Recommended Posts

Well, this is a desktop pc,not a laptop.

I know I can disable the animations, but since Vista I have getting addicted to the animations.

Most people must be blind when it comes to seeing this aero bug. Turning animations off isn't an option for me either. It looks incredibly rough without animations wen u minimize/maximize windows. Even xp had animations. There is no way I can get used to something that operates similar to win95 (if you turn off animations).

Everything post win7 beta is such a disappointment. Beta was on the right track but with all the subsequent releases a lot of major bugs still remained (be it visual or stability). Visually, the aero glitch (animation skipping some frames) and the inconsistency when it comes to different styles of icons makes this release even worse than vista when it comes to polish. In terms of stability, the explorer still manages to crash randomly.

I guess this is the result of cutting out seasoned beta testers out of the process (laughable 2 builds distributed) in favour of partner feedback. Some of these partners are absolutely clueless when it come to coding and testing their own specific software that they force on you when you buy their systems (I am ofcourse referring to people like sony, hp, dell, etc).

Edited by vask
Well, this is a desktop pc,not a laptop.

I know I can disable the animations, but since Vista I have getting addicted to the animations.

Well, is Powermizer disabled for Desktop GPU? I doubt it. Just do what I did, download GPU-Z or anything else to monitor the clocks, if they are underclocked or they are running at full speed all the time.

Well, is Powermizer disabled for Desktop GPU? I doubt it. Just do what I did, download GPU-Z or anything else to monitor the clocks, if they are underclocked or they are running at full speed all the time.

Powermizer is an nvidia technology. This bug exists on all graphics hardware including ati and intel.

Powermizer is an nvidia technology. This bug exists on all graphics hardware including ati and intel.

Intel's cards are crappy so I don't know about them. As far ATI, I am sure they too have got a similar technology as Powermizer, to underclock the GPU when not in heavy use to safe power and temperature.

Yes, it doesent work on desktop pc's. The option to turn on\off powermizer is greyed out and no changes are possible.

It's turned off/greyed out because Windows Vista/Windows 7 have got better power management controls so the Powermizer is integrated into the OS through drivers and registry settings.

Looks like no MSDN/Technet or Volume License availability till 1st September - (according to Paul Thurrot anyway) undefined

another source - Zdnet confirms VL delay - unsure on msdn/technet availability

Volume License Customers are not same as MSDN/Technet.

Looks like no MSDN/Technet or Volume License availability till 1st September - (according to Paul Thurrot anyway) undefined

another source - Zdnet confirms VL delay - unsure on msdn/technet availability

That applies to business users with volume license agreements. Unfortunately, they won't be able to get Windows 7 until the 1st of September (according to the links you provided).

Intel's cards are crappy so I don't know about them. As far ATI, I am sure they too have got a similar technology as Powermizer, to underclock the GPU when not in heavy use to safe power and temperature.

It's turned off/greyed out because Windows Vista/Windows 7 have got better power management controls so the Powermizer is integrated into the OS through drivers and registry settings.

Volume License Customers are not same as MSDN/Technet.

Whether intel is crappy or not is not the point here. All cards exhibit this bug. A much faster nvidia or ati does exactly the same thing as a much slower intel. Speed of graphics card does not affect this. Nor does flashing the bios to overcock 2d clock rates. In vista, with the same cards, the animation is smooth. In win7 the bug is undeniably there, irrelevant of system components. I have not seen a system yet where this bug did not exist. However some people just aren't able to see that there is a kink/jerk in the animation (caused by missing frames in the animation). It can be seen easily if you activate the slow motion aero animation feature/hack.

BTW, here is a video of this problem. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aNlY1pVZZf0

Notice how after a window is opened (with slow motion enabled) the animation is smooth until it gets to the last few frames when it just sort of pops.

Whether intel is crappy or not is not the point here. All cards exhibit this bug. A much faster nvidia or ati does exactly the same thing as a much slower intel. Speed of graphics card does not affect this. Nor does flashing the bios to overcock 2d clock rates. In vista, with the same cards, the animation is smooth. In win7 the bug is undeniably there, irrelevant of system components. I have not seen a system yet where this bug did not exist. However some people just aren't able to see that there is a kink/jerk in the animation (caused by missing frames in the animation). It can be seen easily if you activate the slow motion aero animation feature/hack.

