Recommended Posts

That was unreal. First thing I'd say to my opponent after playing 77 straight games of tennis with him would be, "Lets get out of here and get a beer."

-Spenser

Hahaha. I was thinking exactly the same you know, "Lets just go and have a bev."

They would have a lot to talk about, and there is nothing like having a bevvie after having played sport for four hours or so :p

My dad's just been through and said the exact same thing, and I was thinking it a few minutes ago. Great that it's going so far into the last set, but 26 games with no break of serve, and you have to favour the bigger server to win, and it's not the most entertaining.

BS. Both were playing fantastic tennis technically. Federer had over 50 aces and he could not break Roddick's serve while Roddick had trouble overcoming Federer overall.

It's only boring to people who just want showboating. I was on the edge of my seat because of how amazing these players were technically. They played more than four hours and Roddick was still serving 133+ mph serves and fantastic backhands while Federer kept serving aces. It's true that Federer didn't look at his prime game but that's not because he was having an off day. He had trouble answering to Roddick's powerful serves and baseline shots and could do little but just defend and try not to break mentally due to the crushing pressure to win his 15th and four legends watch him.

It's probably one of the best Wimbledon finals. I thoroughly enjoyed it.

Yes, it's great fun watching consistent big serves and baseline ralli- oh, wait, this is Wimbledon and not Philippe-Chatrier, isn't it? ;) Fantastic technique doesn't necessarily mean fantastic entertainment. I find Murray's matches more watchable, because of the variation of shots, the lobs, drop shots, moving around, it's a bit more of a spectacle than "wham, wham, wham, wham, wham, server holds serve".

72 games in the match I think, and 3 of those went against serve. That's just over 4% of the games didn't go with serve. It was getting a little predictable, really :/

Yep, and the disappointing thing is that in the end it was only resolved by the fact that one man was physically fitter than the other, having played shorter matches, rather than ability.

Federer struggled like hell against Roddick's serve, and I feel if Roddick hadn't thrown away the second set, then he would have won the final, probably even in straight sets. Real shame as well, as he was absolutely devastated after the match, but he carried on fighting tooth and nail with Federer until he physically had nothing left to give. He can be very proud of his performance.

Yes, it's great fun watching consistent big serves and baseline ralli- oh, wait, this is Wimbledon and not Philippe-Chatrier, isn't it? ;) Fantastic technique doesn't necessarily mean fantastic entertainment.

True. However, as a tennis player and avid fan, it was very entertaining and educational. Roddick won over the fans emotionally becuase he was the underdog but people need to credit Federer for keeping Roddick at bay with his technique.

I'll quote someone's post that sums up my empathy for Roddick regarding this whole match:

"If it was anybody else, Roddick would have won... but Federer happens."

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Forgive my ignorance, but the only difference I see here is that a USB-A is now a USB-C, so there are two of them. For the modern age (and I'd argue since 2020), most products would now come with USB-C as an option, if not the default. Display, charging, devices, etc on TWO connectors, sometimes all combined! So having 2 of those powerful ports is great for something this size! Meanwhile my Surface Pro (5) has a single USB-A port which I cannot even get display out to, instead relying on some Surface Connect dock which I don't have. That is a poor experience, not to mention expensive and not compatible with other devices. Thank God USB-C is mainstream!
    • wow. that color finally comes to Surface Pro. was always a little jelly when a friend had the sandstone Surface Laptop. I wonder how different this dune is from the sandstone. I'll be getting the dune version. always thought black and platinum were a little boring. I'll still have access to my blue Surface Pro 11 as it'll be a hand-me-down.
    • Looks a very subjective aren't they!? I like its simple design. I love the way Apple designs their products with function over form, minimalization, and simplicity over cluttered complex designs. Many, not all, of their products follow this trend, and the device becomes a tool rather than dominating the space. I do not however like their OS. I have never bought a Apple product, and while I'd consider the Neo for my wife, I am hoping there are better alternatives out there when her failing MacBook Pro 2017 finally stops. Fischer-Price is famously plastic, garish, and poorly made. Basically you're describing the Window Laptops the Neo competes against! This is how product design should be, and what Apple have often followed in recent years: https://tenprinciples.design/
    • Isn't that true for every codec? I remember having to buy a PCI MPEG-2 decoder card just so I could play DVDs on my computer back in the late 90s. AV1 support is still fairly new.
    • I'm no Apple fan, and have never bought an Apple product for myself. But I'd argue that where you think Apple is behind regarding an OLED display, that the vast majority of people out there wouldn't even know or care for an OLED. Apple have struck the balance well to create a price point that works, and I hope that PC manufactures, and Microsoft take notice. I'd argue that Asus will struggle to compete with the Neo BECAUSE they put in a more expensive OLED that many people won't actually notice with its deeper blacks. Most people wouldn't care either that their screen is stuck at 60Hz! When I bought a 4k monitor (future proof and for the space), my laptop could only push that out at 30Hz, and it worked fine for my needs for 1.5 years! Heck, the average human eye can't see more than 90Hz in many situations!! So while they are trying to differentiate themselves, and it may well gain them a few customers, for the most part, I think they're missing the point of what the Neo is for.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      B2Proxy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      MadMung0 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      jefred earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Apprentice
      JoeyNeo went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Week One Done
      oliviaexpo earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      485
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      228
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      70
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      58
    5. 5
      neufuse
      56
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!