Apple responds to Microsoft ads: "a PC is no bargain"


Recommended Posts

Out of the box = Natively. OSX cannot run the vast majority of programs and/or games and that "PC" users can, and until it can, installing Windows on a Mac does not equal out of the box. Installing Windows on a Mac defeats the purpose of having a Mac in the first place, does it not?

I certainly don't agree. Installing Windows on a Mac is the same as on a regular PC.

It also does not defeat the purpose of having a Mac. I probably spend more time running Windows on my MacBook than OSX, and I'm very satisfied with it. I bought it mostly for the hardware, being able to run OSX is just the cherry on top.

For me, there's no better laptop than this one on the market right now (according to my needs and taste). Yours will differ I imagine.

Microsoft could always ship Office with Windows... oh wait, everyone would cry foul.

Notably the shareholders: packing office free with windows would reduce Microsoft revenue by about 35% (based on their latest 10Q). I think they'd notice $15 billion dollars a year just vanishing.

I'd personally like them to include applications, or lower the price of Windows one or the other. I don't think Vista was worth its retail price for what it included.

Something is worth what people are willing to pay for it. You might not be see the value in a $5—$3,500 Windows license but the overwhelming majority of computer owners do.

I think the prices for Windows are a little on the steep side if you're picking up a retail boxed copy but most computer users don't have a need for that. The majority of computer users will be getting an OEM license from HP, Dell, etc. which costs only a few dollars, and 'upgraders' have discounted versions available to them. Roughly $100 for an operating system upgrade doesn't seem outlandish to me.

Exactly. I agree. But it should also be recognised that iLife comes with a Mac in the same statement which includes many Applications that Windows users would have to purchase if they wanted to do serious Video editing or Photo manipulation, DVD Authoring or learning an Instrument. In the same vain Mac users would have to spend money if they wanted to play Games and by that I mean obviously a license to XP or Vista.

In my opinion if your looking for a Gaming computer get a PC. You can paint a horse to look like a zebra but it's still a Horse at the end of the day and Mac's are just not very good for Gaming as they ship with only Optical out when it comes to more then 2.1 Sound (so you can't use 5.1 or 7.1 gaming headsets) the Graphics cards are very slow and in all but one of the computers (Mac Pro) cannot be changed from the default that the Machine ships with. And of course no SLI/Crossfire support.

iMovie is not for serious video editing - no matter what Apple claims. It is in equal league as WMM. DVD authoring is included in Vista/7.

iMovie is not for serious video editing - no matter what Apple claims. It is in equal league as WMM. DVD authoring is included in Vista/7.

Last time I used WMM, it could only import/edit/export Windows Media formats or DV AVIs. Simple MP4 H.264 video or AAC audio, which is a pretty common standard today, wasn't supported. Is that still the case today?

Well, if you want good components PC's can get quite expensive too.

By good you mean "Any off the shelf component that apple uses" its moronic to define every intel processor not used by apple as bad or any other manufacturer for that matter .

Your right though PC's can get quite expensive too but the difference is you wont end up with bog standard mid range components .

By good you mean "Any off the shelf component that apple uses" its moronic to define every intel processor not used by apple as bad or any other manufacturer for that matter .

Your right though PC's can get quite expensive too but the difference is you wont end up with bog standard mid range components .

May I point you back to https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?show...amp;p=590900946?

Something is worth what people are willing to pay for it. You might not be see the value in a $5—$3,500 Windows license but the overwhelming majority of computer owners do.

I think the prices for Windows are a little on the steep side if you're picking up a retail boxed copy but most computer users don't have a need for that. The majority of computer users will be getting an OEM license from HP, Dell, etc. which costs only a few dollars, and 'upgraders' have discounted versions available to them. Roughly $100 for an operating system upgrade doesn't seem outlandish to me.

I don't think a lot of people would pay for it if they knew how much it cost but most will never know the true cost as they get it with a Hardware purchase (A Computer) and its already an OEM version that ships with that hardware. Like I said in my post I don't think the Retail copy was worth the cost. ?350 for Ultimate and ?220 or so for Premium was a bit of a joke. Again Retail. If you got the OEM copies Ultimate was ?120 but then you couldn't use it on any computer except the one you already had as the next activation would be blocked. Not exactly consumer friendly and definitely not good for money. The high Piracy levels of Windows in general are a good indicator that people are just not willing to pay for it but they do want/need it. The monopoly that Microsoft have built around their Operating System has allowed them to charge almost extortionate prices for new OS editions in my opinion.

