Is it worth it for Vista users to upgrade to 7?


...  

222 members have voted

  1. 1. Will you upgrade to 7?

    • Yes
      178
    • No
      17
    • Not sure
      27
  2. 2. What's your experience with Vista?

    • Great
      132
    • Average
      66
    • Terrible
      19
    • Not sure
      5


Recommended Posts

Vista seems really sluggish to me, XP just seemed faster. I will upgrade to 7, I just hope people who upgrade from Vista get a discount or something.

That's unfair because the only people I know of who had problems with Windows Vista was those people whose hardware wasn't up to scratch or wasn't even average.

Been using Windows Vista 32-bit SP1 and testing Windows 7 RC x64. While 7 is faster and does offer several compelling new features, I did run into reliability problems. Things are great while it lasts, but sometimes start behaving wildly - sound stops working (and when this happens, trying to play any media in WMP hangs it), window thumbnails stop popping up reliably, problems with ClickOnce deployed applications, WinForms (at least some controls) are slower than in Vista and others. Add to that with some backwards steps including removal of tag editor and navigation of videos by artists in WMP12. Most of these problems I would attribute to lack of maturity in driver and application ecosystem around Windows 7.

That I don't have any issues with Windows Vista SP1, I can wait a few months longer before I move to Windows 7 as my primary OS. Hopefully, that extra time will be enough to roll out a few reliability updates across the drivers, applications and the core OS itself to smooth out the initial turbulence.

Will I upgrade to 7 from Vista? Already have.

Using the RC on three "production" machines and my experience has been nearly flawless. Two of those machines are running demonstrably better than they were on Vista RC1 (the third was recently built and never had Vista--I suspect that what few issues I've had on that machine with Win7 wouldn't have been far off from what Vista would have done).

Windows 7 presents a compelling upgrade proposition for a few reasons. Calum's post nicely describes the UI enhancement of the SuperBar, and I second his sentiments. It is a nice improvement and helps make Aero Glass a genuine functional step up from Aero Basic. I would agree, though, that the SuperBar isn't a good reason to upgrade on its own.

First, I expect Windows 7 to be the first client where 64-bit will be in the majority. I don't know how it's breaking out with the downloads, but I think it's a safe bet that Microsoft and OEMs have agreed to limit the number of new machines with the 32-bit version. As 64-bit support spreads, a majority of Vista users will feel some pressure to upgrade, if only for the additional RAM support. While they could upgrade to Vista x64, my guess is most of those users will just go to Win7. The vast majority of systems built in the past three years will support x64, and I know I deliberately built and bought 64-bit-compatible systems just to keep them (relatively) future-proof.

Gamers on Vista (and there many more now than there were even a year ago) will upgrade because of the new memory model for graphics that no longer maintains a duplicate of the drawn windows in RAM. This is the reason why Vista grinds to a halt with too many windows open, and Win7 dispenses with it. Of course, gamers are pathological upgraders anyway...

Hardcore geeks and power users will like the new XP Mode. The integration features in the latest beta for VirtualPC are fantastic, and point the way to a new way to maintain legacy compatibility.

I liked Vista. It represented a significant shift in Windows archetecture with new subsystems like Windows Presentation Foundation and Windows Communication Foundation. The only real problem with Vista was the way it conflicted with legacy hardware and software. In the past two years much more of the "ecosystem" has come to depend on WPF and WCF, and less dependent on legacy technology. Win7 is pretty much perfectly compatible with Vista on these counts.

I'm sure if I tried Windows 7, I would have gone with a solid "Yes", but I haven't tried it yet and I'm not as excited over it as some of you are, so as it stands, "Not sure" is my answer.

I got Vista last year and didn't see what all the fuss was about. I guess all the kinks were rolled out of Vista by then? It works very well for me... aside from the forgetful folders that can't remember my view settings.

I've been using both Vista 64 sp1 (Legal) and Win7 64 RC (dual boot) for graphics/video apps.

On my main rig (E6750/8gb), any performance differences are slight at best. Definitely,

DOES NOT justify paying for the upgrade (Vista to Win7).

However, clean installs of Win7 RC on my older 2gb WinXP machines resulted in noticeable performance increases.

