Barclays Premier League Season 2009/2010


Premier League 2009/2010  

437 members have voted

  1. 1. Who will win the Premier League in 2010?

    • Arsenal
      20
    • Aston Villa
      2
    • Birmingham City
      0
    • Blackburn Rovers
      0
    • Bolton Wanderers
      3
    • Burnley
      2
    • Chelsea
      52
    • Everton
      0
    • Fulham
      0
    • Hull City
      2
    • Liverpool
      18
    • Manchester City
      6
    • Manchester United
      46
    • Portsmouth
      2
    • Stoke City
      0
    • Sunderland
      0
    • Tottenham Hotspur
      6
    • West Ham United
      2
    • Wigan Athletic
      1
    • Wolverhampton Wanderers
      1
  2. 2. Who will be relegated in 2010? [Select 3]

    • Arsenal
      16
    • Aston Villa
      1
    • Birmingham City
      19
    • Blackburn Rovers
      4
    • Bolton Wanderers
      12
    • Burnley
      57
    • Chelsea
      15
    • Everton
      3
    • Fulham
      2
    • Hull City
      49
    • Liverpool
      9
    • Manchester City
      6
    • Manchester United
      13
    • Portsmouth
      56
    • Stoke City
      32
    • Sunderland
      17
    • Tottenham Hotspur
      3
    • West Ham United
      22
    • Wigan Athletic
      28
    • Wolverhampton Wanderers
      73
  3. 3. Who will be top scorer?

    • Andrei Arshavin
      4
    • Carlos Tevez
      4
    • Didier Drogba
      34
    • Dimitar Berbatov
      5
    • Emmanuel Adebayor
      6
    • Fernando Torres
      39
    • Frank Lampard
      1
    • Gabriel Agbonlahor
      2
    • Nicolas Anelka
      6
    • Robin van Persie
      3
    • Robinho
      3
    • Roque Santa Cruz
      0
    • Steven Gerrard
      4
    • Wayne Rooney
      32
    • Yakubu Aiyegbeni
      2
    • Other
      18


Recommended Posts

**** haha 5-3 to us and that was with us leading 5-0 I think any longer and it would of been 5-5! :rofl:

I'd say your defending is just as much a cause for concern as ours is at this moment in time, but hell a win's a win :D

I'd say your defending is just as much a cause for concern as ours is at this moment in time, but hell a win's a win :D

haha yeah :(

It also seems we are going to sell Upson as well in the January window :( :(

You'll probably still have more transfer funds than us, as our earnings are still being used to fly gillette and hicks around the world conducting dodgy business deals, and paying our bank loans off. Won't be long before we are forced to ditch prawn sandwiches in our "rich tosser" boxes and feed them pasties instead :p

You'll probably still have more transfer funds than us, as our earnings are still being used to fly gillette and hicks around the world conducting dodgy business deals, and paying our bank loans off. Won't be long before we are forced to ditch prawn sandwiches in our "rich tosser" boxes and feed them pasties instead :p

look forward to thee derby tomorrow?

Bit of a tough one that. In a sense, Everton's form isn't a lot better than our own, but its never good to play a derby when team spirit and confidence are low, and there are injury problems. Call me pessimistic but I don't actually think a draw would be a bad result given how things are going at the moment, but this will give a good indication of whether we have it in us to turn this season around, after all if you can't rise to a derby against your oldest and closest rivals then what can you rise to?

I appreciate I haven't really given you an answer there, but at the moment I really don't know what to think as our form is so bad :/

Bit of a tough one that. In a sense, Everton's form isn't a lot better than our own, but its never good to play a derby when team spirit and confidence are low, and there are injury problems. Call me pessimistic but I don't actually think a draw would be a bad result given how things are going at the moment, but this will give a good indication of whether we have it in us to turn this season around, after all if you can't rise to a derby against your oldest and closest rivals then what can you rise to?

