[Official] Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2


Recommended Posts

What's really beginning to annoy me are people with grenade launchers- they just stand there on the map somewhere firing blindly and an explosion near you are you're dead. It's friggin' annoying, and when you watch the Killcam it's even worse because they've just fired it over a building. UGH.

Also people who use the auto aim are just annoying- it's on with me but I just forget it's there and just force the crosshair away from the guy it's aiming at. It's annoying more than anything when you know what you're doing a little bit.

I've just got my Akimbo ranger too, kills with one shot so now I'm gonna get my own back on society by killing everyone with 'em.

If it was so easy to use everyone would use it. The goal of the game is to win. To dismiss it as no skill is ignorant. Just because you were able to figure it out does not make it easy for everyone. I see so many people in Hardcore trying to use it with no effect. It has a very needed place in this game. There are many "blind" spots in the game that the weapon was designed for. Being able to put your grenades into these spots can make or break a game. Take Estate for instance. Who ever spawns at the top will take the house and it is easily defended. I am able to but rounds into the windows easily, out of site and uproot the enemy. With scavenger equipped I can easily lock the house down from a safe distance and eventually take the house. Running and random fire is luck, using it how it was meant to be used is skill.

And I agree, the game is very arcade and nowhere realistic but once you get past that and except it for what it is, it is very fun. You want realistic try Arma 2.

No they wouldn't because it's boring and requires no skills, people would rather use a real weapon.

Oh and check this thread https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?showtopic=746808 See who has the most posts in there by a large margin.

No they wouldn't because it's boring and requires no skills, people would rather use a real weapon.

I feel you have been hurt in the past life by someone owning you with a tube. My thoughts and prayers go out to you, now Im off to own some more noobs with my noobtube and make them cry and quit.

I feel you have just been very hurt because you have a hard time getting kills without your beloved noobtube and now you feel the need to defend it :rofl:

Ahhhh I think your feelings are hurt. Most people that knock something only do so because they have no clue how it works, how to use it or are afraid of it. Which one are you? There is my gamer tag, come join me, ill school you. I play on the weekends, not allot of time during the week.

Edited by Hellacool
And I agree, the game is very arcade and nowhere realistic but once you get past that and except it for what it is, it is very fun.

Arcade isn't the word I'd use. Casual friendly is a phrase more apt to what MW2 is. Arcade implies there is some kind of learning curve. ;)

What's really beginning to annoy me are people with grenade launchers- they just stand there on the map somewhere firing blindly and an explosion near you are you're dead. It's friggin' annoying, and when you watch the Killcam it's even worse because they've just fired it over a building. UGH.

For some it is blind fire but for me I know all the spots on the map, the angle to shoot it and where it is going to hit. Especially at the beginning of a Hardcore TM DM. Every map there are reference points (Bushes, tops of buildings etc...) that will guide your shot. I get more 2-3 kills at the start of the game then I can count. Most people that get tubed at the very start of the game rage quit, makes for a fun game. I enjoy making the pansies cry over a game.

Arcade isn't the word I'd use. Casual friendly is a phrase more apt to what MW2 is. Arcade implies there is some kind of learning curve. ;)

The only learning curve in this game is to learn the maps, after that it is to learn what I can do to make the pansies rage quit. The best part is I do not even use a mike so the haters talk all this smack and get no response from me, well except my score. Remember everyone, it is a game. As long as someone is using an aspect of the game that EVERYONE can use then deal with it or go away.

You seem to be getting a lot of enjoyment from making the 'pansies rage quit', don't you?

Oh yes. Especially the 12 year old potty mouths. Those are the best. Some of the hate messages I get are awesome. The more the cry, the more I turn it up. Nothing will make a team quit faster than Akimbo P90's running through their whole team. Of course if it is a cool server with cool people then that is a different story but I am having a harder and harder time finding a server that does not contain cry baby b*tches in it.

Sorry what? :/

That is the only language I know, seems pretty straight forward to me.

He's a perfect example of a typical Live-Tweener who likes to act tough, be an ass and ruin it for everyone else. No offence but it's almost scary how textbook it is.

Ahhhh one of my victims. If you only knew how old I was and what I do for a living ;) I pride myself in making the quitters quit, something you have already admitted too. When the going gets tough you get going, sad individual.

Ahhhh one of my victims. If you only knew how old I was and what I do for a living ;) I pride myself in making the quitters quit, something you have already admitted too. When the going gets tough you get going.

