Opera: Microsoft's 'minor tweak' of Windows 7 not enough


Recommended Posts

The reason Opera has no market share is the browser just plain sucks. I've used it, including very recently and even tried out Beta 10. Opera has major rendering issues and is very unintuitive for even basic task. It is a horrible browser, bloated, to many useless features included like a email client and bittorrent. I just want a browser and not the Swiss army knives of browsers.

Yes because nobody uses email or downloads using torrents! :rolleyes: The torrent download feature is pretty good for the average user who doesn't understand torrents, why would you need an extra application to download something from the internet?

Seeing as everyone keeps saying it, what are the major rendering issues with Opera?

Well actually, your link isn't relevant. Oh it tries to be, but it continues to revisit the ridiculous equating of IE to a commercial product. Internet Explorer is not, nor can I ever remember it being, for sale. It's freeware. Tying involves--as your link explains--linking the purchase of one product to the purchase of another. That wiki in fact uses the word 'purchase' over and over again, even though nobody purchases IE.

This is a completely unreasonable viewpoint perpetuated by a case pursued by ignorant bureaucrats. If anything, Microsoft's defense that the browser is just another facet of the operating system--the defense that was REJECTED at the time--has become a startling reality in almost EVERY operating system at this point, culminating in the recent announcement by Google that they were going to make an operating system OUT OF a browser.

The past ten years of law suits against Microsoft has done nothing but cripple them in a market THEY created and allowed their competitors to pursue MS's own original vision. The whole thing is total madness.

Yes because nobody uses email or downloads using torrents! :rolleyes: The torrent download feature is pretty good for the average user who doesn't understand torrents, why would you need an extra application to download something from the internet?

Seeing as everyone keeps saying it, what are the major rendering issues with Opera?

Because I have a email and torrent solution and don't need Opera's crappy second rate email and bittorrent clients. I Don't want a one size fits all solutions as I found individual programs that are far better like Utorrent and Windows Live Mail. I personally use webmail and don't use a email client.

For starters go and start Firefox and then opera, go to most web sites and you will see large image based text in Opera is very blocky and ugly when you zoom the page in to 120%. Firefox renders it correctly but Opera does not. Then there are sites that just don't work well with Opera like parts of facebook, yahoo and other major sites. Opera has the worst problem with rendering issues of all the browsers I have used.

Yes because nobody uses email or downloads using torrents! :rolleyes: The torrent download feature is pretty good for the average user who doesn't understand torrents, why would you need an extra application to download something from the internet?

Seeing as everyone keeps saying it, what are the major rendering issues with Opera?

I have to say there's not really such a thing as an average user and torrent. If you're advanced enough to understand torrents and be able to find them, you're likely to have a particular program for that.

What do you suggest we do? Ban Opera users? Ban talk of Opera? Start a petition of some sort?

I'll make sure whoever tries to ban me as a Opera user gets banned first. :p

I kid, I kid.

Yes because nobody uses email or downloads using torrents! :rolleyes: The torrent download feature is pretty good for the average user who doesn't understand torrents, why would you need an extra application to download something from the internet?

Exactly. With regards to this:

I have to say there's not really such a thing as an average user and torrent. If you're advanced enough to understand torrents and be able to find them, you're likely to have a particular program for that.

there are some sites offering large files which, when regular users click on the .torrent, anticipate that they'll start a download as if it's a regular HTTP file transfer. This example doesn't apply to just Linux distros which they probably have no knowledge of working with - for the old Autopatcher these guys used to have a torrent copy floating around, and Autopatcher isn't that much more complicated than a regular Windows installer.

Another bundled Opera feature that I use is its integrated IRC client, since I really can't be arsed to search for another client, and 99% of the time if I'm on Neowin's IRC server, I'm also on the forums too. So why not?

Seeing as everyone keeps saying it, what are the major rendering issues with Opera?

One major problem I keep noticing is Opera freezing frames inside a site, be it advertisements or say Neowin's forum RTE that doesn't really work properly.

They do fix some site specific problems from time to time; for instance, Youtube's dropdown menus and Neowin's frontpage menus used to not repaint properly in some of the weeklies until it was fixed in a later build - in the case of Youtube a new entry in the browser.js was added specifically for the menus. Facebook also used to have some problems with entering wall posts - again they also fixed it in a later build.

The point is, some people here tend to forget that these weekly builds are what you expect from pre-release software... but write it off as lousy finished code.