I appreciate I haven't really given you an answer there, but at the moment I really don't know what to think as our form is so bad :/

Understandable but good thing I didn't post a Gif as a response right now :p

Don't last minute goals count or something?

Frank Lampard has never scored a deflected goal. Discuss? :laugh:

How about own goals scored by Arsenal defenders? :p

All anyone who doubts the quality of Liverpool needs to do is watch a re-run of the second half of the 2005 UCL final. Probably the only team in the world that could have came back in that manner, in fact even the blue bottlers that can't buy a CL however much they throw at their squad wouldn't have been able to come back like that.

Quality isn't just in scoring goals from long range, winning by massive margins and playing moves with 30 or 40 passes, it is also in grinding out wins when you aren't playing well, coming back against the odds, and playing with heart; determination; and a never say die attitude. Something that has seen Liverpool through on a few occasions. That isn't luck it's quality and its something these idiots will never understand because their only knowledge of football is watching their teams spend their way to trophies.

:sleep:. Seems as if the blues are still trying to find someone to play against. We played well and got the victory.
Don't worry we still got the CL.

I love that we beat a top side with Lampard and Joe Cole having a terrible day.

And Obi Mikel was in the staring XI? :blink:

Also,wtf is Arsene talking about?Eduardo's challenge was clearly a foul.

Edited by Kostaz

Arsene was a bit of a muppet saying that a Chelsea player kicked it off Cech.

However, I don't think it was a stone-wall foul, more of a 50/50 to be perfectly honest. Cech didn't look to have full control of the ball so it could have been given, but again Eduardo's foot was very high. In any other game, it probably would have been the same decision mind, keepers get way too much protection in their area.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Bluesky COO warns social media regulations could destroy competition from small startups by Paul Hill Fears that increasing government control of social media risks regulatory capture by the biggest social media firms were raised again recently. Bluesky’s chief operating officer said in an interview that social media bans for children and tighter regulations for social media firms risk creating a world where there are only a few social media platforms run by companies with the deepest pockets. Regulations on social media firms have been very lax since they appeared for mainstream users in the 2000’s. This gave Meta, Snapchat, and Google time to build up their user bases and get entrenched, with Meta being the most successful. Now that Meta has succeeded, it has been attempting regulatory capture. By pushing for more regulations of social media, Meta hopes to make it more difficult for rivals to challenge it. For its part, it doesn’t need to worry about the cost of regulation because it has a lot of money to spend, whereas startups do not. Speaking to CNBC, Rose Wang, Bluesky’s chief operating officer, said: “I support the protection and the safety of youth, the question that we have then is at what cost, because essentially what I’m scared of is in the long term, we’re headed to a world where there’s about three to five platforms, and extreme heavy regulation of those platforms, and basically the whole compliance teams of these platforms are 10 times the size of our entire team. So, basically, we’re living in a world where it’s almost impossible for smaller entrants to come in and build healthier spaces. These platforms have led to a place where the bottom line is the thing that drives what they do... so I understand why governments have to step in and regulate, because the platforms have done nothing right.” She said that while she is not against regulation, there needs to be more channels between the small to mid-sized players and regulators to help protect them. She says that big tech players, on the other hand, “who we know are circumventing regulation,” need to be regulated. Essentially, the Bluesky position is one of nuance, rather than absolutes. While Bluesky’s proposal may preserve competition in the social media space, it still doesn’t address the massive privacy implications these age verification measures introduce, such as handing over sensitive identity documents to access age-gated content. Source: CNBC
    • it dosnt support onprem exchange. it dosnt support mapi-calls. the views are all worse/limited. its slower. it cant see public folder calendars. we already have webmail. the list of other missing features is pretty huge but i only see it when customers call to say their email isnt working, and 9/10 times its cause they accidentality changed to outlooknew(new). Hold the line everyone!
    • yeah, this looks beautiful. Damn this winter's going to be great.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      249
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      71
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      70
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!