Is it worth it for Vista users to upgrade to 7?


...  

222 members have voted

  1. 1. Will you upgrade to 7?

    • Yes
      178
    • No
      17
    • Not sure
      27
  2. 2. What's your experience with Vista?

    • Great
      132
    • Average
      66
    • Terrible
      19
    • Not sure
      5


Recommended Posts

Vista seems really sluggish to me, XP just seemed faster. I will upgrade to 7, I just hope people who upgrade from Vista get a discount or something.

That's unfair because the only people I know of who had problems with Windows Vista was those people whose hardware wasn't up to scratch or wasn't even average.

Been using Windows Vista 32-bit SP1 and testing Windows 7 RC x64. While 7 is faster and does offer several compelling new features, I did run into reliability problems. Things are great while it lasts, but sometimes start behaving wildly - sound stops working (and when this happens, trying to play any media in WMP hangs it), window thumbnails stop popping up reliably, problems with ClickOnce deployed applications, WinForms (at least some controls) are slower than in Vista and others. Add to that with some backwards steps including removal of tag editor and navigation of videos by artists in WMP12. Most of these problems I would attribute to lack of maturity in driver and application ecosystem around Windows 7.

That I don't have any issues with Windows Vista SP1, I can wait a few months longer before I move to Windows 7 as my primary OS. Hopefully, that extra time will be enough to roll out a few reliability updates across the drivers, applications and the core OS itself to smooth out the initial turbulence.

Will I upgrade to 7 from Vista? Already have.

Using the RC on three "production" machines and my experience has been nearly flawless. Two of those machines are running demonstrably better than they were on Vista RC1 (the third was recently built and never had Vista--I suspect that what few issues I've had on that machine with Win7 wouldn't have been far off from what Vista would have done).

Windows 7 presents a compelling upgrade proposition for a few reasons. Calum's post nicely describes the UI enhancement of the SuperBar, and I second his sentiments. It is a nice improvement and helps make Aero Glass a genuine functional step up from Aero Basic. I would agree, though, that the SuperBar isn't a good reason to upgrade on its own.

First, I expect Windows 7 to be the first client where 64-bit will be in the majority. I don't know how it's breaking out with the downloads, but I think it's a safe bet that Microsoft and OEMs have agreed to limit the number of new machines with the 32-bit version. As 64-bit support spreads, a majority of Vista users will feel some pressure to upgrade, if only for the additional RAM support. While they could upgrade to Vista x64, my guess is most of those users will just go to Win7. The vast majority of systems built in the past three years will support x64, and I know I deliberately built and bought 64-bit-compatible systems just to keep them (relatively) future-proof.

Gamers on Vista (and there many more now than there were even a year ago) will upgrade because of the new memory model for graphics that no longer maintains a duplicate of the drawn windows in RAM. This is the reason why Vista grinds to a halt with too many windows open, and Win7 dispenses with it. Of course, gamers are pathological upgraders anyway...

Hardcore geeks and power users will like the new XP Mode. The integration features in the latest beta for VirtualPC are fantastic, and point the way to a new way to maintain legacy compatibility.

I liked Vista. It represented a significant shift in Windows archetecture with new subsystems like Windows Presentation Foundation and Windows Communication Foundation. The only real problem with Vista was the way it conflicted with legacy hardware and software. In the past two years much more of the "ecosystem" has come to depend on WPF and WCF, and less dependent on legacy technology. Win7 is pretty much perfectly compatible with Vista on these counts.

I'm sure if I tried Windows 7, I would have gone with a solid "Yes", but I haven't tried it yet and I'm not as excited over it as some of you are, so as it stands, "Not sure" is my answer.

I got Vista last year and didn't see what all the fuss was about. I guess all the kinks were rolled out of Vista by then? It works very well for me... aside from the forgetful folders that can't remember my view settings.

I've been using both Vista 64 sp1 (Legal) and Win7 64 RC (dual boot) for graphics/video apps.