... Right :|

Can you tell this guy is a MW2 regular on Xbox Live? :rofl:

... Right :|

Can you tell this guy is a MW2 regular on Xbox Live? :rofl:

Unlike you who quits as soon as you start losing, what else to you quit at, life? Dont knock the people that are better than you. With a few typed words you are ready to quit here already, shhhhsh, get real. You sound like the kid on the play ground trying to get those around you to agree with you. Dont pull others into your misery. Bottom line you get owned in the game, can not take it and quit. Your own words.

Unlike you who quits as soon as you start losing, what else to you quit at, life? Dont knock the people that are better than you. With a few typed words you are ready to quit here already, shhhhsh, get real. You sound like the kid on the play ground trying to get those around you to agree with you. Dont pull others into your misery.

Okay now I'm lost :rofl:

Unlike you who quits as soon as you start losing, what else to you quit at, life? Dont knock the people that are better than you. With a few typed words you are ready to quit here already, shhhhsh, get real. You sound like the kid on the play ground trying to get those around you to agree with you. Dont pull others into your misery. Bottom line you get owned in the game, can not take it and quit. Your own words.

Lol. Just lol. :rofl:

So pr0... Cant compete with that :laugh:

To play a game simply to ruin the game for others is a bit sad really. I would even say as bad as the hackers that I get to enjoy banning every day :)

How is that blind firing? It's precision.. granade launcher is more difficult then people think. On close range it doesn't explode, you have to have a feel to fire at a proper distance too. It requires skill. That's why people complain. Those who don't know how to use it get killed by it.

I have no issues with other people using it. It's almost on any assault rifle.

I don't get the whining from people. Using exploit and running with a glitchy care package requires no skill and that's BS. Using a granade launcher does and it's a valid part of the game. You can use danger close but you sacrifice stopping power or other perks. It's about a choice and how you play. Launchers can misfire too, so it's definitely not all peachy.

I find it funny, because I don't get what people would like others who use granade launchers to do? Run with a pistol only so you can kill them easier? That's the point of the game. You have the same tools at your disposal. Use it.

The only issue in the game is care package glitching and now nerfed 1887s. There's always someone who finds it awesome to go and run with a care package glitch. And then when I use it to kick their ass they all start crying.

When you fire blindly over walls or into the air (no matter how precise you're aiming may be) you didn't have anyone in your sights that you were aiming for. Basically just a "they are over there direction" guess. That's not skill, sorry. Twist and turn it how you like, but if you're in the real world you shoot to kill. Not shoot and hope for a kill that ends up being 50/50.

As for people who complain about it because they can't do it. Rubbish. I can do it I choose to, but I don't. I much prefer cooking a grenade and perfect my throwing so that it explodes on impact/landing. Something I'm pretty damn good at if I do say so myself. In other games it's pefecting sticky grenades (Y)

When you fire blindly over walls or into the air (no matter how precise you're aiming may be) you didn't have anyone in your sights that you were aiming for. Basically just a "they are over there direction" guess. That's not skill, sorry. Twist and turn it how you like, but if you're in the real world you shoot to kill. Not shoot and hope for a kill that ends up being 50/50.

I can buy that but there are many instances where I haven't seen the person myself but either know they are there because it is the beginning of the game or saw rounds coming from that direction or someone calls them out. I also know many people just fire, like the javelins. I will say this, in the real world (been there) sometimes you know the enemy is in a building, you may not see them, you put rounds on them, end of story. Sometimes it is a 50/50. The days of looking your enemy in the eye have long been gone. But this game is far from real world and should never be compared, I mean really. How can I pick up claymores off a dead body if he never had them????? And Akimbo, really. Unfortunately too many people forget this is a game and get all bunged up over it, those are the ones I prey on.

You can spend the rest of time justifying that the weapon is precise and requires skill til you are blue in the face. But it'll always be called noob tube and for good reason.

The only time I ever use them isn't even in MW2. In fact I think the only game I use them is Battlefield where I'm destroying vehicles or walls.

I can buy that but there are many instances where I haven't seen the person myself but either know they are there because it is the beginning of the game or saw rounds coming from that direction or someone calls them out. I also know many people just fire, like the javelins. I will say this, in the real world (been there) sometimes you know the enemy is in a building, you may not see them, you put rounds on them, end of story. Sometimes it is a 50/50. The days of looking your enemy in the eye have long been gone. But this game is far from real world and should never be compared, I mean really. How can I pick up claymores off a dead body if he never had them????? And Akimbo, really. Unfortunately too many people forget this is a game and get all bunged up over it, those are the ones I prey on.

dude, its a game. Relax, its there to be enjoyed. And for your conversation with Sethos, just chill out man, its not helping anything.

on a side note in the comment which I quoted, you wrote that you had "been there" in the real world, are you implying that you are a soldier or in the army or something along those lines which involves shooting the enemy in buildings? If so, sounds pretty amazing, tell us more!

