Transformers: Dark of the Moon (Transformers 3)


Recommended Posts

@RottenTomatoes: Roger Ebert gives Transformers 1 star. "One of the more unpleasant experiences I've had at the movies." http://t.co/Kt3bi9D

:rofl:

the guy seems to hate everything :p...everytime I see his name mentioned its always because a review or controversy over a tweet

I thought she was Scottish. I didn't think they were one and the same.

She is Scottish.

The English, Welsh and Scottish are all technically British, regardless of if any might moan about being put under the label that has anything to do with being part of the UK but that is usually just some angry Scots, lol.

But isn't Irish not = Scottish. Don't they get twisted if someone confuses the two, I thought the same thing goes with British and Scottish.

What do you mean by twisted?

And ignoring the double negative, :p, Irish aren't Scottish, those from Northern Ireland iirc can be Irish and British because northern island is governed and part of the UK, just like the Scottish are Scottish and British, the same goes for the rest.

The point being, lol, Karen Gillan is Scottish, but that doesn't mean she isn't British, the same would go for anyone from England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland.

@RottenTomatoes: Roger Ebert gives Transformers 1 star. "One of the more unpleasant experiences I've had at the movies." http://t.co/Kt3bi9D

:rofl:

He's a ****ing dip****, I hate him and his reviews :angry: Going to see it Thursday with my girl and not expecting a A+ storyline because that's not what Transformers is about in my opinion, it's all about the fighting :woot: We were going to see it in IMAX but our IMAX decided Cars 2 was a better movie to show :blink: From all of the reviews on Rotten Tomatoes I think people are going in to this movie expecting Schindler's List or something..... This movie is supposed to be dark, gritty and high octane action which I am sure this delivers in every way and I am sure the majority of the people who see it are expecting the same thing I am. Movie critics are just that, I would love for them to make a movie so we can all cut them down and call there stuff ****! :laugh:

Yeah, the 3D was so worth it. Saw it last night, and it was incredible. Only the second time I've ever enjoyed 3D, and I feel like it really added to the experience. It made Michael Bay really slow down his cuts so we could understand and take in what was going on more. See it in 3D for sure.

P.S - Avatar wasn't the other 3D film I enjoyed, it was Tron: Legacy. It's all about value added, not just random 3D... Avatar just felt like 3D for the sake of 3D.

Yeah, the 3D was so worth it. Saw it last night, and it was incredible. Only the second time I've ever enjoyed 3D, and I feel like it really added to the experience. It made Michael Bay really slow down his cuts so we could understand and take in what was going on more. See it in 3D for sure.

P.S - Avatar wasn't the other 3D film I enjoyed, it was Tron: Legacy. It's all about value added, not just random 3D... Avatar just felt like 3D for the sake of 3D.

I really want to see it in 3D but my first time is going to be with my family and 3D makes my mom sick as a dog so that's a no go. Maybe next weekend I will take my little brother again for 3D :cool:

Just got back from seeing it, 3D is amazing, never been a huge fan of 3D, didnt even like the 3D in avatar but for Transformers i loved it. While the script i didnt feel was great (not so much the story but the speech) it was a great action film. The CGI effects i thought were amazing, possibly the best iv seen, the fight scenes were awesome. Its defo the best of the 3 films.

Possibly my only complaints would be that the start felt very rushed (felt that if you blinked you'd miss it all) then the middle slowed right right down which made it feel a very long film. You could also tell that alot of the budget went into the effects rather than the script which is a bit annoying, but was a good story line i felt none the less.

Seeing it again at the imax though as the 3D was that good in my opinion

This movie is supposed to be dark, gritty and high octane action which I am sure this delivers in every way and I am sure the majority of the people who see it are expecting the same thing I am. Movie critics are just that, I would love for them to make a movie so we can all cut them down and call there stuff ****! :laugh:

Response to bold and underline: Welp, it's not, it's bright and explosions take place every other thirty seconds.

Response to underline: That's about all it is... brainless action..

Sad to say, the bad acting and cheesiness is still there.. and so are the paid advertisements for products. I can't count how many times you see a Lenovo monitor in shot.

It might be I'm a douchebag *******, but the gay jokes made me laugh. Going to convince the wife to go see it this weekend if she ever stops working. But now, I'm back and might as well stay awake another hour then go for my run, expected I would get bacl earlier from a midnight showing than 330. And I was more annoyed by the blatant Nokia N9 advertising at the end of the movie. It was fun, and that's what movies should be while you watch them, especially the summer blockbuster variety. To me it was well worth the money, especially loved ones.

Shia LaBeouf has revealed that he hooked up with Megan Fox while filming the first two Transformers films.

The actor cautiously nodded in agreement when asked whether the two had developed any romantic feelings during their time together on the film set.

"Look, you're on the set for six months with someone who's rooting to be attracted to you, and you're rooting to be attracted to them," the actor explained to Details magazine.