I can't help wondering whether, if this deal goes through and Opera gets bundled into Windows, whether they'd go back to being adware. I'm sure Google would be pleased by that.

In this day and age, that won't happen. Simple as that. This isn't the early 2000s anymore.

In this day and age, that won't happen. Simple as that. This isn't the early 2000s anymore.

I disagree, the early 2000's were a relatively innocent age of banner ads compared to today. A huge portion of the modern internet is driven by advertising. (Most) people accept this, they've been conditioned to. Look at Neowin's front page, or virtually any forum out there. You'll find banners, text ads, flash ads. Look at the Windows disk images used by OEMs, trial versions are basically an advertisement for a product, and the fee associated with getting the trialware onto machines is used to subsidize the final cost. Look at any search you run on Bing or Google, those featured results are ads. Ever use Gmail or Live mail? You get ads unless you pay a fee. Same deal with a lot of "free" downloads, where you first have to enter an e-mail address in order to receive spam. You see ads driving so many things online that you don't notice, because you've trained yourself to ignore them.

I remember when Opera was adware/shareware. People would fight to the death defending it as a way of funding the continued development of a "great product". Opera is scrambling here to market itself to a segment of users who don't know enough to make any educated decision about what browser they use. These are the very same people that punch the flash monkey, or enter their e-mail address to download a free ringtone. They're not going to complain about an ad-driven Opera if it is bundled with Windows, though they might remark that the logo of the internet has changed from a blue E to a red O.

The more I think about this possibility, the more it seems that there is no downside of it for Opera. What they stand to lose in loyal users today is peanuts compared to what they stand to gain from going adware.

Edited by Relativity_17

On sites, I agree with your viewpoint. I'm not sure how regular users would react to ads painted in a browser's chrome area though.

It would be odd to reintroduce ads into their browser, and still offer a content blocker which was designed to remove just that. :ermm:

No it does not. MS was punished already for the 90s case by the US DOJ. This is an entirely new case.

MS got a slap on the wrist, nothing more. That's why MS's thuggish business practices continue. It's no surprise really, because MS is such a cash cow and political tool for the US government. MS is a sort of national resource that the government isn't going to mess with too much.

The same way Google cooperates with US intelligence agencies. LOL, you think this is all just business? No, it's politics too. Me, I only care about the quality of the software I use, and I don't like Windows very much--even though I have no choice but to use it on a daily basis. At least now we're not forced to use IE anymore, and that is solely the result of legal action, not something MS willingly agreed to.

Microsofts-Bill-Gates_17.jpg

At least now we're not forced to use IE anymore, and that is solely the result of legal action, not something MS willingly agreed to.

We were never forced to use IE, there's always been an alternative since IE came out that people were free to use (Netscape, etc.).

On sites, I agree with your viewpoint. I'm not sure how regular users would react to ads painted in a browser's chrome area though.

Probably the same way that people react to the ads in MSN Messenger. Some people patch them away, others switch to something else. Most people don't care and ignore them.

We were never forced to use IE, there's always been an alternative since IE came out that people were free to use (Netscape, etc.).

Not true, Billy G was holding a gun up behind my head and making me use IE6. Tru storie!!!

MS got a slap on the wrist, nothing more. That's why MS's thuggish business practices continue. It's no surprise really, because MS is such a cash cow and political tool for the US government. MS is a sort of national resource that the government isn't going to mess with too much.

The same way Google cooperates with US intelligence agencies. LOL, you think this is all just business? No, it's politics too. Me, I only care about the quality of the software I use, and I don't like Windows very much--even though I have no choice but to use it on a daily basis. At least now we're not forced to use IE anymore, and that is solely the result of legal action, not something MS willingly agreed to.

Now I may be wrong in this, but you never were forced to use IE. No one is holding a gun to your head saying "You have to use Internet Explorer or I'm going to kill you". There are some situations like at work where you can't use a different browser, but from what I've seen most network administrators and IT guys put Firefox on those computers as well. So yeah, these days if you're using IE it's likely as not your choice.

MS got a slap on the wrist, nothing more. That's why MS's thuggish business practices continue. It's no surprise really, because MS is such a cash cow and political tool for the US government. MS is a sort of national resource that the government isn't going to mess with too much.

Sure, fall back onto the conspiracy theories when the facts don't fit your preconceived opinions. That's always a free get-out-of-jail card for every imaginable situation.

