Recommended Posts

Even if the RC keys won't work, who cares lol?? :laugh:

You could use it for 30 days, and the RTM is expected in 2~3 weeks.

btw, 7279?? lmao :laugh:

as long as you have a rtm key that is. In fact as a technet subscriber, only rc1 keys are posted so far and I'm not sure how long it will take them to post RTM and keys once it goes gold. Could be weeks out for all we know.

as long as you have a rtm key that is. In fact as a technet subscriber, only rc1 keys are posted so far and I'm not sure how long it will take them to post RTM and keys once it goes gold. Could be weeks out for all we know.

In that case enter the DOS command [slmgr.vbs -dlv], if you find on the script "remaining number of re-arm=3"(translation from Chinese, something like that),then you could assure yourself that you are able to run it for 120 days totally legit.

The only keys that will work for legit activation with 7264 are RTM keys which no one really has, period, end of story. The few people making claims about using RC keys and getting it working are basically lying about it.

I'd hate to get warnings, so only giving out this screen-shot, done by the well-known work-around.

scr_34-1.jpg

That "thread" was one single post so, I can't see how it is "more useful."

But my statement made earlier is still correct: there are no legit methods of activating 7264 without an actual proper RTM key - workarounds don't fall under the "legit" heading...

I just gotta wonder: who the hell bothers to activate their installations of beta/RC code anyway? I mean, since most of us do tend to reinstall quite often, especially in periods where an OS is close to release and the beta/RC builds are flowing like honey, so to speak, who ever goes more than 30 days without a reinstall anyway?

I've probably installed Windows 7 a total of 2500 times so far since last August with all the builds and all the machines I've used it on... I've only activated it 3 times, the rest just get reinstalls < 30 days for a variety of reasons, usually because of a new leaked build.

The rampant fascination with activation just completely stumps me...

thats why RC/beta keys are still working on 7260 right? think before you write please :o

im sure some people want me to apologise, but oh well, my bottom line with this post was "if RC keys did work in first win7rtm branch build, there is no reason to assume they dont work in "next" win7rtm build until its proven otherwise". But ye rc keys dont work anymore :) Just saying that people shouldnt jump to conclusion without any facts, all we can do is assume according to previous expiriance(build) in which they did work :)

I just gotta wonder: who the hell bothers to activate their installations of beta/RC code anyway? I mean, since most of us do tend to reinstall quite often, especially in periods where an OS is close to release and the beta/RC builds are flowing like honey, so to speak, who ever goes more than 30 days without a reinstall anyway?

One reason to activate would be if you wanted to download a particular application directly from Microsoft, something like DirectX, this often requires the system to pass a Genuine advantage check to proceed.

One reason to activate would be if you wanted to download a particular application directly from Microsoft, something like DirectX, this often requires the system to pass a Genuine advantage check to proceed.

I'm quite sure the OS will pass this validation check if it's not activated...that's how Vista works.

Why activate anyway, just use rearm if you need to between builds. Anyway, RTM will be here within 2 weeks or so.

I'm running 7260 unactivated and I can download anything I want, the WGA stuff is irrelevant if I use IE - it only flares up when I attempt to do the download with Firefox where it requires me to do that stupid download of the code generator.

Activation is not a requirement of downloading items from Microsoft because they themselves still allow it with that ActiveX applet (only applicable to IE, of course).

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Not even an OLED display on the laptops. Also it seems that the laptop design isn't the same as the Surface Ultra model. Looks like bargain bin at high prices.
    • VirtualBox 7.2.10 by Razvan Serea VirtualBox is a powerful x86 and AMD64/Intel64 virtualization product for enterprise as well as home use. Targeted at server, desktop and embedded use, it is now the only professional-quality virtualization solution that is also Open Source Software. Presently, VirtualBox runs on Windows, Linux, macOS, and Solaris hosts and supports a large number of guest operating systems including but not limited to Windows (NT 4.0, 2000, XP, Server 2003, Vista, 7, 8, Windows 10 and Windows 11), DOS/Windows 3.x, Linux (2.4, 2.6, 3.x, 4.x, 5.x and 6.x), Solaris and OpenSolaris, OS/2, OpenBSD, NetBSD and FreeBSD. Some of the features of VirtualBox are: Modularity. VirtualBox has an extremely modular design with well-defined internal programming interfaces and a client/server design. This makes it easy to control it from several interfaces at once: for example, you can start a virtual machine in a typical virtual machine GUI and then control that machine from the command line, or possibly remotely. VirtualBox also comes with a full Software Development Kit: even though it is Open Source Software, you don't have to hack the source to write a new interface for VirtualBox. Virtual machine descriptions in XML. The configuration settings of virtual machines are stored entirely in XML and are independent of the local machines. Virtual machine definitions can therefore easily be ported to other computers. VirtualBox 7.2.10 changelog: VMM: Fixed issue when CentOS 10 VM was not booting due to the message "Fatal glibc error: CPU does not support x86-64-v3" (​github:gh-642) Devices/EFI: Fixed booting issue when ARM VM had less than 1024 MiB of RAM assigned (​github:gh-679) USB: Fixed issue when it was not possible to attach USB device to headless VM on Apple Silicon/macOS 26.4.1 (​github:gh-631) Storage: Fixed issue when VIRTIO-SCSI device was not recognized as SSD device by guest system (​github:gh-634) Network: Fixed issue in E1000 emulation code which triggered debug log creation (​github:gh-645) Network: Fixed issue in E1000 emulation code which prevented OS/2 guest from booting (​github:gh-683) Linux Host: Fixed issue when VMs could not be started due to kernel oops (​github:gh-639) Linux Host and Guest: Fixed issue when kernel modules were failing to build with openSUSE 16.0 kernel Linux Host and Guest: Added initial support for kernel 7.1 Linux Host and Guest: Added extra fixes for RHEL 9.8 kernel (​github:gh-676) Linux Host and Guest: Added possibility to build source code using NASM instead of YASM as the assembler (​github:gh-520) Linux Guest Additions: Added initial support for Extended Data Control Protocol for clipboard sharing with Plasma on Wayland guests (​github:gh-33) Linux Guest Additions: Added extra fixes for preventing vboxvideo kernel module build with kernel version 7.0 and newer (​github:gh-655) OS/2 Guest Additions: Fixed issue when Shared Folders automount and clipboard sharing stopped working (​github:gh-551) Download: VirtualBox 7.2.10 | 170.0 MB (Open Source) Download: VirtualBox 7.2.10 Extension Pack | 19.1 MB View: VirtualBox Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • OK, now ask yourself how are they going to enforce that law? By requiring every single adult to prove their age and provide their legal identity documents to an UNREGULATED 3rd party company that already has a long track record of multiple data breaches. Not to mention, parliament have voted AGAINST this ban, twice, and Starmer is going ahead anyway. So, where's the democracy here, because that looks like dictatorship to me. The solution here is parental responsibility, not government control. Run some public service announcements on TV and UK social media teaching parents how to setup parental controls. That's already been proven to actually work. But the, this is not and has NEVER been about keeping kids safe. It's about control and monitoring. Watching what you're doing online and controlling what you can see and what you can say.
    • Interesting read. I knew the adware was quite controversial at the time, however never realised to the point The Guardian wrote an article about Patchou. I just said no and enjoyed his creation, I’d probably be a lot more wary of something like that today though.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Prasann earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      Dys Topia earned a badge
      First Post
    • Collaborator
      vjlex earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Reacting Well
      Dys Topia earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      525
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      180
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      105
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      88
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!