google should consider expanding the temporary chat mode to include Gemini Live. Default to a specific chat One thing that feels somewhat annoying to me is that Gemini always opens in a new chat, whether on web or mobile. Sometimes, you want to return to your last chat. Google can take cues from web browsers, which let you choose whether you want to go to a new tab or a specific web page(s). Gemini can also have options to default to a specific chat when reopened. That said, generative AI chatbots have endless possibilities given the vagueness of their work. You can mold them the way you want by attaching different connectors, adding custom instructions, and including source files. It remains to be seen what Google has in store for future updates and whether anything from this wishlist gets the green light. The search giant released a stream of new Gemini updates in recent months, including Gemini 3.5 Flash and Gemini Omni Spark, adding that it now has 13 products with more than a billion users each. What do you want to see in the Gemini app? Tell us in the comments.
    • Thank you for the post. Just a FYI that links to an outside site or promoting specific software is considered spamming here. Asking general questions is fine.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      507
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      181
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      86
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!