[Official] Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2


Recommended Posts

[...] but still, when I look at people on my friends list, some people have been playing the MP game alone for upwards of 5 DAYS now. Me? I just got over 24 hours last night.

Hmm I think I have someone on my FL that has 28 days played now. D:

Wasteland is an awful, awful map
yeah i really really hate that map.

I actually like Wasteland save for those few that sit around with thermal on their snipers. If we're talking crap maps though, I wish for Favela & Scrapyard to DIAF.

/random Wasteland isa remake of Brecourt from COD1 /random

I actually like Wasteland save for those few that sit around with thermal on their snipers. If we're talking crap maps though, I wish for Favela & Scrapyard to DIAF.

/random Wasteland isa remake of Brecourt from COD1 /random

Weird because I must be the only one who loves Scrapyard and Favela. :p

I mentioned that Wasteland remake fact earlier in the thread but I mistakenly said it was from COD2. Doh!

Weird because I must be the only one who loves Scrapyard and Favela. :p

I mentioned that Wasteland remake fact earlier in the thread but I mistakenly said it was from COD2. Doh!

If I recall correctly there was a Brecourt remake in COD2 too, so you're in the clear.

The one map I like the most is Highrise. Majority of the people I play with seem to hate it though. I kinda like it. Especially when I get C side spawn. I like going down the left side of the map and nabbing the heads that try to pop around the corner.

I just can't sit and play online multiplayer like I could with all of the call of duty games. It's ridiculous, especially on PS3 from what I've seen, so much glitching and stuff. Weapons seem unpredictable and it's not fun anymore :/

They should match you with people your own level, thats a definite. Sick of playing people who are prestige level >9000 with gimped out weapons. Whil eI'm stuck at level 41, impossible to get enough points to level up.

There is zero benefit to prestiging other than new challenges and an extra class slot every now and then. So... yeah. Man up, little buddy.

Wasteland is an awful, awful map
No, quarry is by far the worst map ever.
Weird because I must be the only one who loves Scrapyard and Favela. :p

I mentioned that Wasteland remake fact earlier in the thread but I mistakenly said it was from COD2. Doh!

If I recall correctly there was a Brecourt remake in COD2 too, so you're in the clear.

The one map I like the most is Highrise. Majority of the people I play with seem to hate it though. I kinda like it. Especially when I get C side spawn. I like going down the left side of the map and nabbing the heads that try to pop around the corner.

I tend to have good games and bad games on all of the maps, and it really depends on what game-type I'm playing, as well as what weapon I'm working on. Highrise is nice to climb around on. Wasteland is great for sneaking, especially as a sniper (I'm an Intervention junkie). Derail is fun in Domination. Scrapyard is one of those that can be extremely fun, or incredibly frustrating. I particularly enjoy Estate, which is usually one of my better maps; I get a great sniper post on Domination to cover B, which is always fun. I also really like Afghan, Sub Base, and Rust (especially for a nice, fast-paced game). Quarry, Favela, and Rundown are usually my downfalls, though I often do well on them, too.

I generally don't always do well on one map and bad on another. I tend to do poorly when I'm just starting out on a new weapon (finally moving onto the extremely underpowered (it seems) ACR, for the moment) until I've become cozy with it. I'm always working on new weapons, so I have about as many bad games as good games. I kick the most behind with my Intervention/PP2000 combo, or my M16 which are usually my fallback classes. I change classes constantly throughout every game, though, especially to shoot down enemy vehicles or to pick off certain enemies.

The trick is to learn and incorporate different tactics for each map. I've found that if you can learn to switch things up, depending on the map (different weapons/classes, different methods of moving around or not moving much at all, etc.), then you won't find yourself quite so weak on certain maps.

I constantly hear guys complain (I'm referring to in-game) about the way the other team is playing; camping, going akimbo, sniping with thermal, perching themselves on hard-to-reach places, placing Claymores, etc.. It's all part of the game. Stop whining and learn to adapt. They tend to shut-up when they hear a girl tell them that.

I constantly hear guys complain (I'm referring to in-game) about the way the other team is playing; camping, going akimbo, sniping with thermal, perching themselves on hard-to-reach places, placing Claymores, etc.. It's all part of the game. Stop whining and learn to adapt. They tend to shut-up when they hear a girl tell them that.

The only thing that ****es me off is Akimbo ******s, and I would like to say for good reason. :p

The only thing that ****es me off is Akimbo ******s, and I would like to say for good reason. :p

Understandable. It can get frustrating, sometimes.

