Is it worth it for Vista users to upgrade to 7?


...  

222 members have voted

  1. 1. Will you upgrade to 7?

    • Yes
      178
    • No
      17
    • Not sure
      27
  2. 2. What's your experience with Vista?

    • Great
      132
    • Average
      66
    • Terrible
      19
    • Not sure
      5


Recommended Posts

I'm sure if I tried Windows 7, I would have gone with a solid "Yes", but I haven't tried it yet and I'm not as excited over it as some of you are, so as it stands, "Not sure" is my answer.

I got Vista last year and didn't see what all the fuss was about. I guess all the kinks were rolled out of Vista by then? It works very well for me... aside from the forgetful folders that can't remember my view settings.

There is a fix for that if it bugs you. Here is the link:

Tweakguides.com Fixing Vista Annoyances Page.

Maybe I'll upgrade to 7, my main issue isn't really Windows its the eco system surrounding it. NVIDIA drivers for example have never really been pro quality for me in Vista and nothing has changed with 7. I'm not ready to pay up for Windows 7 if NVIDIA can't even get their drivers sorted out.

Then buy a ATI card and dump the Nvidia. Problem solved.

*facepalm* Just because you can't use Vista properly (if Vista is really the problem for that computer, taking 4 hours to fix it is downright laughable) doesn't mean it's a bad OS. It's still far and away better of an overall OS than XP ever was. I wonder if XP mode will also introduce XP's inherent failings at malware resilience to Windows 7. Hardly something many people would want, given XP can be credited (or blamed) for introducing most of the worst malware the world has ever seen to the consumer market.

That said, as soon as this resolution glitch I have with 7 is resolved, I'll upgrade to it.

Having used computers for more than 23 years, I think i'm more qualified to talk about computer use than you are. I'm very familiar in how to use Windows (including Vista). Agreed it's downright laughable that Vista took 4 hours to fix, but it did. I prefer not to do formats where I can help it, it makes for happier customers. As for a better OS? No, IMO I don't think so.

I doubt XP-M would be able to interact with Win7 in such a way that Malware would affect computers, especially with the security thats present in both O/S today. It'd be mad of MS to allow that sort of access between the two systems.

And that "facepalm" loses most credibility you might had with me. Sorry mate, nothing personal. Or was it? Don't like XP? Point noted. But don't bash other people's abilities when you don't have all the facts. Run my business for a day, and you'll be in a position to comment.

I've been playing with 7 for over six months now, yet I'm back on Vista x64 SP2.

I like the new taskbar and the jump lists. I don't have much use for libraries as I'm quite organised naturally, no use for homegroups and I'm standalone with a router which goes for WMP sharing as well. I don't multitask much either, I'm usally concentrating on one activity at a time.

Don't like WMP12, seems to be a step back from WMP11.

Perormance is all but identical with modern hardware.

I'll probably buy it once available but I wouldn't say it's worth it, will be more out of habit and the placebo effect the computer industry thrives from.

Having used computers for more than 23 years, I think i'm more qualified to talk about computer use than you are. I'm very familiar in how to use Windows (including Vista). Agreed it's downright laughable that Vista took 4 hours to fix, but it did. I prefer not to do formats where I can help it, it makes for happier customers. As for a better OS? No, IMO I don't think so.

I doubt XP-M would be able to interact with Win7 in such a way that Malware would affect computers, especially with the security thats present in both O/S today. It'd be mad of MS to allow that sort of access between the two systems.

And that "facepalm" loses most credibility you might had with me. Sorry mate, nothing personal. Or was it? Don't like XP? Point noted. But don't bash other people's abilities when you don't have all the facts. Run my business for a day, and you'll be in a position to comment.

Is it worth it for Windows Me users to upgrade to XP? You bet!

It's just as much worth it for Windows Me 2.0 users to upgrade to Win7 :yes:

+1 to both of those posts :D

Im on windows 7 now. I purchased Vista Ultimate when it came out - worst mistake of my life. Sure vista has some "pretty-ness" but thats about it. Just to be fair I've tried using it since SP1 and 2, its still a pain. XP does everything I need - and so has win7 so far!

Why do you think MS started working on 7 so quickly?? As far as vista goes, MS has pretty much swept it under the rug.

don't EVER upgrade, do a fresh clean install.

Don't listen to anyone who argues you shouldn't upgrade from Vista RTM to Windows 7 RTM. Microsoft's new (vista+) installation methodology does away with the issues people used to have upgrading from say 98 to XP.

Unfortunately, that outdated FUD is still circling pretty heavily even though it's now about 4 years out of date.

The REAL issue is to make sure you BACK UP before upgrading or doing a clean install...period.

I'm sure if I tried Windows 7, I would have gone with a solid "Yes", but I haven't tried it yet and I'm not as excited over it as some of you are, so as it stands, "Not sure" is my answer.

I got Vista last year and didn't see what all the fuss was about. I guess all the kinks were rolled out of Vista by then? It works very well for me... aside from the forgetful folders that can't remember my view settings.

Your entire answer mirrors what I was going to say. Voted Not sure. Vista has been very solid for me. To be honest, I am sort of wary when I hear all this hype about a product. Usually I am let down when I do finally try it.

Don't like WMP12, seems to be a step back from WMP11.

Just out of curiosity... in what way?

There are many features in Windows Media Player 12 which I think make it an improvement over Windows Media Player 11. Some of the little things like where it plays a preview of the song when you hover over it and the fact that the interface is more intuitive.

