[Cancelled] Heroes Season 4 (Volume 5 : Redemption)


Recommended Posts

The ending was decent but I really thought the episode sucked. I haven't said that about many episodes but wow, what the heck was wrong with this one.

I felt the same way. It just didn't seem "good" until the last 5 minutes.

All of you have really undependable opinions. If you are offended by that comment, disconnect your computer from the internet. I thought it was a decent episode. Nothing spectacular, but the ending was good.

So yeah I thought last nights episode was very slow, and basically a filler episode, and like you guys the last 5 mins was the best. Question though..

Didn't Peter give up his "speed" last episode to pick up something else? But now he has speed back? Or am I lost.

:D

I can see why you put that.

Panettiere 'asked for lesbian storyline'

I felt the same way. It just didn't seem "good" until the last 5 minutes.

+1

So yeah I thought last nights episode was very slow, and basically a filler episode, and like you guys the last 5 mins was the best. Question though..

Didn't Peter give up his "speed" last episode to pick up something else? But now he has speed back? Or am I lost.

People just Assumed that he lost speed.

All of you have really undependable opinions. If you are offended by that comment, disconnect your computer from the internet. I thought it was a decent episode. Nothing spectacular, but the ending was good.

So an opinion has to be dependable? You have to count on somebody saying what YOU want them to say? Sheesh, sorry but agree to disagree on this one.

Awful episode, except for Sylar's return. Now, he shouldn't have any memories, since they are all in Parkman's head, right?

If they want to get the show back on the right track, they need to get Peter his original ability back and have him and Sylar finally throw down for more than 2 seconds of screen time. I hate the use of the abilities just to use them, but everyone has been waiting for that since S1.

The ending was decent but I really thought the episode sucked. I haven't said that about many episodes but wow, what the heck was wrong with this one.

I thought the ending was obvious. I felt that Millie was probably a lot like Angela in the fact that she's ruthless and gets what she wants. When Nathan told her that he had something to do with her daughter's death, and that his m, err, family had something to do with cleaning it up, I assume she was going to have Nathan killed. And to me, logic dictated Sylar would return. Not to mention that Parkman didn't show up at all in this episode, which meant Sylar wasn't in the episode, and I knew the writers couldn't help themselves but have Sylar come back somehow dramatic.

Another total **** episode. In Season One we all knew where the season was headed. There was clear direction, but they haven't had clear direction since then and until they get back to that, we're never going to have a good show again. It is suffering from the exact same thing Lost suffered from in Seasons Two and Three. When they got that end date, the show, in Season Four, became fantastic and only got better. Heroes needs an end date.

I thought the ending was obvious. I felt that Millie was probably a lot like Angela in the fact that she's ruthless and gets what she wants. When Nathan told her that he had something to do with her daughter's death, and that his m, err, family had something to do with cleaning it up, I assume she was going to have Nathan killed. And to me, logic dictated Sylar would return. Not to mention that Parkman didn't show up at all in this episode, which meant Sylar wasn't in the episode, and I knew the writers couldn't help themselves but have Sylar come back somehow dramatic.

Another total **** episode. In Season One we all knew where the season was headed. There was clear direction, but they haven't had clear direction since then and until they get back to that, we're never going to have a good show again. It is suffering from the exact same thing Lost suffered from in Seasons Two and Three. When they got that end date, the show, in Season Four, became fantastic and only got better. Heroes needs an end date.

I remember seeing Sylar's head surface from the ground in one of the previews for Season 4 sometime ago, so I knew it was coming :p

Too many mistakes have happened in Heroes and they are now suffering. I enjoyed Season 3 better Season 4 so far. As for Lost, I didn't think Season Two suffered, the first half of the season was fantastic, it dipped in the middle and picked up towards the end. Season 3 was a good season too, besides Nikki and Paulo :no:

I thought the ending was obvious. I felt that Millie was probably a lot like Angela in the fact that she's ruthless and gets what she wants. When Nathan told her that he had something to do with her daughter's death, and that his m, err, family had something to do with cleaning it up, I assume she was going to have Nathan killed. And to me, logic dictated Sylar would return. Not to mention that Parkman didn't show up at all in this episode, which meant Sylar wasn't in the episode, and I knew the writers couldn't help themselves but have Sylar come back somehow dramatic.

Another total **** episode. In Season One we all knew where the season was headed. There was clear direction, but they haven't had clear direction since then and until they get back to that, we're never going to have a good show again. It is suffering from the exact same thing Lost suffered from in Seasons Two and Three. When they got that end date, the show, in Season Four, became fantastic and only got better. Heroes needs an end date.