On my main rig (E6750/8gb), any performance differences are slight at best. Definitely,

DOES NOT justify paying for the upgrade (Vista to Win7).

However, clean installs of Win7 RC on my older 2gb WinXP machines resulted in noticeable performance increases.

To answer the threads question ... "Is it worth it for VISTA users to upgrade to 7" ....

the answer for me is no.

Obviously, your poll results will be skewed considerably by the non-paying warez crowd.

Maybe I'll upgrade to 7, my main issue isn't really Windows its the eco system surrounding it. NVIDIA drivers for example have never really been pro quality for me in Vista and nothing has changed with 7. I'm not ready to pay up for Windows 7 if NVIDIA can't even get their drivers sorted out.

It is so much worth upgrading Vista to Seven, there UI is generally the same besides some noticeable tweaks and improvements. The performance is amazingly faster, you can run Seven on a net-book without a problem, not so much with Vista.

Try to dual boot the operating system and see what you like best - yet keep what you had before Windows Seven.

I would upgrate if it was FREE, i won't pay for another windows again, i'm fine with vista sp1 and sp2 will be great.

It is free for just about a year, then Windows will turn your computer off every 2 or so hours until it annoys the living hell out of you - therefore forcing you to buy the official release disk.

Download Windows 7 from the Microsoft Download Page and then burn the disk to a DVD or boot from a Flash Drive if you know how. Try it out, you'll like it and it's completely free.

I'm going to wait until they reveal the prices. I want to upgrade but actually upgrading will depend on the cost of Windows 7. I'm currently running Windows Vista Ultimate and, as you may already know, it wasn't cheap. Also, DirectX 11 support was a big reason for me to upgrade but I found out that it's going to be available for Windows Vista as well. Aside from the various performance improvements, UI tweaks, and superbar, I really don't see any other reason to upgrade.

Windows 7 is a hands down winner compared to Vista. There's no way I would think otherwise about it now.

After dealing with a Vista laptop tonight for 4 hours (just finished) - Yeah. Bring on Win7 already!

(In comparison, I also worked on an XP computer tonight, it was done 2 hours ago.)

I love having XP around, but with Win7 having XP-M in it, I get the best of both worlds now. (Y)

*facepalm* Just because you can't use Vista properly (if Vista is really the problem for that computer, taking 4 hours to fix it is downright laughable) doesn't mean it's a bad OS. It's still far and away better of an overall OS than XP ever was. I wonder if XP mode will also introduce XP's inherent failings at malware resilience to Windows 7. Hardly something many people would want, given XP can be credited (or blamed) for introducing most of the worst malware the world has ever seen to the consumer market.

That said, as soon as this resolution glitch I have with 7 is resolved, I'll upgrade to it.

It is so much worth upgrading Vista to Seven, there UI is generally the same besides some noticeable tweaks and improvements. The performance is amazingly faster, you can run Seven on a net-book without a problem, not so much with Vista.

The performance is "amazingly faster" on lower-end hardware. I have a decent machine and the pure performance difference between Vista SP2 and 7 RC on it is negligible. In fact, my hardware seems to get throttled by Windows 7. Every fan within the case goes nuts.

I've had no problems with Vista at all. There are those rare times though, when it just seems to hang before it does something but like I previously said, Vista has been primo for me. Given that, I'm a sucker for a new OS and Windows 7 is the latest and therefore better. I'll be trying to get my hands on it.

For Vista users, there is definitely NO need to upgrade. Vista performs great and the real new features of Win7 (DirectAccess, Brachcache, Bitlocker2Go) are not available to the Home Editions of Win7 and require a Windows Server 2008 R2 server to work.

If you are a XP user throw the XP disks away and move to NT6.x in the form of Win7, Vista users could stay with Vista :)

i am going to simply because its the newest OS

i tried the beta and didnt find it much faster than my vista sp2, but i didnt use it much and didnt have much stuff installed on it

I have to agree that 7 on a dual core and 2 gigs or more of RAM will see little to no performance increase. For me the upgrade is worth it simply because of all the polish and nice touches all over the place. When using Vista now, I almost feel about it the way I did XP when using it after Vista. It just seems dated and a little ugly to look at. The cleaner look, improved start menu search results, Aero Peek, the ability to size a window to half the screen with gesture instead of jumping through hoops and the improvements in Explorer are big factors in my decision to switch at RTM.

