[Official] Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2


Recommended Posts

[...] but still, when I look at people on my friends list, some people have been playing the MP game alone for upwards of 5 DAYS now. Me? I just got over 24 hours last night.

Hmm I think I have someone on my FL that has 28 days played now. D:

Wasteland is an awful, awful map
yeah i really really hate that map.

I actually like Wasteland save for those few that sit around with thermal on their snipers. If we're talking crap maps though, I wish for Favela & Scrapyard to DIAF.

/random Wasteland isa remake of Brecourt from COD1 /random

I actually like Wasteland save for those few that sit around with thermal on their snipers. If we're talking crap maps though, I wish for Favela & Scrapyard to DIAF.

/random Wasteland isa remake of Brecourt from COD1 /random

Weird because I must be the only one who loves Scrapyard and Favela. :p

I mentioned that Wasteland remake fact earlier in the thread but I mistakenly said it was from COD2. Doh!

Weird because I must be the only one who loves Scrapyard and Favela. :p

I mentioned that Wasteland remake fact earlier in the thread but I mistakenly said it was from COD2. Doh!

If I recall correctly there was a Brecourt remake in COD2 too, so you're in the clear.

The one map I like the most is Highrise. Majority of the people I play with seem to hate it though. I kinda like it. Especially when I get C side spawn. I like going down the left side of the map and nabbing the heads that try to pop around the corner.

I just can't sit and play online multiplayer like I could with all of the call of duty games. It's ridiculous, especially on PS3 from what I've seen, so much glitching and stuff. Weapons seem unpredictable and it's not fun anymore :/

They should match you with people your own level, thats a definite. Sick of playing people who are prestige level >9000 with gimped out weapons. Whil eI'm stuck at level 41, impossible to get enough points to level up.

There is zero benefit to prestiging other than new challenges and an extra class slot every now and then. So... yeah. Man up, little buddy.

Wasteland is an awful, awful map
No, quarry is by far the worst map ever.
Weird because I must be the only one who loves Scrapyard and Favela. :p

I mentioned that Wasteland remake fact earlier in the thread but I mistakenly said it was from COD2. Doh!

If I recall correctly there was a Brecourt remake in COD2 too, so you're in the clear.

The one map I like the most is Highrise. Majority of the people I play with seem to hate it though. I kinda like it. Especially when I get C side spawn. I like going down the left side of the map and nabbing the heads that try to pop around the corner.

I tend to have good games and bad games on all of the maps, and it really depends on what game-type I'm playing, as well as what weapon I'm working on. Highrise is nice to climb around on. Wasteland is great for sneaking, especially as a sniper (I'm an Intervention junkie). Derail is fun in Domination. Scrapyard is one of those that can be extremely fun, or incredibly frustrating. I particularly enjoy Estate, which is usually one of my better maps; I get a great sniper post on Domination to cover B, which is always fun. I also really like Afghan, Sub Base, and Rust (especially for a nice, fast-paced game). Quarry, Favela, and Rundown are usually my downfalls, though I often do well on them, too.

I generally don't always do well on one map and bad on another. I tend to do poorly when I'm just starting out on a new weapon (finally moving onto the extremely underpowered (it seems) ACR, for the moment) until I've become cozy with it. I'm always working on new weapons, so I have about as many bad games as good games. I kick the most behind with my Intervention/PP2000 combo, or my M16 which are usually my fallback classes. I change classes constantly throughout every game, though, especially to shoot down enemy vehicles or to pick off certain enemies.

The trick is to learn and incorporate different tactics for each map. I've found that if you can learn to switch things up, depending on the map (different weapons/classes, different methods of moving around or not moving much at all, etc.), then you won't find yourself quite so weak on certain maps.

I constantly hear guys complain (I'm referring to in-game) about the way the other team is playing; camping, going akimbo, sniping with thermal, perching themselves on hard-to-reach places, placing Claymores, etc.. It's all part of the game. Stop whining and learn to adapt. They tend to shut-up when they hear a girl tell them that.

I constantly hear guys complain (I'm referring to in-game) about the way the other team is playing; camping, going akimbo, sniping with thermal, perching themselves on hard-to-reach places, placing Claymores, etc.. It's all part of the game. Stop whining and learn to adapt. They tend to shut-up when they hear a girl tell them that.

The only thing that ****es me off is Akimbo ******s, and I would like to say for good reason. :p

The only thing that ****es me off is Akimbo ******s, and I would like to say for good reason. :p

Understandable. It can get frustrating, sometimes.

But you do have the same (or potentially the same) abilities that they do. Fight fire with fire, be a rat to catch a rat, and all that nonsense. I learned to do that with the noob-tube.