BTW, here is a video of this problem. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aNlY1pVZZf0

Notice how after a window is opened (with slow motion enabled) the animation is smooth until it gets to the last few frames when it just sort of pops.

yep thats exactly it !

http://blogs.zdnet.com/microsoft/?p=3332

Take two: Microsoft says business licensees to get Windows 7 bits on September 1

Why do MS keep doing this? They did it with Vista SP1, i.e said it was done and then sat on it for months. It's so damn annoying especially when the final bits are leaking all over the place. I hope they stick to the orginal end of July date >.<

That applies to business users with volume license agreements. Unfortunately, they won't be able to get Windows 7 until the 1st of September (according to the links you provided).

This is normal, businesses got Windows Vista before normal customers.

Whether intel is crappy or not is not the point here. All cards exhibit this bug. A much faster nvidia or ati does exactly the same thing as a much slower intel. Speed of graphics card does not affect this. Nor does flashing the bios to overcock 2d clock rates. In vista, with the same cards, the animation is smooth. In win7 the bug is undeniably there, irrelevant of system components. I have not seen a system yet where this bug did not exist. However some people just aren't able to see that there is a kink/jerk in the animation (caused by missing frames in the animation). It can be seen easily if you activate the slow motion aero animation feature/hack.

BTW, here is a video of this problem. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aNlY1pVZZf0

Notice how after a window is opened (with slow motion enabled) the animation is smooth until it gets to the last few frames when it just sort of pops.

Wait, what... this is a problem? I don't see any evidence of missing frames.. only that MS sped up the fade out animation compared to Vista. It's less "smooth" because the animation is simply quicker.

7600 is without a doubt (at least to me) the best thing they've created yet, whether it's chosen as the RTM final build or not. It's extremely fast, snappy, so far it's working great, and Office 2010 x64 is just as fast and snappy on it. ;)

Wait, what... this is a problem? I don't see any evidence of missing frames.. only that MS sped up the fade out animation compared to Vista. It's less "smooth" because the animation is simply quicker.

If you don't see it you don't see it. And no, the animation wasn't sped up. The problem is not in the whole animation as the video clearly shows. The problem is that at the end (evident in the last seconds of the video) of animations (close/open window) the animation starts smooth but then ends up completing it with a pop/jerk/skipped frames.

I can't really explain it any better than I already have. To that that notice it can be really annoying. It bothers me enough to not be able to have a windows 7 installation for longer than a few days and reverting back to vista.

Whether intel is crappy or not is not the point here. All cards exhibit this bug. A much faster nvidia or ati does exactly the same thing as a much slower intel. Speed of graphics card does not affect this. Nor does flashing the bios to overcock 2d clock rates. In vista, with the same cards, the animation is smooth. In win7 the bug is undeniably there, irrelevant of system components. I have not seen a system yet where this bug did not exist. However some people just aren't able to see that there is a kink/jerk in the animation (caused by missing frames in the animation). It can be seen easily if you activate the slow motion aero animation feature/hack.

BTW, here is a video of this problem. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aNlY1pVZZf0

Notice how after a window is opened (with slow motion enabled) the animation is smooth until it gets to the last few frames when it just sort of pops.

Omg people actually notice this stuff??

If you don't see it you don't see it. And no, the animation wasn't sped up. The problem is not in the whole animation as the video clearly shows. The problem is that at the end (evident in the last seconds of the video) of animations (close/open window) the animation starts smooth but then ends up completing it with a pop/jerk/skipped frames.

I can't really explain it any better than I already have. To that that notice it can be really annoying. It bothers me enough to not be able to have a windows 7 installation for longer than a few days and reverting back to vista.

If it bothers you that much, you probably should see a doctor or something. Seriously, it's a non-issue and there's no point in making a stink about it when no one notices it during their daily usage of Windows 7.

In 1998, where it's still appropriate to use.
That's just not fair to say. I don't think anyone and everyone who uses 32-bit Windows should be branded as God's worst sinner. I would love to move to a 64-bit OS and probably will with Windows 7, but at the moment most of the software I use doesn't function/doesn't work at all as well as 32-bit versions. That's the main hurdle that I am yet to overcome. You're probably feeling like a pig in crap running x64 stuff, but it's not for everyone. A lot of code out there isn't even multi-threaded yet, let alone 64-bit compatible. So please climb off your high horse ;)
If it bothers you that much, you probably should see a doctor or something. Seriously, it's a non-issue and there's no point in making a stink about it when no one notices it during their daily usage of Windows 7.