"I never understood the separation of work and life in that situation. But the time I spent with Megan was our own thing, and I think you can see the chemistry on screen."

When asked whether Fox had been dating her now-husband Brian Austin Green at the time, LaBeouf repeated the phrase "I don't know" 12 times over with different intonations, before adding: "It was what it was."

LaBeouf recently described Fox's absence from Transformers: Dark of the Moon as "a blessing", as it allowed his character Sam Witwicky to have more of a story arc.

can't blame him :p

got a question for you guys about 3D.. i've never actually been to see a 3d movie yet, but wanted to see TF3 in 3D, however i wear glasses and was always worried that wearing another pair of glasses over mine would be uncomfortable and generally mess up the 3D experience, anyone with glasses have experience with 3D?

got a question for you guys about 3D.. i've never actually been to see a 3d movie yet, but wanted to see TF3 in 3D, however i wear glasses and was always worried that wearing another pair of glasses over mine would be uncomfortable and generally mess up the 3D experience, anyone with glasses have experience with 3D?

They bother me, and I don't wear glasses. I normally don't go to 3D movies, but the screening for this was free, so I did.

got a question for you guys about 3D.. i've never actually been to see a 3d movie yet, but wanted to see TF3 in 3D, however i wear glasses and was always worried that wearing another pair of glasses over mine would be uncomfortable and generally mess up the 3D experience, anyone with glasses have experience with 3D?

I've seen a few 3D movies this way & tbh it doesn't bother me at all. Within minutes I forget about the annoyance.

About the girl, you guy's expectancy must be high. She's no godess but she ain't no dog either. It wouldn't make or break movie for me.

got a question for you guys about 3D.. i've never actually been to see a 3d movie yet, but wanted to see TF3 in 3D, however i wear glasses and was always worried that wearing another pair of glasses over mine would be uncomfortable and generally mess up the 3D experience, anyone with glasses have experience with 3D?

^^ Yes, I wear glasses too (my left eye is short sighted and my right is not =P) and it didn't feel too uncomfortable imo.

Just came back from watching Transformers 3 also and I cried when

Sentinel shot Ironhide

and it made me cry :'( He is my favourite Transformer alongside Bumblebee. Overall I thought the movie was really good and heaps better than the second one. I still prefer the first one though since it has a nice amount of comedy, action and seriousness to it than the other 2. Overall 7/10 for the action and story stuff despite the ending felt really rushed imo.

one things that seam to bother me while watching it

  • Blood (c'mon when do robots bleed lol)
  • Headshots to kill (i always thought u killed the robots via the spark they had)...
    They seam to focus on headshots in the third film, even mention it a few times in the fighting scenes at the end etc...

oh and i wear glasses, they dont really affect the 3D'ness but more of the fact they sit slighty uncomfy on the bridge of my nose but you kinda get use it.

Hot british chicks = Rachel Hurd-Wood, Naomi Watts, Kate Beckinsdale, Elizabeth Hurley (there are more this is just a short list)

And I'd certainly add Rachel Aldana to that list.

Not british but hot = Karen Gillan

Oh hell yeah, give me Amy Pond any day!! My wife (also named Amy) even thinks she's hot!

That being said, we are going to see TF3 in 3D tomorrow afternoon. That's my anniversary present this year (will be married 11 years tomorrow).

Headshots to kill (i always thought u killed the robots via the spark they had)

Optimus used headshots nearly every time he killed another character in the other movies, so that isn't much of a change at all.

And I'd certainly add Rachel Aldana to that list.

I didn't go pron for a reason. There are quite a few adult stars I like. Faith Nelson being one of them.