The only issue I had that I did complain about (secretly and to my boyfriend only), was with the silly little turds running around taking advantage of the Javelin glitch, but I understand they patched that right up.

All of the maps in MW2 are crap, never seen such bland surroundings coupled with random layouts.

Agreed. Layouts of the maps are horrendous. They need to look back on games like CS and see why it was so successful; the maps were simple and fun. The only map in MW2 that manages to get it right is Terminal.

I actually find Wasteland rather fun. Just keep making circles around it clearing out all the snipers and what not. The one I probably hate the most is Estate and Scrapyard... and sometimes Terminal can just suck immensely as well.

Wow, I really like all the maps mentioned. It took me a while to warm up to a few of them like Estate, Sub Base and especially Favella. But after some time on them, I develop some good strategies and learn others tendencies and can enjoy them. The randomness you guys talk about is one of my favorite things about the maps. It's not the original Doom. The randomness makes it feel so much more immersive and fun. Simplicity is a huge turn off when it comes to game styles like this.

Some of the maps I hate are Underpass (not bad on objective, but too many campers on deathmatch types) and Karachi (way over played and the sattelite dish spot is way too over powered).

Agreed. Layouts of the maps are horrendous. They need to look back on games like CS and see why it was so successful; the maps were simple and fun. The only map in MW2 that manages to get it right is Terminal.

I just found a guy that made a lot of maps for CS works with IW now for MP map design. CompoSITe I think.

I think all the maps can be fun, but I find there design can also make the game very difficult to play. And there are far too many little camp corners, basically asking people to camp.

You are right about the camper's corners. They are numerous in the game, but generally easy to get to. To tell you the truth, I don't find camping to be such a big issue; not like it is in games like Halo 2 & 3, or even the original MW. MW2 campers are fairly easy to flush or pick out. I've found the respawn to be random enough not to make camping too big of an issue, as well.

And again: camping is part of the game. If you don't do it, that's your own choice and style--but you certainly have as much of an opportunity to as anyone else. It's not a cheap way to play or anything, it's just a different way to play.

I know campers can become pretty frustrating, but so can players who run around with Marathon, Lightweight, and a tactical knife. I, personally, utilize both of these methods from time to time, but I can certainly understand people's frustrations when others use them excessively.

That said, I agree that all of the maps can be fun. I find it hard to understand how so many people are apparently so disappointed with them. Just a matter of personal taste, though, I suppose.

Wow, I really like all the maps mentioned. It took me a while to warm up to a few of them like Estate, Sub Base and especially Favella. But after some time on them, I develop some good strategies and learn others tendencies and can enjoy them. The randomness you guys talk about is one of my favorite things about the maps. It's not the original Doom. The randomness makes it feel so much more immersive and fun. Simplicity is a huge turn off when it comes to game styles like this.

I agree, completely. If the maps were more simple, it would make kill-cam a bit of a nuisance, in my opinion. It'd be far more difficult to sneak around or ambush the other team, particularly in objective games. It's fun to play on maps that are easy to learn inside out, but it's an entirely different type of game style.

(was hoping this would automatically attach to my last post; sorry for the double)

**** you Infinity Ward...your game is a POS! :crazy:

ANOTHER exploit!

The problems with Modern Warfare 2 keep piling up. The cause might just be that so many people are playing this game so much that every imbalance is quickly found and exploited and every glitch becomes news across the internet. But this problem should have been spotted by developers ? after all, the noob tubes tended to be unpopular among veteran players in the first installment of the Modern Warfare series. It?s hard to understand why the developers would give players a way to nearly instantly reload noob tubes and equipment.

This video by a very talkative and strongly opinionated gamer clearly illustrates the problem with the perk One Man Army, which allows the player to swap classes at any time, and its use in combination with Danger Close Pro, which increases explosive weapon damage (the Pro upgrade increases air support damage).

In this video, the player reaches an ungodly amount of kills in a game of Domination before being disconnected halfway through the match (he is confident that he could have easily gotten 150 kills). For those of you too lazy to watch videos or those with slow internet connections, here?s a shorter and less bandwidth-hungry explanation of how the trick works:

1. Use Danger Close-overpowered noob tubes and claymores to get easy kills.

2. Repeat step 1, using One Man Army when out of ammunition to select the same class again, refilling all noob tubes and claymores.

3. Use overpowered (Danger Close Pro) Predator Missile to get 2 kills.

4. Use overpowered Harrier Strike to get 4 kills (generally easy on most maps)

5. Spam Chopper Gunner with overpowered explosive rounds (Danger Close Pro) to get lots of kills.

Also illustrated in the video is the oft-problematic spawn system, which can make it difficult to escape instant death when one spawns with explosive rounds raining down on one?s head.