And this isn't a Windows vs Mac opinion this is just a Windows user unhappy with the inflated pricing. Yes I know Microsoft spends a lot of money on research and development and they are a business not a charity. But I also think that Microsoft wastes to much money on R&D with reckless spending on projects that they could never hope to commercialise. I don't think the Consumers of Windows should have to eat the bill for all this bad accounting.

Here are the main pitfalls.

You want a Retail edition so you can take your Windows copy and install it on a new PC you buy. That costs 2-3x more then an OEM copy.

OEM Copies only allow you to install it on one computer (But you can reinstall it on that computer as many times as you want)

Upgrade copies require a previous installation of Windows before the Install will even begin so you have to keep an old disc around of XP or Vista so that you can install Vista in the future event that you need/want to format

You can buy a cheaper Retail copy but that may not have all the features you want

You may have to buy a more expensive copy to get just 1 feature that the lower-priced SKU doesn't support (Microsoft doesn't allow you to pay the difference to unlock just 1 or 2 features)

I'm not saying any other license is better just that Microsoft have a problem here. They keep banging on about Piracy but do nothing to stop the real reason for it (In the western world) which is highly inflated retail prices. They recognise emerging markets as using Pirated copies because the price is to high but what about the rest of the world? - Again I don't think Windows is worth ?200 or ?300 especially when I can run all the same software that Vista will run on XP (Except DX10 Games).

So the $1,188.00 price difference between a Dell XPS 16 and the corosponding MBP is explained through a magnetic power connector and a glass track:rolleyes:eyes:

I thought you wanted to discuss reliability differences not price differences.

Well it does if you actually read what I said. Magnetically held in connectors wear less then plastic and metal ones which are subject to heavy friction when pluggin in and pulled out of the notebook. The trackpad is made of Glass which is more resistant to wear then plastic. The notebooks also lack a latching mechanism which is another point of failure on PC notebooks due to wear.

Just like the hinge on your special HDX is different to the average PC hinge it in itself can be considered a more/less reliable part then a normal hinge.

This is just basic science fact m8, I dunno why you're swearing there is no need for it.

By good you mean "Any off the shelf component that apple uses" its moronic to define every intel processor not used by apple as bad or any other manufacturer for that matter .

Your right though PC's can get quite expensive too but the difference is you wont end up with bog standard mid range components .

Totally correct.. Here's what expensive on PC side will get you.. cause I was thinking of upgrading my Mac Pro but I'll probably go with my own PC build this time.

Newest Mac Pro (that I wanted)

  • Two 2.93GHz Quad-Core Intel Xeon
  • 12GB (6x2GB) 1066Mhz DDR3
  • 640GB 7200-rpm Serial ATA 3Gb/s
  • 1TB 7200-rpm Serial ATA 3Gb/s
  • ATI Radeon HD 4870 512MB
  • ATI Radeon HD 4870 512MB (additional purchase +$349)
  • One 18x SuperDrive (no Blu-Ray)

$7,048.00

The PC workstation I will most likely get:

[*]Two Intel Xeon X5570 Nehalem 2.93GHz LGA 1366 95W Quad

[*]SUPERMICRO MBD-X8DA3-O Dual LGA 1366 Intel 5520 Extended ATX - RAID Controller SAS 8 drives

[*]12GB Corsair (6 x 2GB) 240-Pin DDR3 1333Mhz

[*]WD VelociRaptor 300GB 10000 RPM Hard Drive (Raid 0)

[*]WD VelociRaptor 300GB 10000 RPM Hard Drive

[*]Western Digital Caviar Black 1TB 7200RPM 32mb Cache

[*]XFX GeForce GTX 285 1GB GDDR3

[*]XFX GeForce GTX 285 1GB GDDR3

[*]LG Black Blu-ray/HD DVD-ROM & 16X DVD?R DVD Burner SATA

[*]COOLER MASTER 1100W ATX12V / EPS12V SLI Certified CrossFire Ready PSU

[*]COOLER MASTER ATCS 840 Silver all aluminum case

$5,437.89>

I also have TechNet description for $349 a year which gives me full Office 2007 Ultimate + all Windows versions and a bunch of other tools. Something Apple doesn't offer.

So when I include Technet (I already have it though) my PC price goes to$5,786.89>

We don't really have to discuss anything else hardware wise. This is pretty telling and I picked the BEST parts you can get for PC and the difference in price is not even worth discuss how big it is.

You should look at the Lenovo D20 Boz it's very high-end but amazing expansion and 4 years next business day warranty. It trashes the Mac Pro and I think it may also do better then self-builds simply based on the enterprise level support that comes standard.