Perhaps it is you who should actually see a doctor if you can't see it. Something must be wrong with your eyes/brain. If you don't see it or don't care about it doesn't mean it is a non-issue. Maybe just a non issue for you but not to the peoeple who notice this. Just because you can't see it doesn't mean "no one notices itduring their daily useage", there are plenty of posts/threads about this on th internet and I expect there will be many more come GA.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Dude, im talking about simply disable it from settings app. Because of the eu regulation, you could disable it here for years.
    • One big question about Mars was answered thanks to Einstein's 100 year old theory by Sayan Sen Image via DepositPhotos Scientists at the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) have calculated how time passes on Mars compared with Earth, adding detail to how timekeeping would need to work beyond Earth’s orbit. The study, published in The Astronomical Journal, found that clocks on Mars run an average of 477 microseconds, or millionths of a second, faster per day than clocks on Earth. A microsecond is one millionth of a second, a very small unit used in precise scientific timing systems such as atomic clocks, which measure time using consistent atomic behavior. This difference is not constant. Because Mars moves around the Sun in a non-circular path (an eccentric orbit, meaning its distance from the Sun changes over time instead of staying fixed) and is affected by gravity from other bodies, the daily difference can vary by as much as 226 microseconds over a Martian year. The study also identifies smaller repeating changes of about 40 microseconds per day linked to synodic cycles (repeating periods that describe how planets line up with each other as they orbit the Sun from different positions). These longer patterns affect how time differences slowly rise and fall. To make these estimates, researchers compared Mars with Earth and the Moon. The work looks at relativistic proper time (the time actually measured by a clock depending on its speed and the strength of gravity where it is located, as described in Einstein’s relativity). This shows that each world has its own slightly different “rate” of time. This becomes more important as space missions expand into cislunar space (the region between Earth and the Moon) and toward Mars. On Earth, time systems rely on atomic clocks and satellites, which stay closely synchronized for navigation and communication. The study is based on Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity, which shows that time is affected by gravity and motion. Stronger gravity makes clocks run slower, while weaker gravity makes them run faster. “The time is just right for the Moon and Mars,” said NIST physicist Bijunath Patla. “This is the closest we have been to realizing the science fiction vision of expanding across the solar system.” A day on Mars is about 40 minutes longer than on Earth, and a Martian year lasts 687 Earth days. But the main question is not just about days and years, but how fast time itself passes. An atomic clock placed on Mars would function normally, but compared with one on Earth, the two would slowly drift apart due to differences in gravity and motion. This requires careful calculation of what is similar to a time-zone difference across planets. Researchers modeled Mars using a reference surface and included gravitational effects from the Sun, Earth, the Moon, and other planets. This includes a multi-body gravitational system (often described as a three-body or four-body problem, where predicting motion becomes difficult because multiple large objects all pull on each other at the same time through gravity). Mars also follows a Keplerian orbit (an idealized elliptical orbit based on simple gravitational laws that assume smooth motion, before adding real-world disturbances from other bodies). In addition, the researchers accounted for solar tides (small changes in gravitational force caused by the Sun that slightly distort planetary motion and timing, especially in systems involving Earth and the Moon). These combined effects are described as relativistic proper-time offsets (small but measurable differences in elapsed time between locations caused by gravity and motion), which must be included when comparing clocks across planets. “But for Mars, that’s not the case. Its distance from the Sun and its eccentric orbit make the variations in time larger. A three-body problem is extremely complicated. Now we’re dealing with four: the Sun, Earth, the Moon and Mars,” Patla explained. “The heavy lifting was more challenging than I initially thought.” Although the differences are extremely small, they matter for navigation and communication systems that depend on precise timing. Even modern networks on Earth, such as mobile systems, rely on timing accuracy at very small fractions of a second. Communication between Earth and Mars currently takes about four to 24 minutes or more depending on planetary positions, meaning signals are not real-time. A shared and accurate time system could help future missions reduce confusion in navigation and data exchange. “If you get synchronization, it will be almost like real-time communication without any loss of information. You don’t have to wait to see what happens,” Patla said. Researchers note that fully developed interplanetary communication networks are still far in the future. However, understanding how time behaves across planets helps prepare for those