Then again, I haven't purchased the OS for my new system and am using the RC in the mean time to get me by so i don't have to purchase Windows twice.

Edited by soonerproud
Vista SP1 is pretty high on performance. Vista is patched and performs. So why would I move to Windows 7?

I wouldn?t. Windows 7 just does not offer enough new features or any compelling reason for me to spend a hefty sum on an upgrade.

is this a serious question? YES move to 7 but don't EVER upgrade, do a fresh clean install.

Any reason why? Or are you still caught up in the Windows-7-UAC-is-unsafe nonsense?

It is not like it is hard to turn the slider up if he/she is worried about the default UAC setting. That is the first thing I do after initial installation of programs, drivers and changing the Windows setting to my taste on a new install.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Go for a Echo Dot or Pop instead. These Echo shows just advertise to you.
    • NetSpeedTray 1.3.3 by Razvan Serea NetSpeedTray is a lightweight, open-source Windows network monitor that shows live upload and download speeds directly on the Taskbar. Designed for efficiency, it quietly sits in the system tray, conserving CPU and battery with dynamic updates. It blends seamlessly with Windows 10/11, adapts to light/dark themes, and auto-positions to avoid overlaps. Features include accurate interface detection, customizable display, optional mini-graph, color coding, granular font and unit control, detailed per-interface history graphs, safe data management, and easy CSV export—bringing the network monitoring Windows forgot. NetSpeedTray key features: Lightweight & Efficient Runs quietly in your system tray without consuming resources. Features a "Dynamic Update Rate" that lowers refresh frequency when the network is idle to save CPU and battery life. Native Look & Feel Blends seamlessly with Windows 10/11 UI. Smart detection for light and dark taskbar themes ensures text is always visible. Intelligent & Adaptive Positioning Automatically finds empty space next to your system tray and shifts to make room for new icons, preventing overlaps. Seamless OS Integration Behaves like a native Windows component. Hides instantly with auto-hiding taskbar Hides when a fullscreen app is active Smart Network Monitoring Accurate by Default: Auto mode identifies your main internet connection and ignores noise from VPNs or virtual adapters. Easy Interface Selection: Switch effortlessly between Auto, All, or Selected network interfaces via intuitive radio buttons. Total Visual Customization Free Move Mode: Unlock and place the widget anywhere on your screen. Optional Mini-Graph: Real-time graph of recent network activity with adjustable opacity. Color Coding: Customize colors and speed thresholds to quickly see network status. Granular Display Control Text & Font: Adjust font family, size, weight, and alignment. Units: Automatic (B/s, KB/s, MB/s) or fixed Mbps display. Precision: Set decimal places and always show them for uniform appearance. Detailed & Intelligent History Graph Smart Scale: Logarithmic scale shows low-level traffic and large spikes clearly. Per-Interface Filtering: View speed history for specific adapters (Wi-Fi, Ethernet, VPN). Safe & Efficient Data Management: Adjustable retention, automatic cleanup, optimized database. Easy Data Export: Export raw data to .csv or save high-quality graphs for reports. NetSpeedTray v1.3.3: The Updater Fix A stabilization release that repairs a critical regression in v1.3.2: the app shipped without OpenSSL, which silently broke every HTTPS request — including the built-in update checker (the "Could not check for updates" error many of you hit). This release restores it, hardens the build so it can't happen again, and fixes a startup crash plus four other reported bugs. Changes: Fixed update checking — Resolved a critical issue that prevented the app from checking for updates ("Could not check for updates"). Fixed startup crash with Auto-Cycling — The app no longer crashes on launch after enabling Cycle display mode. Fixed incorrect network speeds on 10GbE adapters — Multi-gigabit network cards now display speeds correctly instead of being stuck at 0. Improved color coding — Default color is shown when idle, and color/threshold changes now apply immediately without restarting. Fullscreen visibility fix — The widget now correctly stays visible over fullscreen apps when Keep Visible is enabled. Improved AMD Ryzen temperature detection — More reliable CPU temperature monitoring for Ryzen processors. Cleaner upgrades — Installer now removes outdated application files during upgrades, preventing DLL/version conflicts while preserving user settings. Improved stability — Fixed potential DLL loading issues by excluding critical OpenSSL and NumPy components from UPX compression. Better settings window — Scrollbars removed and layout improved for a cleaner