At least now we're not forced to use IE anymore, and that is solely the result of legal action, not something MS willingly agreed to.

I call pure and utter bull****. I've used Windows since 3.1, and at no stage throughout my decade-long history of Windows usage have I ever been unable to install and use whichever browser I wanted.

You're just another MS-basher who, ironically, doesn't even have the balls to tear yourself from Windows. Though I guess that's neither new nor surprising...

Windows users are "forced" to use IE, just like Apple users are "forced" to use Safari, and Ubuntu users are "forced" to use Firefox. No doubt Google OS users will be "forced" to use Chrome.

So according the EU I should be able to get a Mercedes Benz with a BMW engine? God help us all, seriously.

Why are you surprised? This is, after all, coming from the same political entity that banned the sale of cucumbers that were too curved...

Why are you surprised? This is, after all, coming from the same political entity that banned the sale of cucumbers that were too curved...

Don't hear much about the antics of the EU in Australia but that, and all of this is, absurd. Another reason to stay in Australia, consumer freedom from ridiculous Government decisions.

Don't hear much about the antics of the EU in Australia but that, and all of this is, absurd. Another reason to stay in Australia, consumer freedom from ridiculous Government decisions.

lol not fanning flames here, and purely in jest, but whoever does your game ratings or whatever is a bit extreme down there aren't they, I would consider that ridiculous government decisions.

lol not fanning flames here, and purely in jest, but whoever does your game ratings or whatever is a bit extreme down there aren't they, I would consider that ridiculous government decisions.

Now that is true. I believe some games that are sold in other parts of the world are even banned here due to the laws in place. Back on topic, I just can't understand the reason behind Microsoft not been able to package their Internet explorer in their Operating system. It just eludes me to the reasoning behind this?

Now that is true. I believe some games that are sold in other parts of the world are even banned here due to the laws in place. Back on topic, I just can't understand the reason behind Microsoft not been able to package their Internet explorer in their Operating system. It just eludes me to the reasoning behind this?