systems. “It may be decades before the surface of Mars is covered by the tracks of wandering rovers, but it is useful now to study the issues involved in establishing navigation systems on other planets and moons,” said Neil Ashby. “Like current global navigation systems like GPS, these systems will depend on accurate clocks, and the effects on clock rates can be analyzed with the help of Einstein’s general theory of relativity.” Patla added that the results also help improve understanding of time itself under relativity. “It's good to know for the first time what is happening on Mars timewise. Nobody knew that before. It improves our knowledge of the theory itself, the theory of how clocks tick and relativity,” he said. Source: NIST, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 by Razvan Serea TeraCopy is a compact program designed to copy and move files at the maximum possible speed, also providing you with a lot of features. Copy files faster. TeraCopy uses dynamically adjusted buffers to reduce seek times. Asynchronous copy speeds up file transfer between two physical hard drives. Pause and resume transfers. Pause copy process at any time to free up system resources and continue with a single click. Error recovery. In case of copy error, TeraCopy will try several times and in the worse case just skips the file, not terminating the entire transfer. Interactive file list. TeraCopy shows failed file transfers and lets you fix the problem and recopy only problem files. Shell integration. TeraCopy can completely replace Explorer copy and move functions, allowing you work with files as usual. TeraCopy is free for non-commercial use only. For commercial use you need to buy a license. The paid version of the program includes the following features: Copy/move to your favorite folders. Save reports as HTML and CSV files. Select files with the same extension/folder. Remove the selected files from the copy queue. TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 changelog: Added support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. Improved exception handling and automated bug report upload. Fixed several minor bugs and small memory leaks. Build 26 (June 24) Fixed a rare exception when a transfer completed. Features added since version 3.17: Enhanced speed graph. New multi-threaded copy engine. Support for copying to multiple targets. Queue system for managing multiple copy operations. Support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. TeraCopy entry in the modern Windows Explorer context menu. Integrated toolbar in the title bar. Why receive LocalSend transfers with TeraCopy? Handle file conflicts: Skip, overwrite, or rename files when a file with the same name already exists. LocalSend always creates another copy, which can waste time and disk space, especially when resuming an interrupted transfer. Filter unwanted files: Apply ignore lists or remove files manually before accepting a transfer, so unnecessary files are not downloaded. Better performance on fast networks: In tests over a 10 Gbps connection, TeraCopy received files several times faster than the standard LocalSend app on Windows. Download: TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 | 14.5 MB (Freeware, paid upgrade available) View: TeraCopy Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Briefly used Turbo Pascal (and Turbo C++) in 97 and soon after that I bought PC magazine that included a full version of Delphi 2. I still use Delphi today, some 29 years later.
    • Age of Empires Mobile comes to PC, here's how to carry over progress from your phone by Ivan Jenic Image: YouTube/Microsoft Microsoft just released Age of Empires Mobile for PC. The game, officially called Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, is available for free on Steam and Microsoft Store, almost two years after its initial release for handheld devices. Age of Empires is one of those franchises that entire generations grew up with. The original came out in 1997, and immediately got people hooked to building civilizations and crushing their enemies on the battlefield. However, the franchise today is a far cry from its roots, as Age of Empires Mobile is, well, a game optimized for handheld devices, and not a classic RTS title we’ve all loved for years. And, of course, it includes in-game purchases. The PC version is still a mobile game at its core, but it’s been optimized for desktop play. There’s mouse control, full keyboard compatibility, and a refined UI. Microsoft also refreshed the visuals with some 4k textures, so the game should look better on larger screens. The game supports Crossplay, so you can switch between your phone, tablet, and PC without losing anything. But linked progress doesn’t come out of the box, as you have to enable it first. Here’s how to link your progress: On your mobile device, open Age of Empires Mobile. Go to Settings (Gear icon) > Account. Select Bind Account and choose a sign-in option. Once you enable account binding, sign in on PC using the same method, and your progress will be accessible across all your devices. Xbox Game Pass subscribers also get a bonus reward pack on PC, which includes: 1 Monthly Pass Token 1 Custom Resource Chest 10 Universal 60-Minute Speed-Ups 1,000 Empire Coins Exclusive Player Portrait Frame You can find more info about Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, as well as download links, on the Age of Empires official website.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      458
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!