Having never played Modern Warfare 2 on PS3 (as demonstrated in the video), I?m not sure if it?s a system difference, but in the 360 version I play swapping classes using One Man Army takes a bit longer to complete, but it?s not a deal-breaker.

The fact that the player can simply reload the same class again just seems ridiculous. At least make the player use two of his precious Custom Class slots to do so. And for realism?s sake, if not for game balance, it only makes sense that the player would have a limited amount of times he could change classes.

I would not go so far as some have to say Modern Warfare 2 is a broken game, or that it?s necessarily bad. But there are obviously some more changes Infinity Ward needs to make to balance its hugely popular game.

One thing I hate about MW2 are Team mates in Hardcore. If you get a supply box or whatever it is called, they will kill you and steal whatever it is that is in there. I have had 3 games tonight where there was a C-130 in MY PACKAGE which someone else took on my team by killing me.

One thing I hate about MW2 are Team mates in Hardcore. If you get a supply box or whatever it is called, they will kill you and steal whatever it is that is in there. I have had 3 games tonight where there was a C-130 in MY PACKAGE which someone else took on my team by killing me.

There is friendly fire in hardcore?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Yup, that's a doozy right there 😄
    • It's a bundle of tools created by a variety of people, so things can go wrong sometimes. It's a great addition to Windows, and I use a lot of the tools on a daily basis. Also, it's still a 0.**** release so quick updates are to be expected 😉
    • Oh, I did. And it's even worse than I was hoping! Besides a lot of techno-babble jargon (yes I understand 100% of it but it's still all just techno-babble) there's 2 key points that make me super-weary about even considering testing this out. -- By default, after installation, a relay is automatically set up, so you do not need to care about that. * Non-chatmail apps use email servers as a long-term message archive while chatmail clients use email servers for ephemeral instant message relay. * Supporting the full variety of classic email setups would require considerable development and maintenance efforts, and complicate making chatmail-based messaging more resilient, reliable and fast. -- Basically, the end-user device is the 'server' (relay) so there is NO ARCHIVING whatsoever because every message is necessarily ephemeral. Great for techno-paranoia (and for illicit activities preferring no tracks to cover) but terrible for everybody else. It's also ironically contradictory to engineering principles of redundancies besides the transport layers due to the explicit absence of any persistent storage. Instead of 'classic email address' retaining multi-GB messaging archives on its server, now every device must retain 100% of those storage demands. (Email messages were originally meant to be short correspondences, not the multi-MB attachments boondoggle that now exists with unlimited spam engines flooding every potential recipient.) Any device swap or reset (or loss) makes the entire message history go bye-bye forever... lest there's an off-device auto-archival "relay" mechanism that's really a separate server that holds onto all transported messages (an email server) that utilizes 'chatmail email address' identities (like an email server) and its own persistent storage archive (like an email server). But... this solution is hoping to exist alongside real-world email address identities (based on the email server relay pathway) but simply render messages in chat thread format in an ephemeral manner (with contents being encrypted, and messages auto-expiring) ... In the end, it's a chat app/experience for the Web3/P2P-at-all-costs zealots. (I have accts on all sorts of federated web3 services so I understand the technical and non-technical alike.) For any practical users, however, it's just another service to download/install, register, cross-share id cards/qr codes, but know that there's no history/archive whatsoever (by design) so no account/message recovery whatsoever... update the device, install a bummed update patch, or dare upgrade your device... all history, poof, gone. Ya gotta start everything over again like they're a brand new person.
    • You've tried DuckDuckGo and Brave Search, now get serious with SearXNG by Paul Hill Over the last decade, it has become quite trendy to dump Google Search in favor of privacy-preserving alternatives such as DuckDuckGo, Startpage, and Brave Search. These search engines have done a very good job at highlighting dodgy practices by Google, such as adjusting search results based on what it thinks you’ll like (filter bubble) and stalking you around the web to advertise to you. While these search engines are good starting points when compared to non-private services like Google, there are still quite a few issues with them. For example, both DuckDuckGo and Brave Search require running non-free JavaScript in your web browser, which is comparable to running proprietary software on your computer, meaning you can be sure about what it’s actually doing in the background. Another issue is that these search engines are hosted on the respective companies’ servers, and you are using a service that you don’t control. Finally, DuckDuckGo, while offering privacy features, relies heavily on Microsoft’s infrastructure for its results and, in the past, has permitted Microsoft tracking scripts. If you are looking for a more private search solution than DuckDuckGo, Brave Search, and Startpage, then I recommend taking a look at SearXNG. It is a privacy-respecting metasearch engine that can be used via different public instances, which is useful for mobile users, or you can install it on your computer or server