When you fire blindly over walls or into the air (no matter how precise you're aiming may be) you didn't have anyone in your sights that you were aiming for. Basically just a "they are over there direction" guess. That's not skill, sorry. Twist and turn it how you like, but if you're in the real world you shoot to kill. Not shoot and hope for a kill that ends up being 50/50.

As for people who complain about it because they can't do it. Rubbish. I can do it I choose to, but I don't. I much prefer cooking a grenade and perfect my throwing so that it explodes on impact/landing. Something I'm pretty damn good at if I do say so myself. In other games it's pefecting sticky grenades (Y)

With DM & Seth here. The tube is a joke. It should have an arming range ala BF2. But no it's the only gun that can be used at any range and still remain lethal even when you're not on target. Much like World of Warcraft the game has been dumbed down for 'joe pugger' but unlike WoW it doesn't have a hard mode with additional rewards! :(

The only time I ever use them isn't even in MW2. In fact I think the only game I use them is Battlefield where I'm destroying vehicles or walls.

Ah morons in jeeps who think they can turn you in to road kill! :D

With DM & Seth here. The tube is a joke. It should have an arming range ala BF2. But no it's the only gun that can be used at any range and still remain lethal even when you're not on target.

Agreed

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Yup, that's a doozy right there 😄
    • It's a bundle of tools created by a variety of people, so things can go wrong sometimes. It's a great addition to Windows, and I use a lot of the tools on a daily basis. Also, it's still a 0.**** release so quick updates are to be expected 😉
    • Oh, I did. And it's even worse than I was hoping! Besides a lot of techno-babble jargon (yes I understand 100% of it but it's still all just techno-babble) there's 2 key points that make me super-weary about even considering testing this out. -- By default, after installation, a relay is automatically set up, so you do not need to care about that. * Non-chatmail apps use email servers as a long-term message archive while chatmail clients use email servers for ephemeral instant message relay. * Supporting the full variety of classic email setups would require considerable development and maintenance efforts, and complicate making chatmail-based messaging more resilient, reliable and fast. -- Basically, the end-user device is the 'server' (relay) so there is NO ARCHIVING whatsoever because every message is necessarily ephemeral. Great for techno-paranoia (and for illicit activities preferring no tracks to cover) but terrible for everybody else. It's also ironically contradictory to engineering principles of redundancies besides the transport layers due to the explicit absence of any persistent storage. Instead of 'classic email address' retaining multi-GB messaging archives on its server, now every device must retain 100% of those storage demands. (Email messages were originally meant to be short correspondences, not the multi-MB attachments boondoggle that now exists with unlimited spam engines flooding every potential recipient.) Any device swap or reset (or loss) makes the entire message history go bye-bye forever... lest there's an off-device auto-archival "relay" mechanism that's really a separate server that holds onto all transported messages (an email server) that utilizes 'chatmail email address' identities (like an email server) and its own persistent storage archive (like an email server). But... this solution is hoping to exist alongside real-world email address identities (based on the email server relay pathway) but simply render messages in chat thread format in an ephemeral manner (with contents being encrypted, and messages auto-expiring) ... In the end, it's a chat app/experience for the Web3/P2P-at-all-costs zealots. (I have accts on all sorts of federated web3 services so I understand the technical and non-technical alike.) For any practical users, however, it's just another service to download/install, register, cross-share id cards/qr codes, but know that there's no history/archive whatsoever (by design) so no account/message recovery whatsoever... update the device, install a bummed update patch, or dare upgrade your device... all history, poof, gone. Ya gotta start everything over again like they're a brand new person.
    • You've tried DuckDuckGo and Brave Search, now get serious with SearXNG by Paul Hill Over the last decade, it has become quite trendy to dump Google Search in favor of privacy-preserving alternatives such as DuckDuckGo, Startpage, and Brave Search. These search engines have done a very good job at highlighting dodgy practices by Google, such as adjusting search results based on what it thinks you’ll like (filter bubble) and stalking you around the web to advertise to you. While these search engines are good starting points when compared to non-private services like Google, there are still quite a few issues with them. For example, both DuckDuckGo and Brave Search require running non-free JavaScript in your web browser, which is comparable to running proprietary software on your computer, meaning you can be sure about what it’s actually doing in the background. Another issue is that these search engines are hosted on the respective companies’ servers, and you are using a service that you don’t control. Finally, DuckDuckGo, while offering privacy features, relies heavily on Microsoft’s infrastructure for its results and, in the past, has permitted Microsoft tracking scripts. If you are looking for a more private search solution than DuckDuckGo, Brave Search, and Startpage, then I recommend taking a look at SearXNG. It is a privacy-respecting metasearch engine that can be used via different public instances, which is useful for mobile users, or you can