To answer the threads question ... "Is it worth it for VISTA users to upgrade to 7" ....

the answer for me is no.

Obviously, your poll results will be skewed considerably by the non-paying warez crowd.

Maybe I'll upgrade to 7, my main issue isn't really Windows its the eco system surrounding it. NVIDIA drivers for example have never really been pro quality for me in Vista and nothing has changed with 7. I'm not ready to pay up for Windows 7 if NVIDIA can't even get their drivers sorted out.

It is so much worth upgrading Vista to Seven, there UI is generally the same besides some noticeable tweaks and improvements. The performance is amazingly faster, you can run Seven on a net-book without a problem, not so much with Vista.

Try to dual boot the operating system and see what you like best - yet keep what you had before Windows Seven.

I would upgrate if it was FREE, i won't pay for another windows again, i'm fine with vista sp1 and sp2 will be great.

It is free for just about a year, then Windows will turn your computer off every 2 or so hours until it annoys the living hell out of you - therefore forcing you to buy the official release disk.

Download Windows 7 from the Microsoft Download Page and then burn the disk to a DVD or boot from a Flash Drive if you know how. Try it out, you'll like it and it's completely free.

I'm going to wait until they reveal the prices. I want to upgrade but actually upgrading will depend on the cost of Windows 7. I'm currently running Windows Vista Ultimate and, as you may already know, it wasn't cheap. Also, DirectX 11 support was a big reason for me to upgrade but I found out that it's going to be available for Windows Vista as well. Aside from the various performance improvements, UI tweaks, and superbar, I really don't see any other reason to upgrade.

Windows 7 is a hands down winner compared to Vista. There's no way I would think otherwise about it now.

After dealing with a Vista laptop tonight for 4 hours (just finished) - Yeah. Bring on Win7 already!

(In comparison, I also worked on an XP computer tonight, it was done 2 hours ago.)

I love having XP around, but with Win7 having XP-M in it, I get the best of both worlds now. (Y)

*facepalm* Just because you can't use Vista properly (if Vista is really the problem for that computer, taking 4 hours to fix it is downright laughable) doesn't mean it's a bad OS. It's still far and away better of an overall OS than XP ever was. I wonder if XP mode will also introduce XP's inherent failings at malware resilience to Windows 7. Hardly something many people would want, given XP can be credited (or blamed) for introducing most of the worst malware the world has ever seen to the consumer market.

That said, as soon as this resolution glitch I have with 7 is resolved, I'll upgrade to it.

It is so much worth upgrading Vista to Seven, there UI is generally the same besides some noticeable tweaks and improvements. The performance is amazingly faster, you can run Seven on a net-book without a problem, not so much with Vista.

The performance is "amazingly faster" on lower-end hardware. I have a decent machine and the pure performance difference between Vista SP2 and 7 RC on it is negligible. In fact, my hardware seems to get throttled by Windows 7. Every fan within the case goes nuts.

I've had no problems with Vista at all. There are those rare times though, when it just seems to hang before it does something but like I previously said, Vista has been primo for me. Given that, I'm a sucker for a new OS and Windows 7 is the latest and therefore better. I'll be trying to get my hands on it.

For Vista users, there is definitely NO need to upgrade. Vista performs great and the real new features of Win7 (DirectAccess, Brachcache, Bitlocker2Go) are not available to the Home Editions of Win7 and require a Windows Server 2008 R2 server to work.

If you are a XP user throw the XP disks away and move to NT6.x in the form of Win7, Vista users could stay with Vista :)

i am going to simply because its the newest OS

i tried the beta and didnt find it much faster than my vista sp2, but i didnt use it much and didnt have much stuff installed on it

I have to agree that 7 on a dual core and 2 gigs or more of RAM will see little to no performance increase. For me the upgrade is worth it simply because of all the polish and nice touches all over the place. When using Vista now, I almost feel about it the way I did XP when using it after Vista. It just seems dated and a little ugly to look at. The cleaner look, improved start menu search results, Aero Peek, the ability to size a window to half the screen with gesture instead of jumping through hoops and the improvements in Explorer are big factors in my decision to switch at RTM.

Then again, I haven't purchased the OS for my new system and am using the RC in the mean time to get me by so i don't have to purchase Windows twice.