As far as head shots go, the ROTF video game gave extra bonus for headshots. Headshots is nothing new for the franchise.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I think there will be a 27H1 for actual users of 26H1 The 25h2 supports ARM too : Snapdragon X, Snapdragon X Plus and Snapdragon X Elite
    • Poll: Grand Theft Auto VI price predictions, cast your vote by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe After years of waiting, Rockstar will be solidifying the launch date of Grand Theft Auto VI with the launch of pre-orders next week. While the studio has confirmed a date for this occasion, it is yet to attach a price to the highly anticipated game. So let's see what our readers think it will cost at launch. The Grand Theft Auto VI pre-orders will kick off on June 25 for digital and physical editions. Unless some last-minute changes happen, the release date will be November 19, 2026, across Xbox Series X|S and PlayStation 5. Unfortunately, there's still no information about a PC version from the developer or the publisher Take-Two. Now the question becomes, how much will Grand Theft Auto VI cost at launch? The game is predicted by some analysts to be the biggest launch of an entertainment product ever. With the amount of hype that has been built behind it and with ballooning development costs, Take-Two may price this Grand Theft Auto entry differently from other AAA titles. The current price of a AAA game is $69.99. That norm almost rose to $79.99 before calming down. But with such a massive release, Grand Theft Auto VI may be the game that pushes the boundary again. It's also possible that Take-Two keeps the price relatively low to increase the number of players that jump in early and keep them hooked on Grand Theft Auto Online to spend on microtransactions for years to come. Keep in mind that the below poll is asking for a prediction of the standard edition price, not a deluxe or any other special edition that Take-Two will introduce for additional benefits. Also, there is also the chance of the company splitting up the campaign and online portions. If you think that will happen, put your vote on what you think will be the total cost of the two. Poll Poll: How much will Grand Theft Auto VI cost? $59.99 $69.99 $79.99 $89.99 $100 or more Submit Vote If you have a very specific prediction in mind, sound off in the comments below.
    • Would you please fix your graphics. They are outdated and don't fit the article.
    • The Light of Life? We actually do glow till our Death, study finds by Sayan Sen Image by Rafael Rendon via Pexels A study by researchers at the University of Calgary has found that living organisms produce an extremely faint light known as ultraweak photon emission, and that this glow appears to drop significantly after death. The research was published in the Journal of Physical Chemistry in April 2025 and quickly drew widespread attention, leading to more than 200 news stories about the findings. Ultraweak photon emission (or UPE), sometimes called biophoton emission, refers to tiny amounts of light released by living cells as a result of normal biological activity. A photon is the basic particle of light, and researchers say every living system examined so far, including plants and animals, has been found to emit these photons. The glow is far too faint to be seen by the human eye. “I suppose it has a little to do with people being reminded of auras,” says Dr. Christoph Simon, PhD, one of the authors of the study and a professor in the Department of Physics and Astronomy in the Faculty of Science. “It is a fact that living beings glow. It’s a very weak glow, but it’s there and visible with very sensitive cameras.” According to the study, the light involved is extremely weak, ranging from 10 to 1,000 photons per square centimetre per second across a spectral range of 200 to 1,000 nanometres. For comparison, a nanometre is one-billionth of a metre and is commonly used to measure wavelengths of light. Detecting emissions at such low levels requires highly specialized equipment. To study the phenomenon, researchers used electron-multiplying charge-coupled device (EMCCD) and charge-coupled device (CCD) cameras. These imaging systems are designed to detect extremely small amounts of light, including individual photons, while minimizing background noise. The technology allowed researchers to capture signals that would otherwise be impossible to observe. The team worked with the Human Health Therapeutics Research Centre at the National Research Council of Canada (NRC) in Ottawa to examine photon emissions in mice. Researchers took two-hour exposure images of the animals before and after death and compared the results. “We saw that the level of light that they emit – this biophoton glow – is distinctly different between living and dead animals,” says Dr. Daniel Oblak, PhD, an associate professor in Physics and Astronomy and the corresponding author of the study. The images showed a clear decrease in photon emissions after death across the entire body of each mouse. According to the researchers, this provided direct evidence that living and dead tissue produce different levels of ultraweak photon emission. “It’s a very small amount and it’s, of course, very tricky to detect,” Oblak says. The study grew out of discussions between Simon, whose research interests include quantum biology, and Oblak, whose work focuses on detecting light for quantum communication experiments. Quantum biology is a field that explores whether processes described by quantum physics, which studies matter and energy at very small scales, may also play a role in living systems. “Since I work as a quantum physicist on light detection for quantum communication, I thought that experimentally we have a lot of the tools to be able to detect the light,” Oblak explains. The researchers also investigated UPE in plants and found that the light changed in response to stress. When plants were exposed to higher temperatures or physically injured, their photon emissions increased. Chemical treatments also affected the glow. Among the substances tested, the local anesthetic benzocaine produced the strongest emission response when applied to injured plant tissue. These findings suggest that ultraweak photon emission is closely linked to biochemical and metabolic activity inside living organisms. Metabolism refers to the chemical reactions that allow cells and organisms to stay alive and function. Because these reactions change when an organism experiences stress, injury or disease, researchers believe UPE may provide a way to monitor those changes. The researchers stress that the glow is a physical and biological phenomenon, not a metaphysical one. Oblak says more research is needed to understand exactly how the light is produced and what information it may reveal about the condition of living tissue. “We must understand what that is to figure out what’s happening,” he says. “If we can understand how that relates to certain influences on the body – stress, diseases – then that could be used as a diagnostic tool.” The researchers believe the technique could eventually help scientists study health and disease without invasive procedures. Because UPE can be measured without adding dyes, markers or labels, it may offer a way to monitor whether tissue is healthy, damaged or alive. In plants, it could help researchers better understand how organisms respond to injury, heat and other forms of stress. While the work is still in its early stages, the study demonstrates that ultraweak photon emission imaging can provide a non-invasive and label-free way to observe biological activity. Researchers say the approach could become a useful tool for studying vitality, stress responses and other important processes in both animals and plants. Source: University of Calgary, ACS publication This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      AMV earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      513
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      171
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      82
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!