experience. Localization improvements — Updated translations and completed missing UI text across all supported languages. More reliable releases — Added regression tests covering recent critical fixes, bringing the test suite to 196 passing tests. [full release notes] Download: NetSpeedTray 1.3.3 | 87.9 MB (Open Source) Download: NetSpeedTray Portable | 101.0 MB View: NetSpeedTray Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Why Delta Chat is the best decentralized messenger you have probably never tried by Paul Hill There is no shortage of messaging apps out there; we have WhatsApp, Messenger, and Telegram, just to name a few. While Meta has taken steps to incorporate encryption into Messenger and WhatsApp, they still leave a lot to be desired. If you are in the market for a messaging app that promotes security, privacy, and optional anonymity, you'll want to read what I have to say about Delta Chat. For those not familiar with Delta Chat, rather than relying on centralized servers as you do with Facebook Messenger, it relies on email. Essentially, it is a chat interface that feels like a messaging app, but secretly in the background, it is firing off emails. In the past, you used to have to sign in with your email account. When you sent messages to people, it would just be sending encrypted messages to their inbox, which their Delta Chat client would decrypt. When I first learned about Delta Chat, it required users to sign in with an email account, but I was pleasantly surprised upon trying it in 2026 that this is no longer a requirement, or the preferred method was to use the app. Recently, I’ve tried UAD-ng on my old Nokia 3.4 to disable most of the Google apps because the bootloader is locked, and this is the next best option. While finding replacement apps in F-Droid, I came across Delta Chat again, and it has undergone quite a big change since I last used it, with its new chatmail relays, which no longer require you to sign in to your own email account, providing anonymity, and they offer greater security. Android and Desktop Delta Chat apps. Not only does it run on my de-googled phone, but it also works on desktop computers and iOS, making it truly ubiquitous. For me, Delta Chat is a wonderful alternative messenger because it gives you more control. It supports switching between different profiles, which you can set up super quickly; you don’t register a username, you don’t register a password. The only thing you do have is a random string email address on a chatmail relay (which you don’t have to memorize). To maintain access to your profile, you just need to add a second device to your account via QR code or make a backup of your account, which you can restore later. Fail to do these, your account is gone - as it should be if you don’t want to leave accounts that could get hacked later on. My decision to block Google stuff on my Nokia was done for practical reasons; the device sucked when it launched, and it sucks even more now. The nice thing about F-Droid and the apps within is that they’re usually lightweight, free of bloat, and work well on that device. What was inconvenient for me was that it was hard to send messages from that device, say if I wanted to copy a code over to my main phone or send family members a link from that device. That’s when I decided to look at the available chat apps and saw Delta Chat. Another nice thing about Delta Chat is its notifications. Some messaging apps rely on Google’s ecosystem for notification transport on Android; however, with Delta Chat, it can use Google’s solutions if you have Play Services or MicroG installed. Otherwise, it is able to keep a background connection to the chatmail relay server so that you can get notified when you receive a message. As free software, the code of Delta Chat is open for all who want to take it and build upon it. In the future, if the developers of Delta Chat make a catastrophically bad decision and take the app in an undesirable direction, users can take the code and fork the project. This contrasts with closed-source apps from corporations that can take their products in any direction they like. By relying on free software instead of closed-source programs, you actually control your computing. I’ve spoken at length about how running this type of software is like owning your own home rather than renting it. The same applies here; if you use Delta Chat, you don’t need to worry about it going away in the future. Whether it is Telegram, WhatsApp, or Messenger, you are required to register a username and password to use these services. A major flaw in this design is that anyone can try various passwords and potentially break into your account with your complete chat history intact. Sure, there is encryption in Messenger, where you need a second PIN and two-factor authentication in Telegram, but breaches happen all the time. Unlike before, when you