Edited by soonerproud
Vista SP1 is pretty high on performance. Vista is patched and performs. So why would I move to Windows 7?

I wouldn?t. Windows 7 just does not offer enough new features or any compelling reason for me to spend a hefty sum on an upgrade.

is this a serious question? YES move to 7 but don't EVER upgrade, do a fresh clean install.

Any reason why? Or are you still caught up in the Windows-7-UAC-is-unsafe nonsense?

It is not like it is hard to turn the slider up if he/she is worried about the default UAC setting. That is the first thing I do after initial installation of programs, drivers and changing the Windows setting to my taste on a new install.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Yup, that's a doozy right there 😄
    • It's a bundle of tools created by a variety of people, so things can go wrong sometimes. It's a great addition to Windows, and I use a lot of the tools on a daily basis. Also, it's still a 0.**** release so quick updates are to be expected 😉
    • Oh, I did. And it's even worse than I was hoping! Besides a lot of techno-babble jargon (yes I understand 100% of it but it's still all just techno-babble) there's 2 key points that make me super-weary about even considering testing this out. -- By default, after installation, a relay is automatically set up, so you do not need to care about that. * Non-chatmail apps use email servers as a long-term message archive while chatmail clients use email servers for ephemeral instant message relay. * Supporting the full variety of classic email setups would require considerable development and maintenance efforts, and complicate making chatmail-based messaging more resilient, reliable and fast. -- Basically, the end-user device is the 'server' (relay) so there is NO ARCHIVING whatsoever because every message is necessarily ephemeral. Great for techno-paranoia (and for illicit activities preferring no tracks to cover) but terrible for everybody else. It's also ironically contradictory to engineering principles of redundancies besides the transport layers due to the explicit absence of any persistent storage. Instead of 'classic email address' retaining multi-GB messaging archives on its server, now every device must retain 100% of those storage demands. (Email messages were originally meant to be short correspondences, not the multi-MB attachments boondoggle that now exists with unlimited spam engines flooding every potential recipient.) Any device swap or reset (or loss) makes the entire message history go bye-bye forever... lest there's an off-device auto-archival "relay" mechanism that's really a separate server that holds onto all transported messages (an email server) that utilizes 'chatmail email address' identities (like an email server) and its own persistent storage archive (like an email server). But... this solution is hoping to exist alongside real-world email address identities (based on the email server relay pathway) but simply render messages in chat thread format in an ephemeral manner (with contents being encrypted, and messages auto-expiring) ... In the end, it's a chat app/experience for the Web3/P2P-at-all-costs zealots. (I have accts on all sorts of federated web3 services so I understand the technical and non-technical alike.) For any practical users, however, it's just another service to download/install, register, cross-share id cards/qr codes, but know that there's no history/archive whatsoever (by design) so no account/message recovery whatsoever... update the device, install a bummed update patch, or dare upgrade your device... all history, poof, gone. Ya gotta start everything over again like they're a brand new person.
    • You've tried DuckDuckGo and Brave Search, now get serious with SearXNG by Paul Hill Over the last decade, it has become quite trendy to dump Google Search in favor of privacy-preserving alternatives such as DuckDuckGo, Startpage, and Brave Search. These search engines have done a very good job at highlighting dodgy practices by Google, such as adjusting search results based on what it thinks you’ll like (filter bubble) and stalking you around the web to advertise to you. While these search engines are good starting points when compared to non-private services like Google, there are still quite a few issues with them. For example, both DuckDuckGo and Brave Search require running non-free JavaScript in your web browser, which is comparable to running proprietary software on your computer, meaning you can be sure about what it’s actually doing in the background. Another issue is that these search engines are hosted on the respective companies’ servers, and you are using a service that you don’t control. Finally, DuckDuckGo, while offering privacy features, relies heavily on Microsoft’s infrastructure for its results and, in the past, has permitted Microsoft tracking scripts. If you are looking for a more private search solution than DuckDuckGo, Brave Search, and Startpage, then I recommend taking a look at SearXNG. It is a privacy-respecting metasearch engine that can be used via different public instances, which is useful for mobile users, or you can install it on your computer or server and run it locally with maximum control. Unlike Google, Bing, or Brave Search, which crawl the web and have their own search indexes, SearXNG is a metasearch engine, meaning it taps other search engines, stripping your identifying data, such as IP address, user agent, and cookies, in the process. Your search query is sent to the other search engines