Fast Prime lens?


Do you have one?  

45 members have voted

  1. 1. F2 or wider

    • Yes
      23
    • Yes, but I want a wider one.
      3
    • No, I wan't one
      13
    • No, I don't need one
      1
    • A what lens?
      5


Recommended Posts

I have a Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 MK II that's a piece of crap and a Canon FD 50mm f/1.8 that's completely stunning despite its thirty or so years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 MK II that's a piece of crap and a Canon FD 50mm f/1.8 that's completely stunning despite its thirty or so years.

Build quality is crap, but that lens can make very sharp shots.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nikkor 50mm F/1.8D, making love to it even with the manual focus on my D40, heard the 85mm is even better, hoping to get it sometime soon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
Nikkor 50mm F/1.8D, making love to it even with the manual focus on my D40, heard the 85mm is even better, hoping to get it sometime soon.

In low light the MF is a bitch, I have one of those lens for my D40.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Low light MF is a bitch on DSLRs in general. The matte on the focusing screens isn't as helpful, and they lack the split-prisms on film SLRs. It's doable, just alot harder than on a film SLR :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Low light MF is a bitch on DSLRs in general. The matte on the focusing screens isn't as helpful, and they lack the split-prisms on film SLRs. It's doable, just alot harder than on a film SLR :(

I think it would be easier with a FF frame dSLR, and a focusing screen replacement.

As for myself, I have an SMC Takumar 50/1.4 and a Jupiter 9 85/2.0, both in m42 mount. Stepped down a bit, they're very, very sharp. The only complaint I have about them, is the crop factor on my Pentax, basically turning them into short telephoto lenses, but on the flip-side, it turns my 200mm tele into a 300mm tele. I guess I can't have it all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh yeah I should mention I have a Nikon AF 50mm, and a 50mm Olympus OM lens as well, my fastest lenses are the Pentax 1.7 and the f1.7 lens on my Canon compact.

Low light MF is a bitch on DSLRs in general. The matte on the focusing screens isn't as helpful, and they lack the split-prisms on film SLRs. It's doable, just alot harder than on a film SLR :(

So do the modern film SLR's but I think you can buy replacement focus screens that have them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not used a modern film SLR, I use an excellent, thirty year old film SLR (they don't make em like they used to :p), but given the physical similarity of the bodies of the 1D and 1V/1VHS cameras, I'd imagine that yeah, the focus screens are indeed replacable. But MF on a manual prime with a split-prism rangefinder and microprism collar, it's pretty damned easy, even with shallow depths of field and fairly low light.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, and I don't feel a need either. :)

I'm happy enough with the semi-high ISO performance on my D90 anyway. Sure, it's not top notch performance, but nothing I contemplate on buying despite having the money, at least.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nikon released a 35mm 1.8 for $200. I have it and I must say it's a very good lens for a beginning body. Has an internal focus motor so it can fit perfectly on the d40 and other bodies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I picked up a used Nikkor 50mm f/1.8D the other day. BEAUTIFUL lens, and I am soooooo glad that my D50 can AF on it. I really suck at manual focus (I usually only do so at night with no ambient lighting), which isn't helped at all by my glasses. The only thing I regret is that it's making me want to ditch my 18-55 and 70-300 for faster zoom lenses. Oh well, I can deal for now... I guess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.