But you do have the same (or potentially the same) abilities that they do. Fight fire with fire, be a rat to catch a rat, and all that nonsense. I learned to do that with the noob-tube.

The only issue I had that I did complain about (secretly and to my boyfriend only), was with the silly little turds running around taking advantage of the Javelin glitch, but I understand they patched that right up.

All of the maps in MW2 are crap, never seen such bland surroundings coupled with random layouts.

Agreed. Layouts of the maps are horrendous. They need to look back on games like CS and see why it was so successful; the maps were simple and fun. The only map in MW2 that manages to get it right is Terminal.

I actually find Wasteland rather fun. Just keep making circles around it clearing out all the snipers and what not. The one I probably hate the most is Estate and Scrapyard... and sometimes Terminal can just suck immensely as well.

Wow, I really like all the maps mentioned. It took me a while to warm up to a few of them like Estate, Sub Base and especially Favella. But after some time on them, I develop some good strategies and learn others tendencies and can enjoy them. The randomness you guys talk about is one of my favorite things about the maps. It's not the original Doom. The randomness makes it feel so much more immersive and fun. Simplicity is a huge turn off when it comes to game styles like this.

Some of the maps I hate are Underpass (not bad on objective, but too many campers on deathmatch types) and Karachi (way over played and the sattelite dish spot is way too over powered).

Agreed. Layouts of the maps are horrendous. They need to look back on games like CS and see why it was so successful; the maps were simple and fun. The only map in MW2 that manages to get it right is Terminal.

I just found a guy that made a lot of maps for CS works with IW now for MP map design. CompoSITe I think.

I think all the maps can be fun, but I find there design can also make the game very difficult to play. And there are far too many little camp corners, basically asking people to camp.

You are right about the camper's corners. They are numerous in the game, but generally easy to get to. To tell you the truth, I don't find camping to be such a big issue; not like it is in games like Halo 2 & 3, or even the original MW. MW2 campers are fairly easy to flush or pick out. I've found the respawn to be random enough not to make camping too big of an issue, as well.

And again: camping is part of the game. If you don't do it, that's your own choice and style--but you certainly have as much of an opportunity to as anyone else. It's not a cheap way to play or anything, it's just a different way to play.

I know campers can become pretty frustrating, but so can players who run around with Marathon, Lightweight, and a tactical knife. I, personally, utilize both of these methods from time to time, but I can certainly understand people's frustrations when others use them excessively.

That said, I agree that all of the maps can be fun. I find it hard to understand how so many people are apparently so disappointed with them. Just a matter of personal taste, though, I suppose.

Wow, I really like all the maps mentioned. It took me a while to warm up to a few of them like Estate, Sub Base and especially Favella. But after some time on them, I develop some good strategies and learn others tendencies and can enjoy them. The randomness you guys talk about is one of my favorite things about the maps. It's not the original Doom. The randomness makes it feel so much more immersive and fun. Simplicity is a huge turn off when it comes to game styles like this.

I agree, completely. If the maps were more simple, it would make kill-cam a bit of a nuisance, in my opinion. It'd be far more difficult to sneak around or ambush the other team, particularly in objective games. It's fun to play on maps that are easy to learn inside out, but it's an entirely different type of game style.

(was hoping this would automatically attach to my last post; sorry for the double)

**** you Infinity Ward...your game is a POS! :crazy:

ANOTHER exploit!

The problems with Modern Warfare 2 keep piling up. The cause might just be that so many people are playing this game so much that every imbalance is quickly found and exploited and every glitch becomes news across the internet. But this problem should have been spotted by developers ? after all, the noob tubes tended to be unpopular among veteran players in the first installment of the Modern Warfare series. It?s hard to understand why the developers would give players a way to nearly instantly reload noob tubes and equipment.

This video by a very talkative and strongly opinionated gamer clearly illustrates the problem with the perk One Man Army, which allows the player to swap classes at any time, and its use in combination with Danger Close Pro, which increases explosive weapon damage (the Pro upgrade increases air support damage).

In this video, the player reaches an ungodly amount of kills in a game of Domination before being disconnected halfway through the match (he is confident that he could have easily gotten 150 kills). For those of you too lazy to watch videos or those with slow internet connections, here?s a shorter and less bandwidth-hungry explanation of how the trick works:

1. Use Danger Close-overpowered noob tubes and claymores to get easy kills.

2. Repeat step 1, using One Man Army when out of ammunition to select the same class again, refilling all noob tubes and claymores.