used to sign in to your email account to send and receive messages, the primary way to do it now is to create an account on a chatmail relay. The resulting email address is a random string followed by the name of the relay you pick. This means you can start and begin adding contacts Without a username and password, you either need to ensure you have a backup or at least one device running your Delta Chat profile. The primary way to log in on another device is to go to the settings and add a second device. Then, you’ll just scan a QR code with your new device, and it’ll log in to your account and sync all your chat history and contacts. To end users, Delta Chat just looks like any instant messenger; however, it is really sending your messages as encrypted emails to your contact. This is pretty cool from a censorship perspective, as it makes the service more difficult to block. Previously, the main way to use the app was by logging in with email, but nowadays, it’s recommended that you use chatmail relays. Chatmail relays temporarily hold messages in case your device is offline. They are cheap, simple servers that don’t store data as group states. Other information, like your name and avatar, only exists on your device and the devices of those you share your contact information with. The relays are also decentralized and operated by various groups and individuals. It is even possible to set up your own chatmail relay, but most people will want to use one hosted elsewhere. To keep your messages secure, Delta Chat uses a secure subset of the OpenPGP standard that gives you automatic end-to-end encryption. It also uses Secure-Join to exchange encryption setup information through QR-code scanning or invite links. Autocrypt is also used to automatically establish end-to-end encryption between contacts and all members of group chat, but sometime this year Autocrypt v2 will be rolled out, bringing post-quantum resistant encryption and forward secrecy. The Delta Chat FAQ is an interesting read that explains many more details about the app. Credit: Pexels Delta Chat is unique among messaging apps because it is built on email, a technology that’s decades old and isn’t going anywhere soon. What’s more is that email is not centralized either, so it’s far more difficult for any authoritarian regime to disrupt the Delta Chat app. I haven’t spoken too much about features yet, so I will do that now. Delta Chat allows you to do one-on-one chats, group chats, and create channels. It also supports file sharing and making audio and video calls when chatting one-to-one, but it’s not available for group chats right now. At the time of writing, the calling functionality is disabled and can be enabled in Settings > Advanced > Debug Calls. I have used the video calling feature, and the quality is excellent. It works over WebRTC, another open standard. The app also lets you send voice notes, enables disappearing messages, and has its own app ecosystem. I did try playing chess one time there, but it was a bit spotty; though, we did manage to complete the game with a victory for me. To add people to Delta Chat, you can either give them your Delta Chat link or your QR code to scan. These are the only ways to add users, so you won't have any spam bots bothering you. If the people you want to chat with don't have the app yet, just send them your link, and it will take them to a webpage where they can install the app and then add you. It's really quick for them to install it and get started, which is nice. Credit: Microsoft. The Majorana 2 quantum chip unveiled in 2026. I do not think quantum computers are too far out now, and I do hope that Delta Chat is able to push out Autocrypt v2 sooner, rather than later, so bad actors do not attempt to collect encrypted communications and then decrypt them in the future using quantum computers. By getting people’s messages post-quantum-safe now, users won’t have to worry when quantum computers start cracking legacy encryption. Overall, I would recommend this app to people who are already past WhatsApp and Messenger and have perhaps begun using apps like Telegram or Session. It shares a lot of characteristics with these apps and goes a lot further than Telegram in terms of security. By being based on email, it is also resistant to censorship, and the lack of a username and password makes you anonymous (if you want to be) and safe from brute force password cracking attempts. Let me know in the comments if you’ve tried Delta Chat recently. Do you think it's a good bulwark against governments that are tightening their grip on the internet?
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      474
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      220
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      156
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      73
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!