I'm interested in why you think it is a step backwards? Many people I've heard say it's because of how different the design of the player is compared to the more 'nice-looking' Windows Media Player 11, but I go beyond the design, sometimes, and look at the features.

Just out of curiosity... in what way?

There are many features in Windows Media Player 12 which I think make it an improvement over Windows Media Player 11. Some of the little things like where it plays a preview of the song when you hover over it and the fact that the interface is more intuitive.

I'm interested in why you think it is a step backwards? Many people I've heard say it's because of how different the design of the player is compared to the more 'nice-looking' Windows Media Player 11, but I go beyond the design, sometimes, and look at the features.

Hmm, well for starters I use 64 bit WMP in Vista. As to why, well by installing 64 bit codec pack I don't mess up anything that runs @32 bit and in turn no 32 bit players interfere with WMP. It's a little sandbox in a way if you make WMP your main media tool as there should be no other 64 bit codecs or players about. Can't find a way to set WMP12 x64 as default in 7 as yet, which is a shame. Yeah I know 7 has it's Codecs locked down if you will, but I have stuff it won't play and also need filters to handle subtitles and such, so I have to install some codecs. Doing this on x64 has meant since day 1 I've been able to play everything I need and never had a problem, it's proven reliability for me.

Navigation in 12 seems to be all over the place, in 11 I have immediate access to everything and I stay in library view. 12 has incorportated tabs for what I can see as no good reason. In 11, in library view I can just right click the menu bar, select view and view anything anywhere. In 12, say if I wanted to open the equaliser, I have to switch tabs and it's still buried away even then.

I don't think 12 is aesthetically pleasing as 11 either. The tabs look horribly out of place and instead of intuative controls things are starting to sprawl off in every direction.

It's not as pleasant to use as 11 either, I just don't like it. I'll be sticking to 11 for as long as I can.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Opinion. All you did was blame Democrats for everything. You offered nothing but a hit piece to support your pro Trump, anti union right wing ideology.
    • Excuse me for having an opinion, fella'... (Why am I not surprised?...) Congrats on your very informative post however...
    • By the sounds of that wall of Fox News propaganda gibberish attacking the Democratic Party you've already had plenty of "juices" flowing this morning. You've ruined what could have been a productive comment thread.
    • (Topic to get the juices flowing this Sunday morning!...) Actually, the situation has almost nothing to do with "lack of skills", especially since assembly-line skills can be taught to anyone, including Americans, certainly. Rather, the inadequacy-to-impossibility of large-scale tech manufacturing in America today, and the reasons why America finds tech manufacturing completely onerous in the 21st century, has to do with politically driven laws amid a plethora of non-scientific, utterly politicized "science-fact" that is patently false, punitive business taxation at every turn, an array of judicial fines of unimaginable scope and complexity, and, last but not least, American unionization strictures that serve to actually slay job creation and hobble all such manufacturing endeavors in America before they can get off the ground. Globalism emerged, they tell us, as the needed answer to American hubris and an unholy American drive to excel. Unless one is buried under mounds of political propaganda, it's easy to see the absurdity of labeling the employees of SpaceX, for instance, as "unskilled labor"... Etc. ad infinitum. At one time in the recent past, American manufacturing prowess was the envy of the world in a wide variety of technical fields! The current federal and state government roadblocks against America becoming competitive globally in tech manufacturing are considerable, it's true, as anyone with a working brain knows. But remarkably, that is only half the story! The other half of the story is, of course, the corporations themselves... Chinese tech manufacturing is simply unassailable in terms of profits, because the Chinese government wants to see its tech manufacturing second-to-none globally so that no companies/nations can compete in terms of ROI, and China has completely succeeded in that goal. Let's tic-off a few things: *Chinese tariff policies are set according to what is considered best for Chinese business, Chinese employees, and the Chinese people. Huge difference with how things are done with tariffs in the US--as the US government (SCOTUS in this case, Congress in others) plainly feels that tariffs are "unfair" for the limited number of citizens who may pay them, whereas nothing is "unfair" when Congress considers the Personal Income Tax rates to be infinitely hike-able, along with infinitely enlarging annual budget deficits. *The Chinese government boldly subsidizes Chinese companies to artificially amplify their profits. *The Chinese government deliberately refuses to avidly demonize Chinese businesses and does not consider Chinese businesses "the enemy", so very unlike American (D)s these days. *Chinese labor laws and businesses are allowed to set their own labor policies according to what Chinese companies consider is best for companies and their employees... Simply put, American workers in tech manufacturing are not allowed to set their own labor policies! * One additional problem corporations have that I also do not sympathize with is they don't want to pay to train their American employees. They could easily do so, but would rather not have to pay for it. I find that pathetic, actually. It is the height of hypocrisy for Americans to decry working conditions in China while simultaneously ensuring that American products are manufactured in China, not in the US, simply to maximize profits. There is nothing wrong with making a profit, of course, absolutely nothing. But there is plenty wrong with attempts to normalize hypocrisy of this kind! But rank hypocrisy and the (D) party in the US are longtime bedfellows... The current government in Washington is working overtime to see if it can toss out the horribly poor, failed economic policies of the past, while the (D)s still in Washington work very hard to bring back the stupidity whenever possible. With the right policies in place, America can be an infinitely competitive manufacturer.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      508
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      152
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      73
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      62
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!