3. Use overpowered (Danger Close Pro) Predator Missile to get 2 kills.

4. Use overpowered Harrier Strike to get 4 kills (generally easy on most maps)

5. Spam Chopper Gunner with overpowered explosive rounds (Danger Close Pro) to get lots of kills.

Also illustrated in the video is the oft-problematic spawn system, which can make it difficult to escape instant death when one spawns with explosive rounds raining down on one?s head.

Having never played Modern Warfare 2 on PS3 (as demonstrated in the video), I?m not sure if it?s a system difference, but in the 360 version I play swapping classes using One Man Army takes a bit longer to complete, but it?s not a deal-breaker.

The fact that the player can simply reload the same class again just seems ridiculous. At least make the player use two of his precious Custom Class slots to do so. And for realism?s sake, if not for game balance, it only makes sense that the player would have a limited amount of times he could change classes.

I would not go so far as some have to say Modern Warfare 2 is a broken game, or that it?s necessarily bad. But there are obviously some more changes Infinity Ward needs to make to balance its hugely popular game.

One thing I hate about MW2 are Team mates in Hardcore. If you get a supply box or whatever it is called, they will kill you and steal whatever it is that is in there. I have had 3 games tonight where there was a C-130 in MY PACKAGE which someone else took on my team by killing me.

One thing I hate about MW2 are Team mates in Hardcore. If you get a supply box or whatever it is called, they will kill you and steal whatever it is that is in there. I have had 3 games tonight where there was a C-130 in MY PACKAGE which someone else took on my team by killing me.