Because its pointless to worry about the lifetime of the power connector when the internal components (Hard Disk and RAM) are far more likely to fail.

Says who? - It depends how much you're willing to spend and who your supplier is. I bought a Medion notebook a while ago and the power connector on that broke. Wasn't good. And I also had an iBook where the Power Connector broke twice. The Magsafe however I owned for 3 years and it never looked warn at all.

I also have a friend who had two laptops running in her living room connected to AC power when her dog ran in and hit the wires breaking them both which required replacement connectors for both notebooks. In this case had she had Magsafe it would have come free from the notebook with zero damage to the connector, the port or the animal. Total price for the two replacement adapters (One from HP and one from Acer) was about ?86.

So a Hard Drive is your argument? - What a Joke.

May I also point out that the Hard Disk is easily removable from the MacBooks and MacBook Pros while some other manufacturers require you to take apart the entire notebook to replace that part.

Also I would argue that post is based on assumptions. As can be seen by my post the Notebooks power connector is likely to fail in many different normal usage scenarios.

You should look at the Lenovo D20 Boz it's very high-end but amazing expansion and 4 years next business day warranty. It trashes the Mac Pro and I think it may also do better then self-builds simply based on the enterprise level support that comes standard.

Don't talk crap, how the hell does a single 1.86GHz Xeon trash a Mac Pro? It certainly isn't very high end or it would have dual CPU's and they'd be 3GHz.

So a Hard Drive is your argument? - What a Joke.

May I also point out that the Hard Disk is easily removable from the MacBooks and MacBook Pros while some other manufacturers require you to take apart the entire notebook to replace that part.

Also I would argue that post is based on assumptions. As can be seen by my post the Notebooks power connector is likely to fail in many different normal usage scenarios.

Shame you can't do something simple like swap the battery without undoing about a dozen screws though isn't it?

Don't talk crap, how the hell does a single 1.86GHz Xeon trash a Mac Pro? It certainly isn't very high end or it would have dual CPU's and they'd be 3GHz.

Perhaps you should actually click on Configure and see that it is a Dual Socket system which will take CPU's up to 3.2GHz just like the Mac Pro.

How it beats the Mac Pro:

Same price in same configuration. But it includes more Hard Disk bays and connectors, 3x the RAM capacity, much more expansion, 1200Watt power supply, 4 year next day buisness support.

Totally correct.. Here's what expensive on PC side will get you.. cause I was thinking of upgrading my Mac Pro but I'll probably go with my own PC build this time.

Newest Mac Pro (that I wanted)

  • Two 2.93GHz Quad-Core Intel Xeon
  • 12GB (6x2GB) 1066Mhz DDR3
  • 640GB 7200-rpm Serial ATA 3Gb/s
  • 1TB 7200-rpm Serial ATA 3Gb/s
  • ATI Radeon HD 4870 512MB
  • ATI Radeon HD 4870 512MB (additional purchase +$349)
  • One 18x SuperDrive (no Blu-Ray)

$7,048.00

No one in their right mind buys RAM from Apple.

Shame you can't do something simple like swap the battery without undoing about a dozen screws though isn't it?

With an Eight hour battery I never need/want to do that. Plus I chose to buy the new model after already owning the older model which had an easily accessible and replaceable battery. I never replaced that one. The only event that would make me want to change the battery would be if the one already in the notebook failed in which case I could remove the bottom panel and do that.

Absolutely platters that spin 7,200 rpm when the drive is operating , a read head that flicks out 50 times per second . Its a mericle these things actually work . Hard Disks have a MTBF, power connectors do not .