Opera wants money. They aren't getting it. That's basically what it comes down to. They're disguising it by saying Microsoft is stifling competition. Mozilla and Firefox of course, prove otherwise.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • NetSpeedTray 1.3.3 by Razvan Serea NetSpeedTray is a lightweight, open-source Windows network monitor that shows live upload and download speeds directly on the Taskbar. Designed for efficiency, it quietly sits in the system tray, conserving CPU and battery with dynamic updates. It blends seamlessly with Windows 10/11, adapts to light/dark themes, and auto-positions to avoid overlaps. Features include accurate interface detection, customizable display, optional mini-graph, color coding, granular font and unit control, detailed per-interface history graphs, safe data management, and easy CSV export—bringing the network monitoring Windows forgot. NetSpeedTray key features: Lightweight & Efficient Runs quietly in your system tray without consuming resources. Features a "Dynamic Update Rate" that lowers refresh frequency when the network is idle to save CPU and battery life. Native Look & Feel Blends seamlessly with Windows 10/11 UI. Smart detection for light and dark taskbar themes ensures text is always visible. Intelligent & Adaptive Positioning Automatically finds empty space next to your system tray and shifts to make room for new icons, preventing overlaps. Seamless OS Integration Behaves like a native Windows component. Hides instantly with auto-hiding taskbar Hides when a fullscreen app is active Smart Network Monitoring Accurate by Default: Auto mode identifies your main internet connection and ignores noise from VPNs or virtual adapters. Easy Interface Selection: Switch effortlessly between Auto, All, or Selected network interfaces via intuitive radio buttons. Total Visual Customization Free Move Mode: Unlock and place the widget anywhere on your screen. Optional Mini-Graph: Real-time graph of recent network activity with adjustable opacity. Color Coding: Customize colors and speed thresholds to quickly see network status. Granular Display Control Text & Font: Adjust font family, size, weight, and alignment. Units: Automatic (B/s, KB/s, MB/s) or fixed Mbps display. Precision: Set decimal places and always show them for uniform appearance. Detailed & Intelligent History Graph Smart Scale: Logarithmic scale shows low-level traffic and large spikes clearly. Per-Interface Filtering: View speed history for specific adapters (Wi-Fi, Ethernet, VPN). Safe & Efficient Data Management: Adjustable retention, automatic cleanup, optimized database. Easy Data Export: Export raw data to .csv or save high-quality graphs for reports. NetSpeedTray v1.3.3: The Updater Fix A stabilization release that repairs a critical regression in v1.3.2: the app shipped without OpenSSL, which silently broke every HTTPS request — including the built-in update checker (the "Could not check for updates" error many of you hit). This release restores it, hardens the build so it can't happen again, and fixes a startup crash plus four other reported bugs. Changes: Fixed update checking — Resolved a critical issue that prevented the app from checking for updates ("Could not check for updates"). Fixed startup crash with Auto-Cycling — The app no longer crashes on launch after enabling Cycle display mode. Fixed incorrect network speeds on 10GbE adapters — Multi-gigabit network cards now display speeds correctly instead of being stuck at 0. Improved color coding — Default color is shown when idle, and color/threshold changes now apply immediately without restarting. Fullscreen visibility fix — The widget now correctly stays visible over fullscreen apps when Keep Visible is enabled. Improved AMD Ryzen temperature detection — More reliable CPU temperature monitoring for Ryzen processors. Cleaner upgrades — Installer now removes outdated application files during upgrades, preventing DLL/version conflicts while preserving user settings. Improved stability — Fixed potential DLL loading issues by excluding critical OpenSSL and NumPy components from UPX compression. Better settings window — Scrollbars removed and layout improved for a cleaner experience. Localization improvements — Updated translations and completed missing UI text across all supported languages. More reliable releases — Added regression tests covering recent critical fixes, bringing the test suite to 196 passing tests. [full release notes] Download: NetSpeedTray 1.3.3 | 87.9 MB (Open Source) Download: NetSpeedTray Portable | 101.0 MB View: NetSpeedTray Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Why Delta Chat is the best decentralized messenger you have probably never tried by Paul Hill There is no shortage of messaging apps out there; we have WhatsApp, Messenger, and Telegram, just to name a few. While Meta has taken steps to incorporate encryption into Messenger and WhatsApp, they still leave a lot to be desired. If you are in the market for a messaging app that promotes security, privacy, and optional anonymity, you'll want to read what I have to say about Delta Chat. For those not familiar with Delta Chat, rather than relying on centralized servers as you do with Facebook Messenger, it relies on email. Essentially, it is a chat interface that feels like a messaging app, but secretly in the background, it is firing off emails. In the past, you used to have to sign in with your email account. When you sent messages to people, it would just be sending encrypted messages to their inbox, which their Delta Chat client would decrypt. When I first learned about Delta Chat, it required users to sign in with an email account, but I was pleasantly surprised upon trying it in 2026 that this is no longer a requirement, or the preferred method was to use the app. Recently, I’ve tried UAD-ng on my old Nokia 3.4 to disable most of the Google apps because the bootloader is locked, and this is the next best option. While finding replacement apps in F-Droid, I came across Delta Chat again, and it has undergone quite a big change since I last used it, with its new chatmail relays, which no longer require you to sign in to your own email account, providing anonymity, and they offer greater security. Android and Desktop Delta Chat apps. Not only does it run on my de-googled phone, but it also works on desktop computers and iOS, making it truly ubiquitous. For me, Delta Chat is a wonderful alternative messenger because it gives you more control. It supports switching between different profiles, which you can set up super quickly; you don’t register a username, you don’t register a password. The only thing you do have is a random string email address on a chatmail relay (which you don’t have to memorize). To maintain access to your profile, you just need to add a second device to your account via QR code or make a backup of your account, which you can restore later. Fail to do these, your account is gone - as it should be if you don’t want to leave accounts that could get hacked later on. My decision to block Google stuff on