There is friendly fire in hardcore?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Amazon Prime Day 2026: Best Dolby soundbar deals from Sony, Samsung, JBL, Polk, and more by Sayan Sen Yesterday we covered the JBL BAR 800 which is a 5.1.2 Dolby Atmos/Vision soundbar. The unit is on sale for its lowest ever price of just $800 making it a solid offer. However, there are many more options to choose from and in this article, we have made a compilation of the best deals including from Sony, Polk, Yamaha, Denon, Samsung and more. Sony's BAR models are currently at their lowest prices which makes them solid offerings. The company's BRAVIA Theatre Bar lineup is designed to suit different home cinema needs. The Bar 5 is an entry-level 3.1-channel soundbar with a wireless subwoofer, supporting Dolby Atmos®, DTS:X, S-Force PRO Front Surround, and Vertical Surround Engine for immersive audio with clear dialogue. The Bar 6 upgrades to a 3.1.2-channel configuration by adding dedicated up-firing speakers for more convincing overhead Atmos effects while retaining the wireless subwoofer. At the premium end, the Bar 7, Bar 8, and flagship Bar 9 are single-soundbar solutions featuring Sony’s 360 Spatial Sound Mapping technology, which creates phantom speakers for a wider surround field. Bar 7 includes nine speaker units, Bar 8 increases this to eleven, and Bar 9 offers thirteen speaker driver units promising the most expansive soundstage and acoustic performance. All models should integrate seamlessly with compatible BRAVIA TVs and support the BRAVIA Connect app for setup and control. Get them at the links below: Sony BRAVIA Theater Bar 9 Soundbar (HT-A9000): $998.00 (Amazon US) (Was: $1498) Sony BRAVIA Theater Bar 8 Soundbar (HT-A9000): $798.00 (Amazon US) (Was: $998) Sony BRAVIA Theater Bar 7 Soundbar (HT-A7100): $618.00 (Amazon US) (Was: $768) Sony BRAVIA Theater System 6: $548.00 | Sony BRAVIA Theater Bar 6: $448.00 Sony BRAVIA Theater Bar 5 (HT-B500): $278.00 (Amazon US) (Was: $348) Sony HT-S400 2.1 soundbar: $198.00 (Amazon US) (Was: $248) Aside from those, we also have more discounts including from Samsung, Polk Audio, and more: Samsung Q-Series Soundbar HW-QS90H 7.1.2: $797.99 (Amazon US) (Was: $998) Polk Audio Signa S4: $336.00 (Amazon US) (Was: $449) Hisense AX3120Q: $229.00 (Amazon US) (Was: $259) Check out more soundbar deals that you may like at this link. Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Stellarium 26.2 by Razvan Serea Stellarium is a free open source planetarium for your computer. It shows a realistic sky in 3D, just like what you see with the naked eye, binoculars or a telescope. It is being used in planetarium projectors. Just set your coordinates and go. Stellarium key features: Realistic simulation of the sky, sunrise and sunset Default catalogue of over 600,000 stars Downloadable additional catalogues for up to 210 million stars Catalog data for all New General Catalogue (NGC) objects Images of almost all Messier objects and the Milky Way Artistic illustrations for all 88 modern constellations More than a dozen different cultures with their constellations Solar and lunar eclipse simulation Photorealistic landscapes (more are available on the website) Scripting support with ECMAScript (a few demo scripts are included) Extendable with plug-ins: 8 plug-ins installed by default, including: artificial satellites plug-in (updated from an on-line TLE database) ocular simulation plug-in (shows how objects look like in a given ocular) Solar System editor plug-in (imports comet and asteroid data from the MPC) telescope control plug-in (Meade LX200 and Celestron NexStar compatible) The major changes of this version: Added new sky culture Added new plugin: Planes Many improvements in plugins Many improvements in Core and GUI Many updates in sky cultures. [full release notes] Download: Stellarium 26.2 (64-bit) | 456.0 MB (Open Source) View: Stellarium Home Page | Other Operating Systems | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NASA: This asteroid may not kill us but it probably won't be far off either by Sayan Sen Image by Zelch Csaba via Pexels New observations by NASA's James Webb Space Telescope have eliminated the last remaining impact threat posed by asteroid 2024 YR4, ruling out the possibility that the near-Earth object could strike the Moon in December 2032. NASA said observations collected by Webb on February 18 and 26, 2026, enabled scientists to refine the asteroid's orbit enough to "rule out a chance of lunar impact on Dec. 22, 2032." Instead, asteroid 2024 YR4 is now expected to pass the Moon at a distance of about 13,200 miles (21,200 km). The agency stressed that the update "reflects improved precision in our understanding of where the asteroid is expected to be in 2032 rather than a shift in its orbital path." The announcement closes a remarkable chapter in planetary defence that began in late 2024, when the approximately 60-metre-wide asteroid briefly became the most closely watched near-Earth object in the world. Discovered on December 27, 2024, by the ATLAS telescope in Chile, 2024 YR4 initially appeared to have a small chance of colliding with Earth on December 22, 2032. As astronomers gathered more observations, the impact probability briefly climbed to around 3%—the highest ever recorded for an asteroid of its size—before steadily falling as its orbit became better understood. By early 2025, international observations had ruled out any significant risk to Earth. However, astronomers were left with another possibility: a roughly 4% chance that the asteroid could instead strike the Moon. "The probability that asteroid 2024 YR4 will strike the Moon on 22 December 2032 is now approximately 4%," the European Space Agency (ESA) had said last year, noting that "there is a 96% chance that the asteroid will not impact the Moon." ESA said such an impact, while unlikely, would have presented an extraordinary scientific opportunity. "It is a very rare event for an asteroid this large to impact the Moon – and it is rarer still that we know about it in advance. The impact would likely be visible from Earth, and so scientists will be very excited by the prospect of observing and analysing it," said Richard Moissl, Head of ESA's Planetary Defence Office. "It would certainly leave a new crater on the surface. However, we wouldn't be able to accurately predict in advance how much material would be thrown into space, or whether any would reach Earth," he added. The asteroid also exposed an important blind spot in planetary defence. Because 2024 YR4 approached Earth from the direction of the Sun, it remained hidden from ground-based telescopes until after its closest approach. "We looked into how Neomir would have performed in this situation, and the simulations surprised even us," Moissl said. "Neomir would have detected asteroid 2024 YR4 about a month earlier than ground-based telescopes did. This would have given astronomers more time to study the asteroid's trajectory and allowed them to much sooner rule out any chance of Earth impact in 2032." He added, "As an infrared telescope, like Webb, Neomir would have also immediately given us a much better estimate for the asteroid's size, which is very important for assessing the significance of the hazard." The latest NASA observations underscore the value of space-based infrared telescopes in tracking faint asteroids. According to NASA, Webb made "among the faintest ever observations of an asteroid," extending the object's observational record by nearly eight months at a time when it had become too faint for other telescopes. That additional data allowed scientists to eliminate the remaining uncertainty surrounding its 2032 flyby. Although asteroid 2024 YR4 is now confirmed to pose no threat to either Earth or the Moon, scientists say its discovery remains one of the most significant real-world tests of the international planetary defence system, demonstrating how continued observations can rapidly transform an object once considered hazardous into one whose future path is known with high confidence. Source: NASA, ESA This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      Admir earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      First Post
    • Apprentice
      daryld went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Contributor
      Carltonbar went up a rank
      Contributor
    • One Month Later
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      418
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      130
    4. 4
      Xenon
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!