Yes they have MTBF's etc but I've owned something like 40 hard disks in my life and never had a single one fail. But if you look at the notebooks I've had 2 have had the Power connector fail. One of those notebooks had it fail twice in-fact. (Apple iBook)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • You literally have to do it on a desktop, which is incredibly annoying in our mobile-first world. What???
    • What part of "you can’t really depend on service providers to maintain features forever" is not clear enough?
    • Nope. That lack of surround sound capability (analog) won't fly with me. Sure, I use headphones most of the time, but still.
    • Creative Sound Blaster AE-X PCIe review: your headphones will love it by Steven Parker If you have been reading Neowin for any length of time, you may remember that I reviewed the Sound Blaster Audigy FX Pro back in April. I found it to be an excellent budget sound card, even though it lacked support for formats such as DTS over the included SPDIF port. Anyway, Creative reached out to me again asking if I was interested in reviewing the Sound Blaster AE-X. It is a card mainly targeted at headphone wearers, which I'll get into a bit later. Before we get underway, here is a disclaimer: Creative Labs provided a free sample without any review pre-approval. Here are the full specs of it: Creative Sound Blaster AE-X Dimensions: 179 x 126 x 18 mm Weight: 263g / 9.28 oz Platform: PCI-e DAC: ESS ES9039Q2M Connectivity Options Side: Rear: 1 x HD Audio Front Panel Connector, 1 x ⅛“ Headphone port, 1 x RCA Line-out (Left) port, 1 x RCA Line-out (Right) port, 1 x Coaxial SPDIF-out port, 1 x ⅛“ Mic in/Line-in port, 1 x TOSLINK SPDIF-in port Surround: No DNR / SNR: THD+N: 0.0001% Dynamic Range 130 dB Recording Resolution: PCM up to 32-bit / 192kHz (Stereo) Direct Mode: Line Out (Stereo): PCM up to 32-bit  384 kHz Coaxial SPDIF Out: PCM up to 24-bit 192.0 kHz Headphone Amp: PCM up to 32-bit / 384kHz (Stereo) Native DSD: DSD64, DSD128, DSD256 Output Impedance: 1Ω, Supported Headphone Impedance: 8–600Ω, IEM: 0.5Vrms, Low: 1.5Vrms, Mid: 3Vrms, High: 6Vrms, Maximum output power: 350mW @ 32Ω (High), Maximum output voltage: 6Vrms (High) Front Panel Headphone Amp: PCM up to 32-bit / 192kHz (Stereo) Native DSD: DSD64, DSD128 Output Impedance: 10Ω, Supported Headphone Impedance: 32–300Ω, Maximum output power: 40mW @ 32Ω, Maximum output voltage: 1.9Vrms ASIO: ASIO 2.3 Total Harmonic Distortion: THD+N: 0.0006% Dynamic Range: 114 dB Scout Mode: Yes EMI shielding: No (but it passed all the FCC emission tests) Operating temperature: 0–45°C Input Power: 12V⎓0.5A Warranty: 1 Year (MSRP) Price: $179.99 / £169.99 The Sound Blaster AE-X was announced at the end of May, and it becomes clear that it is mainly for headphone wearers. I should also note that the card does not support DDL/DTS encoding technology, but it is said to support decoding through the coaxial SPDIF port. I was able to test this working with the classic Windows Sound properties, but I could not get a DTS (decode) signal through my Logitech Z906, it defaulted to 3D sound whenever I played DTS content through Plex or Emby. In addition, this card only supports two channels (stereo) over the speakers. The surround support is limited to the Headphone Amp, so before I get underway, what we have here is a card mostly intended for headphone use, especially with its SPDIF In (Toslink) port where you could connect another device like a console. So what about the highlights of this card? The AE-X is powered by the ESS SABRE DAC (ES9039Q2M), which is capable of a 130 dB dynamic range. In addition, it supports 32-bit/384 kHz playback for deeper detail and clarity. The headphone amplifier delivers up to 350 mW @ 32Ω, which admittedly far surpasses standard onboard audio, offering support for studio-grade headphones. DSD256 and ASIO 2.3 are also supported. What doesn't it have? No support for What-U-Hear, Super X-Fi, or the SmartComms Kit No EMI shielding, but it passed all the FCC emission tests (from the FAQ) I also want to make it clear that I am no audiophile. For me, it's purely subjective and it should just "work" out of the box. First impressions As I said in the introduction, I was a bit sad to see that the AE-X only supports stereo output, meaning it would not be on par with my ALC1220 over my speakers, as I mentioned it seems like this card is marketed toward headphone users. Since I am not an avid gamer that would rule me out as a potential customer, but I can still test its capabilities! The card arrived in a nice-looking box, as shown above. It's quite a bit larger than the Audify FX Pro that I reviewed back in April, and at first I thought the covering meant that it was EMI shielded, but it isn't as mentioned above in the highlights section. What's in the box: 1 x Sound Blaster AE-X PCIe card 1 x 3.5 mm CTIA TRRS to Dual TRS Headset Splitter Cable 1 x Quick Start Guide Aside from the Quick Start Guide, which someone at my age (I guess) needs a magnifying glass to read thanks to the tiny fonts, Creative Labs also has the manual online, which first requires you to prove that you're human in order to access it (so I can't direct link it). Anyway, the box is mostly made up of cardboard, and the only plastic in it is the anti-static bag for the card itself. Design Top Bottom The card itself looks pretty cool and actually wouldn't look out of place in an all-white build. There's only one connector, and