my Nokia was done for practical reasons; the device sucked when it launched, and it sucks even more now. The nice thing about F-Droid and the apps within is that they’re usually lightweight, free of bloat, and work well on that device. What was inconvenient for me was that it was hard to send messages from that device, say if I wanted to copy a code over to my main phone or send family members a link from that device. That’s when I decided to look at the available chat apps and saw Delta Chat. Another nice thing about Delta Chat is its notifications. Some messaging apps rely on Google’s ecosystem for notification transport on Android; however, with Delta Chat, it can use Google’s solutions if you have Play Services or MicroG installed. Otherwise, it is able to keep a background connection to the chatmail relay server so that you can get notified when you receive a message. As free software, the code of Delta Chat is open for all who want to take it and build upon it. In the future, if the developers of Delta Chat make a catastrophically bad decision and take the app in an undesirable direction, users can take the code and fork the project. This contrasts with closed-source apps from corporations that can take their products in any direction they like. By relying on free software instead of closed-source programs, you actually control your computing. I’ve spoken at length about how running this type of software is like owning your own home rather than renting it. The same applies here; if you use Delta Chat, you don’t need to worry about it going away in the future. Whether it is Telegram, WhatsApp, or Messenger, you are required to register a username and password to use these services. A major flaw in this design is that anyone can try various passwords and potentially break into your account with your complete chat history intact. Sure, there is encryption in Messenger, where you need a second PIN and two-factor authentication in Telegram, but breaches happen all the time. Unlike before, when you used to sign in to your email account to send and receive messages, the primary way to do it now is to create an account on a chatmail relay. The resulting email address is a random string followed by the name of the relay you pick. This means you can start and begin adding contacts Without a username and password, you either need to ensure you have a backup or at least one device running your Delta Chat profile. The primary way to log in on another device is to go to the settings and add a second device. Then, you’ll just scan a QR code with your new device, and it’ll log in to your account and sync all your chat history and contacts. To end users, Delta Chat just looks like any instant messenger; however, it is really sending your messages as encrypted emails to your contact. This is pretty cool from a censorship perspective, as it makes the service more difficult to block. Previously, the main way to use the app was by logging in with email, but nowadays, it’s recommended that you use chatmail relays. Chatmail relays temporarily hold messages in case your device is offline. They are cheap, simple servers that don’t store data as group states. Other information, like your name and avatar, only exists on your device and the devices of those you share your contact information with. The relays are also decentralized and operated by various groups and individuals. It is even possible to set up your own chatmail relay, but most people will want to use one hosted elsewhere. To keep your messages secure, Delta Chat uses a secure subset of the OpenPGP standard that gives you automatic end-to-end encryption. It also uses Secure-Join to exchange encryption setup information through QR-code scanning or invite links. Autocrypt is also used to automatically establish end-to-end encryption between contacts and all members of group chat, but sometime this year Autocrypt v2 will be rolled out, bringing post-quantum resistant encryption and forward secrecy. The Delta Chat FAQ is an interesting read that explains many more details about the app. Credit: Pexels Delta Chat is unique among messaging apps because it is built on email, a technology that’s decades old and isn’t going anywhere soon. What’s more is that email is not centralized either, so it’s far more difficult for any authoritarian regime to disrupt the Delta Chat app. I haven’t spoken too much about features yet, so I will do that now. Delta Chat allows you to do one-on-one chats, group chats, and create channels. It also supports file sharing and making audio and video calls when chatting one-to-one, but it’s not available for group chats right now. At the time of writing, the calling functionality is disabled and can be enabled in Settings > Advanced > Debug Calls. I have used the video calling feature, and the quality is excellent. It works over WebRTC, another open standard. The app also lets you send voice notes, enables disappearing messages, and has its own app ecosystem. I did try playing chess one time there, but it was a bit spotty; though, we did manage to complete the game with a victory for me. To add people to Delta Chat, you can either give them your Delta Chat link or your QR code to scan. These are the only ways to add users, so you won't have any spam bots bothering you. If the people you want to chat with don't have the app yet, just send them your link, and it will take them to a webpage where they can install the app and then add you. It's really quick for them to install it and get started, which is nice. Credit: Microsoft. The Majorana 2 quantum chip unveiled in 2026. I do not think quantum computers are too far out now, and I do hope that Delta Chat is able to push out Autocrypt v2 sooner, rather than later, so bad actors do not attempt to collect encrypted communications and then decrypt them in the future using quantum computers. By getting people’s messages post-quantum-safe now, users won’t have to worry when quantum computers start cracking legacy encryption. Overall, I would recommend this app to people who are already past WhatsApp and Messenger and have perhaps begun using apps like Telegram or Session. It shares a lot of characteristics with these apps and goes a lot further than Telegram in terms of security. By being based on email, it is also resistant to censorship, and the lack of a username and password makes you anonymous (if you want to be) and safe from brute force password cracking attempts. Let me know in the comments if you’ve tried Delta Chat recently. Do you think it's a good bulwark against governments that are tightening their grip on the internet?
    • Putin was behind Farage/Brexit and behind Trump/MAGA. Different idiot lying beasts, same fascist master. Same screwed up results for both nations.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      464
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      217
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      154
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      73
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!