you enable before aggregating the results. SearXNG has deployment flexibility. If you are a casual user or a mobile user and don’t want to run SearXNG locally, you can use a public instance that is hosted by someone else. The main problem with this is that you are putting trust in the maintainer of the instance regarding stuff like logs that they may keep; good hosts should have a privacy policy explaining their policies. If you are trying to use SearXNG, you can also install the software on your device and then head to 127.0.0.1:8080 in your browser and search from there. While you don’t have to worry about a third-party admin like the public instances, search engines could ultimately block your IP address if they frown on you pulling in their search results locally. If you want to run it locally, it’s a good idea to use proxies or VPNs to hide your actual IP. You don’t have to worry about this with a public instance, as search engines never see your IP address. The main privacy benefit of using SearXNG is that it isolates your identity from the underlying engines that it’s capable of searching, such as Google and Bing. These search engines will only see requests coming from a generic server, so they can’t profile you and create a bubble filter that influences what results you see. This also ensures that your search engine doesn’t turn into an echo chamber that prevents you from reading alternative points of view. As a free software project, you are allowed to inspect SearXNG to make sure there are no negative features bundled inside. This sets it apart from the privacy search engines mentioned earlier because you can’t check their source code. As a meta search engine, you are not restricted to getting results from one source. Due to the fact that it scrapes content from other websites, your SearXNG instance will periodically get blocked from different providers, so it’s good to select a range of sources as a backup. While enabling all of the services will give you great results, this can make searching slower. I am personally happy with slower searches for the best results, but you can always check which providers are slowing down your search from the search results page and disable them to speed things up. If you want decent results quickly, enable the main search providers such as Google, Brave, DuckDuckGo, Qwant, Bing, and Yahoo. This way, you get wide coverage without the latency. On the Engines tab in Preferences, do note that there are different tabs, such as General, Images, and Videos, with their own providers that can be toggled and are not covered by "Enable all" while on the General tab, so be sure to dig into each. Just a note, if you want to enable everything, press "Enable all" in one tab, then hit save at the bottom of the page, then do the next tab, and so on. If you press "Enable all", then do that in each tab, and then save, nothing will stick. When I had just some of the search engines enabled, I searched “define nefarious” and results came back with the definition of “define” - obviously that was a sucky result. However, when I had everything enabled, it found dictionary pages for the word “nefarious” and even had an inline definition on the sidebar, which is quite nice too - that was delivered by WolframAlpha for anyone wondering! Probably the worst thing about this meta search engine is that the engines you select are saved with a cookie, so you must enable them on every new device you use SearXNG on, including if you decide to go into incognito mode with your web browser. Honestly, I would say this is the most annoying aspect, and perhaps if your browser lets you choose a separate private browsing search engine, then it would be best to use DuckDuckGo for this portion of your browsing. Another weakness of SearXNG is the random blocking of it by search providers. When you are on the results page, expand the “Response time” box, and it will show things like “Suspended: too many requests” or “access denied”. This is why it is good to enable several providers so that there is always a fallback to get results from. I won’t pretend SearXNG will be for everyone, however, if you enable all of the providers and put up with the slower response time, the results can be really amazing. Even if you don’t want to use it as your daily driver, keeping a bookmark handy that links to it is a good idea if you ever feel like doing a deep dive into a niche topic where other search engines are just failing to bring up any good result, due to the amount of sources it looks on. If you’re interested in radical user control over the software you use, installing SearXNG locally can also be a good idea, but be prepared to be temporarily blocked from sites if you trigger bot sensors without a VPN. Personally, I’ve opted to use a public instance, rather than install it myself. If you want to use it via a public instance, head over to searx.space to find a provider. Let us know in the comments if you have used SearXNG or its predecessor, Searx. What do you think about the quality of the results?
    • Dear Neowin, If it is not too much trouble, can you start using the new-ish designations for Insider Preview? "Experimental" is different than "former Dev" as it can apply to different models, eg 26H1 or 26H2 etc, right? No need to seed confusion IMHO. And, please "finally" update your graphics. OK?
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      226
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      158
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!