install it on your computer or server and run it locally with maximum control. Unlike Google, Bing, or Brave Search, which crawl the web and have their own search indexes, SearXNG is a metasearch engine, meaning it taps other search engines, stripping your identifying data, such as IP address, user agent, and cookies, in the process. Your search query is sent to the other search engines you enable before aggregating the results. SearXNG has deployment flexibility. If you are a casual user or a mobile user and don’t want to run SearXNG locally, you can use a public instance that is hosted by someone else. The main problem with this is that you are putting trust in the maintainer of the instance regarding stuff like logs that they may keep; good hosts should have a privacy policy explaining their policies. If you are trying to use SearXNG, you can also install the software on your device and then head to 127.0.0.1:8080 in your browser and search from there. While you don’t have to worry about a third-party admin like the public instances, search engines could ultimately block your IP address if they frown on you pulling in their search results locally. If you want to run it locally, it’s a good idea to use proxies or VPNs to hide your actual IP. You don’t have to worry about this with a public instance, as search engines never see your IP address. The main privacy benefit of using SearXNG is that it isolates your identity from the underlying engines that it’s capable of searching, such as Google and Bing. These search engines will only see requests coming from a generic server, so they can’t profile you and create a bubble filter that influences what results you see. This also ensures that your search engine doesn’t turn into an echo chamber that prevents you from reading alternative points of view. As a free software project, you are allowed to inspect SearXNG to make sure there are no negative features bundled inside. This sets it apart from the privacy search engines mentioned earlier because you can’t check their source code. As a meta search engine, you are not restricted to getting results from one source. Due to the fact that it scrapes content from other websites, your SearXNG instance will periodically get blocked from different providers, so it’s good to select a range of sources as a backup. While enabling all of the services will give you great results, this can make searching slower. I am personally happy with slower searches for the best results, but you can always check which providers are slowing down your search from the search results page and disable them to speed things up. If you want decent results quickly, enable the main search providers such as Google, Brave, DuckDuckGo, Qwant, Bing, and Yahoo. This way, you get wide coverage without the latency. On the Engines tab in Preferences, do note that there are different tabs, such as General, Images, and Videos, with their own providers that can be toggled and are not covered by "Enable all" while on the General tab, so be sure to dig into each. Just a note, if you want to enable everything, press "Enable all" in one tab, then hit save at the bottom of the page, then do the next tab, and so on. If you press "Enable all", then do that in each tab, and then save, nothing will stick. When I had just some of the search engines enabled, I searched “define nefarious” and results came back with the definition of “define” - obviously that was a sucky result. However, when I had everything enabled, it found dictionary pages for the word “nefarious” and even had an inline definition on the sidebar, which is quite nice too - that was delivered by WolframAlpha for anyone wondering! Probably the worst thing about this meta search engine is that the engines you select are saved with a cookie, so you must enable them on every new device you use SearXNG on, including if you decide to go into incognito mode with your web browser. Honestly, I would say this is the most annoying aspect, and perhaps if your browser lets you choose a separate private browsing search engine, then it would be best to use DuckDuckGo for this portion of your browsing. Another weakness of SearXNG is the random blocking of it by search providers. When you are on the results page, expand the “Response time” box, and it will show things like “Suspended: too many requests” or “access denied”. This is why it is good to enable several providers so that there is always a fallback to get results from. I won’t pretend SearXNG will be for everyone, however, if you enable all of the providers and put up with the slower response time, the results can be really amazing. Even if you don’t want to use it as your daily driver, keeping a bookmark handy that links to it is a good idea if you ever feel like doing a deep dive into a niche topic where other search engines are just failing to bring up any good result, due to the amount of sources it looks on. If you’re interested in radical user control over the software you use, installing SearXNG locally can also be a good idea, but be prepared to be temporarily blocked from sites if you trigger bot sensors without a VPN. Personally, I’ve opted to use a public instance, rather than install it myself. If you want to use it via a public instance, head over to searx.space to find a provider. Let us know in the comments if you have used SearXNG or its predecessor, Searx. What do you think about the quality of the results?
    • Dear Neowin, If it is not too much trouble, can you start using the new-ish designations for Insider Preview? "Experimental" is different than "former Dev" as it can apply to different models, eg 26H1 or 26H2 etc, right? No need to seed confusion IMHO. And, please "finally" update your graphics. OK?
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      226
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      158
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!