and run it locally with maximum control. Unlike Google, Bing, or Brave Search, which crawl the web and have their own search indexes, SearXNG is a metasearch engine, meaning it taps other search engines, stripping your identifying data, such as IP address, user agent, and cookies, in the process. Your search query is sent to the other search engines you enable before aggregating the results. SearXNG has deployment flexibility. If you are a casual user or a mobile user and don’t want to run SearXNG locally, you can use a public instance that is hosted by someone else. The main problem with this is that you are putting trust in the maintainer of the instance regarding stuff like logs that they may keep; good hosts should have a privacy policy explaining their policies. If you are trying to use SearXNG, you can also install the software on your device and then head to 127.0.0.1:8080 in your browser and search from there. While you don’t have to worry about a third-party admin like the public instances, search engines could ultimately block your IP address if they frown on you pulling in their search results locally. If you want to run it locally, it’s a good idea to use proxies or VPNs to hide your actual IP. You don’t have to worry about this with a public instance, as search engines never see your IP address. The main privacy benefit of using SearXNG is that it isolates your identity from the underlying engines that it’s capable of searching, such as Google and Bing. These search engines will only see requests coming from a generic server, so they can’t profile you and create a bubble filter that influences what results you see. This also ensures that your search engine doesn’t turn into an echo chamber that prevents you from reading alternative points of view. As a free software project, you are allowed to inspect SearXNG to make sure there are no negative features bundled inside. This sets it apart from the privacy search engines mentioned earlier because you can’t check their source code. As a meta search engine, you are not restricted to getting results from one source. Due to the fact that it scrapes content from other websites, your SearXNG instance will periodically get blocked from different providers, so it’s good to select a range of sources as a backup. While enabling all of the services will give you great results, this can make searching slower. I am personally happy with slower searches for the best results, but you can always check which providers are slowing down your search from the search results page and disable them to speed things up. If you want decent results quickly, enable the main search providers such as Google, Brave, DuckDuckGo, Qwant, Bing, and Yahoo. This way, you get wide coverage without the latency. On the Engines tab in Preferences, do note that there are different tabs, such as General, Images, and Videos, with their own providers that can be toggled and are not covered by "Enable all" while on the General tab, so be sure to dig into each. Just a note, if you want to enable everything, press "Enable all" in one tab, then hit save at the bottom of the page, then do the next tab, and so on. If you press "Enable all", then do that in each tab, and then save, nothing will stick. When I had just some of the search engines enabled, I searched “define nefarious” and results came back with the definition of “define” - obviously that was a sucky result. However, when I had everything enabled, it found dictionary pages for the word “nefarious” and even had an inline definition on the sidebar, which is quite nice too - that was delivered by WolframAlpha for anyone wondering! Probably the worst thing about this meta search engine is that the engines you select are saved with a cookie, so you must enable them on every new device you use SearXNG on, including if you decide to go into incognito mode with your web browser. Honestly, I would say this is the most annoying aspect, and perhaps if your browser lets you choose a separate private browsing search engine, then it would be best to use DuckDuckGo for this portion of your browsing. Another weakness of SearXNG is the random blocking of it by search providers. When you are on the results page, expand the “Response time” box, and it will show things like “Suspended: too many requests” or “access denied”. This is why it is good to enable several providers so that there is always a fallback to get results from. I won’t pretend SearXNG will be for everyone, however, if you enable all of the providers and put up with the slower response time, the results can be really amazing. Even if you don’t want to use it as your daily driver, keeping a bookmark handy that links to it is a good idea if you ever feel like doing a deep dive into a niche topic where other search engines are just failing to bring up any good result, due to the amount of sources it looks on. If you’re interested in radical user control over the software you use, installing SearXNG locally can also be a good idea, but be prepared to be temporarily blocked from sites if you trigger bot sensors without a VPN. Personally, I’ve opted to use a public instance, rather than install it myself. If you want to use it via a public instance, head over to searx.space to find a provider. Let us know in the comments if you have used SearXNG or its predecessor, Searx. What do you think about the quality of the results?
    • Dear Neowin, If it is not too much trouble, can you start using the new-ish designations for Insider Preview? "Experimental" is different than "former Dev" as it can apply to different models, eg 26H1 or 26H2 etc, right? No need to seed confusion IMHO. And, please "finally" update your graphics. OK?
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      226
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      158
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!