for some reason it is awkwardly placed on the side (front-facing) that is for the front panel audio connector, which will let you use the headphones through the front PC audio jack. Since the front panel Headphone Amp has fewer capabilities than the rear headphone port, I decided not to use it. Rear of card PCI-e interface The rear of the card is completely open and is normally where you would find the front panel connector. The PCIe interface side is completely covered, which initially made me think it was EMI shielded. I/O panel Side (front-facing) with Front panel connector On the outer rear bracket side we have the TOSLINK SPDIF in, Coaxial SPDIF out, RCA line out (Right), RCA line out (Left), Headphone out, and Mic/Line in ports. On the front facing portion of the card itself is the F-panel connector. Usage Test System Our test system consists of the following: AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D Gigabyte X870E AORUS MASTER (BIOS F12) Corsair RM1000x (2024) Thermal Grizzly Kyronaut (33x33x0,2mm) 2x 32GB Kingston Fury Beast RGB DDR5 6000MT/s CL36-38-38-80 T-Force Z540 2TB (PCIe Gen5) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Founders Edition (NVIDIA) Creative Sound Blaster AE-X Windows 11 25H2 Pro I installed the card into the Gigabyte X870E AORUS MASTER which includes the RealTek ALC1220 onboard audio. For our subjective listening tests, I used the Coaxial SPDIF port to my Logitech Z906 speakers. For headphone tests I used the OneOdio Studio Max 2 Wireless DJ Headphones that I reviewed last month. After installing the audio driver, I installed Creative Nexus, which is a relatively new app designed for the latest Sound Blaster cards. Then I discovered the AE-X needed both a driver update from 1.00.15.0001 to 1.01.09.000 and a firmware update from 1.00.06.0000 to 1.00.06.0002, then I was set to go. It should be noted that the card did not work without the driver (not Plug and Play). As you can see above, you can manage the firmware, driver, and inputs via Advanced Settings on the Device tab. By default Nexus enabled "Direct Mode". Upon clicking on Acoustic Engine, the Equalizer can be enabled and set to four different presets, which are: Gaming Music Movies Footsteps Enhancer There's also a dedicated Scout Mode for gamers. I mainly used Tidal and Spotify in the past week to listen to some of my Liked Songs (which now total over 700) in Shuffle mode; there were no pops or interference that I could hear. I also found a 5.1 Surround Music playlist on Tidal that sounded really great over Studio Max 2 headphones. When I reviewed the Audigy FX Pro, I went out and purchased a Logitech Z906 set second-hand for €100 specifically to use with the card, but in this instance all I could get on the AE-X was the 3D output of surround sound through Coaxial SPDIF and although it still sounded great, it isn't quite as good as DTS Interactive via my onboard Realtek ALC1220. Conclusion So what have I learned? The AE-X lacks multi-channel support for 5.1/7.1 setups and drops support for modern surround technologies like Dolby or DTS, functioning strictly as a stereo output device. So to really benefit, you will need Studio-grade headphones to "hear" the benefits of this card. With that being said, I can imagine it will appeal to gamers who are switching between console and PC. By utilizing the SPDIF in port, you could just plug your headphones into the AE-X (front or rear port) and then switch between PC and Console without having to move the headphones to a different port. As I said in the Sound Blaster Audigy review, the EQ in the Creative Nexus app offers safe presets, which allows a user to further tweak the lows, mids, and highs for a personal listening experience. Of course it all depends on the headphones you hook up to it. Speaking of headphones, I kind of wish I had higher-quality Studio-grade headphones to really test this card with; I'm not usually wearing headphones in my day to day duties. The only time I will wear them is if I want to listen to music very late at night and I don't want to disturb my neighbors, so my rating (verdict) is based on this fact. Someone with a PC/Console setup and wears headphone religiously to game, and consume media will benefit much more than I from the high-quality Headphone Amps that are included in the AE-X. Once again, I do feel like Creative could have gone the extra mile to support the S/PDIF port a bit more. Why include it if you're not supporting the main popular digital formats? It seems like the decision was more of a legacy-based one, offering uncompressed 2-channel PCM audio, for users with high-fidelity audio systems and external DACs. Maybe I will be lucky enough to review a card that truly includes all these features in the future. I am sure readers with far more knowledge on audio systems than me will correct me in the comments below. I'll just say I am happy to learn what I don't know! Where to buy The Sound Blaster AE-X is available to purchase now in preorder for $179.99 on the U.S. Creative website, or for £169.99 on the Creative UK website and will start shipping to customers from June 25.
    • $80 or 90%, anything else would be financial suicide one way or another.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      513
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      165
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      88
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!