Fedor Emelianenko fights undefeated Brett Rogers in Strikeforce debut


Recommended Posts

Notice that Fedor and Gegard has fought against the best international fighters, while Anderson Silva, GSP, and Brock Lesnar has mainly fought against local American fighters. Also notice that Anderson Silva in his international excursions hasn’t fared to well and has lost against three Japanese fighters out of the four fighters outside North/South America he has fought. Just because American fight fans are unfamiliar with the fighter (as is the case with non UFC/international fighters) does not mean that they are not good fighters.

Skip to 1:18 into the video of why Fedor didn’t sign with UFC, he is correct in his assessment too as with my example below.

Strikeforce fighters

Fedor Emelianenko

fedoremelianenkoj.jpg

Gegard Mousasi

gegardmousasi.jpg

UFC fighters

Georges St-Pierre

georgesstpierre.jpg

Anderson Silva

andersonsilva.jpg

Brock Lesnar

brocklesnar.jpg

I'll watch that video tomorrow when I have time but are you honestly telling me that Fedor will have better competition in StrikeForce? Comeon now.

Regardless of what country their opponents are from doesn't make them any better or worse. You can't sit there and honestly say that GSP, Silva, Machida are not among the top of their weight-classses. Lesner still remains relatively untested obviously, but he's only getting better.

I'll watch that video tomorrow when I have time but are you honestly telling me that Fedor will have better competition in StrikeForce? Comeon now.

Regardless of what country their opponents are from doesn't make them any better or worse. You can't sit there and honestly say that GSP, Silva, Machida are not among the top of their weight-classses. Lesner still remains relatively untested obviously, but he's only getting better.

Tell me the win loss ratio of the fighters Brock has gone up against, the quality of fighters isnt as good. However those fighters are vell known in America because they belong to the UFC.

Normally a wider international pool of athletes has a better chance of finding better quality fighters. Take for example TUF 9, the Brits won against the Americans. Other countries do have talent, UFC however is only interested in locally grown North and South American fighters.

Tell me the win loss ratio of the fighters Brock has gone up against, the quality of fighters isnt as good. However those fighters are vell known in America because they belong to the UFC.

Normally a wider international pool of athletes has a better chance of finding better quality fighters. Take for example TUF 9, the Brits won against the Americans. Other countries do have talent, UFC however is only interested in locally grown North and South American fighters.

he's right. all my friends who became MMA fans as soon as UFC got popular tell me the same line all the time. Just because it's not UFC, doesn't make it worse...

I don't just watch the UFC, I've watched anything that has been televised the last few years: Affliction, WEC, Elite-XC, StrikeForce, UFC, Pride, etc. Regardless of how much MMA your friends have seen, it's not an inaccurate statement to say that the UFC is stronger than StrikeForce (talent-wise). We're not talking about any other international MMA organizations, we're talking UFC vs. StrikeForce, how did you stray from that?

I don't just watch the UFC, I've watched anything that has been televised the last few years: Affliction, WEC, Elite-XC, StrikeForce, UFC, Pride, etc. Regardless of how much MMA your friends have seen, it's not an inaccurate statement to say that the UFC is stronger than StrikeForce (talent-wise). We're not talking about any other international MMA organizations, we're talking UFC vs. StrikeForce, how did you stray from that?

and strikeforce has two guys that i don't think anyone in the UFC could beat. Gegard and Fedor.

and strikeforce has two guys that i don't think anyone in the UFC could beat. Gegard and Fedor.

That sounds like more of a fanboy statement then truth. There is no doubt they are incredibly talented fighters, but come on. So fedor beat Arlovski and Rogers, both of whom imo were getting the better of Fedor for the most part, he just happened to connect with a good punch. It's not as if he's beating the who's who of MMA, he's been fighting guys that the UFC let go because they couldn't compete with the top HW's. Yes he's got an impressive record but he's fought mostly unknown people, that doesn't make them bad fighters, but they obviously weren't good enough to be in a major organization. Call it what you want but your nationality doesn't matter, if you are a great fighter, one of the major organizations will pick you up. Whether anyone agrees or not, the UFC is the top organization with the top fighters. Gegard is a huge talent, but he's in the same boat as Fedor imo, he's beating people that couldn't compete in the ufc, so what if he beats Sobral or Sokoudjou, both were let go by the ufc because they couldn't compete against the top fighters. If you really want to test your talent you have to fight the best, and right now the best is the ufc.

That sounds like more of a fanboy statement then truth. There is no doubt they are incredibly talented fighters, but come on. So fedor beat Arlovski and Rogers, both of whom imo were getting the better of Fedor for the most part, he just happened to connect with a good punch. It's not as if he's beating the who's who of MMA, he's been fighting guys that the UFC let go because they couldn't compete with the top HW's...

+1, knew I wasn't alone lol. :)

Tell me the win loss ratio of the fighters Brock has gone up against, the quality of fighters isnt as good. However those fighters are vell known in America because they belong to the UFC.

Normally a wider international pool of athletes has a better chance of finding better quality fighters. Take for example TUF 9, the Brits won against the Americans. Other countries do have talent, UFC however is only interested in locally grown North and South American fighters.

I agree with this actually. If some of the UFC champs fought others outside of the UFC/USA, they may get their asses whooped.

That jumping leglock on Silva still surprises me to this day.

Fedor doesn't really stare at people though, he just looks at the ground in an unamused manner.