Heroes has an end date. I doubt it will make it to it, though.

Heroes has an end date. I doubt it will make it to it, though.

Oh it does, does it? I did not know that. Then if that's true, I would have thought that the show would get some sort of overall story arc then, but so far it doesn't seem like that it does. At least not like the first season. Unless I'm missing something.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Qualcomm takes on NVIDIA with new Dragonfly CPU and AI chips by Pradeep Viswanathan Microsoft, Google, Amazon, AMD, Meta, Apple, OpenAI, and several others have been developing their own chips for AI infrastructure. However, NVIDIA still remains the dominant player in the market. Today, Qualcomm announced a major expansion of its data center infrastructure portfolio to better compete with NVIDIA. The new lineup includes the Qualcomm Dragonfly C1000 CPU, Qualcomm High Bandwidth Compute technology, the Dragonfly AI300 inference accelerator, new connectivity products, and custom silicon solutions. Qualcomm claims that this new lineup improves performance per watt, token throughput, and total cost of ownership for AI data centers. The Dragonfly C1000 is a new data center CPU built with Qualcomm’s custom Oryon cores. This chip will feature more than 250 cores, frequencies above 5GHz, and a chiplet-based design. Qualcomm claims that this new C1000 can deliver more than 2x better performance per watt compared to existing server CPU offerings based on specifications. The Dragonfly C1000 will support PCIe Gen 7 with more than 2TB/s of connectivity, along with CXL, advanced RAS features, and both air and liquid cooling. Qualcomm expects the Dragonfly C1000 to be commercially available in 2028. Additionally, Qualcomm and Meta announced a multi-year, multi-generation agreement under which Qualcomm will supply Dragonfly C1000 data center CPUs for Meta’s next-generation server fleet. Qualcomm also announced High Bandwidth Compute, a new near-memory computing architecture designed to address AI’s memory bandwidth bottleneck. HBC Gen 1 will debut with the Dragonfly AI250, which is expected to sample in mid-2027. The AI250 will deliver 133TB/s per card, an 18x increase in effective memory bandwidth compared to the AI200 with LPDDR5X. The new Dragonfly AI300 with HBC Gen 2 is a rack-level AI inference platform from Qualcomm. Qualcomm claims that the AI300 can deliver 4x to 8x better performance per watt compared to existing GPU-based architectures based on memory bandwidth per watt per card. The Dragonfly AI300 is expected to be available in 2028.
    • IBM reveals sub-1nm chip technology, production expected in another 5 years by Pradeep Viswanathan TSMC is now leading the chip manufacturing industry with its 2nm-class process node called N2. Samsung Foundry also has a 2nm-class process node called SF2. TSMC says N2 entered volume production in Q4 2025. Samsung says SF2 started mass production in 2025. Today, IBM announced the world’s first sub-1-nanometer chip technology, marking another major semiconductor research milestone. The new technology is based on a 0.7nm, or 7-angstrom, node and uses a new transistor architecture called “nanostack.” The new design vertically stacks and staggers nanosheet-based transistors so that more components can fit into the same chip area while also improving performance and power efficiency. IBM claims that this new sub-1nm chip can pack nearly 100 billion transistors onto a chip the size of a fingernail. This offers almost twice the density, up to 50 percent higher performance, or 70 percent better energy efficiency when compared to IBM's 2nm node design announced back in 2021. Also, IBM mentioned that this new architecture can deliver 40 percent SRAM scaling. It is important to consider that this announcement from IBM is a research milestone rather than a near-term process node launch. Back in 2021, IBM unveiled the world’s first 2nm chip design, claiming 50 billion transistors on a fingernail-sized chip and major performance and efficiency gains. Five years later, IBM’s 2nm technology has still not entered mainstream commercial production. That is because IBM is no longer a major commercial chip manufacturer. It sold its chip manufacturing business to GlobalFoundries years ago and has since then focused only on semiconductor research, IP development, and partnerships. To productize its 2-nm chip technology, IBM partnered with Japan’s Rapidus, but it has not resulted in anything shipping at scale. IBM says that its new sub-1nm technology can reach production as early as within the next five years. If that happens, it will likely depend on manufacturing partners, advanced EUV tooling, and years of yield improvements.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Meta Plast earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      kinowa earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      461
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      171
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      136
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!