Probably thinking to himself, "Where should I drop this guy?"

lol good one.

on a sad note: Lesnar in bad shape

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft launches Godot Sample to streamline Xbox PC game development on the engine by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe Microsoft today announced a new endeavor that aims to make it simpler for Godot developers to get their products into the Xbox PC ecosystem. Dubbed the "XBOX Godot Sample," this is a new public reference for developers using the open-source engine. This is set to serve as an example of how Microsoft GDK, Xbox Services, and PlayFab can be integrated into their projects. The sample is available now on GitHub as a working example. This covers key features in gaming projects that developers may need to release their projects on Xbox PC, with everything from matchmaking and game sign-in to gamepad compatibility with Godot being covered. This release is being called the first step in giving Godot developers the tools to bring their games over to Xbox PC, with more changes to come based on feedback and issue reports. However, the company was clear that this is not related to bringing Godot projects to Xbox consoles. The engine's open development model stops it from accessing console SDKs due to the requirement of NDAs and legal contracts. Here's how it explained this Godot sample project's focus: This is a source-only sample, not a product. It's MIT-licensed at the wrapper layer; the GDK and PlayFab dependencies still require their own installs and license acceptance, consistent with our other XBOX samples. There is no set update cadence for support or maintenance. We’ll watch the repo, monitor issues, and iterate where it makes sense, but this isn't a commercial release. That said, we’re excited to hear your feedback and see any community PRs, as we evolve this together. This is the first step in bringing Godot for XBOX on PC. We plan to evolve it over time based on what the community tells us is most valuable. This sample is built specifically for XBOX on PC. It doesn’t include support for XBOX Series X|S or XBOX One. If you’re already building for XBOX Series X|S or XBOX One, please talk with your XBOX representative. If not, you can get started by signing up here. Game developers can find the XBOX Godot Sample by heading to GitHub over here. Documentation on how to get started with Godot for building an Xbox PC project can be seen here.
    • I don't understand the vision. Do people really want to buy a new computer from Dell with 6 browsers installed? We all keep asking for Microsoft to stop having so much junk on their OS, and adding a bunch of browsers seems to go against that. Ideally, we would just be asked what browser we want during OOBE but Google is just going to pay Dell a bunch of money to include Chrome. Additionally, would you want your phones to start including all the browsers too when you get them? The only thing I ever wanted was to be able to uninstall IE or edge and I believe you are now able to. I do agree that microsoft needs to chill with their "are you sure you don't want to try edge before you install chrome" ads when going to download chrome.
    • It is notable that around 70% of web browser users choose Google Chrome. However, it is puzzling why anyone on Windows would opt for Chrome when Microsoft Edge is often superior in many aspects and comes pre-installed. Edge collects less data, uses less RAM, and is more optimized for Windows as a native Microsoft product. While some may point to bloat in Edge, much of it can be removed with simple tools, requiring no more effort than installing Chrome. Meanwhile, Chrome reportedly downloads large amounts of AI data (4 GB) without explicit consent. I'm sure you Chrome users love that, or? Here is one example of a tool that doesn't even need to be installed to be able to use: https://github.com/TheBobPony/MSEdgeTweaker Although Microsoft’s aggressive promotion of Edge may be questionable, the browser’s current advantages make it a preferable choice over Chrome today, even if Chrome may have been better in the past.
    • JetBrains rolls out IntelliJ IDEA update with Markdown preview fixes and more by David Uzondu Image via JetBrains IntelliJ 2026.1.3 from JetBrains has landed, bringing several highly requested bug fixes that target common UI glitches and terminal rendering issues. If you run tmux inside the integrated terminal, the IDE no longer renders the cursor above the active line. The Markdown preview bug, which was fixed in this release, had annoyed developers for quite some time, as the preview pane failed to render images saved outside the project directory. Instead of displaying the actual image, the IDE simply showed a broken image icon, a problem that stuck around for two years before this update. Over on Windows, developers running WSL can now use wsl.exe to spin up their environments without losing terminal functionality. In previous builds, launching a terminal shell with something like wsl.exe -d ubuntu inside a Windows-based project broke both shell integration and active process detection. Other bug fixes in this release include: An issue where Gradle sync incorrectly reported success as a failure on WSL when using Gradle 9.5.0. A syntax highlighting bug that flagged valid Java for-loop initialization blocks with multiple statements as incorrect. A warning bug that triggered a false non-null local variable alert when using JSpecify annotations. A database generation bug that hid the option to use a DELETE statement instead of a TRUNCATE checkbox. A Kotlin highlighting failure where an assertion error in the Gradle redundant library inspection broke error highlighting. A UI bug where the ComboBox popup lacked a maximum height restriction. A Snowflake syntax error where DataGrip failed to support the "create temp" command. A Svelte syntax parsing failure that incorrectly flagged quotes inside inline expressions. A VCS repository manager deadlock that triggered thread pool exhaustion. A memory leak where the LazyTree component kept all previous versions of a tree in memory. IntelliJ 2026.1.3 is the third bug fix release for the IntelliJ 2026.1 series. The first one landed back in April with a fix for the WSL Python interpreter freeze, another fix for guest participants using Emmet abbreviations, and corrected WildFly server deployment errors.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      Asgardi earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Conversation Starter
      mobandz earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Apprentice
      fernan99 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • One Month Later
      nothanks earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      B2Proxy earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      468
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      243
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      79
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      73
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      60
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!